From: Phenotypic variability and population structure analysis of Tanzanian free-range local chickens
Trait | Sex | Â | Ecotype | Â |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kuchi | Ching’wekwe | Morogoro- medium | ||
BL | M | 50.9 ± 0.62a | 46.1 ± 0.95b | 48.30 ± 0.41c, f |
 | F | 45.2 ± 0.48a, d | 43.7 ± 0.22b, e | 46.80 ± 0.72c |
NL | M | 19.4 ± 0.54a | 17.0 ± 0.54b | 17.40 ± 0.28c, f |
 | F | 18.0 ± 0.29a, d | 15.8 ± 0.17b, e | 16.70 ± 0.45c |
CG | M | 35.30 ± 0.59a | 31.1 ± 0.45b | 34.0 ± 0.25c, f |
 | F | 29.30 ± 0.20a, d | 29.0 ± 0.17b, e | 31.86 ± 0.44c |
WS | M | 47.7 ± 0.78a | 43.1 ± 0.75b | 42.74 ± 0.55c |
 | F | 45.7 ± 0.82a, d | 40.0 ± 0.47b, e | 42.60 ± 0.77c, f |
SL | M | 11.4 ± 0.28a | 10.2 ± 0.25b | 10.30 ± 0.16c |
 | F | 10.5 ± 0.16a, d | 9.0 ± 0.09b, e | 9.90 ± 0.19c |
SG | M | 5.1 ± 0.17a | 4.1 ± 0.12a | 4.6 ± 0.06a |
 | F | 4.7 ± 0.06a | 3.9 ± 0.04a | 4.4 ± 0.13a |
BW | M | 2152.4 ± 50.25a, d | 1687.6 ± 84.02b | 2090.4 ± 38.55c, f |
 | F | 1575.47 ± 91.37a | 1162.5 ± 30.65b, e | 1455.7 ± 68.23c |