Skip to main content

Table 1 Mean volume values (± SD) of SAT, Formula method and Wrap function separated into volume groups

From: Evaluation of canine prostate volume in calculated tomographic images - comparison of two assessment methods

Assessment method/function

Mean volume (± SD) of vg 1

Statistical comparison

Mean volume (± SD) of vg 2

Statistical comparison

Mean volume (± SD) of vg 3

Statistical comparison

SAT (cm3)

3.1 (± 1.6)

A

18.6 (± 8.3)

A

157.2 (± 310.4)

A

Formula (cm3)

2.2 (± 1.2)

B

14.5 (± 7.0)

B

109.3 (± 235.4)

B

Wrap (cm3)

3.8 (± 1.7)

A

19.5 (± 7.8)

A

159.2 (± 310.2)

A

  1. Significant differences are indicated by letters. Groups with the same letter are not significantly different. SAT volumes are derived from a previously published paper [3]
  2. SAT slice addition technique, SD standard deviation, vg volume group