Open Access

Proteomic analysis of the excretory/secretory products and antigenic proteins of Echinococcus granulosus adult worms from infected dogs

BMC Veterinary Research201511:119

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-015-0423-8

Received: 23 November 2014

Accepted: 29 April 2015

Published: 21 May 2015

Abstract

Background

Cystic echinococcosis, which is caused by Echinococcus granulosus, is one of the most widespread zoonotic helminth diseases that affects humans and livestock. Dogs, which harbor adult worms in their small intestines, are a pivotal source of E. granulosus infection in humans and domestic animals. Therefore, novel molecular approaches for the prevention and diagnosis of this parasite infection in dogs need to be developed.

Results

In this study, we performed proteomic analysis to identify excretory/secretory products (ES) and antigenic proteins of E. granulosus adult worms using two-dimensional electrophoresis, tandem matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF/TOF), and Western blotting of sera from infected dogs. This study identified 33 ES product spots corresponding to 9 different proteins and 21 antigenic protein spots corresponding to 13 different proteins. Six antigenic proteins were identified for the first time.

Conclusions

The present study extended the existing proteomic data of E. granulosus and provides further information regarding host-parasite interactions and survival mechanisms. The results of this study contribute to vaccination and immunodiagnoses for E. granulosus infections.

Keywords

Echinococcus granulosus Adult worm Excretory/secretory products Antigenic protein 2-dimensional gel electrophoresis MALDI-TOF/TOF

Background

Cystic echinococcosis (CE) is a type of zoonosis caused by Echinococcus granulosus, a canine tapeworm [1]. According to recent estimates, 4 million individuals are affected with CE and 40 million individuals are at risk [24]. The life cycle of E. granulosus is complex and involves two hosts: definitive and intermediate hosts. The definitive hosts are primarily dogs, which harbor adult worms in their small intestines. The intermediate hosts, e.g., humans and herbivores, particularly sheep and cattle, get infected through the ingestion of parasite eggs released in the feces of definitive hosts or through consumption of foods contaminated with the parasite eggs [5]. Dogs, as definitive hosts, are therefore pivotal in the transmission of CE.

One of the strategies to reduce the risk of infection is to interrupt the transmission of CE. Vaccination of the definitive hosts is an effective method. As there are far fewer dogs than sheep and cattle in endemic areas, far fewer animals consequently need to be vaccinated. However, a limitation of vaccination is that the immune modulatory mechanisms of E. granulosus are not fully understood. The immune modulatory mechanisms of the parasite might involve antigenic proteins and excretory-secretory (ES) products released by the parasite [6, 7]. The surveillance of E. granulosus infections in definitive hosts through sensitive diagnostic procedures is of paramount importance; coproantigen detection and arecoline purgation are not sufficiently sensitive. Therefore, there is an urgent need to identify immune markers that can be used in diagnosis and vaccine development. The identification of ES products and antigenic proteins could provide valuable insights into host-parasite interactions and improve the repertoire of candidate proteins used in immunodiagnoses, vaccination, and therapy. However, E. granulosus adult worms have received little attention; most studies have focused on the pre-adult stage of the parasite [811]. The proteomic profile of ES products and antigenic proteins from adult E. granulosus remain to be elucidated.

In this study, we investigated the ES products and antigenic proteins of E. granulosus adult worms from infected dogs using two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (2DE) and tandem matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF/TOF) mass spectroscopy. The results obtained from this study are crucial for understanding the survival mechanisms of E. granulosus and host-parasite interactions. Furthermore, the results could assist in the development of vaccine antigens, drug targets, and immunodiagnosis markers.

Methods

Ethics statement

This study was performd in strict accordance with the recommendations of the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. The protocol was approved by the Laboratory Animal Welfare & Ethics Committee (LAWEC), National Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (Permit Number: IPD 2010–007). Three dogs used in the research belonged to local farmers. The owners of the all dogs have oral consent for the use of their dogs in this research by explaining the purpose of the research and ensuring the welfare of animals.

