Skip to main content

Table 6 Reasons for the retraction of articles in veterinary medicine/animal health

From: Comprehensive analysis of retracted journal articles in the field of veterinary medicine and animal health

Category

Reason

No. (%) of Retractions*

Total No. (%) Retractions

Error

  

50 (20.6%)

Administrative error by journal or publisher

13 (5.3%)

 

Erroneous data, analysis, or interpretation by author

37 (15.3%)

 

Research misconduct

  

44 (18.2%)

Data fabrication or falsification

23 (9.5%)

 

Suspected data fabrication/ falsification

5 (2.0%)

 

Image manipulation

13 (5.3%)

 

Research misconduct, not otherwise specified

3 (1.2%)

 

Publication misconduct

  

183 (75.6%)

Plagiarism, misappropriation of data

65 (26.8%)

 

Duplicate publication†

41 (16.9%)

 

Authorship irregularity

41 (16.9%)

 

Compromised peer review

36 (14.9%)

 

Unknown

  

35 (14.4%)

  1. *Retraction notices reporting both research and publication misconduct (n = 11) are counted in both categories, so percentages add up to > 100%
  2. †Four of 41 retractions for duplicate publication also specified duplicate submission