Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access

Characterization of STAT3 expression, signaling and inhibition in feline oral squamous cell carcinoma

  • Megan E. Brown1,
  • Misty D. Bear1,
  • Thomas J. Rosol2,
  • Chris Premanandan2,
  • William C. Kisseberth1 and
  • Cheryl A. London1, 2Email author
BMC Veterinary Research201511:206

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-015-0505-7

Received: 19 March 2015

Accepted: 23 July 2015

Published: 14 August 2015

Abstract

Background

Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) plays a critical role in tumor development by regulating signaling pathways involved in cell proliferation, survival, metastasis and angiogenesis. STAT3 is activated in many cancers, including head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) in people. Feline oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is similar to advanced or recurrent HNSCC as it is poorly responsive to traditional therapies and carries a poor long-term prognosis. The purpose of this study was to characterize expression and activation of STAT3 in feline OSCC cell lines and tumor samples and to investigate the biologic activity of a novel, allosteric STAT3 inhibitor, LLL12, in feline OSCC cell lines.

Results

We evaluated 3 feline OSCC cell lines and one of these (SCCF2) exhibited high levels of constitutive STAT3 phosphorylation and high sensitivity to LLL12 treatment. Exposure of SCCF2 cells to LLL12 resulted in decreased expression of pSTAT3 and total STAT3, apoptosis as assessed by caspase 3/7 activation, inhibition of colony formation and reduced expression of the STAT3 transcriptional target survivin. In contrast, the STAT3 transcriptional targets VEGF and MCL-1 increased after LLL12 treatment. This was, in part, likely due to LLL12 mediated upregulation of HIF-1α, which is known to drive VEGF and MCL-1 expression. The OSCC cell lines with low basal STAT3 phosphorylation did not exhibit these effects, suggesting that STAT3 inhibition was responsible for the observed results. Lastly, immunohistochemistry for pSTAT3 was performed using a feline OSCC tissue microarray, demonstrating expression in 48 % of samples tested.

Conclusions

These data demonstrate that LLL12 has biologic activity against a feline OSCC cell line expressing pSTAT3 and that STAT3 represents a target for therapeutic intervention in this disease. However, given the up-regulation of several STAT3 transcriptional targets following treatment, further investigation of STAT3 and its related signaling pathways in OSCC is warranted.

Keywords

STAT3Oral squamous cell carcinomaFeline

Background

The signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) family of proteins consists of seven isoforms that are transcription factors responsible for relaying signals from extracellular growth factors and cytokines, thereby influencing normal cellular physiology and development. Due to their role in cell survival, proliferation and angiogenesis, STAT proteins, in particular STAT3 and STAT5, also have been implicated in cancer initiation and progression [1]. Initial evidence of the role of STAT proteins in tumor biology came from the discovery that activated STAT3 was required for cellular transformation by the viral oncogene, v-src [1, 2]. There is now substantial data supporting the role of STAT proteins in cancer biology, including the observation that constitutive activation of STAT3 is present in a variety of human malignancies [1, 3].

While phosphorylation of STAT3 was initially believed to be primarily driven by the Janus kinase (JAK) family members following cytokine receptor signaling, it is now evident that substantial cross-talk exists between receptor and non-receptor kinases (e.g. EGFR, Src), and this also contributes to the activation of STAT3 [4, 5]. After phosphorylation of the critical tyrosine residue (Tyr705), STAT3 homodimerization occurs followed by nuclear translocation and alteration of gene transcription. In normal cells, STAT3 activation is transient due to endogenous regulating proteins including SH2-containing phosphatases (SHPs), protein inhibitors of activated STAT3 (PIAS3) and suppressors of cytokine signaling (SOCS) [6]. Since activating mutations of STAT3 are rare [7], constitutive phosphorylation of STAT3 is generally the result of aberrations in upstream signaling proteins or physiologic regulators [5, 8].

Importantly, constitutive STAT3 activation contributes to metastasis and chemotherapy resistance through its effects on several transcriptional targets, including VEGF, survivin and Bcl2 family members. As such, it represents a potentially relevant target for therapeutic intervention in many cancers and several inhibitors of STAT3 are currently under investigation [9, 10]. Recently, the role of STAT3 in human head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) has received significant attention as constitutive activation has been demonstrated in several HNSCC cell lines [11, 12]. Inhibition of STAT3 with dominant negative constructs or antisense oligonucleotides promoted downregulation of expression of STAT3 transcriptional targets, growth inhibition and induction of apoptosis in HNSCC cell lines, suggesting that STAT3 is necessary for growth and survival of HNSCC cells [11]. Similar results were generated in HNSCC murine xenograft models treated with STAT3 decoys or siRNA [13]. Lastly, STAT3 phosphorylation was found in HNSCC tumor samples and has been associated with a poor prognosis [14].

Similar to people, squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is the most common oral malignancy in cats, representing 61 % of oral tumors [15]. Feline oral SCC (OSCC) is locally invasive, rapidly progressive and poorly responsive to traditional therapies such as radiation therapy and chemotherapy. In most cases, OSCC arising from the gingiva exhibits bone invasive properties early in the course of disease, causing substantial morbidity in the form of anorexia and pain. Furthermore, as OSCC primarily occurs in older cats, it is often mistaken for dental disease resulting in advanced tumor stage at the time of diagnosis. The overall prognosis for cats diagnosed with OSCC is poor, with a one year survival rate of less than 10 % [16]. In rare cases, surgery followed by radiation therapy may provide adequate tumor control in patients with small tumors or tumors located in the rostral mandible [17]. However, recurrence rates following surgery are generally considered unacceptably high and acute and long-term post-surgical morbidities are common [17, 18]. Radiation therapy is also considered ineffective in management of OSCC as both definitive and hypofractionated protocols fail to extend survival beyond 2–3 months in most instances [19, 20]. Finally, chemotherapy alone has minimal benefit in treatment of OSCC [21]; however, the combination of radiation therapy and chemotherapy or radiosensitizers results in modest improvements in response rates and outcomes [22] but use is limited by increased local and systemic toxicity [23].

Given the similarities between feline and human SCC and the paucity of effective treatments in cats with this disease, we sought to determine whether STAT3 plays a role in feline OSCC. In previous studies we have shown that the allosteric, small molecule inhibitor, LLL12, is a potent and selective inhibitor of STAT3 phosphorylation [24]. Specifically, LLL12 reduces STAT3 phosphorylation, inhibits proliferation, and induces apoptosis in a variety of canine and human cell lines (breast, pancreatic, glioblastoma, osteosarcoma) and inhibits tumor growth and angiogenesis in several murine tumor xenograft models [2426]. As such, the purpose of this study was to characterize activation and expression of phosphorylated STAT3 (pSTAT3) in feline OSCC cell lines and tumor samples and to investigate the biologic activity of LLL12 in feline OSCC cell lines.