Collection and culture of parasites

All dogs were infected with E. granulosus protoscoleces from sheep after dewormed with praziquantel, and sacrificed to obtain intestines at 40 d post-infection. All surgery was performed under sodium pentobarbital anesthesia, and all efforts were made to minimize suffering. Worms were released by soaking the intestinal contents in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, Gibco, California, USA), washed in sterile PBS containing 100 U/ml penicillin G and 100 μg/ml streptomycin (Gibco), and cultured for 24 h at 37 °C at 500 worms/ml in serum-free RPMI 1640 medium (Gibco) supplemented with 2 % glucose (Sigma, St.Louis, USA) and antibiotics. The supernatant was harvested and concentrated using a micro-concentrator with a 3-kDa cut-off (Millipore, Massachusetts, USA).

Sample preparation

The concentrated supernatant was precipitated overnight at −20 °C with five volumes of ice-cold acetone containing 0.2 % dithiothreitol (DTT; w/v) and 20 % trichloroacetic acid (TCA; w/v). Protein precipitates were collected by centrifugation (10,000 rpm, 4 °C, 10 min) and washed three times with ice-cold acetone containing 0.2 % DTT (w/v). The resulting pellet was freeze-dried, suspended in lysate buffer (6 M urea, 2 M thiourea, 4.0 % CHARPS, 40 mM DTT, and 0.5 % IPG; pH 3–10), and sonicated in ice until the suspension became clear. The homogenate was centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 15 min at 4 °C. The resulting supernatant contained ES products.

E. granulosus adult worms were washed in PBS, suspended in lysate buffer, and sonicated in ice until the suspension became clear. The homogenate was centrifuged at 12,000 rpm at 4 °C for 15 min. The supernatant contained adult worms.

The samples were cleaned up using the 2D Clean-up kit (Amersham Biosciences), quantified using the 2D Quant Kit (Amersham Biosciences), and subjected to 2DE.

Two-dimensional electrophoresis

One-dimensional isoelectric focusing (IEF) and two-dimensional sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) were performed (Amersham Biosciences). Briefly, 100 μg of the ES sample in 130 μl rehydration buffer was loaded onto a 7-cm immobiline IPG drystrip (pH3-10NL; Amersham Biosciences); 800 μg of adult worm protein sample in 450 μl of rehydration buffer was loaded onto a 24-cm immobiline IPG drystrip (pH3-10NL; Amersham Biosciences). IEF was performed at 80,000 Vh using Ettan™IPGphorII (Amersham Biosciences). The drystrips were equilibrated twice (15 min each time) in equilibration buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl [pH 8.8], 6 M urea, 30 % glycerol, 2 % SDS, and 1 % DTT for the first equilibration; 50 mM Tris–HCl [pH 8.8], 6 M urea, 30 % glycerol, 2 % SDS, and 4.8 % iodacetamide for the second equilibration). Two-dimensional SDS-PAGE was performed on a 12 % polyacrylamide gel in the Ettan™DALTsix and Ettan™VE systems (Amersham Biosciences). Two replicates were performed per protein sample.

Protein identification by MALDI-TOF/TOF analysis

The gels were stained with Coomassie brilliant blue (CBB) G-250 (BioRad). Protein spots were excised by an Ettan Spot Picker (Amersham Biosciences). In-gel digestion was performed as previously described [12]. Protein identification was carried out using MALDI-TOF/TOF mass spectrometry (4700 MALDI-TOF/TOF mass spectrometer; Applied Biosystems, California, USA). The spectra were processed and analyzed by the Global Protein Server Workstation (GPS; Applied Biosystems), which uses the internal Mascot v2.1 software (Matrix Science, London, UK) to search for peptide mass fingerprints and MS/MS data based on the NCBI non-redundant protein database. Identification with a GPS confidence interval >95 % was accepted. Gene ontology (GO) terms were applied to the identified proteins; pie charts of the GO terms for molecular functions, cellular components, and biological processes were generated. Additionally, Eukaryotic Orthologous Group (KOG) annotation was assigned (http://genome.jgi.doe.gov/Tutorial/tutorial/kog.html).

