Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Veterinary Research

Open Access

Prevalence and characterization of verotoxigenic-Escherichia coli isolates from pigs in Malaysia

  • Wing Sze Ho1, 2,
  • Lai Kuan Tan1, 2,
  • Peck Toung Ooi3,
  • Chew Chieng Yeo4 and
  • Kwai Lin Thong1, 2Email author
BMC Veterinary Research20139:109

https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-6148-9-109

Received: 27 March 2013

Accepted: 29 May 2013

Published: 4 June 2013

Abstract

Background

Postweaning diarrhea caused by pathogenic Escherichia coli, in particular verotoxigenic E. coli (VTEC), has caused significant economic losses in the pig farming industry worldwide. However, there is limited information on VTEC in Malaysia. The objective of this study was to characterize pathogenic E. coli isolated from post-weaning piglets and growers with respect to their antibiograms, carriage of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases, pathotypes, production of hemolysins and fimbrial adhesins, serotypes, and genotypes.

Results

PCR detection of virulence factors associated with different E. coli pathotypes (ETEC, EPEC, EHEC, and VTEC) revealed that VTEC was the only pathotype identified from six swine farms located at north-western Peninsular Malaysia. A low prevalence rate of VTEC was found among the swine samples (n = 7/345) and all 7 VTEC isolates were multidrug resistant. Five of these isolates from different hosts raised in the same pen were likely to be of the same clone as they shared identical sero-pathotypes (O139:H1, VT2e/α-hly/F18), resistance profiles and DNA fingerprinting profiles. Two other serotypes, O130: H26 (n = 1) and O168: H21 (n = 1) carrying virulence factors were also identified. O168: H21 is possibly a new serotype as this has not been previously reported.

Conclusions

The occurrence of VTEC with infrequently encountered serotypes that are multidrug resistant and harbouring virulence factors may be of public health concern. The detection of possible clones in this study also showed that the combination of different typing tools including phenotyping and genotyping methods is useful for molecular epidemiologic surveillance and studies.

Keywords

Verotoxigenic-E. coli (VTEC)Shiga-toxin (Stx)-producing E. coli (STEC)Postweaning diarrhea (PWD)Multidrug resistancePig farmsSwine

Background

Escherichia coli is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in newborn and weaned pigs [1] with postweaning diarrhea (PWD) as the main health problem in piggeries and has caused significant losses in the swine industry worldwide [2]. The main causal agents of PWD are verotoxin (VT)-producing E. coli (VTEC), also known as Shiga-toxin (Stx)-producing E. coli (STEC) and enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC) [2]. Enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) and enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC) have also been found associated with PWD [3]. VTEC is characterized by the production of VTs (VT1 and VT2) which disrupt protein synthesis whereas ETEC is characterized by the production of heat labile enterotoxin (LT) and heat stable enterotoxin (ST) [4]. Among the pathogenic E. coli, VTEC O157 is often the main focus of most surveillance programs due to its association with severe human infections. However, monitoring should be extended to other serotypes as cases of human infections caused by non-O157 VTEC are substantial [5]. Furthermore, serotypes involved in porcine PWD were mostly non-related to human infections [6, 7].

Pathogenicity of E. coli is associated with bacterial fimbrial adhesins which enable the bacteria to adhere to the cell lining of the small intestine and colonize the host [4]. A number of fimbrial adhesins have been associated with PWD caused by pathogenic E. coli in pigs namely the F4, F5, F6, F17, F18 and F41 fimbriae [8, 9] with F4 and F18 as the most common adhesins [2, 9, 10]. Despite the substantial number of swine farms in Malaysia, there is a dearth of published information on the characteristics of pathogenic E. coli infection in pigs from Malaysian farms. Hence, the objectives of this study were to determine the prevalence of different E. coli pathotypes in Malaysian swine samples and to further characterize the pathogenic E. coli with respect to their antibiograms, production of extended spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs), virulence genes, fimbrial adhesive genes, serotypes, production of hemolysins and genetic diversity. The outcome of this study would provide information on the prevalence and characteristics of pathogenic E. coli as a cause of post-weaning diseases in pigs in Malaysia.