Methods

Cell lines and reagents

Feline OSCC lines SCCF1, SCCF2 and SCCF3 were previously established and characterized by one of the investigators (TJR) [27, 28]. The SCCF1, SCCF2 and SCCF3 cell lines were derived from a laryngeal, bone-invasive gingival and lingual SCC, respectively. Cell lines were maintained in DMEM supplemented with 10 % FBS, non-essential amino acids, sodium pyruvate, penicillin, streptomycin, L-glutamine, and HEPES (4-(2-hydroxythyl)-1-piperazineethanesolfonic acid) at 35 °C, supplemented with 5 % CO2. LLL12 was synthesized and purified as previously described and provided by Dr. Chenglong Li (College of Pharmacy, The Ohio State University) [24]. Aliquots of the stock solution were stored at -20 °C until use. The proteasome inhibitor MG132 was purchased from Calbiochem (Billerica, MA). The following antibodies were used for Western blotting and/or immunohistochemistry experiments: pSTAT3 (Y705, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA), STAT3 (Cell Signaling Technology), survivin (Novus Biologicals, Littleton, CO), pAKT (Ser473, Cell Signaling Technology), AKT (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) and β-actin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA).

Cell proliferation

Optimal 96-well plating densities were determined for each cell line. This was defined as the concentration of cells at which proliferation occurred but cell confluence and/or medium color change did not occur in 48 h. Feline OSCC cells (SCCF1: 1 × 104; SCCF2: 1 × 104; SCCF3: 5 × 103) were seeded in triplicate in 96-well plates overnight in 10 % FBS supplemented medium and incubated with DMSO or increasing concentrations of LLL12. After 24 h, the medium was removed and the plates were frozen at -80 °C overnight before processing using the CyQUANT® Cell Proliferation Assay Kit (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Cell proliferation was calculated as a percentage of the DMSO-treated control wells and IC50 values were derived after plotting proliferation values on a logarithmic curve.

Detection of apoptosis

Feline OSCC cells (SCCF2: 1 × 104; SCCF3: 5 × 103) were seeded in triplicate in 96-well plates overnight in 10 % FBS supplemented medium and incubated with DMSO or increasing concentrations of LLL12 for 12 or 24 h. Caspase 3/7 activity was determined using the SensoLyte Homogenous AMC Caspase 3/7 Assay (Anaspec Inc, San Jose, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Clonogenic assay

SCCF2 and SCCF3 cells were grown in flasks until approximately 80 % confluent, then collected, washed and plated at 1,000 cells per well in six-well plates in 10 % FBS supplemented medium. After 24 h, the cells were treated with DMSO, 0.02, 0.2 or 2 μM LLL12 and incubated at 35 °C, supplemented with 5 % CO2 until colony formation was observed in DMSO treated control wells. Cells were then fixed with methanol/acetic acid (3:1), washed with PBS, stained with crystal violet (0.2 g/L) and colonies consisting of greater than 50 cells were counted. After counting colonies, plating efficiency and survival fraction were calculated. Plating efficiency was defined as the number of colonies formed divided by the number of cells seeded in DMSO treated groups. Survival fraction was defined as the number of colonies formed divided by the number of cells seeded in LLL12 treated groups, normalized to the plating efficiency [29].

Western blotting

Cell lines were cultured in 10 % FBS supplemented medium until 80 % confluent. Protein lysates were prepared and quantified, 100 μg of protein was separated by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting for pSTAT3 and STAT3 was performed as previously described [30]. To evaluate effects of LLL12 treatment, SCCF2 and SCCF3 cells (1 × 107) were cultured in 1 % FBS supplemented medium and treated with DMSO, 0.2 μM LLL12 alone, 10 μM MG132 alone or MG132 in combination with LLL12 for 12 h. Protein lysate preparation, quantification and Western blotting were repeated as described above. The membranes were incubated overnight with anti-pSTAT3, anti-survivin or anti-pAKT antibodies incubated with the appropriate horseradish peroxidase-linked secondary antibodies, washed, and exposed to substrate (SuperSignal West Dura Extended Duration Substrate, Pierce, Rockford, IL). Blots were stripped, washed, and re-probed for total STAT3, AKT or β-actin.

RT-PCR and qRT-PCR

Total RNA was extracted from SCCF2 and SCCF3 cells cultured in 1 % FBS supplemented medium following 12 h of treatment with DMSO or 0.2 μM LLL12, using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). cDNA was made from 2 μg of total RNA using Superscript III (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For each PCR reaction, 1/20th of the resultant cDNA was used in a total volume of 25 μL. Primers designed and utilized for feline survivin, VEGF, STAT3, HIF-1α, cyclin D1, MCL-1 and GAPDH are listed in Additional file 1: Table S1. An annealing temperature of 60 °C was used for all reactions. Standard PCR was performed with all primer sets and amplicon length was verified through agarose gel electrophoresis and visualization of PCR products using the Alpha Imager system (Alpha Innotech Corp, San Leandro, CA).

To quantitatively measure the effect of LLL12 treatment on STAT3 gene expression as well as downstream targets, total RNA was collected using the methods described above. Real-time quantitative PCR was performed using Applied Biosystem’s StepOne Plus Real-Time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Feline survivin, VEGF, STAT3, HIF-1α, cyclin D1, MCL-1 and GAPDH were detected using Fast SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. All reactions were performed in triplicate and included non-template controls for each gene. Relative expression was calculated using the comparative threshold cycle method. With this method, the cycle threshold (C T) values are compared between the sample of interest and a non-treated sample. The C T values of both samples are normalized to an endogenous housekeeping gene, GAPDH [31].

