Table 2 The model selection results for the analyses investigating the probability of (1) PIT tag loss, (2) temperature logger loss, and (3) heart rate logger loss, showing the used degrees of freedom (df), log likelihood (logLik), AICc, ∆AIC, and AIC weight. Models were ranked by AICc
From: Retention and loss of PIT tags and surgically implanted devices in the Eurasian beaver
Model | df | logLik | AICc | ∆AIC | AIC weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(1) PIT tag loss | |||||
 Intercept only | 2 | -114 | 231 | 0.00 | 0.484 |
 Sex | 3 | -113 | 232 | 1.05 | 0.286 |
 Age class | 4 | -113 | 234 | 2.44 | 0.143 |
 Age class + Sex | 5 | -112 | 235 | 3.44 | 0.087 |
(2) Temperature logger loss | |||||
 Intercept only | 1 | -15 | 33 | 0.00 | 0.451 |
 Sensor type | 2 | -15 | 34 | 1.06 | 0.266 |
 Sex | 2 | -15 | 35 | 1.78 | 0.185 |
 Sensor type + Sex | 3 | -14 | 36 | 3.07 | 0.097 |
(3) Heart rate monitor loss | |||||
 Intercept only | 1 | -12 | 27 | 0.00 | 0.564 |
 Sensor type | 2 | -12 | 29 | 1.83 | 0.226 |
 Sex | 2 | -12 | 30 | 2.55 | 0.157 |
 Sensor type + Sex | 3 | -12 | 32 | 4.73 | 0.053 |