Results

Isolation and confirmation of E. coliisolates from post-weaning piglets and growers

A total of 86 post-weaning piglets (< 2 months) and 24 growers (2–4 months) [from farms D (n = 20), E (n = 20), and F (n = 18) from the state of Perak and farms G (n = 16), H (n = 20), and I (n = 16) from Penang were selected and three swab types (nasal, tongue and rectal swabs) were sampled from each pig. A total of 511 presumptive E. coli isolates were obtained from these 110 pigs. Out of 511 presumptive E. coli isolates, 345 (67.5%) were confirmed as E. coli as they were phoA-positive by PCR [11] (nasal swabs, n = 57; rectal swabs, n = 202 and tongue swabs, n = 86).

Virulence and adhesion genes

None of the 345 isolates was positive for the LT1, LT2, ST and eaeA genes while 9 isolates were verotoxin (VT)-positive and were thus termed as verotoxin-producing E. coli (VTEC). Of the 9 VTEC isolates, 4 were obtained from the same swab samples of 2 animals (i.e., duplicates), hence, only one VTEC isolate from each animal was further characterized. Overall, 7 VTEC isolates were subjected to further characterization. These 7 VTEC isolates were obtained from three swine farms located in Penang and no VTEC was found in the farms that were sampled in Perak. Of the 7 VTEC, 5 were obtained from farm G (located in the coastal area) and 1 each from farms H and I (located inland). VTEC were obtained from all three swab types (rectal: n = 3; tongue: n = 2; nasal: n = 2) (Figure 1). Five VTEC were isolated from unhealthy pigs (from 5 different hosts) while 2 were from a healthy pig (2 different swab samples from a single host) (Figure 1). All the VTs belonged to subtype 2e (VT2e). Only 1 type of fimbrial gene, F18 was detected in 5 of the 7 VTEC isolates (Figure 1) and none was positive for F4, F5, F6, F17 and F41.
Figure 1

Dendrogram generated from PFGE profiles of the VTEC strains using UPGMA based on Dice coefficients of similarity.AStrain code; Bpulsotype; CREP profiles; Dswab samples; Ehealth condition of pig; Fage group; Gswine farm; Hserotype/virulence factor/hemolysin gene/adhesin; Iphenotypic result for haemolytic activity on washed blood agar; Jantimicrobial resistance profiles.

Serotyping of VTEC

O antigen typing using both conventional and molecular methods revealed three O serogroups, namely O139, O130, and O168. The determination of the H serogroup for O139 E. coli isolates using molecular typing method was inconclusive as the amino acid sequence of the respective H antigens shared highest similarity with H1 (3 amino acid differences), H12 (7 amino acid differences) and a peculiar H2 flagellin (H2d ,8 amino acid differences) (Figure 2). Very low degree of sequence identity was observed for the common H2 flagellin sequence (H2e) with the H antigen sequence obtained from our study (Figure 2). The respective RFLP of the fliC gene also resembled H1 as described previously by Fields et al., [12] (data not shown). However, the phenotypic result showed that the respective H antigen belonged to serogroup H2. Nevertheless, the H serogroup of these strains were designated H1 based on the molecular data since conventional H serotyping is reported to have discrepancy and uncertainty [13, 14]. The representative fliC DNA sequence obtained in this study has been deposited in GenBank under the accession number KC753181.
Figure 2

Multiple-sequence alignment of flagellin amino acid sequences representing serogroups H1, H2 and H12 of E. coli using Clustal W. The amino acid sequence of H1a was obtained in this study [GenBank: KC753181]. The amino acid sequences of serogroups H1b, H12c,H2d and H2e were retrieved from NCBI protein database [GenBank: ADR27342, AAQ22679, AAD28525 and BAI30971, respectively]. Two very distinctive H2 flagellin sequences were included in the alignment (H2 d : common H2 sequence; H2 e : peculiar H2 sequence obtained from E74/68). A dash (‘-’) denotes a gap in the alignment. Amino acid sequence differences are indicated in bold letters. Numbers indicate the various amino acid sequence positions.

Overall, H antigen typing using both conventional and molecular methods revealed the presence of serotypes O139:H1 (n = 5), O130:H26 (n = 1) and O168:H21 (n = 1) among the VTEC isolates. The most common serotype was O139:H1 which was isolated from different pigs in the same pen in farm G in Penang.