Tissue microarray construction and immunohistochemistry

To assess the prevalence of STAT3 activation in primary feline OSCC samples, a tissue microarray (TMA) was made from archived feline OSCC surgical biopsies and immunohistochemistry for pSTAT3 was performed. Surgical biopsies were obtained and evaluated microscopically to confirm the presence of OSCC as previously described [32]. Representative areas of tumor tissue were identified on hematoxylin and eosin (HE) stained sections by a single pathologist (CP) for 1.5 mm core sampling. Cores were extracted from the corresponding areas on thirty-seven paraffin embedded tissue blocks and inserted into predetermined sites on the TMA recipient block. Immunohistochemical staining was performed for pSTAT3 (Cell Signaling Technology). Briefly, slides containing tissue sections were deparaffinized in xylene and rehydrated in distilled water. Slides were then placed in plastic coplin jars containing Target Retrieval Solution (Target Retrieval Solution, pH 6.0, Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) and then enclosed in a decloaking chamber containing distilled water. Antigen retrieval was performed by heating the slides to 125 °C for 15 min; slides were allowed to cool to 90 °C for 10 s followed by cooling at room temperature for 10 min. Endogenous peroxidase activity was quenched by immersion in 3 % hydrogen peroxide for 10 min. Non-specific binding was blocked by incubation with serum-free protein block (Dako) for 10 min. Slides were incubated for 30 min at room temperature with anti-pSTAT3 antibody at a dilution of 1:100 in antibody diluent (Dako). After rinsing in wash buffer, biotinylated goat-anti-rabbit secondary antibody was applied at a dilution of 1:200 for 30 min. All slides were rinsed and then incubated with Vector RTU ABC Elite complex (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) for 30 min followed by incubation with DAB chromagen for 5 min. Finally, slides were counterstained with hematoxylin, rinsed, dehydrated with ethanol and fitted with coverslips. For negative controls, staining procedures were carried out as above but without the addition of a primary antibody. Mouse lymph node served as a positive control. The construction of the tissue microarray and immunohistochemistry were performed by the OSU-CVM Veterinary Biosciences Comparative Pathology and Mouse Phenotyping Shared Resource Histology/IHC Core Lab.

Slides were evaluated by light microscopy to assess pSTA3 immunoreactivity. Overall pSTAT3 signal intensity of OSCC cells was subjectively scored from 0 to 3 (0 = none to weak, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = strong), with strong reactivity defined as staining intensity of the positive control. The percentage of positive cells was also estimated and scored as follows: <5 % = 0, 5–20 % = 1, 20–50 % = 2, 50–100 % = 3. A total score was obtained by adding the score of signal intensity and percentage positivity. Total scores greater than or equal to 2 were considered positive. The distribution of pSTAT3 immunoreactivity was noted as nuclear in both positive control and OSCC samples.

Statistical analysis

All experiments were performed in triplicate and/or repeated three times. All values reported are mean ± standard deviation. A one-way ANOVA comparison (parametric data) or Kruskal-Wallis test (non-parametric data) was performed to compare multiple treatment groups in the cell proliferation, caspase and colony formation assays. An independent samples t-test (parametric data) or Mann–Whitney U test (non-parametric data) was performed to evaluate differences in gene expression between LLL12 treated groups and DMSO treated controls for real-time quantitative PCR assays. Values of p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Constitutive phosphorylation of STAT3 is variable in feline OSCC cell lines and correlates with response to LLL12

To assess whether STAT3 is constitutively activated in feline OSCC cell lines, Western blotting was performed to evaluate for the presence of pSTAT3. As shown in Fig. 1, only one of the three cell lines, SCCF2, demonstrated high levels of pSTAT3 when compared to the others. All three OSCC cell lines were then incubated with increasing concentrations of LLL12 (0.01 μM – 10 μM) for 24 h and cell proliferation was assessed. While LLL12 significantly reduced cell proliferation in all cell lines (p < 0.005), SCCF2 was most sensitive to LLL12, with a calculated IC50 concentration in the nanomolar range (180 nM), correlating with the highest level of basal STAT3 phosphorylation (Fig. 2).
Fig. 1

Activation of STAT3 in feline OSCC cell lines. Protein lysates were generated from the three untreated cell lines, separated by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting for pSTAT3 (Y705), STAT3 and β-actin was performed

Fig. 2

Effects of LLL12 on proliferation in feline OSCC cell lines. Feline OSCC cell lines were treated with DMSO or LLL12 at increasing concentrations (0.01-10 μM) for 24 h and proliferation was assessed using CyQUANT® Cell Proliferation Assay Kit. Experiments were performed in triplicate and IC50 values were calculated

Treatment with LLL12 inhibits pSTAT3 and STAT3 expression in feline OSCC cells that express elevated levels of pSTAT3

To assess the direct effects of LLL12 on pSTAT3, two OSCC cell lines with high (SCCF2) and low (SCCF3) basal STAT3 activation were chosen for further analysis. Cells were treated with DMSO or 0.2 μM LLL12 for 12 h and Western blotting for pSTAT3 and STAT3 was performed. Western blot analyses revealed that pSTAT3 and, to a lesser degree, total STAT3, were both downregulated in SCCF2 following treatment with LLL12 (Fig. 3a). In contrast, no change in pSTAT3 or STAT3 expression was observed in the SCCF3 cell line.
Fig. 3

Effects of LLL12 treatment on pSTAT3 and STAT3 expression in feline OSCC cell lines. a Feline OSCC cell lines were treated with DMSO or 0.2 μM LLL12 for 12 h prior to collection. Protein lysates were generated, separated by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting for pSTAT3, STAT3 and β-actin was performed. b SCCF2 cells were treatment with 0.2 μM LLL12 alone, 10 μM MG132 alone or MG132 in combination with LLL12 for 12 h. c Feline OSCC cell lines were treated with DMSO or 0.2 μM LLL12 for 12 h. RNA was collected and quantitative RT-PCR for STAT3 was performed

As ubiquitin-mediated proteasomal degradation is a known regulatory mechanism for STAT family protein turnover [33, 34], SCCF2 cells were treated with the proteasome inhibitor, MG132, to determine if this mechanism was responsible for the loss of total STAT3. Cells were treated with LLL12 alone, MG132 alone or MG132 in combination with LLL12 for 12 h. Western blot analysis demonstrated that MG132 did not block LLL12 mediated downregulation of total STAT3, suggesting that ubiquitin-mediated proteosomal degradation is not the mechanism responsible for loss of total STAT3 following LLL12 treatment in feline OSCC cells (Fig. 3b). Lastly, because STAT3 mRNA expression levels did not decrease following LLL12 treatment, loss of total STAT3 was likely not due to autoregulation whereby pSTAT3 can enhance STAT3 gene transcription [35]. Although there was slight decrease in STAT3 mRNA following LLL12 treatment in the SCCF2 cell line, this difference was not statistically significant (Fig. 3c).