Immunoblot analysis of antigenic proteins

Adult worm proteins were electro-transferred from the 2DE gels to polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes (Amersham Biosciences) at 300 mA for 2 h using a TE77 semi-dry transfer unit (Amersham Biosciences). Membranes were blocked for 1 h in 5 % nonfat milk powder in TBS (20 mM Tris, 500 mM NaCl, pH 7.5) at room temperature and incubated overnight with serum from E. granulosus-infected dogs (1:500 dilution) at 4 °C. After three washes with TBST (TBS containing 0.05 % v/v Tween-20), the membranes were incubated at room temperature with HRP-labeled anti-dog IgG (1:10000 dilution; Sigma-Aldrich) for 1 h. Bound antibodies were revealed using the DAB reagent. Antigenic spots on the 2DE gels were identified based on matches with the 2DE proteomic map.

Results

ES products of adult E. granulosus

Approximately 50 spots representative of the ES products were resolved on Coomassie-stained 2DE gels (Fig. 1). A total of 48 spots were subjected to MALDI-TOF/TOF analysis; 33 protein spots corresponding to 8 different proteins were identified (Table 1).
Fig. 1

Representative 2DE gels of the excretory/secretory products of E. granulosus adult worms. Proteins (100 μg) were separated on a linear pH range of 3–10 using IEF in the first dimension and 12 % SDS-PAGE in the second dimension. The proteins were stained with Coomassie blue. Molecular weight markers are shown on the left. The proteins identified are shown in detail in Table 1

Table 1

ES products of E. granulosus adult worms identified by MALDI-TOF/TOF analysis

GI number

Protein name

Species

MW

pI

Protein score C.I.%

547974

Paramyosin

E. granulosus

98681.8

5.21

100

262192839

Enolase

E. granulosus

46531.9

6.48

100

576695773

Actin

E. granulosus

41717.8

5.3

100

576698524

Small heat shock protein p36

E. granulosus

35821.2

5.92

99.995

6016537

Malate dehydrogenase, cytoplasmic

E. granulosus

36627.8

8.11

100

2316076

Glutathione S-transferase

E. granulosus

25536.8

7.51

100

189016336

Thioredoxin peroxidase

E. granulosus

21419.7

5.78

100

31077167

Cyclophilin

E. granulosus

17343.4

6.41

99.003

The identified proteins were subjected to functional annotation based on the GO and KOG classification systems. 33, 30, and 20 proteins had GO terms for molecular functions, cellular components, and biological processes, respectively. A summary of the GO and KOG annotations is provided in Fig. 2. Three proteins could not be classified by KOG.
Fig. 2

Functional analysis of the excretory/secretory proteins identified in E. granulosus adult worms. Gene ontology terms for the subcategories molecular function (a), cellular component (b), and biological process (c) were assigned to the proteins identified in the adult worms. KOG functional categories (d) were assigned to the proteins identified in the adult worms. The percentage and number (in parentheses) of proteins identified in each functional category are indicated in each sector. KOG functional categories: (Z) cytoskeleton; (O) posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones; (G) carbohydrate transport and metabolism; (C) energy production and conversion; (noKOG) protein not assigned to any KOG category. The number of proteins in the graph might exceed the total number of identified proteins because some were grouped into more than one functional category

Antigenic proteins of E. granulosus adult worms

To identify adult worm antigenic proteins, we performed 2DE immunoblot analyses using serum from E. granulosus-infected dogs. In this study, 36 antigen spots were detected (Fig. 3). Using the corresponding 2DE proteomic map, 21 antigen spots were identified, corresponding to 12 different proteins (Table 2), three of which were identified for the first time: severin, hypothetical protein EGR_06319, and triosephosphate isomerase.
Fig. 3

Antigenic proteins on corresponding representative 2DE gels of the proteins expressed by E. granulosus adult worms. Proteins (800 μg) were separated on a linear pH range of 3–10 by using IEF in the first dimension and 12 % SDS-PAGE in the second dimension. Proteins were electrotransferred to PVDF membranes and probed with sera from E. granulosus-infected dogs. Antigenic protein spots are indicated by red circles. Molecular weight markers are shown on the left. The proteins identified are shown in detail in Table 2

Table 2

Antigenic proteins of E. granulosus adult worms identified by immunoblot analysis

