Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of subspecies identification results using the different techniques (biochemistry, PCR, WGS, and gene sequencing) for discrepant C. fetus isolates

From: Biochemical and molecular characterization of Campylobacter fetus isolates from bulls subjected to bovine genital campylobacteriosis diagnosis in Spain

Sample

Phenotypic identification tests

PCR

1 & 2a

WGSb

PCR-3c

Gene sequence % identityd

H2S

72 h

H2S

5 days

Glycine 1%

Phenotype

ATP_BP

yckJ

yckK

cysK

Sal3

+ 

+ 

+ 

Cff

Cfv

Cfv (97.63)

Cfvi

100

100

100

100

C3.46

+ 

+ 

+ 

Cff

Cfv

Cfv (94.86)

Cfvi

100

100

100

100

C3.52

+ 

+ 

+ 

Cff

Cfv

Cfv (95.01)

Cfvi

100

100

100

100

C2.6

+ 

+ 

+ 

Cff

Cfv

Cfv (95.36)

Cfvi

100

100

100

100

C3.4

+ 

+ 

+ 

Cff

Cfv

Cfv (95.74)

Cfvi

100

100

100

100

C3.10

+ 

+ 

+ 

Cff

Cfv

Cfv (95.34)

Cfvi

100

100

100

100

C1.43

-

-

-

Cfv

Cfv

Cfv (95.89)

Cfvi

100

100

99.87

100

C3.5

-

-

-

Cfv

Cfv

Cfv (95.48)

Cfvi

100

100

100

100

  1. Cff Camylobacter fetus subsp. fetus, Cfv Camylobacter fetus subsp. venerealis, Cfvi Camylobacter fetus subsp. venerealis bv. intermedius
  2. aPCRs targeting the nahE and the ISCfe for C. fetus subspecies identification [14, 15]
  3. bThe number in brackets indicates the KamerFinder query coverage of these isolates compared to the reference strain CfviADRI545
  4. cPCR targeting the L-Cysteine transporter genes for Cfv biovars differentiation [16]
  5. dPercentage identity result of these genes compared to the reference strain Cff 82–40