Treatment with LLL12 promotes apoptosis of feline OSCC cells that express elevated levels of pSTAT3

To determine if growth inhibition of feline OSCC cells was mediated by apoptosis, SCCF2 and SCCF3 were treated with DMSO, 0.02, 0.2, or 2 μM of LLL12 for 12 or 24 h and caspase 3/7 activity was measured. After 12 h of treatment with 0.2 μM of LLL12, SCCF2 showed a trend towards increased caspase 3/7 activity (data not shown), but this difference did not reach statistical significance until 24 h of treatment. SCCF3 showed a small, but statistically significant, increase in caspase 3/7 activity after 24 h of treatment with 2 μM of LLL12 (Fig. 4).
Fig. 4

Evaluation of feline OSCC cell lines for apoptosis following LLL12 treatment. Feline OSCC cell lines were treated with DMSO or increasing concentrations of LLL12 (0.2 – 2 μM) for 24 h. Caspase activity was assessed using SensoLyte Homogenous AMC Caspase 3/7 Assay kit. Experiments were performed in triplicate (*p < 0.05)

Treatment with LLL12 reduces colony formation in feline OSCC cells

To further assess the effects of LLL12 on feline OSCC cell growth, SCCF2 and SCCF3 cells were seeded in 6-well plates and treated with DMSO or LLL12 and evaluated daily. Once colony formation was observed in DMSO treated wells, the plates were collected and colonies were counted following staining with crystal violet. As shown in Fig. 5, colony formation was significantly inhibited in both SCCF2 and SCCF3 at concentrations above 0.02 and 0.2 μM, respectively. Photographs of representative 6-well plates are shown in Figure 5b.
Fig. 5

Impact of LLL12 on colony formation in feline OSCC cell lines. a Feline OSCC cells were seeded at 1,000 cells per well in 6 –well plates for 24 h, followed by treatment with DMSO, 0.02, 0.2 or 2 μM LLL12 until formation of visible colonies. Cells were then fixed and stained with crystal violet and colonies greater than 50 cells were counted. After counting colonies, plating efficiency and survival fraction were calculated. Plating efficiency was defined as the number of colonies formed divided by the number of cells seeded in DMSO treated groups. Survival fraction was defined as the number of colonies formed divided by the number of cells seeded in LLL12 treated groups, normalized to the plating efficiency (*p < 0.0001). b Photographs of representative 6-well plates

Effects of LLL12 on STAT3 transcriptional targets

The effect of LLL12 on survivin, a transcriptional target of STAT3, was assessed by quantitative RT-PCR. Following 12 h of treatment, the expression of survivin was significantly downregulated in SCCF2 as demonstrated in Fig. 6a. A small decrease in survivin protein was also observed following LLL12 treatment as assessed by Western blotting (Fig. 6b). In contrast, no changes in survivin mRNA or protein levels were seen in SCCF3.
Fig. 6

Effects of LLL12 on transcriptional targets of STAT3. Feline OSCC cells were treated with DMSO or 0.2 μM LLL12 for 12 h and RNA and protein were collected. Quantitative RT-PCR (a) and Western blotting (b) were performed to assess survivin mRNA and protein levels, respectively (*p < 0.0001). (c) Quantitative RT-PCR was performed to assess cyclin D1, MCL-1, VEGF and HIF1α mRNA expression in the cells treated above (*p < 0.05)

Quantitative RT-PCR was performed to evaluate the effects of LLL12 treatment on other STAT3 transcriptional targets, including cyclin D1, VEGF, and MCL-1. As shown in Figure 6c, there was no change in cyclin D1 gene expression in either cell line following treatment with LLL12. In contrast, there was an approximately 7-fold increase in VEGF gene expression in SCCF2 after LLL12 treatment. Likewise, expression of MCL-1, an anti-apoptotic protein whose transcription is regulated by both STAT3 and VEGF, was significantly increased in SCCF2 following LLL12 treatment. Finally, as HIF-1α is a known transcriptional regulator of VEGF activation, mRNA levels were also assessed by quantitative RT-PCR. As with VEGF and MCL-1, HIF-1α gene expression was significantly increased in the SCCF2 cell line following treatment. In contrast, no significant changes in VEGF, MCL-1 or HIF-1α gene expression were observed in the SCCF3 cell line.

Activation of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR is not responsible for up-regulation of VEGF, MCL-1 and HIF-1α gene expression following LLL12 treatment

To determine if activation of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway is responsible for the observed up-regulation of VEGF, MCL-1 and HIF-1α gene expression in SCCF2 following LLL12 treatment, we evaluated the expression and phosphorylation status of AKT in these cells after 12 h of drug exposure. Western blotting demonstrated low levels of basal AKT phosphorylation in SCCF2, which remained unchanged after treatment with LLL12 (Fig. 7).
Fig. 7

Evaluation of PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway in feline OSCC. Feline OSCC cells were treated with DMSO or 0.2 μM LLL12 for 12 h. Cells were harvested and total protein isolated followed by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting for pAKT, AKT and β-actin

Immunohistochemical expression of pSTAT3 in primary feline OSCC tumor samples

To assess the prevalence of STAT3 activation in primary feline OSCC samples, a tissue microarray was constructed from 37 archived feline OSCC surgical biopsies and immunohistochemical staining for pSTAT3 was performed. Signal intensity and percent positivity were scored; these scores were added to generate a total score. Examples of no, mild and moderate signal intensity are shown in Figures 8a-c. Total scores of greater than or equal to 2 were considered positive. Of 37 samples, 27 had adequate tumor tissue for evaluation and 13 of these 27 (48.1 %) samples were considered positive. In 9 of the 13 positive samples, immunoreactivity was detected in 5–20 % of OSCC cells, while 3 and 1 sample displayed immunoreactivity in 20–50 % and 50–100 % of cells, respectively. In 4 samples, pSTAT3 expression was also observed in adjacent gingiva (Fig. 8d), although 2 of these 4 samples were considered to have inadequate tumor sample and were excluded from analysis. The results of the TMA scoring are summarized in Additional file 1: Table S2.
Fig. 8

Immunohistochemistry for pSTAT3 in primary feline OSCC tumor samples. Immunohistochemistry was performed for pSTAT3 using a tissue microarray of feline OSCC tumor samples. Signal intensity and percent positivity were scored; these scores were added to generate a total score. Examples of no (a), mild (b) and moderate (c) signal intensity are shown (20X). d pSTAT3 immunoreactivity was also observed in adjacent gingiva in 4 OSCC samples (10X)

Discussion

Feline oral squamous cell carcinoma is a devastating cancer, for which effective treatments are lacking. It shares several similarities with advanced or recurrent HNSCC, including tumor biology (both tumors are locally invasive and cause malignant osteolysis), molecular markers (EGFR, p53) and poor response of advanced stage disease to conventional therapies [36, 37]. In humans, key risk factors for development of HNSCC have been identified and include tobacco use, alcohol consumption and human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. In contrast, the etiopathogenesis of feline OSCC is not well understood. Although papillomavirus DNA has been isolated from feline cutaneous and nasal planum SCC [38, 39], no viral DNA was amplified in a series of 30 feline OSCC samples [40]. Retrospective, case-controlled studies have identified potential risk factors for development of feline OSCC, including use of flea control products, diet and exposure to environmental tobacco smoke [41, 42]. However, given the retrospective nature of these studies, a cause and effect relationship cannot be definitively determined.

