Table 3 Antimicrobial resistance patterns of the cefotaxime-resistant E. coli isolates
R-Typea | Egret (n = 87) | Duck (n = 4) | Cattle (n= 53) |
|---|---|---|---|
CTX | 3 (3.4) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (1.9) |
CTX, CP | 1 (0.1) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
CTX, CP, STR, CHL | 0 | 0 (0.0) | 1 (1.9) |
CTX, CP, TET | 2 (2.3) | 0 (0.0) | 3 (5.7) |
CTX, CP, TET, CHL | 1 (0.1) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (1.9) |
CTX, CP, TET, CHL, STR | 2 (2.3) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
CTX, CP, TET, GEN | 6 (6.9) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
CTX, CP, TET, GEN, CHL | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (3.8) |
CTX, CP, TET, GEN, CHL, STR | 19 (21.8) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
CTX, CP, TET, GEN, STR | 3 (3.4) | 1 (25.0) | 0 (0.0) |
CTX, CP, TET, STR | 4 (4.6) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
CTX, CP, TET, STR, GEN | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (3.8) |
CTX, CP, TET, STR, GEN, CHL | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 9 (17.0) |
CTX, GEN, CHL | 1 (0.1) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
CTX, STR | 0 (0.0) | 3 (75.0) | 4 (7.5) |
CTX, TET | 7 (0.8) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (3.8) |
CTX, TET, GEN, STR | 2 (2.3) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
CTX, TET, STR | 36 (41.4) | 0 (0.0) | 28 (52.8) |