Genotypes of VTEC based on PFGE and REP-PCR

Five out of 7 VTEC isolates shared an indistinguishable pulsotype designated A1 (Figure 1). These 5 VTEC isolates were obtained from the same farm and 2 of them were isolated from the same animal but from different swab samples. The remaining 2 isolates were isolated from 2 different farms in Penang and showed unrelated pulsotypes (more than 3 band differences). REP-PCR profiling also revealed only 3 distinct patterns with one REP profile found for each farm (Figure 1). Isolates that shared the same pulsotype (A1) had the same REP profile (B1). All 5 isolates with the same serotype shared an indistinguishable pulsotype and REP profile while another two were genetically different.

Antibiograms and ESBL producers

All VTEC isolates were multidrug resistant as they were resistant to at least 3 groups of antimicrobials. They showed 100% resistance to Tet, Amp, Nal, Sxt, Kan, Chl, Spt, and Aml (Figure 1). However, none of the VTEC was ESBL positive.

Haemolytic activity

Six out of the 7 VTEC isolates were beta-hemolytic as indicated by the zone of clearing on the defribinated, washed sheep blood agar after 4 hours of incubation. These 6 isolates were also positive for the α-hly gene. None of the isolates was positive for the E-hly gene.

Discussion

ETEC and VTEC are common etiologic agents for PWD in pigs worldwide. However, the distribution of such pathogenic E. coli in the swine population in Malaysia is unknown and there is limited information for the Southeast Asian region. Different pathotypes of E. coli are known to be associated with specific virulence factors. Among the 5 virulence factors tested in this study, only verotoxin (VT) was detected and at a low prevalence of 2.0% (7/345). Thus VTEC appeared to be the only pathotype identified from the swine samples in north-western Peninsular Malaysia. However, a larger sample size would be needed in any future studies to estimate the true prevalence rates of pathogenic E. coli among the Malaysian swine populations. A recent study from Thailand [15] reported a relatively higher prevalence of VTEC (11.2%) from pigs with PWD. The results obtained in this study and that of Prapasarakul et al.[15] were in contrast with earlier reports by Zhang et al.[16] and Fairbrother et al. [2] who reported ETEC as the most common pathotype found in pigs with PWD in the United States and worldwide, respectively. The VT detected in this study belonged to subtype VT2e. Although Oanh et al. [17] reported that VT2e is commonly associated with oedema in pigs, however, none of the VTEC-infected pigs in this study showed signs of oedema. Nevertheless, pigs with oedema often suffer sudden death [17], hence these infected pigs are difficult to observe.

Of the 7 VTEC isolates, 6 were obtained from weaners and 1 from grower. Colonization of the guts of newly weaned piglets with pathogenic bacteria often occurs as the absorption and digestion of the gut is disturbed due to dietary changes [18]. A majority of the VTEC isolates (n = 5/7) were also isolated from unhealthy pigs inferring the undesirable outcome to the health conditions of the pigs due to infections.

H antigen typing for isolates with serogroup O139 yielded ambiguous result as the conventional serotyping method yielded H2, while the fliC sequence analysis closely matched to H1 type (with 3 amino acid differences). Serotyping has been reported to have limited sensitivity and specificity [13] and the result may not always be reliable. Hence, the H type for the O139 isolates was designated H1 (DebRoy, C., personal communication). The discrepancy in H serotyping results using both molecular and conventional serotyping methods had also been encountered by Reid et al.[14] for an EPEC strain (E74/68) with serotype O128:H2 which was investigated with respect to its fliC gene sequence. It was found that the amino acid sequence [GenBank: AAD28525] best resembles H1 (with 10 amino acid difference) and H12 (with 1 amino acid difference) out of the 527-amino acid residues of the flagellin protein (Figure 2) although the conventional serotyping revealed that it belongs to serogroup H2. However, the discrepancies in the result were not discussed by Reid et al.[14] in their paper. Coincidentally, the amino acid sequence of the “H2” flagellin obtained from strain E74/68 shared relatively high sequence identity with the H1 flagellin obtained in our study (8 amino acid difference) (Figure 2).

