From: Effects of various mastitis treatments on the reproductive performance of cows
Group | AI (d) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
<  70 d | 70–90 d | >  90 d | |||||||
Control | 60.5a,j | ± | 6.7 | 81.5 | ± | 6.1 | 107.6 | ± | 16.4 |
26 | Â | 43% | 20 | Â | 33% | 14 | Â | 23% | |
Experimental | 56.5k | ± | 6.3 | 81.1 | ± | 6.1 | 113.2 | ± | 20.2 |
31 | Â | 20% | 47 | Â | 30% | 79 | Â | 50% | |
Antibiotic | 61.3ab | ± | 5.1 | 82.7 | ± | 5.9 | 121.0 | ± | 24.9 |
4.0 | Â | 9% | 10.0 | Â | 23% | 27 | Â | 63% | |
Antibiotic + antioxidants | 54.4b | ± | 6.0 | 82.3 | ± | 5.6 | 103.5 | ± | 11.5 |
14 | Â | 36% | 12 | Â | 31% | 13 | Â | 33% | |
Antibiotic + lysozyme | 58.8ab | ± | 7.2 | 79.7 | ± | 6.4 | 113.5 | ± | 20.3 |
12 | Â | 32% | 12 | Â | 32% | 13 | Â | 35% | |
Antibiotic + NSAID | 60.3ab | ± | 9.5 | 82.1 | ± | 5.3 | 110.0 | ± | 15.7 |
3 | Â | 8% | 11 | Â | 30% | 26 | Â | 70% | |
Total | 58.4 | ± | 6.7 | 81.2 | ± | 6.0 | 112.4 | ± | 19.7 |
57 | Â | 26% | 67 | Â | 31% | 93 | Â | 43% | |
SEM | 0.89 | 0.74 | 2.05 | ||||||
P value | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Control vs. experimental (j,k) | 0.026 | 0.84 | 0.33 | ||||||
Control vs. groups (a,b) | 0.066 | 0.59 | 0.057 |