Skip to main content
Download PDF

Dietary lysozyme and avilamycin modulate gut health, immunity, and growth rate in broilers

BMC Veterinary Research volume 20, Article number: 28 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Attempts to use dietary lysozyme (LYZ) as an alternative to antibiotics in broilers have been successful, but further research is needed for effective use. Here, we compared the differences between LYZ and avilamycin (AVI) feed additives for growth performance, gut health and immunity of broilers. One-day old, one hundred and twenty broiler chicks (Ross 308) were randomly allocated into three groups consisting forty birds in each group. Standard diet without supplementation was applied as the control group (I), while the chicks of the other groups were supplemented with 100 mg of AVI per kg diet (AVI, group II), and 90 mg LYZ per kg diet (LYZ, group III) for five consecutive weeks.

Results

Body weight, feed conversion ratio, body weight gain, and European production efficiency factor were markedly (p < 0.05) increased in both AVI and LYZ groups in relation to CON group, but the feed intake and protein efficiency ratio were not affected. Both AVI and LYZ significantly (p < 0.001) upregulated the mRNA expression of ileal interleukin-18 (IL-18), interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), and interleukin-10 (IL-10), interleukin-2 (IL-2), and glutathione peroxidase (GSH-PX) genes compared to CON group. However, IL-2, IL-10, IL-18, and GSH-PX genes were markedly (p < 0.01) upregulated in LYZ compared to the AVI group. LYZ treated group had a significant increase (p < 0.05) in the serological haemagglutination inhibition titers of H5N1 vaccination and a significant decrease (p < 0.0001) in coliform counts compared to control and AVI groups, but all growth parameters were nearly similar between AVI and LYZ groups. The VH and VH/CD were markedly higher in LYZ than AVI and control groups.

Conclusion

Exogenous dietary lysozyme supplementation by a dose of 90 mg/kg broilers’ diet induced better effects on intestinal integrity, fecal bacterial counts, immune response, and growth performance which were comparable to avilamycin. Therefore, dietary lysozyme could safely replace avilamycin in the broiler chickens’ diet. However, further experimental studies regarding the use of lysozyme in commercial broilers, both in vitro and in vivo, targeting more communities of intestinal microbiome and explaining more details about its beneficial effects need to be conducted.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Intestinal integrity in broilers is known as maintaining intestinal health to fully utilize dietary nutrients and allow the expression of full genetic potential for growth. The improvement of this integrity is essential for protection against infectious and non-infectious agents, improve digestion and absorption of nutrients, efficient intestinal microbial balance, and secretion of endogenous materials. All of the previous research strongly suggested that the continuous evaluation of intestinal integrity should be an ongoing activity within a broiler production program. Several antibiotics used in human medicine such as avilamycin, monensin, salinomycin, flavophospholipol have been banned from being added to the animal feed as growth promoters by the USA and/or Europe since January 1st 2006 [1]. The One Health approach necessitates the importance of fighting against antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is one of the top 10 global public health threats facing humanity that was declared by the WHO in 2019. AMR is the silent pandemic or even the silent tsunami, a global threat to public, and animal health and the infections of bacterial origin are the second cause of death worldwide [2].

Thus, searching for antibiotic alternatives for poultry diets with similar One Health benefits is essential [3]. Several probiotics, prebiotics and phytobiotics [4,5,6], exogenous enzymes [7,8,9], and organic acids [10] represent promising alternatives to antibiotics. These alternatives have become a mandatory need as a part of the global fight against antibiotic resistance. Lysozyme (LYZ) is one of the most promising antibiotics alternatives. It is an enzyme derived from avian albumin, and is widely distributed in secretions and tissues of animals that plays a vital role against several bacteria that give a positive result in the Gram stain test via hydrolyzing their cell wall’s β-1,4-glycosidic linkage between N-acetyl glucosamine and N-acetyl muramic acid [11, 12]. Following the positive results of our previous study of sole LYZ with different concentrations [13] and others [14], we were motivated to compare the best obtained level of LYZ (90 mg/kg feed) with the most commonly used growth promoter antibiotic AVI (100 mg/kg) [15].

In this way, this novel study was aimed to compare between dietary LYZ and AVI on intestinal health, growth performance and viability in broilers’ production to substitute growth-promoting antibiotics. The outputs of the study can help in combating and limiting the spread of antibiotics resistance in humans to achieve a better way for One Health approach.

Materials and methods

Ethical approval

This work was ethically accepted by the Committee of Local Experimental Animal Care, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Damanhour University, Egypt (DMU/VetMed-2023/010).