Swine VTEC has been reported to be associated with specific serogroups such as O138, O139 and O141 [19] and indeed, the major O serogroup identified in this study is O139. E. coli serotype O157:H7, which is commonly known to be a serious food-borne pathogen throughout the world, was not detected in this study. O139:H1, the most prevalent serotype in this study, has been reported worldwide to cause swine diseases such as PWD and oedema [2]. It has also been reported to be one of the major serotypes associated with diseased pigs [20]. The other two serotypes identified in this study were O130:H26 and O168:H21. O130:H26 is considered as a rare serotype as it has only been reported once and was isolated from the stool sample of a diarrhea patient [21] while E. coli with serotype O168:H21 has not been described in any study before. To the best of our knowledge, serotypes O130:H26 and O168:H21 have not been previously associated with swine diseases and are also considered as infrequently encountered E. coli serotypes.

VTEC producing F4 and F18 fimbrial adhesins are one of the most common pathogens associated with diarrheas in pigs worldwide [2, 16]. In our study, the F18 fimbriae was the most common, which concurred with the findings of Vu Khac et al. [9] in Slovakia while other studies by Zhang et al. [16] and Madoroba et al. [22] showed that F4 was the prevalent type of fimbriae in pathogenic E. coli isolated from young piglets in the United States and Zimbabwe, respectively. The distribution of fimbriae types may vary for different geographical regions. Fairbrother et al. [2] also reported that ETEC serogroup O139 is often associated with the F18 fimbriae and these strains typically caused PWD in Australia and oedema in Europe. The detection of hemolysins of VTEC was also evaluated using molecular and phenotypic methods revealing the presence of α-hly but not E-hly. The presence of α-hly may serve as a virulence factor for our local VTEC isolates as it codes for pore forming cytolysins [2], which are capable of destroying red blood cells [23].

The emergence of multi-drug resistant bacteria in the poultry farming industry, including the piggeries is of public health concern as transmission of these bacteria to humans via the food-chain and direct contact has been described [24]. However, the prophylactic use of antimicrobials was justified by a study which demonstrated that the withdrawal of animal growth-promoting antimicrobials from feeds was associated with elevated prevalence of diarrhea, weight loss and increased fatality rate of post-weaning pigs mainly due to E. coli infections [25]. In this study, all VTEC isolated were multidrug-resistant, in which high resistance rates were observed for Amp, Aml, Cip, Enr, Tet, Sxt, Chl and Nal (Figure 1). This is similar to recent reports from Thailand and Korea [15, 26]. This suggests that the swine farms in those countries may have used the similar antimicrobials for prophylactics as the swine farms in Malaysia.

PFGE, which is known for its discriminatory power as a molecular typing tool in epidemiologic studies revealed that 5 out of the 7 VTEC isolates shared an indistinguishable pulsotype, which was further supported by REP-PCR. In addition, these 5 VTEC isolates also shared identical seropathotypes, i.e., O139:H1 VT2e/ α-hly/ F18 and antimicrobial resistance profiles (Figure 1). All five isolates were obtained from different pigs raised in the same pen, strongly suggesting that the transmission of the E. coli clone among the animals have occurred, and this transmission may occur via direct contact (such as nose-to-nose), contaminated aerosols [27] or other mechanisms.

Conclusions

In conclusion, VTEC was the only pathogenic E. coli identified among the pigs sampled in this study. A clone with serotype O139:H1 that is commonly associated with diseased pigs worldwide was found in Malaysia. Two infrequently encountered VTEC serotypes, O130:H26 and O168:H21 carrying virulence factors were also identified. The VTEC isolates were all multidrug resistant and a majority possessed the fimbrial adhesins, F18 and hemolysins which may serve as additional virulence factors. More samples should be characterized in any future study to determine the true prevalence of different pathogenic E. coli obtained from Malaysian swine populations.

