Skip to main content

Table 1 Detection and differentiation of Brachyspira (B.) in dogs (reports published from 1989 until recently)

From: Brachyspira in dogs: risk factors of shedding in central Germany and longitudinal study of an infected kennel

Country

SMa

Detection method

Number of samples

Positive samples, n (%)

Differentiation of Brachyspira

Reference

TSAb

Micc

BCd

PCRe

Seqf

Other

  

B. pilog

B. canis

B. pulli

B. innoh

B. interi

B. hyok

 

Germany

Fl

 

x

x

  

CSAm

149

6 (4%)

   

5

 

1

[43]

Australia

Fl

x

     

203

38 (19%)

      

[44]

   

x

x

MEEn, riboo

24/203

24

 

24

    

[21]

Papua New Guinea

Rr

x

x

 

x

  

76

7 (9%)

4

     

[45]

Sweden

Rr

x

 

x

 

x (4)

PFGEs (4)

46*

24 (52%)*

2

  

1

  

[20]

Australia

Fl

x

x

 

x

 

MEEn

49

20 (41%)ǂ

7

5

    

[18]

India

Fl

   

x

x

 

101

1 (1%)

1

     

[46]

USA

Fl

   

x

  

120

5 (4%)

      

[47]

Spain

Rr

    

x

 

311

41 (13%)

15

25

  

1

 

[17]

Czech Republic

Fl

x

x

x

x

  

1156

36 (3%)

19

    

1

[26]

Thailand

Fl

x

x

x

 

x

 

151

17 (11%)

4

9

3

 

1

 

[19]

Iran

Rr

x

x

 

x

x

 

151

14 (9%)

 

12

  

1

 

[27]

  1. asampling method; bculture on trypticase-soy agar; cmicroscopic detection of Brachyspira; dbiochemical differentiation of Brachyspira: indol production, hippurate-cleavage, and α-galactosidase and ß-glucosidase activity; epolymerase chain reaction; fsequencing; gBrachyspira pilosicoli; hBrachyspira innocens; iBrachyspira intermedia; kBrachyspira hyodysenteriae; lfecal sample; mculture on casein-soybean flour-peptone agar with 10% ovine blood + spectinomycin; nmultilocus enzyme electrophoresis; oribotyping; rrectal swab; spulsed-field gel electrophoresis; *sampling bias: 29 laboratory Beagle dogs tested after previous diarrhea outbreak, 17 pet dogs with diarrhea; ǂsampling bias: pet shop puppies originating from breeding kennels