Despite multiple clinical efforts to identify effective treatments for feline OSCC, few studies have investigated the molecular abnormalities that promote the development of this cancer and drive resistance to therapy. As with humans, activation of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) may be important as this has been shown to be widely expressed in feline OSCC tumor samples [43, 44] and EGFR inhibition by a small molecule inhibitor and RNA interference resulted in reduced proliferation and migration in a feline cell line [45]. However, dysregulation of other signaling pathways is poorly characterized.

In HNSCC, several potential contributors to disease pathogenesis have been identified including activation of STAT3 signaling. Specifically, phosphorylated STAT3 has been shown to be upregulated in both tumor and normal epithelium from HNSCC patients as compared to epithelium from non-cancer patients [12]. Furthermore, multiple studies have demonstrated that increased levels of activated STAT3 in patient tumor samples is associated with tumor stage, nodal metastasis and decreased survival [14, 46, 47], although conflicting reports also exist [48, 49]. Recently, a phase 0 clinical trial evaluating a STAT3 decoy oligonucleotide demonstrated decreased expression of STAT3 target genes in head and neck tumors following intratumoral injection [9]. Given the emerging role of STAT3 in human HNSCC, we elected to evaluate its potential function in the feline disease. Our collaborator (C. Lin, College of Pharmacy, OSU) has developed a small molecule, allosteric STAT3 inhibitor (LLL12) that exhibits broad activity against both human and canine cancer cell lines at concentrations in the nanomolar/low micromolar range [24, 50]. The purpose of this study was to characterize the expression of pSTAT3 in feline OSCC cell lines and tumor samples and to investigate the effects of LLL12 in feline OSCC cell lines.

Our initial work showed that one cell line, SCCF2, had high levels of pSTAT3 compared to the other two OSCC cell lines. Although treatment with LLL12 significantly reduced proliferation in all cell lines, SCCF2 was the most sensitive to drug exposure (IC50 = 180 nM), correlating with the highest level of basal pSTAT3. We further evaluated the effects of LLL12 on cell proliferation with colony formation assays in high and low pSTAT3 expressing cell lines, (SCCF2 and SCCF3, respectively). Colony formation was significantly reduced in both cell lines; however, this occurred at a drug concentration 10 times lower for SCCF2 (20 nM) compared to the SCCF3 line (200 nM), providing further support for STAT3 specific effects. In both cell lines, inhibition of colony formation occurred at concentrations well below the calculated IC50 values. While the exact reason for this discordance is not known, constitutive STAT3 phosphorylation has been previously associated with enhanced colony formation [51]. In contrast to our study, effects on colony formation with other STAT3 inhibitors generally occurred at drug concentrations approximating IC50 values [52, 53] suggesting that other factors (i.e. culture conditions, anchorage dependence, etc.) may have influenced the sensitivity of our feline OSCC lines to LLL12.

Treatment of SCCF2 with LLL12 resulted in downregulation of both pSTAT3 and STAT3 protein expression. Mechanisms of STAT3 protein downregulation include autoregulation of gene transcription and ubiquitin-mediated proteasomal degradation [3335]. However, STAT3 mRNA levels were unchanged following LLL12 treatment and concurrent treatment with a proteasome inhibitor failed to reverse STAT3 downregulation, suggesting that neither of these mechanisms are responsible for the observed decreased in STAT3 protein. Other potential reasons for loss of total STAT3 include caspase-dependent proteolysis [54] and post-transcriptional modification by microRNAs [55].

Apoptosis of SCCF2 cells, as detected via caspase 3/7 activity, occurred at concentrations of LLL12 that reduced pSTAT3 expression, indicating that pSTAT3 inhibition may lead to apoptosis. One possible mechanism of apoptosis is downregulation of STAT3 transcriptional targets, which include anti-apoptotic genes. In support of this, survivin mRNA was significantly downregulated following treatment with LLL12; however, only a relatively small concomitant decrease in survivin protein was observed. This may be due to the prolonged presence of existing survivin protein, necessitating significant turnover before downregulation would be noted by western blotting, as previously described [50]. Importantly, SCCF3, a cell line with minimal basal pSTAT3, showed no change in survivin mRNA or protein levels, once again supporting a STAT3 specific effect.

To assess the prevalence of basal STAT3 phosphorylation in primary feline OSCC tissue samples, we constructed a TMA from archival formalin-fixed paraffin embedded tissue samples and performed IHC for pSTAT3. Based on our scoring criteria, 13 of 27 (48.1 %) samples that had adequate tissue for analysis were considered positive. This finding is consistent with previous HNSCC immunohistochemical studies that have demonstrated nuclear pSTAT3 immunoreactivity in 37–67 % of HNSCC tissue samples [14, 56]. It is difficult to compare studies due to differing methodologies employed, including those used to define STAT3 activation. In the current investigation we used nuclear accumulation of pSTAT3 as an indicator of activation. Other studies have relied on nuclear localization of unphosphorylated STAT3 or increased nuclear or cytoplasmic levels of unphosphorylated STAT3 as compared to control tissues [48, 57]. Interpretation of STAT3 activation is complicated by the discovery that unphosphorylated STAT3 can also enter the nucleus and activate gene expression via acetylation of other sites on the protein [58, 59]. Nevertheless, the presence of pSTAT3 in nearly half of the tumors examined indicates that this transcription factor is activated in a substantial proportion of feline OSCC.