Experimental design

One-day-old, Ross-308 broiler chicks (obtained from a commercial hatchery), with a total number of 120 were randomly allocated into three groups of mixed sex (40 birds/ group reared in 4 replicates of 10 birds per each). All the 3 chicken groups were caged on wire-floor of equal dimensions [110 (width), 90 (length), 50 (height) cm3]. The cage’s mesh was constructed of 7 mm diameter wire and contained 6.25 cm square orifices. Linear feeders were placed outside the cages and sufficient nipple drinkers were supplied. The observation period was 35 days. The incubation temperature was 33 °C and gradually lowered till 25 °C by the 3rd week of age and the duration of light exposure was a 23 h of light daily. The chicks of 3 groups, I (control) fed on a commercial basic diet; II (AVI) supplemented with commercial basic diet containing 100 mg of avilamycin/kg which is the maximum dose recommended by the producer company, Hangzhou Well Sunshine Biotech.Co. Ltd., China, and III (LYZ) had 90 mg of lysozyme 10%/kg diet (Nanchang Lifeng Industry and Trading Co., Ltd., Jiangxi, China) according to Abdel-Latif et al. [12], respectively for 35 days of rearing cycle during April (Spring), 2023. The used corn–soybean based diet were formulated according to the nutrient requirements for Ross-308 broiler chickens [16]. The nutritive analysis of the ingredients was done according to [17]. The calculated composition analysis of the used feed is shown in Table 1. Gradual and effective mixing of both feed supplements was confirmed.

Table 1 Ingredients’ percentage and calculated composition analysis of the experimental starter and grower diets (%, as-fed basis)
Full size table

Vaccination

All broilers groups were vaccinated using: (1) inactivated avian influenza subtype H5N1 (AI-H5N1) vaccine (MeFluvac®, MEVAC, Cairo, Egypt) by subcutaneous injection, and bivalent live Newcastle and infectious bronchitis vaccine (Nobilis® Clone 30 + Ma5, MSD, Boxmeer, the Netherlands) on 7 days old, (2) live Gumboro intermediate plus vaccine (Bursine Plus® vaccine, Zoetis Inc. New Jersey, USA) on 14 days old, and (3) live Newcastle vaccine (Nobilis® ND LaSota, MSD, Boxmeer, the Netherlands) on 18 days old. All live vaccines were applied through eye drops.

Broiler growth performance

Performance parameters including feed intake (FI), body weight (BW), feed conversion ratio (FCR); the ratio between average feed intake and body weight gain, body weight gain (BWG), and protein efficiency ratio (PER) were determined weekly by dividing the number of grams of weight gain produced by weight of dietary protein consumed. Also, mortality rate was recorded throughout the whole experiment. In addition, European production efficiency factor (EPEF) was determined at the end of the experiment using the following equation: [(viability % × body weight Kg / age (d) × FCR)] ×100 [18].

Haemagglutination inhibition (HI) test

To determine the antibody titers for AI-H5N1, we used standard H5N1 antigen. On the final day, 35, blood samples blood samples (n = 5 per group) were collected from the brachial vein of live chickens, centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 15 min (at 4 °C) to get clear sera for the HI test. The positive cut off of samples was the highest serum dilution that caused complete inhibition of 4 haemagglutination units (4 HAU) of the used antigen [19] .

RNA extraction and RT-PCR

In order to determine the intestinal mRNA genes expression, at the final, 35, day of age, 5 chickens per each group were necropsied after anesthesia through intravenous injection of sodium pentobarbital (50 mg/kg) and the remaining chickens of avilamycin treated group (n = 35) were humanly culled using the same method followed by cervical dislocation and hygienic burial. Approximately one cm samples from the ileum (5 cm after the yolk sac diverticulum) were obtained and cleaned with physiological saline (0.75% NaCl) then immersed immediately in the liquid nitrogen (at -80 oC) and stored for further analysis. The total RNA was extracted and purified from intestinal mucosal layer using QIAamp RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen, GmbH, Germany). The TaqMan RT-PCR was done for IFN-γ, IL-18, IL-2, and IL10 while QuantiTect SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Qiagen, GmbH, Germany) was used for the expression of GSHPX (20–24). The primers are listed in supplementary Tables S1 and S2 [20,21,22,23,24]. All values of different genes were normalized to the expression of housekeeping genes, 28 S rRNA and β-actin, using the geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes, fold change = 2−ΔΔCt as previously stated [25].

Total fecal bacterial count

Fecal samples (n = 5), from the same 5 birds in each group, were collected at days 21st and 35th, and subjected for total coliform, Clostridium perfringens and lactobacillus counts (log10 CFU/g). Counts were evaluated based on our previous study [13]. Briefly, ten-fold dilutions (10 − 1 to 10 − 7) of each sample were performed with buffered peptone water and directly inoculated on MacConkey’s agar for total coliform counting and incubated aerobically at 37 °C for 24 h. All red colonies within the range of 15–150 μm were selected for counting.

C. perfringens were sub-cultured on Perfringens agar base mixed with 400 mg of D-cycloserine per liter by the dilutions from 10 − 1 to 10 − 7 and incubated anaerobically at 37 °C, using gas generating kits (Oxoid) for 48 h. Plates with black colonies within the range of 25–250 μm were counted. The lactobacillus count was conducted using Rogosa agar plates and cultured by dilutions from 10 − 1 to 10 − 7, then incubated at 37 °C in 5% CO2. All whitish colonies that appeared after 48 h of incubation were counted.

Histology

Jejunal samples (about 3 cm; 1 cm before the midpoint) were collected for histological examination (n = 5) from the same 5 birds in each group, washed with saline and rapidly fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin for 24 h [26]. The fixed samples were paraffin embedded then stained with Hematoxylin and Eosin (H and E) as described by Bancroft and Layton [27]. Sectioning and slide preparation were done according to the protocol described by Saeed et al. [28]. Photos were examined under a light microscope (Leica DM500) at 4× magnification using a digital camera (Leica EC3, Leica, Germany). Measurements of the villi height (VH), villi width in the middle of the individual villus (VW), crypt depth (CD), and VH:CD ratio for each villus in the control and supplemented groups were made by using Image J software (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA) [29].

