Skip to main content

Table 5 Mean (SEM) TMABc (total mesophilic aerobic bacteria counts) and Enterobacteriaceae counts expressed as Log10 CFU/cm2 and p-values for comparisons between feed type, cleaning method and bowl material pairwise interactions

From: Pet feeding habits and the microbiological contamination of dog food bowls: effect of feed type, cleaning method and bowl material

  

n

%

TMABc

[Log10CFU/cm2]

p-value

Enterobacteriaceae

[Log10CFU/cm2]

p-value

Food type & cleaning method

Dry food & dry wiping

26

29

1.02 (0.25)

0.3270

-1.06 (0.25)

0.6331

Dry food & hand washing

20

22

1.81 (0.29)

-0.48 (0.29)

Wet food & dry wiping

25

27

1.87 (0.26)

-0.82 (0.26)

Wet food & hand washing

20

22

2.11 (0.29)

-0.50 (0.29)

Food type & bowl material

Dry food & plastic

22

24

0.98 (0.28)

0.7875

-1.10 (0.28)

0.7163

Dry food & metal

24

26

1.85 (0.26)

-0.44 (0.26)

Wet food & plastic

24

26

1.48 (0.26)

-0.87 (0.27)

Wet food & metal

21

23

2.49 (0.28)

-0.46 (0.28)

Cleaning method & bowl material

Dry wiping & plastic

25

28

1.23 (0.24)

0.0646

-1.13 (0.24)

0.6094

Dry wiping & metal

23

25

1.67 (0.27)

-0.74 (0.27)

Hand washing & plastic

21

23

1.23 (0.30)

-0.83 (0.31)

Hand washing & metal

22

24

2.68 (0.27)

-0.15 (0.28)

  1. Statistical significance: p ≤ 0.05