GI number

Protein name

Species

MW

pI

Protein score C.I.%

547974

Paramyosin

E. granulosus

98681.8

5.21

100

148613837

Calreticulin

E. granulosus

42199.2

4.47

100

256274460

HSP60

E. granulosus

   

674568928

HSP70

E. granulosus

70640

5.47

100

26399708

Severin a

E. granulosus

41681.9

5.74

100

262192839

Enolase

E. granulosus

46531.9

6.48

100

576695773

Actin

E. granulosus

41717.8

5.3

100

576695197

Hypothetical protein EGR_06319 a

E. granulosus

23119

4.77

100

6016537

Malate dehydrogenase, cytoplasmic

E. granulosus

36627.8

8.11

100

576692880

Triosephosphate isomerase a

E. granulosus

27149.8

6.6

100

576691284

Superoxide dismutase

E. granulosus

15442.8

6.15

99.992

31077167

Cyclophilin

E. granulosus

17343.4

6.41

99.003

aAntigenic proteins identified for the first time in adult worms are shown in bold

A total of 61 adult worm protein spots corresponding to 26 different proteins were identified (Table 3); 2 of these proteins were identified in E. granulosus adult worms for the first time.
Table 3

Proteins of E. granulosus adult worms identified by MALDI-TOF/TOF analysis

GI number

Protein name

Species

MW

pI

Protein score C.I.%

547974

Paramyosin

E. granulosus

98681.8

5.21

100

148613837

Calreticulin

E. granulosus

42199.2

4.47

100

256274460

HSP60

E. granulosus

   

674568928

HSP70

E. granulosus

70640

5.47

100

576695773

Actin

E. granulosus

41745.8

5.39

100

26399708

Severin

E. granulosus

41681.9

5.74

100

262192839

Enolase

E. granulosus

46531.9

6.48

100

576695773

Actin a

E. granulosus

41717.8

5.3

100

576695197

Hypothetical protein EGR_06319

E. granulosus

23119

4.77

100

6016537

Malate dehydrogenase, cytoplasmic

E. granulosus

36627.8

8.11

100

576692880

Triosephosphate isomerase

E. granulosus

27149.8

6.6

100

576691284

Superoxide dismutase

E. granulosus

15442.8

6.15

99.992

31077167

Cyclophilin

E. granulosus

17343.4

6.41

99.003

29336624

78-kDa glucose-regulated protein

E. granulosus

71876.1

5.16

100

674566315

Transitional endoplasmic reticulum atpase

E. granulosus

71581.6

5.17

100

110558962

Ferritin

E. granulosus

16676.2

5.24

100

189016336

Thioredoxin peroxidase

E. granulosus

21419.7

5.78

100

674565853

Succinate dehydrogenase ubiquinone

E. granulosus

54812.5

7.62

100

576691476

Transketolase

E. granulosus

72574.6

6.53

100

576693013

T-complex protein 1 subunit zeta a

E. granulosus

26703

7.77

100

182676451

Tropomyosin

E. granulosus

32249.2

4.6

100

576698524

Small heat shock protein p36

E. granulosus

35821.2

5.92

99.995

674567794

Oncosphere protein Tso22e

E. granulosus

31416.3

6.61

100

2316076

Glutathione S-transferase

E. granulosus

25536.8

7.51

100

193213138

Phosphoglycerate mutase

Chlorobaculum parvum

28366.6

5.76

95.745

576700988

Fructose-bisphosphate aldolase

E. granulosus

39702.4

8.03

100

aProteins identified for the first time in adult worms are shown in bold

Discussion

In this study, we performed the first proteomic analysis of ES products from adult E. granulosus. Enolase was the most abundant ES product Enolase has been described as a multifunctional surface protein and an ES product of parasites; it exhibits host-interacting properties and is involved in invasion [1317]. Enolase is likely to play an important role in E. granulosus-host interactions and parasite evasion mechanisms via the immunomodulation of the host immune system. The second most abundant ES product was cyclophilin, which plays a role in parasite development and host-parasite interactions [18]. Furthermore, cyclophilin is a target compound for the immunosuppressive agent, cyclosporine A [1921].