Molecular docking

Molecular docking of AVI against Gallus gallus interleukin 1 receptor accessory protein (IL1RAP; AlphaFold ID: A0A1D5P4S3), interleukin 1 receptor type 2 (IL1R2; AlphaFold ID: A0A1L1RVR1), interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase-like 2 (IRAK2; AlphaFold ID: F1N826), and interleukin-17 receptor D (IL17RD; AlphaFold ID: Q7T2L7) were performed after retrieval of the three dimensional protein structures from AlphaFold database (https://alphafold.ebi.ac.uk/). The protein structures were prepared with BIOVIA Discovery Studio (Vélizy-Villacoublay, France) by removal of water molecules and all ligands in addition to energy minimization and refinement processes. In addition, the 3 dimention structures of AVI were obtained from the PubChem database (https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). The scores of molecular docking and the interactions of AVI with prepared proteins were determined using Molecular Operating Environment (MOE) software (Montreal, QC, Canada).

Egg white LYZ (AlphaFold ID: Q6LEL2) were retived from AlphaFold database and prepared with BIOVIA Discovery Studio for molecular docking with Gallus gallus IL1RAP, IL1R2, IRAK2, and IL17RD using ClusPro serever (https://cluspro.bu.edu/home.php) for protein-protein docking. Finally, BIOVIA Discovery Studio Visualizer software did the visualization of target-ligands interaction.

Statistical analysis

All data were statistically analyzed using SPSS (IBM SPSS. 20®) utilizing the one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple range tests. The data of HI assay, RT-PCR, and total fecal bacterial counts were analyzed by One-way ANOVA, Tukey’s multiple range tests by Graphpad prism 5. The significance was estimated at p < 0.05.

Results

Broiler growth performance

No marked variations in the chicks’ live BW between different experimental groups were recorded during the first day of age (Table 2). The BW and BWG were markedly (p < 0.05) increased by 8, 8.6 and 8.2, 8.8% for AVI and LYZ supplemented groups, respectively, in comparison with control group. Additionally, the FCR and EPEF were markedly (p < 0.05) improved in AVI and LYZ groups compared to control group without marked difference between AVI and LYZ groups in all growth measurements. On the other hand, feed intake and PER were unaffected in all chicken groups throughout the whole experimental period, however, they were ameliorated in both supplemented groups in relation to control.

Table 2 Effects of avilamycin (AVI) and lysozyme (LYZ) feed supplements on growth performance and economic viability of broilers
Full size table

Haemagglutination inhibition (HI) test

Data illustrated in Fig. 1 reveals a significant increase (p < 0.05) in serum antibody titers for AI-H5N1 in LYZ-supplemented birds when compared with control and AVI groups, respectively on day 35.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Antibody titer of H5N1 (log 2) in all groups. Statistical analysis was done by One-way ANOVA, Tukey’s post hoc test multiple comparisons. ns = nonsignificant. *p < 0.05. Error bars represent SE.

Full size image

RNA extraction and RT-PCR

Results illustrated in Fig. 2 which represents the mRNA expression of intestinal interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), interleukin-18 (IL-18), interleukin-2 (IL-2), interleukin-10 (IL-10), and glutathione peroxidase (GSH-PX) genes. Both AVI and LYZ significantly (p < 0.0001) upregulated these genes in comparison with control group. In a comparison between AVI and LYZ groups IL-2, IL-10, IL-18, and GSH-Px genes were significantly (p < 0.01) upregulated in LYZ compared with AVI group.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) of differentially selected and expressed genes in all groups. Selected genes were IFN-γ = interferon-gamma; IL-2 = interleukin-2, IL-10 = interleukin-10, IL-18 = interleukin-18, and GSH-Px = glutathione peroxidase. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, and ****p < 0.0001. Statistical analysis was done by One-way ANOVA, Tukey’s post hoc test multiple comparisons. Error bars represent SE.

Full size image

Total fecal bacterial count

The total coliform count in LYZ supplemented group was lower (p < 0.0001) than control or AVI on both 21 and 35 days-old chicks. Regarding total clostridial count, LYZ and AVI supplemented groups had the minimum count (p < 0.0001) on 21st and 35th days of age compared to control; however, this count was significantly higher in LYZ in relation to AVI group. Also, LYZ led to the maximum lactobacillus count on 35th days of age (p < 0.0001) compared to AVI and control groups, while on 21st days old, LYZ increased the total lactobacillus count with slightly lower significance (p < 0.05) (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Total coliform (A, B), clostridial (C, D), and lactobacillus (E, F) counts in fecal samples. AVI, birds fed avilamycin (100 mg/kg). LYZ, birds fed lysozyme (90 mg/kg). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, and ****p < 0.0001. ns = nonsignificant. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc test for multiple comparisons

Full size image

Histology

Jejunal histology in response to AVI and LYZ dietary supplements was estimated by measuring villi height (VH), crypt depth (CD), and VH/CD (Tables 3and Fig. 4). The height of intestinal villi was markedly higher in LYZ than AVI and control groups. However, the crypt depth of LYZ was similar to that of other groups although it was markedly lower in AVI group than control. As a result, VH/CD was markedly elevated in LYZ and AVI groups respectively, compared with control group.

