Skip to main content

Table 2 Posturographic,Dynamic Pedobarographic Parameters and PVF in ED Group, Expressed as Mean ± SD, and 95% Confidence Intervals, as well as P-values of t-test, Shapiro - wilk test and Levene test

From: Posturography and dynamic pedobarography in lame dogs with elbow dysplasia and cranial cruciate ligament rupture

 

Difference

SWT

LT

Statokinesiogram (mm2)

Study

  46.57 ± 22.47

   

  38.20, 54.95

  

Controls

  2.29 ± 1.38

44.28 ± 3.76

0.21

0.98

  1.66, 2.93

36.45,52.11

  

Stabilogram (mm)

Study

  X

   10.26 ± 4.14

   

   8.71, 11.82

  

Controls

  3.14 ± 0.68

7.12 ± 0.72

0.16

0.98

  2.75, 3.53

5.62,8.62

  

Study

  Y

   1.70 ± 0.63

   

   1.46, 1.94

   

Controls

  1.35 ± 0.5

0.35 ± 0.14

0.32

0.99

  1.13, 1.57

0.05,0.65

  
 

LL

CL

% Difference

  

Pressure distribution

p = 0.26

p = 0.96

Study

38.51 ± 3.70%

61.49 ± 3.70%

22.98 ± 7.40%

  

37.26, 39.76

59.77, 63.21

20.48, 25.49

Controls

47.93 ± 1.16%

52.07 ± 1.16%

4.15 ± 2.33%

47.49, 48.36

50.30, 53.85

3.28, 5.02

Paw Area (cm2)

p = 0.009

p = 0.56

Study

40.94 ± 3.70

51.97 ± 2.76

23.94 ± 9.97%

  

39.69, 42.19

50.81, 53.14

20.57, 27.31

 

Controls

44.00 ± 2.82

47.20 ± 3.59

8.90 ± 6.64%

  

43.45, 46.35

47.04, 49.16

6.41, 11.38

 

MP

p = 0.87

p = 0.72

Study

97.90 ± 12.99

149.69 ± 14.32

41.85 ± 18.94%

  

93.50, 102.29

143.88, 155.05

35.44, 48.26

 

Controls

118.06 ± 9.19

130.15 ± 7.09

9.88 ± 8.70%

  

114.62, 121.49

127.51, 132.80

6.63, 13.12

 

PP

p = 0.75

p = 0.25

Study

388.67 ± 33.41

461 ± 40.63

58.95 ± 40.78%

  

377.36, 399.97

448.21, 475.70

45.16, 72.75

 

Controls

402.19 ± 42.03

435.51 ± 40.40

26.83 ± 30.43%

  

386.50, 417.88

420.42, 450.60

15.47, 38.20

 

PVF

P = 0.05

P = 0.85

Study

62.29 ± 4.40%

74.33 ± 4.90%

12.04 ± 1.80%

  

59.95, 64.64

71.83, 76.83

(8.30, 15.77)

 

Controls

68.85 ± 4.89%

69.56 ± 4.75%

0.71 ± 1.15) %

  

65.72, 71.98

66.39, 72.72

−3.02,1.61