Given the lack of complete patient information and follow-up accompanying the archival feline tumor samples, it was not possible to determine the prognostic significance of nuclear pSTAT3 immunoreactivity in feline OSCC. In 9 of the 13 samples that were considered positive, immunoreactivity was detected in less than 20 % of tumor cells. Reasons for this low percentage of positivity include tumor heterogeneity, sample aging and effects of and variation in fixation methods. Another possibility is that STAT3 activation is an early step in feline OSCC carcinogenesis and reliance on STAT3 signaling pathways is lost in later stages of tumor development. This theory is supported by HNSCC studies that have demonstrated increased STAT3 activation in normal mucosa from patients with HNSCC as well as in pre-malignant lesions such as leukoplakia [12, 14]. In addition, decreasing STAT3 activation with increasing tumor grade has also been observed [57]. As most cases of feline OSCC are diagnosed at an advanced stage, our results may support loss of STAT3 activation with tumor progression although further work is needed to investigate the expression of STAT3 in early tumorigenesis. Interestingly, pSTAT3 immunoreactivity was observed in adjacent mucosa in a handful of feline OSCC samples, which may further support the theory of early STAT3 activation.

One of the more intriguing findings in this study was the upregulation of expression of several STAT3 transcriptional targets, VEGF, MCL-1 and HIF-1α following LLL12 treatment. It is possible that the HIF-1α upregulation is responsible for the observed increase in VEGF and MCL-1, although the mechanism for HIF-1α up-regulation is not yet known. Moreover, several other studies have demonstrated downregulation of these targets following STAT3 inhibition [12, 25, 46, 50, 60], suggesting that feline OSCC may utilize different pathways to regulate the expression of these genes.

To further investigate the potential contribution of additional signaling pathways in feline OSCC, we assessed levels of pAKT/total AKT in the SCCF2 line. The PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway regulates a diverse set of oncogenic processes including cellular survival, metastasis, angiogenesis and glucose metabolism. This pathway is of particular interest in HNSCC as it is frequently mutated in primary HNSCC tumors [61] and may represent a mechanism of resistance to anti-EGFR therapy [62]. Furthermore, studies on the involution of mammary gland epithelial cells have demonstrated a role for STAT3 in downregulation of PI3K-AKT signaling via STAT3 mediated expression of PI3K regulatory subunits [63]. We observed no upregulation of pAKT following LLL12 treatment, suggesting that STAT3 does not negatively regulate this pathway in feline OSCC and that enhanced AKT activation is not responsible for the observed increase in HIF-1α.

Signaling pathway cross-talk and redundancy may also help explain our unexpected results regarding VEGF, MCL-1 and HIF-1α expression. For example, studies have demonstrated that STAT3 regulates HIF-1α expression through multiple mechanisms including direct activation of gene transcription and promotion of protein stabilization [6466]. In contrast, another study showed that HIF-1α, in cooperation with heat shock protein 90, regulates STAT3 activation and expression in colorectal cancer cells [67]. These findings underscore the complexity of STAT3 signaling pathways. Finally, cellular context may also influence the nature of STAT3 signaling. In contrast to its generally accepted role as an oncogene, a growing number of recent studies have demonstrated a growth suppressive function of pSTAT3 due to its activation of genes that inhibit tumorigenesis, including p21 and members of the FOX family of transcription factors [68]. This is further supported by work in tumor cell lines showing that STAT3 is a negative regulator of tumor growth in certain cancers such as thyroid carcinoma [69]. Although the results of our study are most supportive of growth stimulating role of STAT3 in feline OSCC, the upregulation of STAT3 target genes following LLL12 treatment indicate that STAT3 inhibition may be most effective when used in combination with other therapeutics.

Conclusions

These data demonstrate that LLL12 has biologic activity against a feline OSCC cell line with constitutive STAT3 phosphorylation. In addition, pSTAT3 expression was detected in 48 % of feline OSCC tumor samples, further supporting STAT3 as a potential therapeutic target in this disease. However, LLL12 treatment also resulted in upregulation of several STAT3 transcriptional targets, suggesting that further research into the role of STAT3 in feline OSCC is needed.

Availability of supporting data

All supporting data are included as additional files.

Abbreviations

EGFR: 

Epidermal growth factor receptor

HNSCC: 

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

JAK: 

Janus kinase

OSCC: 

Oral squamous cell carcinoma

PARP: 

Poly (ADP- ribose) polymerase

PIAS3: 

Protein inhibitors of activated STAT3

SHPs: 

SH2-containing phosphatases

STAT3: 

Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3

SOCS: 

Suppressors of cytokine signaling

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the OSU-CVM Veterinary Biosciences Comparative Pathology and Mouse Phenotyping Shared Resource Histology/IHC Core Lab for preparation of TMA and performance of IHC. This project was supported by the following grants: UL1TR001070 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences and P30CA016058 from the National Cancer Institute to The Ohio State University. The authors would also like to thank Tim Vojt of The Ohio State University College of Veterinary Medicine Biomedical Media Services for assistance in figure preparation. Finally, the authors would like to thank Dr. Chenglong Li for providing LLL12.

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, USA
(2)
Department of Veterinary Biosciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, USA