Table 3 Effects of dietary supplementation with avilamycin (AVI) and lysozyme (LYZ) on villi length and crypt depth in broiler chickens
Full size table
Fig. 4
figure 4

Histological examination of jejunum samples stained with H and E. (A) control, (B) AVI, and (C) LYZ. Arrows point to intestinal villi. Arrowheads point to intestinal crypts. Scale bar = 400 μm

Full size image

Molecular docking

AVI exhibited binding affinity to IL1RAP, IL1R2, IRAK2, and IL17RD with docking scores of -9.12, -7.32, -8.27, and − 9.19, respectively (Tables 4and Supplementary Fig. 1). AVI interacted with IL1RAP by eight hydrogen (HIS382, VAL383, TRP385, GLU387, ARG393, ARG466, LYS499, and ARG534) and one charge (LEU545) interactions. Similarly, AVI bound by six hydrogen (LYS75, PRO77, SER78, ASP160, ALA162, and LYS250), one charge (LYS75), and three hydrophobic (PHE60, TYR63, and LYS75) with IL1R2. On same context, AVI bound to IRAK2 with more hydrophobic interactions with ARG379, TYR381, MET391, PHE609, and TRP611, while interacted with THR242, ARG379, TYR381, and LYS395 by hydrogen bonds. Also, bound to the binding sites of IRAK2 with four hydrogen (THR242, ARG379, TYR381, and LYS395) and five hydrophobic (ARG379, TYR381, MET391, PHE609, and TRP611) interactions. Finally, AVI also interacted with IL17RD by six hydrogen (GLY43, ARG44, SER47, LYS51, ILE85, and GLU148) and four hydrophobic (ARG44, LYS51, TYR88, and LEU99).

LYZ bound to IL1RAP with ten Pi-interactions and 24 hydrogen bonds as represented in Supplementary File 1 and Supplementary Fig. 2. Similarly, LYZ interacted with IL1R2 by five Pi-interactions and four hydrogen bonds (Supplementary File 2 and Supplementary Fig. 2). Interaction between LYZ and IRAK2 exhibited one salt bridge, eight Pi-interactions, and 15 hydrogen bonds (Supplementary File 3 and Supplementary Fig. 2). Also, by one salt bridge, 14 Pi-interactions, and 31 hydrogen bonds (Supplementary File 4 and Supplementary Fig. 2), LYZ was bound to IL17RD.

Table 4 Molecular scores and interactions of avilamycin (AVI) against Gallus gallus interleukin 1 receptor accessory protein (IL1RAP; AlphaFold ID: A0A1D5P4S3), interleukin 1 receptor type 2 (IL1R2; AlphaFold ID: A0A1L1RVR1), interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase-like 2 (IRAK2; AlphaFold ID: F1N826), and interleukin-17 receptor D (IL17RD; AlphaFold ID: Q7T2L7)
Full size table

Discussion

It is well known that broilers are the highest efficient land animals in converting energy into meat [30]. However, the broiler performance (BW, BWG, FCR, and PER) is closely related to the intestinal integrity and the microbiome community of bird gut. Several investigations in chickens have revealed the significance of intestinal integrity and gut microbiota on some pivotal functions such as mucosal immunity, gut development, nutrient absorption and digestion of feed by the host [31,32,33,34,35]. In the same context, LYZ supplement to broiler chickens diet (90 mg/kg) amended the bird performance and gut health [13, 14]. In the current study, both LYZ and AVI supplementation significantly improved performance parameters including BW, BWG, FCR, and EPEF, with the absence of significant difference in FI and PER compared with control group. Furthermore, the molecular docking model showed high affinity of either AVI or LYZ to bind with IL1RAP, IL1R2, IRAK2, and IL17RD, which indicated that AVI and LYZ could bind to the intestinal IL1RAP, IL1R2, IRAK2, and IL17RD leading to subsequent diminishing of intestinal inflammatory process. These anti-inflammatory effects of AVI or LYZ led to improve the gut health which might reflect on the general performance of the bird. These computational results need future biological assessment to investigate the effects of AVI and LYZ on these target proteins synthesis and interactions.

In this study, the performance enhancement may be attributed to the improved gut morphology that was explained by significant higher VH and VH/CD ratio in jejunum of LYZ group compared to other groups despite similar crypt depth in control vs. LYZ group and in LYZ vs. AVI. In addition, higher value of LYZ group compared to AVI group, however, crypt depth was significantly high in control group compared to AVI group (Table 3; Fig. 4). The increase in VH is was previously suggested to be a gut absorption efficiency indicator [36, 37]. The improved VH and VH/CD ratio lead to enhancement of nutrient absorption rates in the small intestine [38, 39]. It is well known that diet has the major impact on the intestinal morphology and its absorptive capacity which reflects on the broiler growth performance [40]. So, longer intestinal villi means more intestinal absorptive area and more intestinal absorptive capacity for nutrients and more growth [41].