Actin and paramyosin, cytoskeletal proteins, were other ES products. Similar results have been obtained in other parasites [2225]. The presence of these proteins may indicate parasite damage or death; however, it is more likely that these proteins are products of tegument shedding. The continuous shedding of the parasite tegument is thought to release components that aid the parasite in evading an effective immune response [26].

An antioxidant defense mechanism is another form of parasite survival. Among the ES products identified, only thioredoxin peroxidase was involved in redox homeostasis. This enzyme plays a major role in protecting the adult worms from oxidative damage. This result is in accordance with the findings of a study performed of hydatid cyst fluid (HCF) that contained ES products from E. granulosus protoscoleces [9].

Metacestodes (hydatid cysts), protoscoleces, and adult worms are different developmental stages of E. granulosus. The HCF is a reservoir of ES products from both the germinal layer and protoscoleces. Compared with HCF [9] and ES products from protoscoleces [11], the ES products from adult worms comprise different proteins. Some of the proteins in this study have not been identified in HCF, including enolase, malate dehydrogenase, GST, and cyclophilin. Similarly, some of the proteins have not been identified in the ES products from protoscoleces, including paramyosin, small HSP p36, and GST. In another study, we observed that the ES products from E. granulosus adult worms failed to induce dendritic cell maturation and cytokine production (data not published); this result, however, is in contrast with the finding that HCF induces dendritic cell activation [27]. These differences could be attributed to the different proteins in ES products and HCF; however, this needs to be confirmed.

The search for antigenic proteins by 2DE immunoblots contributed to the identification of 12 parasite proteins that were recognized in the serum of E. granulosus-infected dogs. Nine of these proteins (malate dehydrogenase, HSP60, HSP70, calreticulin, enolase, actin, cyclophilin, paramyosin and superoxide dismutase) were previously identified in E. granulosus and E. multilocularis human infections [9, 18, 2830]. The other three proteins (severin, hypothetical protein EGR_06319 and triosephosphate isomerase,) were identified in this study for the first time. Some of these proteins have potential in vaccine development, such as paramyosin. Paramyosins, which are multifunctional modulators of the host immune response, play a role in binding complement components, immunoglobulins, and secreted components of cellular immune response [3136]. Paramyosin has been proposed by WHO/TDR as a vaccine candidate against schistosomiasis and has shown some protection, which may suggest a potential for this protein in the treatment of E. granulosus infections [3739].

Recently, the protein profile of E. granulosus adult worms has been analyzed by two dimensional LC-MS [40]. In addition to proteins that had been reported in that work, we identified two novel proteins of this parasite, which has increased the known repertoire of the parasitic protein profile and demonstrates the value of our experimental approaches for the proteomic analysis of E. granulosus proteins.

Conclusions

The present study investigated the ES products and antigenic proteins of E. granulosus adult worms from infected dogs. The results obtained from this study extend the existing proteomic data regarding E. granulosus and could assist in the development of vaccine antigens, drug targets, and immunodiagnostic markers.

Abbreviations

2DE: 

Ttwo-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis

CE: 

Cystic echinococcosis

ES: 

Excretory-secretory products

GO: 

Gene ontology

KOG: 

Eukaryotic Orthologous Group (KOG)

MALDI-TOF/TOF: 

Tandem matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight

Declarations

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation (No. 81371841 to J.C., 81371842 to Y.S.), and the National S & T Major Program (No.2012ZX10004-201 to J.C.).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
National Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention; Laboratory of Parasite and Vector Biology, MOH, China; WHO Collaborating Center for Malaria, Schistosomiasis and Filariasis
(2)
Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, State Key Laboratory for Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, National Institute for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention
(3)
Qinghai Institute for Endemic Disease Prevention and Control

References

  1. Moro P, Schantz PM. Echinococcosis: a review. Int J Infect Dis. 2009;13:125–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Craig PS, McManus DP, Lightowlers MW, Chabalgoity JA, Garcia HH, Gavidia CM, et al. Prevention and control of cystic echinococcosis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2007;7:385–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Eckert J, Conraths FJ, Tackmann K. Echinococcosis: an emerging or re-emerging zoonosis? Int J Parasitol. 2000;30:1283–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. McManus DP, Zhang W, Li J, Bartley PB. Echinococcosis. Lancet. 2003;362:1295–304.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. McManus DP. Echinococcosis with particular reference to Southeast Asia. Adv Parasitol. 2010;72:267–303.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Casaravilla C, Pittini A, Ruickerl D, Seoane PI, Jenkins SJ, MacDonald AS, et al. Unconventional maturation of dendritic cells induced by particles from the laminated layer of larval Echinococcus granulosus. Infect Immun. 2014;82:3164–76.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Nono JK, Pletinckx K, Lutz MB, Brehm K. Excretory/secretory-products of Echinococcus multilocularis larvae induce apoptosis and tolerogenic properties in dendritic cells in vitro. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6:e1516.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Chemale G, van Rossum AJ, Jefferies JR, Barrett J, Brophy PM, Ferreira HB, et al. Proteomic analysis of the larval stage of the parasite Echinococcus granulosus: Causative agent of cystic hydatid disease. Proteomics. 2003;3:1633–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Monteiro KM, de Carvalho MO, Zaha A, Ferreira HB. Proteomic analysis of the Echinococcus granulosus metacestode during infection of its intermediate host. Proteomics. 2010;10:1985–99.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Aziz A, Zhang W, Li J, Loukas A, McManus DP, Mulvenna J. Proteomic characterization of Echinococcus granulosus hydatid cyst fluid from sheep, cattle and humans. J Proteomics. 2011;74:1560–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Virginio VG, Monteiro KM, Drumond F, de Carvalho MO, Vargas DM, Zaha A, et al. Excretory/secretory products from in vitro-cultured Echinococcus granulosus protoscoleces. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2012;183:15–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Zou Q, Yan X, Li B, Zeng X, Zhou J, Zhang J. Proteome analysis of sorbitol fermentation specific protein in Vibrio cholerae by 2-DE and MS. Proteomics. 2006;6:1848–55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Perez-Sanchez R, Ramajo-Hernandez A, Ramajo-Martin V, Oleaga A. Proteomic analysis of the tegument and excretory-secretory products of adult Schistosoma bovis worms. Proteomics. 2006;6:226–36.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Bernal D, de la Rubia JE, Carrasco-Abad AM, Toledo R, Mas-Coma S, Marcilla A. Identification of enolase as a plasminogen-binding protein in excretory-secretory products of Fasciola hepatica. FEBS let. 2004;563:203–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Seweryn E, Pietkiewicz J, Szamborska A, Gamian A. Enolase on the surface of prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells is a receptor for human plasminogen. Postepy Hig Med Dosw. 2007;61:672–82.Google Scholar
  16. Ramajo-Hernandez A, Perez-Sanchez R, Ramajo-Martin V, Oleaga A. Schistosoma bovis: plasminogen binding in adults and the identification of plasminogen-bingding proteins from the worm tegument. Exp Parasitol. 2007;115:83–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Antunez K, Anido M, Arredondo D, Evans JD, Zunino P. Paenibacillus larvae enolase as a virulence factor in honeybee larvae infection. Vet Microbiol. 2011;10:83–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Ortona E, Vaccari S, Margutti P, Delunardo F, Rigano R, Profumo E, et al. Immunological characterization of Echinococcus granulosus cyclophilin, an allergen reactive with IgE and IgG4 from patients with cystic echinococcosis. Clin Exp Immunol. 2002;128:124–30.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Galat A. Function-dependent clustering of orthologues and paralogues of cyclophilins. Proteins. 2004;56:808–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Bell A, Monaghan P, Page AP. Peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerases (immunophilins) and their roles in parasite biochemistry, host-parasite interaction and antiparasitic drug action. Int J Parasitol. 2006;36:261–76.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Kameyama K, Nishimura M, Punsantsogvoo M, Ibrahim HM, Xuan X, Furuoka H, et al. Immunological characterization of Neospora caninum cyclophilin. Parasitology. 