References

  1. Bowman T, Garcia R, Turkson J, Jove R. STATs in oncogenesis. Oncogene. 2000;19:2474–88.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Turkson J, Bowman T, Garcia R, Caldenhoven E, De Groot RP, Jove R. Stat3 activation by Src induces specific gene regulation and is required for cell transformation. Mol Cell Biol. 1998;18:2545–52.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Turkson J, Jove R. STAT proteins: novel molecular targets for cancer drug discovery. Oncogene. 2000;19:6613–26.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Garcia R, Bowman TL, Niu G, Yu H, Minton S, Muro-Cacho CA, et al. Constitutive activation of Stat3 by the Src and JAK tyrosine kinases participates in growth regulation of human breast carcinoma cells. Oncogene. 2001;20:2499–513.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Silva CM. Role of STATs as downstream signal transducers in Src family kinase-mediated tumorigenesis. Oncogene. 2004;23:8017–23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Huang S. Regulation of metastases by signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 signaling pathway: clinical implications. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:1362–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Leeman RJ, Lui VWY, Grandis JR. STAT3 as a therapeutic target in head and neck cancer. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2006;6:231–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Komazaki T, Nagai H, Emi M, Terada Y, Yabe A, Jin E, et al. Hypermethylation-associated inactivation of the SOCS-1 gene, a JAK/STAT inhibitor, in human pancreatic cancers. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2004;34:191–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Sen M, Thomas SM, Kim S, Yeh JI, Ferris RL, Johnson JT, et al. First-in-human trial of a STAT3 decoy oligonucleotide in head and neck tumors: implications for cancer therapy. Cancer Discov. 2012;2:694–705.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Bendell JC, Hong DS, Burris HA, Naing A, Jones SF, Falchook G, et al. Phase 1, open-label, dose-escalation, and pharmacokinetic study of STAT3 inhibitor OPB-31121 in subjects with advanced solid tumors. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2014;74:125–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Grandis JR, Drenning SD, Chakraborty A, Zhou M-Y, Zeng Q, Pitt AS, et al. Requirement of Stat3 but not Stat1 activation for epidermal growth factor receptor-mediated cell growth In vitro. J Clin Invest. 1998;102:1385.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Grandis JR, Drenning SD, Zeng Q, Watkins SC, Melhem MF, Endo S, et al. Constitutive activation of Stat3 signaling abrogates apoptosis in squamous cell carcinogenesis in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:4227–32.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Masuda M, Wakasaki T, Suzui M, Toh S, Joe AK, Weinstein IB. Stat3 orchestrates tumor development and progression: the Achilles’ heel of head and neck cancers? Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 2010;10:117–26.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Macha MA, Matta A, Kaur J, Chauhan SS, Thakar A, Shukla NK, et al. Prognostic significance of nuclear pSTAT3 in oral cancer. Head Neck. 2011;33:482–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Stebbins KE, Morse CC, Goldschmidt MH. Feline oral neoplasia: a ten-year survey. Vet Pathol. 1989;26:121–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Postorino Reeves NC, Turrel JM, Withrow SJ. Oral squamous cell carcinoma in the cat. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 1993;29:1–4.Google Scholar
  17. Hutson CA, Willauer CC, Walder EJ, Stone JL, Klein MK. Treatment of mandibular squamous cell carcinoma in cats by use of mandibulectomy and radiotherapy: seven cases (1987–1989). J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1992;201:777–81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Northrup NC, Selting KA, Rassnick KM, Kristal O, O’Brien MG, Dank G, et al. Outcomes of cats with oral tumors treated with mandibulectomy: 42 cases. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 2006;42:350–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Fidel JL, Sellon RK, Houston RK, Wheeler BA. A nine-day accelerated radiation protocol for feline squamous cell carcinoma. Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2007;48:482–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Sabhlok A, Ayl R. Palliative radiation therapy outcomes for cats with oral squamous cell carcinoma (1999–2005). Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2014;0:1–6.Google Scholar
  21. Fox LE, Rosenthal RC, King RR, Levine PB, Vail DM, Helfand SC, et al. Use of cis-bis-neodecanoato-trans-R, R-1,2-diaminocyclohexane platinum (II), a liposomal cisplatin analogue, in cats with oral squamous cell carcinoma. Am J Vet Res. 2000;61:791–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Fidel J, Lyons J, Tripp C, Houston R, Wheeler B, Ruiz A. Treatment of oral squamous cell carcinoma with accelerated radiation therapy and concomitant carboplatin in cats. J Vet Intern Med. 2011;25:504–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. LeBlanc AK, LaDue TA, Turrel JM, Klein MK. Unexpected toxicity following use of gemcitabine as a radiosensitizer in head and neck carcinomas: a veterinary radiation therapy oncology group pilot study. Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2004;45:466–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Lin L, Hutzen B, Li P-K, Ball S, Zuo M, DeAngelis S, et al. A novel small molecule, LLL12, inhibits STAT3 phosphorylation and activities and exhibits potent growth-suppressive activity in human cancer cells. Neoplasia. 2010;12:39–51.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Onimoe G-I, Liu A, Lin L, Wei C-C, Schwartz EB, Bhasin D, et al. Small molecules, LLL12 and FLLL32, inhibit STAT3 and exhibit potent growth suppressive activity in osteosarcoma cells and tumor growth in mice. Invest New Drugs. 2011;30:916–26.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Bid HK, Oswald D, Li C, London CA, Lin J, Houghton PJ. Anti-angiogenic activity of a small molecule STAT3 inhibitor LLL12. PLoS One. 2012;7:e35513.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Tannehill-Gregg S, Kergosien E, Rosol TJ. Feline head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cell line: characterization, production of parathyroid hormone-related protein, and regulation by transforming growth factor-beta. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim. 2001;37:676–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Martin CK, Dirksen WP, Shu ST, Werbeck JL, Thudi NK, Yamaguchi M, et al. Characterization of bone resorption in novel in vitro and in vivo models of oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol. 2012;48:491–9.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Buch K, Peters T, Nawroth T, Sänger M, Schmidberger H, Langguth P. Determination of cell survival after irradiation via clonogenic assay versus multiple MTT Assay - a comparative study. Radiat Oncol. 2012;7:1.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Fossey SL, Liao AT, McCleese JK, Bear MD, Lin J, Li P-K, et al. Characterization of STAT3 activation and expression in canine and human osteosarcoma. BMC Cancer. 2009;9:81.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Schmittgen TD, Livak KJ. Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative CT method. Nat Protoc. 2008;3:1101–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Martin CK, Tannehill-Gregg SH, Wolfe TD, Rosol TJ. Bone-invasive oral squamous cell carcinoma in cats: pathology and expression of parathyroid hormone-related protein. Vet Pathol. 2011;48:302–12.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Ulane CM, Rodriguez JJ, Parisien JP, Horvath CM. STAT3 ubiquitylation and degradation by mumps virus suppress cytokine and oncogene signaling. J Virol. 2003;77:6385–93.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Safhi MMA. Priming of STAT1 and STAT3 for cytokine-triggered degradation by the proteasome upon A2Aadenosine Receptor (A2AAR) expression. Mol Pharmacol. 2008;77:968–78.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Ichiba M, Nakajima K, Yamanaka Y, Kiuchi N, Hirano T. Autoregulation of the Stat3 gene through cooperation with a cAMP-responsive element-binding protein. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:6132–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Tannehill-Gregg SH, Levine AL, Rosol TJ. Feline head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a natural model for the human disease and development of a mouse model. Vet Comp Oncol. 2006;4:84–97.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Wypij JM. A naturally occurring feline model of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Pathol Res Int. 2013;2013:1–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Munday JS, French AF, Gibson IR, Knight CG. The presence of p16CDKN2A protein immunostaining within feline nasal planum squamous cell carcinomas is associated with an increased survival time and the presence of papillomaviral DNA. Vet Pathol. 2013;50:269–73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Munday JS, Gibson I, French AF. Papillomaviral DNA and increased p16CDKN2A protein are frequently present within feline cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas in ultraviolet-protected skin. Vet Dermatol. 2011;22:360–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Munday JS, Knight CG, French AF. Research in veterinary science. Res Vet Sci. 2011;90:280–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Bertone ER, Snyder LA, Moore AS. Environmental and lifestyle risk factors for oral squamous cell carcinoma in domestic cats. J Vet Intern Med. 2003;17:557–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Snyder LA, Bertone ER, Jakowski RM, Dooner MS, Jennings-Ritchie J, Moore AS. p53 expression and environmental tobacco smoke exposure in feline oral squamous cell carcinoma. Vet Pathol. 2004;41:209–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Looper JS, Malarkey DE, Ruslander D, Proulx D, Thrall DE. Epidermal growth factor receptor expression in feline oral squamous cell carcinomas. Vet Comp Oncol. 2006;4:33–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Bergkvist GT, Argyle DJ, Morrison L, MacIntyre N, Hayes A, Yool DA. Expression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and Ki67 in feline oral squamous cell carcinomas (FOSCC). Vet Comp Oncol. 2010;9:106–17.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Bergkvist GT, Argyle DJ, Pang LY, Muirhead R, Yool DA. Studies on the inhibition of feline EGFR in squamous cell carcinoma: enhancement of radiosensitivity and rescue of resistance to small molecule inhibitors. Cancer Biol Ther. 2011;11:927–37.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Masuda M, Suzui M, Yasumatu R, Nakashima T, Kuratomi Y, Azuma K, et al. Constitutive activation of signal transducers and activators of transcription 3 correlates with cyclin D1 overexpression and may provide a novel prognostic marker in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2002;62:3351–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Shah NG, Trivedi TI, Tankshali RA, Goswami JA, Jetly DH, Kobawala TP, et al. Stat3 expression in oral squamous cell carcinoma: association with clinicopathological parameters and survival. Int J Biol Markers. 2005;21:175–83.Google Scholar
  48. Pectasides E, Egloff AM, Sasaki C, Kountourakis P, Burtness B, Fountzilas G, et al. Nuclear localization of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma is associated with a better prognosis. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16:2427–34.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Seethala RR, Gooding WE, Handler PN, Collins B, Zhang Q, Siegfried JM, et al. Immunohistochemical analysis of phosphotyrosine signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 and epidermal growth factor receptor autocrine signaling pathways in head and neck cancers and metastatic lymph nodes. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:1303–9.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Couto JI, Bear MD, Lin J, Pennel M, Kulp SK, Kisseberth WC, et al. Biologic activity of the novel small moleculeSTAT3 inhibitor LLL12 against canineosteosarcoma cell lines. BMC Vet Res. 2012;8:244.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Yue P, Zhang X, Paladino D, Sengupta B, Ahmad S, Holloway RW, et al. Hyperactive EGF receptor, Jaks and Stat3 signaling promote enhanced colony-forming ability, motility and migration of cisplatin-resistant ovarian cancer cells. Oncogene. 2011;31:2309–22.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Reed S, Li H, Li C, Lin J. Celecoxib inhibits STAT3 phosphorylation and suppresses cell migration and colony forming ability in rhabdomyosarcoma cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2011;407:450–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Wang X, Goldstein D, Crowe PJ, Yang J-L. Impact of STAT3 inhibition on survival of osteosarcoma cell lines. Anticancer Res. 2014;34:6537–45.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Darnowski JW, Goulette FA, Guan Y-J, Chatterjee D, Yang Z-F, Cousens LP, et al. Stat3 cleavage by caspases impact on full-length Stat3 expression, fragment formation, and transcriptional activity. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:17707–17.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Haghikia A, Hoch M, Stapel B, Hilfiker-Kleiner D. STAT3 regulation of and by microRNAs in development and disease. JAKSTAT. 2014;1:143–50.Google Scholar
  56. Klosek SK, Nakashiro K-I, Hara S, Li C, Shintani S, Hamakawa H. Constitutive activation of Stat3 correlates with increased expression of the c-Met/HGF receptor in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oncol Rep. 2004;12:293–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Nagpal JK, Mishra R, Das BR. Activation of Stat-3 as one of the early events in tobacco chewing-mediated oral carcinogenesis. Cancer. 2002;94:2393–400.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Yang J, Chatterjee-Kishore M, Staugaitis SM, Nguyen H, Schlessinger K, Levy DE, et al. Novel roles of unphosphorylated STAT3 in oncogenesis and transcriptional regulation. Cancer Res. 2005;65:939–47.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Liu L, McBride KM, Reich NC. STAT3 nuclear import is independent of tyrosine phosphorylation and mediated by importin-alpha3. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:8150–5.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Leong PL, Andrews GA, Johnson DE, Dyer KF, Xi S, Mai JC, et al. Targeted inhibition of Stat3 with a decoy oligonucleotide abrogates head and neck cancer cell growth. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:4138–43.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Lui VWY, Hedberg ML, Li H, Vangara BS, Pendleton K, Zeng Y, et al. Frequent mutation of the PI3K pathway in head and neck cancer defines predictive biomarkers. Cancer Discov. 2013;3:761–9.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Rebucci M, Peixoto P, Dewitte A, Wattez N, De Nuncques MA, Rezvoy N, et al. Mechanisms underlying resistance to cetuximab in the HNSCC cell line: role of AKT inhibition in bypassing this resistance. Int J Oncol. 2010;38:189–200.Google Scholar
  63. Abell K, Bilancio A, Clarkson RWE, Tiffen PG, Altaparmakov AI, Burdon TG, et al. Stat3-induced apoptosis requires a molecular switch in PI(3)K subunit composition. Nat Cell Biol. 2005;7:392–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Jung JE, Kim HS, Lee CS, Shin Y-J, Kim Y-N, Kang G-H, et al. STAT3 inhibits the degradation of HIF-1α by pVHL-mediated ubiquitination. Exp Mol Med. 2008;40:479.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Jung JE. STAT3 is a potential modulator of HIF-1-mediated VEGF expression in human renal carcinoma cells. FASEB J. 2005;10:1296–8.Google Scholar
  66. Niu G, Briggs J, Deng J, Ma Y, Lee H, Kortylewski M, et al. Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 is required for hypoxia-inducible factor-1 RNA expression in both tumor cells and tumor-associated myeloid cells. Mol Cancer Res. 2008;6:1099–105.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Ganji PN, Park W, Wen J, Mahaseth H, Landry J, Farris AB, et al. Antiangiogenic effects of ganetespib in colorectal cancer mediated through inhibition of HIF-1α and STAT-3. Angiogenesis. 2013;16:903–17.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Carpenter R, Lo H-W. STAT3 target genes relevant to human cancers. Cancers. 2014;6:897–925.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Couto JP, Daly L, Almeida A, Knauf JA, Fagin JA, Sobrinho-Simões M, et al. STAT3 negatively regulates thyroid tumorigenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:E2361–70.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Brown et al. 2015

Advertisement