Intestinal crypts are the main source of the intestinal stem cells to renew and regenerate intestinal villi. So, deeper intestinal crypts leads to more production of intestinal villi cells and more absorption [40] and decreasing crypt depths results in reduced nutrient absorption [42]. Consequently, our results in this research confirmed the explanation of the role of LYZ in changing gut morphology and modulation of some gut microbiota in our previous study [12]. Also, LYZ supplementation significantly decreased the total coliform count and significantly increased the total lactobacillus count at 21st and 35th days of age compared with other 2 groups which might lead to improved eubiosis. The total clostridial count in LYZ group was significantly lower than control group, however, it was higher (p < 0.01 − 0.001) than AVI supplemented group. Some investigations had recorded marked effect of LYZ in different organisms as a good defense facing pathogenic bacteria of both Gram types [43, 44]. The upregulation in IFN-γ, which is a mediator of mucus that has antimicrobial roles, a physical barrier, as well as being composed of mucin glycoproteins that enhance the growth of beneficial bacteria and have direct toxic to many harmful bacteria might have a role in the significant increase of lactobacillus, and significant decrease in coliform, and clostridial counts [13, 45].

Modulation of some intestinal microbiota such as total coliform, clostridial, and lactobacillus counts resulted in the enhancement of intestinal immune system and its pro- and anti-inflammatory status where the expression of intestinal IFN-γ, IL-18, IL-2, IL-10, and GSH-Px genes in the present study were more upregulated in LYZ supplemented group. The intestinal tract is the main entrance for several bacteria and viruses. Mucosal adaptive and innate immune cells are prepared to fight invading pathogens [37, 46]. IL-10, produced by epithelial cells is critical for lowering the gut inflammation. Also, the enhanced IL-2, stimulate the proliferation and cytotoxicity via intestinal lymphocytes [47]. IL-2, maintaining the integrity of in rat intestinal epithelial cell lines [48]. IL-18 a pro-inflammatory mediator in several cell types which has important roles in enhancing the production of IFN-γ, induction the differentiation of Th1 cells and priming of NK cell cytotoxicity [49, 50]. The enhanced IFN-γ protects gut against bacterial infections [46]. GSH-Px gene encodes GSH-Px (EC 1.11.1.9) enzyme that is a member of endogenous antioxidant enzymatic defense against different xenobiotics. After H2O2 has been produced by the action of superoxide dismutase (SOD), it is reduced to water by GSH-Px and catalase [51]. GSH-Px is located in the epithelial cells of GIT where it have a role in reduction of dietary peroxides [52].

Moreover, it is worth mentioning that LYZ supplementation has a pivotal role in the stimulation of cellular and humoral immunity [53]. Also, Jiménez-Saiz et al. [54] and Mine et al. [55] stated that oral lysozyme could be hydrolyzed in the duodenum and be accompanied by the production of antimicrobial peptides that could play critical roles in innate immunity. Herein, a significant increase in serum antibody titers for AI-H5N1 in LYZ-supplemented G3 than in control and AVI groups, respectively at 35 days suggested the immunomodulatory effect of LYZ. Furthermore, van de Crommenacker et al. [56] detected that LYZ supplementation in adult pigeons augmented immune function.

Conclusions

Exogenous dietary lysozyme supplementation to broilers with a dose of 90 mg/kg had better comparable effects on intestinal health, fecal bacterial counts, growth performance and immune response to avilamycin. Therefore, it is recommended to use this promising alternative, lysozyme, to avilamycin achieving the goals of one health approach. However, further in vitro and in vivo experimental studies regarding the use of lysozyme in broilers are needed to target more communities of intestinal microbiome and explore more details about its beneficial effects.

Data availability

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding authors.

Abbreviations

ANOVA:

Analysis of variance

Avail. P:

Available phosphorus

BW:

Body weight

BWG:

Body weight gain

CD:

Crypt depth

CP:

Crude protein

EPEF:

European production efficiency factor

FCR:

Feed conversion ratio

GSH-Px:

Glutathione peroxidase

IFN-γ:

Interferon-gamma

IL:

Interleukin

ME:

Metabolizable energy

MOE:

Molecular Operating Environment

PER:

Protein efficiency ratio

RT-PCR:

Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction

FI:

Feed intake

VH:

Villi height

References

  1. Marshall BM, Levy SB. Food animals and antimicrobials: impacts on human health. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2011;24(4):718–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Escribano EZ. Meeting with third countries on the Draft Commission Delegated Regulation supplementing regulation (EU) 2019/6 as regards the application of article 118. Brussels: European Commission; 2023. 12 January 2023.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Janardhana V, Broadway MM, Bruce MP, Lowenthal JW, Geier MS, Hughes RJ, Bean AG. Prebiotics modulate immune responses in the gut-associated lymphoid tissue of chickens. J Nutr. 2009;139(7):1404–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Abdel-Latif MA, Elbestawy AR, El-Far AH, Noreldin AE, Emam M, Baty RS, Albadrani GM, Abdel-Daim MM, Abd El-Hamid HS. Quercetin dietary supplementation advances growth performance, gut microbiota, and intestinal mrna expression genes in broiler chickens. Animals. 2021;11(8):2302.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Manaa EA, Abdel-Latif MA, Ibraheim SE, Sakr A, Dawood M, Albadrani GM, El-Kott AF, Abdel-Daim MM, Shafik BM. Impacts of Macleaya cordata on productive performance, expression of growth-related genes, hematological, and biochemical parameters in Turkey. Front Vet Sci. 2022;9:873951.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Abd El-Ghany WA, Abdel-Latif MA, Hosny F, Alatfeehy NM, Noreldin AE, Quesnell RR, Chapman R, Sakai L, Elbestawy AR. Comparative efficacy of postbiotic, probiotic, and antibiotic against necrotic enteritis in broiler chickens. Poult Sci. 2022;101(8):101988.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Saleh AA, El-Far AH, Abdel-Latif MA, Emam MA, Ghanem R, Abd El-Hamid HS. Exogenous dietary enzyme formulations improve growth performance of broiler chickens fed a low-energy diet targeting the intestinal nutrient transporter genes. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(5):e0198085.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Saeed M, Ayaşan T, Alagawany M, El-Hack M, Abdel-Latif M, Patra A. The role of ß-mannanase (Hemicell) in improving poultry productivity, health and environment. Brazilian J Poult Sci. 2019; 21.

  9. Abd El-Hack ME, Chaudhry MT, Mahrose KM, Noreldin A, Emam M, Alagawany M. The efficacy of using exogenous enzymes cocktail on production, egg quality, egg nutrients and blood metabolites of laying hens fed distiller’s dried grains with solubles. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr. 2018;102(2):726–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ding J, He S, Xiong Y, Liu D, Dai S, Hu H. Effects of dietary supplementation of fumaric acid on growth performance, blood hematological and biochemical profile of broiler chickens exposed to chronic heat stress. Brazilian J Poult Sci. 2020; 22.

  11. Grossowicz N, Ariel M. Methods for determination of lysozyme activity. Methods Biochem Anal. 1983;29:435–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ibrahim HR, Yamada M, Matsushita K, Kobayashi K, Kato A. Enhanced bactericidal action of lysozyme to Escherichia coli by inserting a hydrophobic pentapeptide into its C terminus. J Biol Chem. 1994;269(7):5059–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Abdel-Latif MA, El-Far AH, Elbestawy AR, Ghanem R, Mousa SA, Abd El-Hamid HS. Exogenous dietary lysozyme improves the growth performance and gut microbiota in broiler chickens targeting the antioxidant and non-specific immunity mRNA expression. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(10):e0185153.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Liu D, Guo Y, Wang Z, Yuan J. Exogenous lysozyme influences Clostridium perfringens colonization and intestinal barrier function in broiler chickens. Avian Pathol. 2010;39(1):17–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wellenreiter RH, Mowrey DH, Stobbs LA, d’Assonville JA. Effects of avilamycin on performance of broiler chickens. Veterinary Therapeutics: Research in Applied Veterinary Medicine. 2000;1(2):118–24.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ross Nutrition Specifications. [http://es.aviagen.com/assets/Tech_Center/Ross_Broiler/RossBroilerNutritionSpecs2019-EN.pdf].

  17. AOAC. Official methods of analysis of AOAC. International: AOAC International; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Marcu A, Vacaru-Opriş I, Dumitrescu G, Ciochina LP, Marcu A, Nicula M, Peţ I, Dronca D, Kelciov B. The influence of the genotype on economic efficiency of broiler chickens growth. Sci Papers Anim Sci Biotechnologies. 2013;46(2):339–46.

    Google Scholar 

  19. World Organization for Animal Health (WOAH). Avian influenza (including infection with high pathogenicity avian influenza viruses). In Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals. ; 2021, Chap. 3.3.4; OIE: Paris, France.

  20. Suzuki K, Okada H, Itoh T, Tada T, Mase M, Nakamura K, Kubo M, Tsukamoto K. Association of increased pathogenicity of Asian H5N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses in chickens with highly efficient viral replication accompanied by early destruction of innate immune responses. J Virol. 2009;83(15):7475–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Kaiser P, Rothwell L, Galyov EE, Barrow PA, Burnside J, Wigley P. Differential cytokine expression in avian cells in response to invasion by Salmonella typhimurium, Salmonella enteritidis and Salmonella gallinarumThe GenBank accession numbers for the sequences reported in this paper are AI982185 for chicken IL-6 cDNA and AJ250838 for the partial chicken IL-6 genomic sequence, respectively. Microbiology. 2000;146(12):3217–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Samy A, El-Enbaawy M, El-Sanousi A, Abd El-Wanes S, Ammar A, Hikono H, Saito T. In-vitro assessment of differential cytokine gene expression in response to infections with Egyptian classic and variant strains of highly pathogenic H5N1 avian influenza virus. Int J Veterinary Sci Med. 2015;3(1–2):1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yuan J, Guo Y, Yang Y, Wang Z. Characterization of fatty acid digestion of Beijing fatty and arbor acres chickens. Asian-australasian J Anim Sci. 2007;20(8):1222–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Akbarian A, Michiels J, Golian A, Buyse J, Wang Y, De Smet S. Gene expression of heat shock protein 70 and antioxidant enzymes, oxidative status, and meat oxidative stability of cyclically heat-challenged finishing broilers fedOriganum compactum andCurcuma xanthorrhiza essential oils. Poult Sci. 2014;93(8):1930–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Gasparino E, Del Vesco A, Voltolini D, Nascimento CD, Batista E, Khatlab A, Grieser D, Zancanela V, GuimarÃEs S. The effect of heat stress on GHR, IGF-I, ANT, UCP and COXIII mRNA expression in the liver and muscle of high and low feed efficiency female quail. Br Poult Sci. 2014;55(4):466–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Oliveira L, Madrid J, Ramis G, Martínez S, Orengo J, Villodre C, Valera L, López MJ, Pallarés FJ, Quereda JJ, et al. Adding crude glycerin to nursery pig diet: Effect on nutrient digestibility, metabolic status, intestinal morphology and intestinal cytokine expression. Livest Sci. 2014;167:227–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bancroft JD, Layton C. The hematoxylin and eosin, connective and mesenchymal tissues with their stains. In: Bancroft s Theory and practice of histological techniques. 7th edn. Edited by S. Kim suvarna CLaJDB. Philadelphia Churchill Livingstone:; 2013: 173–186.

  28. Saeed M, Yatao X, Hassan FU, Arain MA, Abd El-Hack ME, Noreldin AE, Sun C. Influence of graded levels of l-Theanine dietary supplementation on growth performance, carcass traits, meat quality, organs Histomorphometry, Blood Chemistry and Immune response of broiler chickens. Int J Mol Sci. 2018; 19(2).

  29. Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9(7):671–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Choct M. Managing gut health through nutrition. Br Poult Sci. 2009;50(1):9–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Stanley D, Hughes RJ, Geier MS, Moore RJ. Bacteria within the gastrointestinal tract microbiota correlated with improved growth and feed conversion: challenges presented for the identification of performance enhancing probiotic bacteria. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:187.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Stanley D, Hughes RJ, Moore RJ. Microbiota of the chicken gastrointestinal tract: influence on health, productivity and disease. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014;98(10):4301–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Gong J, Si W, Forster RJ, Huang R, Yu H, Yin Y, Yang C, Han Y. 16S rRNA gene-based analysis of mucosa-associated bacterial community and phylogeny in the chicken gastrointestinal tracts: from crops to Ceca. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2007;59(1):147–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. El-Hack A, Mohamed E, Shafi ME, Alghamdi WY, Abdelnour SA, Shehata AM, Noreldin AE, Ashour EA, Swelum AA, Al-Sagan AA. Black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens) Meal as a promising feed ingredient for poultry: a comprehensive review. Agriculture. 2020;10(8):339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Alagawany M, Abd El-Hack M, Farag M, Shaheen H, Abdel-Latif M, Noreldin A, Patra A. The usefulness of oregano and its derivatives in poultry nutrition. World’s Poult Sci J. 2018;74(3):463–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Shamoto K, Yamauchi K. Recovery responses of chick intestinal villus morphology to different refeeding procedures. Poult Sci. 2000;79(5):718–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Helmy YA, Kassem II, Rajashekara G. Immuno-modulatory effect of probiotic E. Coli Nissle 1917 in polarized human colonic cells against Campylobacter jejuni infection. Gut Microbes. 2021;13(1):1857514.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Urán P, Gonçalves A, Taverne-Thiele J, Schrama J, Verreth J, Rombout J. Soybean meal induces intestinal inflammation in common carp (Cyprinus carpio L). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2008;25(6):751–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Long Y, Lin S, Zhu J, Pang X, Fang Z, Lin Y, Che L, Xu S, Li J, Huang Y. Effects of dietary lysozyme levels on growth performance, intestinal morphology, non-specific immunity and mRNA expression in weanling piglets. Anim Sci J. 2016;87(3):411–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Hamedi S, Rezaian M, Shomali T. Histological changes of small intestinal mucosa of cocks due to sunflower meal single feeding. Am J Anim Veterinary Sci. 2011;6(4):171–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Izadi H, Arshami J, Golian A, Raji MR. Effects of chicory root powder on growth performance and histomorphometry of jejunum in broiler chicks. Veterinary Research Forum: 2013. Urmia, Iran: Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Urmia University; 2013. p. 169.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Saeid J, Mohamed A, Baddy MA. Effect of garlic powder (Allium sativum) and black seed (Nigella sativa) on broiler growth performance and intestinal morphology. Iran J Appl Anim Sci. 2013;3(1):185–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Nakamura K, Furukawa N, Matsuoka A, Takahashi T, Yamanaka Y. Enzyme activity of lysozyme-dextran complex prepared by high pressure treatment. Volume 3. Tokyo: Food Science and Technology International; 1997. pp. 235–8. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Ibrahim HR, Kobayashi K, Kato A. Length of hydrocarbon chain and antimicrobial action to gram-negative bacteria of fatty acylated lysozyme. J Agric Food Chem. 1993;41(7):1164–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Smirnov A, Perez R, Amit-Romach E, Sklan D, Uni Z. Mucin dynamics and microbial populations in chicken small intestine are changed by dietary probiotic and antibiotic growth promoter supplementation. J Nutr. 2005;135(2):187–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Pott J, Stockinger S. Type I and III interferon in the gut: tight balance between host protection and immunopathology. Front Immunol. 2017;8:258.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Ebert E. IL-10 enhances IL‐2‐induced proliferation and cytotoxicity by human intestinal lymphocytes. Clin Experimental Immunol. 2000;119(3):426–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Dignass AU, Podolsky DK. Interleukin 2 modulates intestinal epithelial cell functionin vitro. Exp Cell Res. 1996;225(2):422–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Matsumoto S, Tsuji-Takayama K, Aizawa Y, Koide K, Takeuchi M, Ohta T, Kurimoto M. Interleukin-18 activates NF-κB in murine T helper type 1 cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1997;234(2):454–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Chaix J, Tessmer MS, Hoebe K, Fuséri N, Ryffel B, Dalod M, Alexopoulou L, Beutler B, Brossay L, Vivier E. Cutting edge: priming of NK cells by IL-18. J Immunol. 2008;181(3):1627–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Birben E, Sahiner UM, Sackesen C, Erzurum S, Kalayci O. Oxidative stress and antioxidant defense. World Allergy Organization Journal. 2012;5(1):9–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Chu F-F, Doroshow J. Expression, characterization, and tissue distribution of a new cellular selenium-dependent glutathione peroxidase, GSHPx-GI. J Biol Chem. 1993;268(4):2571–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Siwicki A, Klein P, Morand M, Kiczka W, Studnicka M. Immunostimulatory effects of dimerized lysozyme (KLP-602) on the nonspecific defense mechanisms and protection against furunculosis in salmonids. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 1998;61(2–4):369–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Jiménez-Saiz R, Martos G, Carrillo W, López-Fandiño R, Molina E. Susceptibility of lysozyme to in-vitro digestion and immunoreactivity of its digests. Food Chem. 2011;127:1719–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Mine Y, Ma F, Lauriau S. Antimicrobial peptides released by enzymatic hydrolysis of Hen Egg White Lysozyme. J Agric Food Chem. 2004;52:1088–94. pmid:14995103.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. van de Crommenacker J, Horrocks NP, Versteegh MA, Komdeur J, Tieleman BI, Matson KD. Effects of immune supplementation and immune challenge on oxidative status and physiology in a model bird: implications for ecologists. J Exp Biol. 2010;213(20):3527–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Nutrition and Veterinary Clinical Nutrition, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Damanhour University, Damanhour, 22511, Egypt

    Mervat A. Abdel-Latif & Mohamed Emam

  2. Department of Poultry and Fish Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Damanhour University, Damanhour, 22511, Egypt

    Hatem S. Abd El-Hamid & Ahmed R. Elbestawy

  3. Department of Histology and Cytology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Damanhour University, Damanhour, 22511, Egypt

    Ahmed. E. Noreldin

  4. Department of Animal Hygiene, Zoonoses and Animal Ethology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, 41522, Egypt

    Yosra A. Helmy

  5. Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Damanhour University, Damanhour, 22511, Egypt

    Ali H. El-Far

Authors
  1. Mervat A. Abdel-Latif
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hatem S. Abd El-Hamid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mohamed Emam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ahmed. E. Noreldin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yosra A. Helmy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ali H. El-Far
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Ahmed R. Elbestawy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization, HSA, AHE, MAA and ARE; Data curation, AHE, MAA and ARE; Investigation, ME; Methodology, MAA, ME, AHE, ARE, AEN; Resources, HSA; Software, AHE and MAA; Supervision, HSA, and MAA; Writing – review & editing, AHE, ARE, ME, YAH, and MAA. All authors reviewed and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mervat A. Abdel-Latif.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval and consent to participate

This work was ethically accepted by the Committee of Local Experimental Animal Care, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Damanhour University, Egypt (DMU/VetMed-2023/010). All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

The authors reported no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Supplementary Material 2

Supplementary Material 3

Supplementary Material 4

12917_2023_3871_MOESM5_ESM.pptx

Supplementary Material 5. Supplementary Fig. 1. Molecular scores and interactions of avilamycin (AVI) against Gallus gallus in-terleukin 1 receptor accessory protein (IL1RAP; AlphaFold ID: A0A1D5P4S3), interleukin 1 receptor type 2 (IL1R2; AlphaFold ID: A0A1L1RVR1), interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase-like 2 (IRAK2; AlphaFold ID: F1N826), and interleukin-17 receptor D (IL17RD; AlphaFold ID: Q7T2L7)

12917_2023_3871_MOESM6_ESM.pptx

Supplementary Material 6. Supplementary Fig. 2. Molecular scores and interactions of lysozyme (LYZ) against Gallus gallus in-terleukin 1 receptor accessory protein (IL1RAP; AlphaFold ID: A0A1D5P4S3), interleukin 1 receptor type 2 (IL1R2; AlphaFold ID: A0A1L1RVR1), interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase-like 2 (IRAK2; AlphaFold ID: F1N826), and interleukin-17 receptor D (IL17RD; AlphaFold ID: Q7T2L7)

12917_2023_3871_MOESM7_ESM.docx

Supplementary Material 7. Table S1 Primers sequences, target genes and cycling conditions for TaqMan RT-PCR. Table S2 Primers sequences, target genes and cycling conditions for SYBR green RT-PCR.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abdel-Latif, M.A., El-Hamid, H.S.A., Emam, M. et al. Dietary lysozyme and avilamycin modulate gut health, immunity, and growth rate in broilers. BMC Vet Res 20, 28 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-023-03871-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-023-03871-2

Keywords

BMC Veterinary Research

ISSN: 1746-6148

Contact us