Methods

Sampling sites and isolation of bacterial isolates

Random selection of participating swine farms was not possible in this routine observational study as selection was subjected to management and practices of the commercial swine farms. A total of six swine farms located in two states in the north-western part of Peninsular Malaysia, i.e., Perak (farms D, E, F) and Penang (farms G, H, I) were enrolled in this study during year 2010 to 2011. Penang and Perak are the top two largest and important swine producing states in Malaysia and these farms are located in-land as well as by the coastal areas. We performed a stratified random sampling on two age categories of pigs (weaner, 1–2 months and grower, 2–4 months). Three types of swabs were sampled from each pig (nasal, tongue and rectal swabs) and maintained in Cary-Blair transport medium (Oxoid, UK) in ice box before being processed in laboratory. Presumptive E. coli were determined by direct streaking on Chromagar E. coli selective medium, CHROMagar™ ECC (CHROMagar™, Paris, France) which give the characteristic blue-colored morphology (according to manufacturer). One to 3 presumptive E. coli colonies on CHROMagar™ ECC were picked for further confirmation. Data of each pig included herd, age group, gender and clinical conditions (unhealthy/healthy) was recorded as observed by farmers and examined by a veterinarian. Pigs were termed unhealthy based on the common visible gastrointestinal clinical symptoms such as lethargy (standing with heads down), fever (>39.5°C), diarrhea, rectal prolapse, blood from rectum and dehydration. Healthy pigs are pigs without any of the above-mentioned gastrointestinal clinical symptoms. Disabled pigs (eg: with conjunctivitis, crippled) were categorized as healthy pigs. All the samples were collected with supervision from institution veterinarian. The sampling complied with the current guidelines for the care and use of animals and was approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee (ACUC), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universiti Putra Malaysia.

PCR detection of housekeeping genes, virulence genes and adhesion genes of E. coliisolates

Boiled suspensions of presumptive E. coli cells were used as DNA template. All presumptive E. coli isolates (based on color morphology on CHROMagar™ ECC) were subjected to PCR confirmation targeting the housekeeping gene, phoA that is specific for E. coli[11]. For E. coli isolates that were positive for the phoA gene, another multiplex PCR to identify the virulence genes was performed. The virulence genes screened included the verotoxin (VT), heat-labile toxin 1 (LT1), heat-labile toxin 2 (LT2), heat stable toxin (ST) and attachment and effacement (eaeA) which are associated with the pathotypes VTEC, ETEC, EPEC and EHEC [11]. Three positive control strains (E. coli O157, SA53 and ATCC35401) were included in this study [11]. Any VT-positive E. coli isolates termed VTEC were further subtyped to VT1 or VT2 by using primers that were previously described [28] and subsequent DNA sequencing of the VT gene amplicon. PCR detection of the fimbrial colonization antigens (F4, F5, F6, F17, F18 and F41) was carried out on all VT-positive E. coli isolates as previously described [9, 29, 30].

Serotyping

Both conventional and molecular serotyping were carried out for the VTEC isolates. Conventional serotyping using antisera was performed at Ipoh Public Health Laboratory (reference laboratory for E. coli serotyping in Malaysia) while molecular serotyping of O-serogroups and H-serogroups were determined by PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) of the amplified O-antigen gene cluster (rfb – RFLP) [31] and flagellin-encoding (fliC) gene (fliC - RFLP) [12, 32], respectively. Restriction digestion of the O-antigen and H-antigen amplicons was then performed using RsaI (Promega, Madison, WI) (for H-antigen) and MboII (Promega, Madison, WI) (for O-antigen). The resultant RFLPs were then compared with the banding patterns described previously [31, 32]. The H-antigen was further confirmed by performing DNA sequencing of the amplified fliC gene at a commercial facility (First BASE Laboratories).

Genotyping by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and repetitive extragenic palindrome (REP)-PCR

Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) for XbaI-digested genomic DNA of VTEC was performed in a CHEF Mapper (Bio- Rad, Hercules, CA) according to Thong et al. [33] using pulse times of 6.76 to 35.38 sec. XbaI-digested Salmonella enterica serovar Braenderup H9812 was used as the DNA size marker. PFGE was repeated twice to determine reproducibility. For untypeable isolates, 50 μM thiourea (Sigma Aldrich, USA) was added to the 0.5 × TBE buffer prior to PFGE run as described by Römling and Tümmler [34].

A dendrogram based on the pulsotypes was constructed with BioNumerics 6.0 (Applied Maths, Kortrijk, Belgium) using the Dice coefficient and unweighted pair group method using arithmetic averages (UPGMA) at 1.0% tolerance level. REP-PCR was carried out using REP oligonucleotides (Operon Biotechnologies GmBH, Germany) as previously reported [35].

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing and phenotypic detection of ESBL for VTEC

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of the VTEC isolates was performed using the disk diffusion method following the procedures described by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines [36] on Mueller-Hinton II agar (BD) with commercial disks (Oxoid Ltd.). The antimicrobial agents used were: amikacin (Amk, 30 μg), amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (Amc, 20/10 μg), ampicillin (Amp, 10 μg), aztreonam (Atm, 30 μg), ceftriaxone (Cro, 30 μg), cefoperazone (Cfp, 30 μg), cefotaxime (Ctx, 30 μg), cefepime (Fep, 30 μg), ceftazidime (Caz, 30 μg), chloramphenicol (Chl, 30 μg), ciprofloxacin (Cip 5 μg), imipenem (Ipm, 10 μg), kanamycin (Kan, 30 μg), meropenem (Mem, 10 μg), nalidixic acid (Nal, 30 μg), tetracycline (Tet, 30 μg) and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (Sxt, 30 μg). Four other commonly used antimicrobials in swine farming were also included: amoxicillin (Aml, 25 μg), colistin sulphate (Css, 10 μg ), enrofloxacin (Enr, 5 μg) and spectinomycin (Spt, 100 μg).

All VTEC isolates were also screened for ESBL-production using the modified double-disk synergy test (DDST) [37] and two E-test ESBL strips (CTX/CTX + clavulanic acid and CAZ/CAZ + clavulanic acid) (AB Biodisk). E. coli ATCC 25922 and ATCC 35218 were used as control strains in the ESBL phenotypic detection test.

Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of hemolysins

Hemolytic activity of the VTEC isolates was determined by plating the cultures on trypticase soy agar (TSA) (Oxoid Ltd., Hampshire, England) supplemented with 5% defribinated sheep blood (Oxoid Ltd., Hampshire, England) where the blood was washed three times with saline. The inoculated plates were incubated for 4–6 hours (for the phenotypic detection of α-hemolysin) and 18–24 hours (for the phenotypic detection of enterohemolysin) at 37°C [38, 39]. PCR detection of two hemolysin determinants [α-hly (codes for α-hemolysins) and E-hly (codes for enterohemolysin)] was also carried out as described [38, 39].

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank University of Malaya for financial support and facilities. This study was supported by the Postgraduate Research Fund (PS318/2010B) and University of Malaya High Impact Research Grant-Molecular Genetics (reference UM.C/625/1HIR/MOHE/-02 [A000002-5000]). Wing Sze Ho is supported by a fellowship from University of Malaya. Our thanks to Dr DebRoy C. from Penn State University for helpful discussions and suggestions regarding H serotyping.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Institute of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Malaya
(2)
Laboratory of Biomedical Science and Molecular Microbiology UMBIO Research Cluster, University of Malaya
(3)
Department of Clinical Veterinary Studies, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University Putra Malaysia
(4)
Faculty of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin

References

  1. Flores A: New way to control E. coli in weaned pigs. Agric Res. 2004, 52: 9.Google Scholar
  2. Fairbrother JM, Nadeau E, Gyles CL: Escherichia coli in postweaning diarrhea in pigs: an update on bacterial types, pathogenesis, and prevention strategies. Anim Health Res Rev. 2005, 6: 17-39. 10.1079/AHR2005105.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Botteldoorn N, Heyndrickx M, Rijpens N, Herman L: Detection and characterization of verotoxigenic Escherichia coli by a VTEC/EHEC multiplex PCR in porcine faeces and pig carcass swabs. Res Microbiol. 2003, 154: 97-104. 10.1016/S0923-2508(03)00028-7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Kaper JB, Nataro JP, Mobley HL: Pathogenic Escherichia coli. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2004, 2: 123-140. 10.1038/nrmicro818.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Strockbine NA, Wells JG, Bopp CA, Barrett TJ: Overview of detection and subtyping methods. Escherichia coli O157:H7 and other Shiga toxin-producing E. coli strains. Edited by: Kaper JB, O’Brien AD. Washington, D.C: American Society for Microbiology; 1998:331-356.Google Scholar
  6. DesRosiers A, Fairbrother JM, Johnson RP, Desautels C, Letellier A, Quessy S: Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of Escherichia coli verotoxin-producing isolates from humans and pigs. J Food Prot. 2001, 64: 1904-1911.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. von Muffling T, Smaijlovic M, Nowak B, Sammet K, Bulte M, Klein G: Preliminary study of certain serotypes, genetic and antimicrobial resistance profiles of verotoxigenic Escherichia coli (VTEC) isolated in Bosnia and Germany from cattle or pigs and their products. Int J Food Microbiol. 2007, 117: 185-191. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2006.08.003.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Nagy B, Arp LH, Moon HW, Casey TA: Colonization of the small intestine of weaned pigs by enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli that lack known colonization factors. Vet Pathol. 1992, 29: 239-246. 10.1177/030098589202900308.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Vu Khac H, Holoda E, Pilipcinec E, Blanco M, Blanco JE, Mora A, Dahbi G, López C, González EA, Blanco J: Serotypes, virulence genes, and PFGE profiles of Escherichia coli isolated from pigs with postweaning diarrhoea in Slovakia. BMC Vet Res. 2006, 2: 10-10.1186/1746-6148-2-10.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Nagy B, Fekete PZ: Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) in farm animals. Vet Res. 1999, 30: 259-284.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Yu KX, Thong KL: Multiplex PCR for simultaneous detection of virulence genes in Escherichia coli. Mal J Science. 2009, 28: 1-14.Google Scholar
  12. Fields PI, Blom KH, Hughes JH, Helsel LO, Feng P, Swaminathan B: Molecular characterisation of the gene encoding H-antigen in Escherichia coli and development of PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism test for identification of E. coli O157:H7 and O157:NM. J Clin Microbiol. 1997, 35: 1066-1070.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Nataro JP, Kaper JB: Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1998, 11: 142-201.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Reid SD, Selander R, Whittam TS: Sequence diversity of flagellin (FliC) alleles in pathogenic Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1999, 181: 153-160.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Prapasarakul N, Tummaruk P, Niyomtum W, Tripipati T, Serichantalergs O: Virulence genes and antimicrobial susceptibilities of hemolytic and nonhemolytic Escherichia coli isolated from post-weaning piglets in central Thailand. J Vet Med Sci. 2010, 72: 1603-1608. 10.1292/jvms.10-0124.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Zhang W, Zhao M, Ruesch L, Omot A, Francis D: Prevalence of virulence genes in Escherichia coli strains recently isolated from young pigs with diarrhea in the US. Vet Microbiol. 2007, 123: 145-152. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.02.018.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Oanh TK, Nguyen VK, Do TN, Goddeeris BM, De Greve H: Escherichia coli strains causing edema disease in northern Vietnam share an identical verotoxin 2e. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2010, 42: 1797-1804. 10.1007/s11250-010-9639-6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Dirkzwager A, Veldman B, Bikker P: A nutritional approach for the prevention of post weaning syndrome in piglets. Anim Res. 2005, 54: 231-236. 10.1051/animres:2005013.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Han W, Liu B, Cao B, Beutin L, Kruger U, Liu H, Li Y, Liu Y, Feng L, Wang L: DNA microarray-based identification of serogroups and virulence gene patterns of Escherichia coli isolates associated with porcine postweaning diarrhea and edema disease. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007, 73: 4082-4088. 10.1128/AEM.01820-06.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Beutin L, Kruger U, Krause G, Miko A, Martin A, Strauch E: Evaluation of major types of Shiga toxin 2e-producing Escherichia coli present in food, pigs, and the environment as potential pathogens for humans. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008, 74: 4806-4816. 10.1128/AEM.00623-08.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Müller D, Greune L, Heusipp G, Karch H, Fruth A, Tschäpe H, Schmidt MA: Identification of unconventional intestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli isolates expressing intermediate virulence factor profiles by using a novel single-step multiplex PCR. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007, 73: 3380-3390. 10.1128/AEM.02855-06.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Madoroba E, Van Driessche E, De Greve H, Mast J, Ncube I, Read J, Beeckmans S: Prevalence of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli virulence genes from scouring piglets in Zimbabwe. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2009, 41: 1539-1547. 10.1007/s11250-009-9345-4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Burgos Y, Beutin L: Common origin of plasmid encoded alpha-haemolysin genes in Escherichia coli. BMC Microbiol. 2010, 10: 193-10.1186/1471-2180-10-193.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. CIWF (Compassion in World Farming): Antibiotics in animal farming: Public health and animal welfare. 2011, Available at http://www.ciwf.org.uk/includes/documents/cm_docs/2011/a/antibiotics_in_animal_farming.pdf. Accessed on October 29, 2012Google Scholar
  25. Docic M, Bilkei G: Differences in antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli, isolated from East-European swine herds with or without prophylactic use of antibiotics. J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health. 2003, 50: 27-30. 10.1046/j.1439-0450.2003.00609.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Lee SI, Rayamahji N, Lee WJ, Cha SB, Shin MK, Roh MY, Sang HY: Genotypes, antibiogram, and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis profiles of Escherichia coli strains from piglets in Korea. J Vet Diagn Invest. 2009, 21: 510-516. 10.1177/104063870902100413.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Cornick NA, Vu Khac H: Indirect transmission of Escherichia coli O157:H7 occurs readily among swine but not among sheep. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008, 74: 2488-2491. 10.1128/AEM.02897-07.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Olsvik O, Strockbine NA: PCR detection of heat-stable, heat-labile and Shiga-like toxin genes in Escherichia coli. Diagnostic molecular microbiology. Edited by: Persing DH, Smith TF, Tenover FC, White TJ. 1993, Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology, 271-276.Google Scholar
  29. Imberechts H, Van Pelt N, De Greve H, Lintermans P: Sequences related to the major subunit gene fedA of F107 fimbriae in porcine Escherichia coli strains that express adhesive fimbriae. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1994, 119: 309-314. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1994.tb06906.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Ojeniyi B, Ahrens P, Meyling A: Detection of fimbrial and toxin genes in Escherichia coli and their prevalence in piglets with diarrhea. The application of colony hybridization assay, polymerase chain reaction and phenotypic assays. J Vet Med B. 1994, 41: 49-59. 10.1111/j.1439-0450.1994.tb00205.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Coimbra RS, Grimont F, Lenormand P, Burguiere P, Beutin L, Grimont PAD: Identification of Escherichia coli O-serogroups by restriction of the amplified O-antigen gene cluster (rfb-RFLP). Res Microbiol. 2000, 151: 639-654. 10.1016/S0923-2508(00)00134-0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Prager R, Strutz U, Fruth A, Tschäpe H: Subtyping of pathogenic Escherichia coli strains using flagellar (H)-antigens: serotyping versus fliC polymorphisms. Int J Med Microbiol. 2003, 29: 477-486.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Thong KL, Lai KS, Puthucheary SD, Koh YT, Ahmad Yassin RM: Subtyping of Salmonella enterica serovar Muenchen by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, plasmid profiling and antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Mal J Science. 2007, 26: 1-13.Google Scholar
  34. Römling U, Tümmler B: Achieving 100% typeability of Pseudomonas aeruginosa by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. J Clin Microbiol. 2000, 38: 464-465.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Lim KT, Yasin R, Yeo CC, Putucheary SD, Thong KL: Characterization of multidrug resistant ESBL- producing Escherichia coli isolates from hospitals in Malaysia. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2009, 2009: 165637-10.1155/2009/165637PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; 20th informational supplement (M100-S20).Wayne PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2010.Google Scholar
  37. Jarlier V, Nicolas MH, Fournier G, Philippon A: Extended broad-spectrum beta-lactamases conferring transferable resistance to newer beta-lactam agents in Enterobacteriaceae: hospital prevalence and susceptibility patterns. Rev Infect Dis. 1988, 10: 867-878. 10.1093/clinids/10.4.867.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Beutin L, Krause G, Zimmermann S, Kaulfuss S, Gleier K: Characterization of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli strains isolated from human patients in Germany over a 3-year period. J Clin Microbiol. 2004, 42: 1099-1108. 10.1128/JCM.42.3.1099-1108.2004.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Schmidt H, Beutin L, Karch H: Molecular analysis of the plasmid-encoded hemolysin of Escherichia coli O157:H7 strain EDL 933. Infect Immun. 1995, 6: 1055-1061.Google Scholar

Copyright

© Ho et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement