Skip to main content

Table 1 Pattern visual evoked potential (P-VEP) peak latencies

From: Comparison of the effect of sedation and general anesthesia on pattern and flash visual evoked potentials in normal dogs

Ā 

Sedation

General Anesthesia

O1

Oz

O2

O1

Oz

O2

N75

ā€ƒLatency (ms)

48.46 (33.82ā€“57.97)

48.36 (24.46ā€“57.67)

48.54 (29.89ā€“55.82)

43.78 (35.33ā€“117.94)

46.44 (43.48ā€“118.45)

46.88 (43.18ā€“119.46)

ā€ƒn(%)

13 (100%)

13 (100%)

13 (100%)

7 (53.8%)

7 (53.8%)

7 (53.8%)

P100

ā€ƒLatency (ms)

81.30 (70.2ā€“89.75)

82.82 (73.22ā€“91.03)

82.42 (73.30ā€“89.98)

80.53 (69.70ā€“173.89)

81.69 (69.91ā€“173.39)

129.68 (99.12ā€“205.14)

ā€ƒn(%)

13 (100%)

13 (100%)

13 (100%)

6 (46.2%)

6 (46.2%)

6 (46.2%)

N135

ā€ƒLatency (ms)

132.06 (125.30ā€“162.74)

134.89 (125.45ā€“158.21)

135.91 (115.04ā€“158.15)

46.88 (43.18ā€“119.46)

83.18 (67.94ā€“172.88)

130.59 (99.97ā€“203.63)

ā€ƒn(%)

8 (61.5%)

8 (61.5%)

8 (61.5%)

7 (53.8%)

6 (46.2%)

6 (46.2%)

  1. Latency is presented as median (range)
  2. n (%) ā€“ number of dogs (percent of total) exhibiting that peak