2012;139:294–301.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Mulvenna J, Sripa B, Brindley PJ, Gorman J, Jones MK, Colgrave ML, et al. The secreted and surface proteomes of adult stage of the carcinogenic human liver fluke Opisthorchis viverrini. Proteomics. 2010;10:1063–78.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Kundsen GM, Medzihradszky KF, Lim KC, Hansell E, McKerrow JH. Proteomic analysis of Schistosoma mansoni cercarial secretions. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2005;4:1862–75.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Liu F, Cui SJ, Hu W, Feng Z, Wang ZQ, Han ZG. Excretory/secretory proteome of the adult developmental stage of human blood fluke, Schistosoma japonicum. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2009;8:1236–51.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Bernal D, Carpena I, Espert AM, De la Rubia JE, Esteban JG, Toledo R, et al. Identification of proteins in excretory/secretory extracts of Echinostoma friedi (Trematoda) from chronic and acute infections. Proteomics. 2006;6:2835–43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Van Hellemond JJ, Retra K, Brouwers JF, van Balkom BW, Yazdanbakhsh M, Shoemaker CB, et al. Functions of the tegument of schistosomes: clues from the proteome and lipidome. Int J Parasitol. 2006;36:691–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Kanan JH, Chain BM. Modulation of dendritic cell differentiation and cytokine secretion by the hydatid cyst fluid of Echinococcus granulosus. Immunology. 2006;118:271–8.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Wang YH, Cheng Z, Lu XF, Tang CT. Echinococcus multilocularis: proteomic analysis of the protoscoleces by two-dimensional electrophoresis and mass spectrometry. Exp Parasitol. 2009;123:162–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Virginio VG, Hernandez A, Rott MB, Monteiro KM, Zandonai AF, Nieto A, et al. A set of recombinant antigens from Echinococcus granulosus with potential for use in the immunodiagnosis of human cystic hydatid disease. Clin Exp Immunol. 2003;132:309–15.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Colebrook AL, Lightowlers MW. Serological reactivity to heat shock protein 70 in patients with hydatid disease. Parasite Immunol. 1997;19:41–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Gobert GN, McManus DP. Update on paramyosin in parasitic worms. Parasitaol Int. 2005;54:101–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Wei J, Gu Y, Yang Y, Wang S, Cui S, Zhu X. Identification and characterization of protective epitope of Trichinella spiralis paramyosin. Vaccine. 2011;29:3162–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Jiz M, Wu HW, Meng R, Pond-Tor S, Reynolds M, Friedman JF, et al. Pilot-scale production and characterization of paramyosin, a vaccine candidate for schistosomiasis japonica. Infect Immun. 2008;76:3164–9.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Zhao QP, Moon SU, Na BK, Kim SH, Cho SH, Lee HW, et al. Paragonimus westermani: biochemical and immunological characterization of paramyosin. Exp Parasitol. 2007;115:9–18.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Park TJ, Kang JM, Na BK, Sohn WM. Molecular cloning and characterization of a paramyosin from Clonorchis sinensis. Korean J Parasitol. 2009;47:359–67.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Jiz M, Fridman JF, Leenstra T, Jarilla B, Pablo A, Langdon G, et al. Immunoglobulin E (IgE) responses to paramyosin predict resistance to reinfection with Schistosoma japonicum and are attenuated by IgG4. Infect Immun. 2009;77:2051–8.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Hemandez MG, Hafalla JC, Acosta LP, Aligui FF, Aligui GD, Ramirez BL, et al. Paramyosin is a major target of the human IgA response against Schistosoma japonicum. Parasite Immunol. 1999;21:641–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Zhang DM, Pan WQ, Qian L, Duke M, Shen LH, McManus DP. Investigation of recombinant Schistosoma japonicum paramyosin fragments for immunogenicity and vaccine efficacy in mice. Parasite Immunol. 2006;28:77–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Chen G, Dai Y, Chen J, Wang X, Tang B, Zhu Y, et al. Oral delivery of the Sj23LHD-GST antigen by Salmonella typhimurium type III secretion system protects against Schistosoma japonicum infection in mice. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011;5:e1313.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Cui SJ, Xu LL, Zhang T, Xu M, Yao J, Fang CY, et al. Proteomic characterization of larval and adult developmental stages in Echinococcus granulosus reveals novel insight into host-parasite interactions. J Proteomics. 2013;84:158–75.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Wang et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement