- Research article
- Open Access
Low MRSA prevalence in horses at farm level
BMC Veterinary Researchvolume 8, Article number: 213 (2012)
In Europe, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) belonging to the clonal complex (CC) 398 has become an important pathogen in horses, circulating in equine clinics and causing both colonization and infection. Whether equine MRSA is bound to hospitals or can also circulate in the general horse population is currently unknown. This study, therefore, reports the nasal and perianal MRSA screening of 189 horses on 10 farms in a suspected high prevalence region (East- and West-Flanders, Belgium).
Only one horse (0.53%) from one farm (10%) tested positive in the nose. It carried a spa type t011-SCCmecV isolate, resistant to β-lactams and tetracycline, which is typical for livestock-associated MRSA CC398.
In the region tested here, horses on horse farms seem unlikely to substantially contribute to the large animal associated ST398 MRSA reservoir present at intensive animal production units.
Since its first discovery in horses in 1989 , methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has clearly emerged as an important pathogen in equine clinics, causing both carriage (colonization) and infections in patients and personnel [1–8]. Whether MRSA is also circulating in the equine population outside clinics, as in humans and livestock [9, 10], is however much less known. Such carriage in the general population could be very important since colonized horses are at an increased risk of developing infections themselves and may spread the pathogen to other horses, animal species and their human caretakers [3, 6, 11]. Current literature on the presence and extent of an equine MRSA reservoir at farm level is rather limited and demonstrates regional differences in carriage rates (0-4.7%) and strain types [12–16], a phenomenon typical for MRSA carriage [17–19]. On the European mainland, the colonization status of healthy horses outside clinics is largely unknown, with only two studies reporting on seemingly negative populations [13, 14].
At the beginning of the 2000s, MRSA belonging to the clonal complex (CC) 398 was isolated from pigs and pig farmers in the Netherlands . These so called livestock-associated-MRSA (LA-MRSA) strains are highly prevalent in pigs in European countries . Although pigs act as the main reservoir, LA-MRSA CC398 has also been shown to be present in other food producing animals, including poultry [21, 22] and cattle , and it has occasionally been detected in companion animals . In horses, LA-MRSA CC398 is currently regularly being detected in European equine clinics with up to 55% of hospitalized animals testing positive [5–9, 25, 26].
In a previous study, 10.9% of the horses arriving at an equine clinic in Flanders, Belgium, carried LA-MRSA CC398 in their nose . Although it has been suggested that these horses might be representatives of the general population [6, 7], it cannot be excluded that patients arriving at a clinic represent a biased subpopulation. It was therefore the aim of the present study to assess if LA-MRSA CC398 is really endemically present in the general horse population, by screening horses on horse farms for the occurrence of MRSA.
The screened horses were between 3 and 26 years of age (mean age 8.3 years with standard error of this mean of 0.4 years) with 73 (38.6%) of them being male [19 (10.1%) stallions, 54 (28.6%) geldings] and 116 (61.4%) being female. The sampling population existed of 120 (63.5%) warmbloods, 21 (11.1%) standardbreds, 22 (11.6%) draft horses (Brabant, Haflinger, Fjord), 9 (4.8%) thoroughbreds (Arabian, Anglo-Arabian) and 14 (7.4%) others (other breeds and crossbreds).
In total, 373 samples (188 nasal swabs + 185 perianal swabs) from horses were gathered. From one horse no nasal swab and from four other horses, no perianal swab could be taken due to signs of resistance in the animals.
From one nasal swab, a MRSA isolate was obtained with a spa type t011 strain carrying a SCCmecV cassette. MRSA was not isolated from any of the other samples. Phenotypically, the obtained MRSA isolate showed acquired resistance to oxacillin and tetracycline.
The animal from which the MRSA isolate was obtained was a warmblood, breeding mare, housed at a breeding facility with about 70 horses.
In the present study, only 1 out of 189 horses from 10 different farms carried a typical representative of the LA-MRSA CC398 clone. The farms were all situated in a region surrounding an equine clinic where shortly before, high carriage rates had been detected in arriving patients . The fact that such a low presence of MRSA on farms was found in this study is rather surprising, and in contrast with the earlier described high carriage rate in horses arriving at the clinic. Possible factors responsible for the higher carriership in equine patients admitted to a clinic may be previous antimicrobial administration, stress due to transportation, transport in contaminated vehicles and direct contact with referring veterinarians who might carry MRSA. Large animal veterinarians are indeed considered to be at high risk of carrying the strains circulating in their main contact species [27–30].
The finding that only one horse was found to be MRSA positive was all the more unexpected since the samples were collected on rather large (n > 20) horse farms, which are more likely to harbor MRSA carriers  and the study was performed in a region where the LA-MRSA CC398 clone is highly prevalent in pigs, with high carriage rates detected at human, individual pig and farm level [31, 32]. Although contact of the horses in the current study with pigs was not assessed as such, it would not have been impossible for pig to horse transmission of CC398 to occur, especially given the long term environmental survival, potential airborne transmission of MRSA and the possibility of large animal veterinarians circulating between pig and horse farms [33–36]. In the current study, the only positive horse was a breeding mare housed on a breeding facility with consequent regular veterinary contact and a high number of horses present in the facility.
The low MRSA presence in the general horse population found here is in accordance with recent findings in the Netherlands where the detection of high CC398 prevalences in livestock (pig, veal calves, poultry), equine clinics and veterinarians [7, 37–40] also stands opposite to a study detecting no MRSA in the general horse population . Both Dutch and Belgian data thus seem to classify equine CC398 carriage as a primarily veterinary-care associated problem with high detection rates only being found in horses arriving and residing at veterinary clinics. This difference in MRSA prevalence found between horse farms and intensive food production animal facilities seems unlikely to be due to differences in host adaptation given the substantial MRSA carriage found in equine clinics [7, 26]. It could, however, be due to differences in husbandry between the examined horse farms and intensive animal husbandry in the same region. For instance, the animal density on horse farms is much lower and group medication (antimicrobials) is virtually non-existing. In fact, the conditions encountered in equine clinics concur much more with those in intensive animal production and may thus, partially, explain the high MRSA prevalence encountered in equine clinics. Common factors in the housing and husbandry of high prevalence sectors in the animal industry should probably be the first to scrutinize when examining potential risk factors for animal LA-MRSA carriage. In addition to the nature of equine husbandry, a second factor may counteract the spread of LA-MRSA in the general horse population. Indeed, horses appear to be mainly transient carriers eliminating MRSA quickly (< 3 weeks) when removed from potential contamination sources . If contaminated at clinic, they may thus quickly eliminate the bacterium when at home.
In conclusion, our results indicate that the prevalence of equine LA-MRSA is low on horse farms. Continued monitoring is, however, advisable to avoid missing the potential future emergence of MRSA in the general, healthy horse population.
Study population and sample collection
The study was conducted in accordance with the Belgian Law of 14 August 1986 and the European Directive 86/609/EEC.
A total of 189 horses from 10 farms (15 to 21 animals per farm) housing at least 20 horses and/or ponies, were screened between January and March 2008. The farms were all situated in the provinces of East- and West-Flanders (Belgium), in a region surrounding an equine clinic where five to nine months before, high carriage rates (10.9%) had been detected in arriving patients. Animals were chosen according to availability for immediate sampling and owner compliance.
All animals were swabbed both in the nose and at the perianal region using cotton-tipped swabs embedded in solid Stuart’s medium (UNI-TER AMIES CLR, Piove di Sacco, Italy), as previously described [2, 3, 6, 26]. Samples were held at 4°C for a maximum of 24 hours before transfer to the lab.
MRSA isolation, typing and antimicrobial susceptibility testing
Samples were cultured according to Van den Eede et al.  using a 0.001% colistin and nalidixic acid containing enrichment broth and chromogenic MRSA screening agar (ChromIDTM MRSA, bioMérieux, Lyon, France) with isolation and further phenotypic identification (colony morphology, haemolytic capacity, DNAse and catalase activity and growth on a modified Baird-parker agar). A previously developed duplex PCR , using the primers described by Mehrotra et al.  was used to confirm femA (S. aureus specific) and mecA (methicillin resistance) gene presence in MRSA suspected isolates. Positive isolates were further characterized by spa typing  and SCCmec typing [44, 45].
Antimicrobial susceptibility to tetracycline, enrofloxacin, erythromycin, tylosin, clindamycin, lincomycin, sulfonamide, trimethoprim, gentamicin and neomycin of MRSA isolates was determined using the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method, with Neo-SensitabsTM (Rosco Diagnostica A/S, Taastrup, Denmark) on Iso-Sensitest agars (Oxoid, Wesel, Germany), incubated at 35°C. Inoculum standardization, medium and incubation conditions as well as interpretation of inhibition zones were performed according to the tablet manufacturer’s guidelines (Guidelines for the use of NeosensitabsTM, 18th ed., 2005/2006, http://www.rosco.dk). Oxacillin resistance was similarly tested but with incubation at 30°C for 48 hrs.
Freddy Haesebrouck and Katleen Hermans, Department of Pathology, Bacteriology and Avian Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, 9820 Merelbeke, Belgium.
Freddy Haesebrouck and Katleen Hermans shared senior authorship.
Livestock-Associated Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
Anzai T, Kamada M, Kanemaru T, Sugita S, Shimizu A, Higuchi T: Isolation of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) from mares with metritis and its zooepidemiology. J Equine Sci. 1996, 7: 7-11. 10.1294/jes.7.7.
Weese JS, Archambault M, Willey BM, Hearn P, Kreiswirth BN, Said-Salim B, McGeer A, Likhoshvay Y, Prescott JF, Low DE: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in horses and horse personnel, 2000-2002. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005, 11: 430-435. 10.3201/eid1103.040481.
Weese JS, Rousseau J, Willey BM, Archambault M, McGeer A, Low DE: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in horses at a veterinary teaching hospital: frequency, characterization, and association with clinical disease. J Vet Intern Med. 2006, 20: 182-186.
Weese JS, Caldwell F, Willey BM, Kreiswirth BN, McGeer A, Rousseau J, Low DE: An outbreak of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus skin infections resulting from horse to human transmission in a veterinary hospital. Vet Microbiol. 2006, 114: 160-164. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2005.11.054.
Hermans K, Lipinska U, Denis O, Deplano A, Struelens MJ, Nemati M, Pasmans F, Butaye P, Martens A, Deprez P, Haesebrouck F: MRSA clone ST398-SCCmec IV as a cause of infections in an equine clinic. Vlaams Diergen Tijds. 2008, 77: 429-433.
Van den Eede A, Martens A, Lipinska U, Struelens M, Deplano A, Denis O, Haesebrouck F, Gasthuys F, Hermans K: High occurrence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398 in equine nasal samples. Vet Microbiol. 2009, 133: 138-144. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2008.06.021.
van Duijkeren E, Moleman M, van Oldruitenborgh-Oosterbaan MMS, Multem J, Troelstra A, Fluit AC, van Wamel WJB, Houwers DJ, de Neeling AJ, Wagenaar JA: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in horses and horse personnel: An investigation of several outbreaks. Vet Microbiol. 2010, 141: 96-102. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.08.009.
Sieber S, Gerber V, Jandova V, Rossano A, Evison JM, Perreten V: Evolution of multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in horses and colonized personnel in an equine clinic between 2005 and 2010. Microb Drug Resist. 2011, 17: 471-478. 10.1089/mdr.2010.0188.
Catry B, van Duijkeren E, Pomba MC, Greko C, Moreno MA, Pyörälä S, Ruzauskas M, Sanders P, Threlfall EJ, Ungemach F, Torneke K, Munoz-Madero C, Torren-Edo J: Reflection paper on MRSA in food-producing and companion animals: epidemiology and control options for human and animal health. Epidemiol Infect. 2010, 138: 626-644. 10.1017/S0950268810000014.
Weese JS: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in animals. Inst Lab Anim Res J. 2010, 51 (3): 233-244.
Weese JS, van Duijkeren E: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus pseudintermedius in veterinary medicine. Vet Microbiol. 2010, 140 (3–4): 418-429.
Weese JS, Rousseau J, Traub-Dargatz JL, Willey BM, McGeer AJ, Low DE: Community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in horses and humans who work with horses. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2005, 226: 580-583. 10.2460/javma.2005.226.580.
Busscher JF, van Duijkeren E, van Oldruitenborgh-Oosterbaan MMS: The prevalence of methicillin-resistant staphylococci in healthy horses in the Netherlands. Vet Microbiol. 2006, 113: 131-136. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2005.10.028.
Vengust M, Anderson ME, Rousseau J, Weese JS: Methicillin-resistant staphylococcal colonization in clinically normal dogs and horses in the community. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2006, 43: 602-606. 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2006.02018.x.
Burton S, Reid-Smith R, McClure JT, Weese JS: Staphylococcus aureus colonization in healthy horses in Atlantic Canada. Can Vet J. 2008, 49: 797-799.
Maddox TW, Clegg PD, Diggle PJ, Wedley AL, Dawson S, Pinchbeck GL, Williams NJ: Cross-sectional study of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria in horses. Part 1: Prevalence of antimicrobial-resistant Escherichia coli and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Equine Vet J. 2011, 44: 289-296.
Nakamura MM, Rohling KJ, Shashaty M, Hongzhou L, Tang YW, Edwards KM: Prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage in the community pediatric population. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2002, 21: 917-921. 10.1097/00006454-200210000-00006.
Cuny C, Friedrich A, Kozytska S, Layer F, Nubel U, Ohlsen K, Strommenger B, Walther B, Wieler L, Witte W: Emergence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in different animal species. Int J Med Microbiol. 2010, 300: 109-117. 10.1016/j.ijmm.2009.11.002.
Johnson AP: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: the European landscape. J Antimicrob Chemoth. 2011, 66 (Suppl 4): iv43-iv48.
Voss A, Loeffen F, Bakker J, Klaassen C, Wulf M: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in pig farming. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005, 11: 1965-1966. 10.3201/eid1112.050428.
Nemati M, Hermans K, Lipinska U, Denis O, Deplano A, Struelens M, Devriese LA, Pasmans F, Haesebrouck F: Antimicrobial resistance of old en recent Staphylococcus aureus isolates from poultry: first detection of livestock-associated methicillin-resistant strain ST398. Antimicrob Agents Ch. 2008, 52: 3817-3819. 10.1128/AAC.00613-08.
Persoons D, Van Hoorebeke S, Hermans K, Butaye P, de Kruif A, Haesebrouck F, Dewulf J: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in poultry. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009, 15: 452-453. 10.3201/eid1503.080696.
Vanderhaeghen W, Cerpentier T, Adriaensen C, Vicca J, Hermans K, Butaye P: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) ST398 associated with clinical and subclinical mastitis in Belgian cows. Vet Microbiol. 2010, 144: 166-171. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.12.044.
Floras A, Lawn K, Slavic D, Golding GR, Mulvey MR, Weese JS: Sequence type 398 meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection and colonisation in dogs. Vet Rec. 2010, 166: 826-827. 10.1136/vr.b4870.
Cuny C, Strommenger B, Witte W, Stanek C: Clusters of infections in horses with MRSA ST1, ST254, and ST398 in a veterinary hospital. Microb Drug Resist. 2008, 14: 307-310. 10.1089/mdr.2008.0845.
Van den Eede A, Hermans K, Van den Abeele A, Floré K, Dewulf J, Vanderhaeghen W, Crombé F, Butaye P, Gasthuys F, Haesebrouck F, Martens A: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) on the skin of long-term hospitalised horses. Vet J. in press.
Hanselman BA, Kruth SA, Rousseau J, Low DE, Willey BM, McGeer A, Weese JS: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization in veterinary personnel. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006, 12: 1933-1938. 10.3201/eid1212.060231.
Anderson ME, Lefebvre SL, Weese JS: Evaluation of prevalence and risk factors for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization in veterinary personnel attending an international equine veterinary conference. Vet Microbiol. 2008, 129: 410-417. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.11.031.
Moodley A, Nightingale EC, Stegger M, Nielsen SS, Skov RL, Guardabassi L: High risk for nasal carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among danish veterinary practitioners. Scand J Work Env Hea. 2008, 34: 151-157. 10.5271/sjweh.1219.
Wulf MWH, Sorum M, van Nes A, Skov R, Melchers WJG, Klaassen CHW, Voss A: Prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among veterinarians: an international study. Clin Microbiol Infec. 2008, 14: 29-34. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2007.01873.x.
Denis O, Suetens C, Hallin M, Catry B, Ramboer I, Dispas M, Willems G, Gordts B, Butaye P, Struelens MJ: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398 in swine farm personnel, Belgium. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009, 15: 1098-1101. 10.3201/eid1507.080652.
Crombé F, Willems G, Dispas M, Hallin M, Denis O, Suetens K, Gordts B, Struelens M, Butaye P: Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among pigs in Belgium. Microb Drug Resist. 2011, 18: 125-131.
Kramer A, Schwebke I, Kampf G: How long do nosocomial pathogens persist on inanimate surfaces? A systematic review. BMC Infect Dis. 2006, 6: 130-10.1186/1471-2334-6-130.
Dewaele I, De Man I, Stael A, Heyndrickx M, Herman L, Rasschaert G, Delputte P, Butaye P, Vlaemynck G: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) on pig farms: analysis of pigs, pig farmers and farm environment. 2007, 36: Proceedings 2nd Symposium ARAE 2007. 17-19 December, Tours-France, Abstract 36.
Anonymous: Scientific opinion of the panel on biological hazards on a request from the European commission on assessment of the public health significance of meticillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in animals and foods. The EFSA Journal. 2009, 7: 1-73.
Garcia-Graells C, Antoine J, Larsen J, Catry B, Skov R, Denis O: Livestock veterinarians at high risk of acquiring methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398. Epidemiol Infect. 2012, 140: 383-389. 10.1017/S0950268811002263.
de Neeling AJ, van den Broek MJM, Spalburg EC, van Santen-Verheuvel MG, Dam-Deisz WDC, Boshuizen HC, van de Giessen AW, van Duijkeren E, Huijsdens XW: High prevalence of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus in pigs. Vet Microbiol. 2007, 122: 366-372. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.01.027.
van Duijkeren E, Ikawaty R, Broekhuizen-Stins MJ, Jansen MD, Spalburg EC, de Neeling AJ, Allaart JG, van Nes A, Wagenaar JA, Fluit AC: Transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains between different kinds of pig farms. Vet Microbiol. 2008, 126: 383-389. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.07.021.
Mulders MN, Haenen APJ, Geenen PL, Vesseur PC, Poldervaart ES, Bosch T, Huijsdens XW, Hengeveld PD, Dam-Deisz WDC, Graat EAM, Mevius D, Voss A, Van De Giessen AW: Prevalence of livestock-associated MRSA in broiler flocks and risk factors for slaughterhouse personnel in The Netherlands. Epidemiol Infect. 2010, 138: 743-755. 10.1017/S0950268810000075.
Graveland H, Wagenaar JA, Heesterbeek H, Mevius D, van Duijkeren E, Heederik D: Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398 in veal calf farming: human MRSA carriage related with animal antimicrobial usage and farm hygiene. PLoS One. 2010, 5: e10990-10.1371/journal.pone.0010990.
Weese JS, Rousseau J: Attempted eradication of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonisation in horses on two farms. Equine Vet J. 2005, 37: 510-514.
Mehrotra M, Wang G, Johnson WM: Multiplex PCR for detection of genes for Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxins, exfoliative toxins, toxic shock syndrome toxin 1 and methicillin resistance. J Clin Microbiol. 2000, 38: 1032-1035.
Harmsen D, Claus H, Witte W, Rothganger J, Claus H, Turnwald D, Vogel U: Typing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a university hospital setting by using novel software for spa repeat determination and database management. J Clin Microbiol. 2003, 41: 5442-5448. 10.1128/JCM.41.12.5442-5448.2003.
Oliveira DC, de Lencastre H: Multiplex PCR strategy for rapid identification of structural types and variants of the mec element in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Ch. 2002, 46: 2155-2161. 10.1128/AAC.46.7.2155-2161.2002.
Zhang KY, McClure JA, Elsayed S, Louie T, Conly JM: Novel multiplex PCR assay for characterization and concomitant subtyping of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec types I to V in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol. 2005, 43: 5026-5033. 10.1128/JCM.43.10.5026-5033.2005.
The authors state that there is no conflict of interest with regard to this study.
AV was the PhD student who conducted the study, together with IF. KH and AM designed the study and were direct supervisors. UL and WV performed molecular typing. FH, PB and FG contributed to interpretation of results and to the design of the final manuscript. The manuscript was prepared by AV and corrected by all other authors. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.