Skip to main content

Table 2 Effect of sampling time, challenge and age on frequency of severe intestinal lesions

From: Developing an experimental necrotic enteritis model in turkeys - the impact of Clostridium perfringens, Eimeria meleagrimitis and host age on frequency of severe intestinal lesions

Study variable

Study variable level

CP1

EM dose2

Hours after EM3

Experiments

No. of birds (gut contents)4

% score3

OPG5

Hrs post

97–99

1

1.6–15

3,4

34 (10)

< 3.0a

0a

EM6

121–149

1

1.6–15

3,4

91 (20)

29.7b

5.8b

(3-wk-old)

168–171

1

1.6–15

3,4

38 (9)

18.4ab

5.0b

 

123–129

1

5–20

1,4,9

53 (16)

64.2c

6.3e

 

145–147

1

5–20

1,4,97

59 (10)

1.7d

5.4e

 

125

1

10–20

9

8 (2)

12.5g

4.6e

 

145

1

10–20

9

15 (2)

6.7g

6.2f

(5-wk-old)

125

1

10–20

9

8 (2)

75.0c

4.6e

 

145

1

10–20

9

17 (2)

76.5c

6.1f

Challenge

None

0

0

119–171

1,2,3,4,5

50 (12)

< 2.1a

0a

(3-wk-old)

EM8

0

0.25–20

119–171

1,2,3,4,5

77 (16)

6.5a

5.5b

 

EM + CP9

1

0.25–20

119–171

1,2,3,4,5

278 (43)

15.5b

5.6b

Turkey age

3-wk-old

1

10–20

125–145

9

23 (8)

8.7c

5.8e

 

5-wk-old

1

10–20

125–145

9

25 (8)

76.0d

5.6e

  1. 1Clostridium perfringens inoculation (0 = no, 1 = yes) status of lesion scored birds, 2 Number (in thousands) of inoculated Eimeria meleagrimitis oocysts per bird, 3 number of hours elapsed between Eimeria meleagrimitis inoculation and examination of turkeys, 4 Number of bird scored for intestinal lesions (number of pooled samples of intestinal contents examined for OPG), 5 Median log10 of oocysts per gram intestinal contents, based on samples of contents from posterior small intestine (from Meckel’s diverticulum to caeco-intestinal junction), caeca and colorectum from Eimeria meleagrimitis-inoculated turkeys, 6 Hours elapses between Eimeria meleagrimitis inoculation and examination for intestinal lesions, 7 OPG data from experiments 4 and 9, 8 Inoculated with Eimeria meleagrimitis, 9 Inoculated with Eimeria meleagrimitis and Clostridium perfringens
  2. a-bDunn’s test with Bonferroni adjustment of p-values for multiple comparisons, c-dPearson chi-square test, e-fKruskal-Wallis rank test, gFisher’s exact test. Different letters indicate significant (p < 0.05) difference