Skip to main content

Table 3 Clinical scores and results of D. nodosus culture, gelatinase test and rtPCR (aprB2/aprV2 positive, two cut offs, duplicate runs) in 318 sheep from flocks considered to be free of footrot (clinically healthy), 170 sheep from flocks considered having virulent footrot (clinically affected) and 27 sheep from a closed flock (#11) that apparently eradicated virulent footrot more than 10 years ago. Flocks were sampled from October 2014 to August 2015

From: Assessment of a rtPCR for the detection of virulent and benign Dichelobacter nodosus, the causative agent of ovine footrot, in Australia

 

Flock ID

No. sheep tested

Results

aprB2 rtPCRd

aprV2 rtPCRd

Clinical Scoreb

Culturec

Gelatinase testd

Run 1

Run 2

Run 1

Run 2

0

1

2

3

4

5

Mean

Benign

Virulent

Undetermined

Cut-off

Cut-off

Cut-off

Cut-off

40

35

40

35

40

35

40

35

Clinically healthy

1

18

18

–

–

–

–

–

0

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

2

18

18

–

–

–

–

–

0

1

–

–

1

–

–

–

–

2

2

2

2

3

19

17

–

1

–

1

–

0.1

–

–

–

–

–

–

1

–

–

–

–

–

4

18

11

1

6

–

–

–

0.6

–

–

–

–

–

–

4

–

–

–

–

–

5

19

19

–

–

–

–

–

0

–

–

–

–

–

–

2

–

–

–

–

–

6

18

11

3

1

1

–

2

0.8

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

5

4

6

4

7

18

16

2

–

–

–

–

0.1

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

8

55

55

–

–

–

–

–

0

–

–

–

–

5

1

1

1

3

2

4

2

9

81

81

–

–

–

–

–

0

2

2

–

–

5

3

4

3

2

–

5

–

10

54

51

3

–

–

–

–

0.1

–

–

–

–

8

–

–

–

2

1

2

1

Subtotal

318

297

9

8

1

1

2

 

3

2

0

1

18

4

#

4

14

9

19

9

 

11a

27

11

16

–

–

–

–

0.6

–

–

–

–

16

10

20

13

–

–

–

–

Clinically affected

12

26

14

12

–

–

–

–

0.5

7

–

5

2

–

–

–

–

26

25

26

26

13

10

1

3

–

5

1

–

2.2

4

2

2

–

5

3

3

3

9

6

9

6

14

36

20

8

3

–

–

5

1.1

2

–

2

–

6

5

6

5

17

14

21

13

15

10

–

–

1

–

2

7

4.5

2

–

2

–

–

–

ND

ND

10

9

ND

ND

16

10

–

–

4

3

2

1

3

5

–

5

–

–

–

ND

ND

10

10

ND

ND

17

10

–

–

4

2

4

–

1

10

4

6

–

4

4

ND

ND

6

6

ND

ND

18

9

–

9

–

–

–

–

4.9

3

–

3

–

–

–

ND

ND

9

9

ND

ND

19

10

–

–

–

–

1

9

2.7

3

–

3

–

–

–

ND

ND

9

9

ND

ND

20

10

–

–

4

5

1

–

1.1

3

2

1

–

10

10

ND

ND

10

10

ND

ND

21

10

–

9

1

–

–

–

3.5

–

–

–

–

2

2

ND

ND

2

1

ND

ND

22

10

–

–

1

5

3

1

3.3

6

1

5

–

–

–

ND

ND

10

10

10

10

23

10

–

–

–

–

10

–

4

–

–

–

–

–

–

ND

ND

10

10

ND

ND

24

9

–

–

5

2

2

–

2.6

–

–

–

–

–

–

ND

ND

9

8

ND

ND

Subtotal

170

35

41

23

22

26

23

 

45

9

34

2

27

24

9

8

137

127

66

55

  1. a Flock 11 has been excluded from specificity and sensitivity calculations because of its history
  2. b Results expressed as a number of sheep in which the highest rated foot was in the particular score
  3. c Results expressed as a number of sheep from which an organism morphologically consistent with D. nodosus was isolated
  4. d Results expressed as a number of sheep that tested positive