Table 5 Antimicrobial resistance pattern of Salmonella serotypes isolated from dogs
Number | Serotypes | No. | Resistance pattern | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intermediate | Resistant | |||
1 | Anatum | 1 | N, T | - |
2 | Anatum | 1 | N | DO, S, T |
3 | Braenderup | 1 | K, N, T | - |
4 | Bronx | 1 | N, T | - |
5 | Bronx | 1 | T | - |
6 | Bronx | 1 | AMC, DO, N, S | AM, CF, FOX, GM |
7 | Bronx | 1 | N, T | AM |
8 | Bronx | 2 | N, S | - |
9 | Bronx | 1 | - | - |
10 | Chailey | 1 | N,S | AM, CF, CRO, SXT |
11 | Haifa | 1 | N | DO, T |
12 | Haifa | 1 | CRO, N, AM | AMC, CF, FOX, S, SXT |
13 | Indiana | 1 | N,S | - |
14 | Indiana | 2 | S | - |
15 | Indiana | 1 | DO, NA, T | AM, AMC, C, CF, FOX, S, SXT |
16 | Kentucky | 1 | - | AM, AMC,CF,FOX |
17 | Kentucky | 1 | S, T | - |
18 | Kentucky | 2 | N, T | - |
19 | Minnesota | 1 | N, T | - |
20 | Muenchen | 1 | N | - |
21 | Newport | 1 | CF, N | AM, AMC, DO, T |
22 | Newport | 1 | N | AM, AMC, CF |
23 | Newport | 2 | - | DO, S, T |
24 | Newport | 1 | AM, N | AMC, CF, DO, S, T |
25 | Newport | 1 | DO | AM, AMC, CF, T |
26 | Saintpaul | 1 | CF | AM, AMC, DO, T |
27 | Saintpaul | 1 | N | AM, AMC, CF, DO, T |
28 | Saintpaul | 1 | CF, S | AM, AMC, C, DO, SXT, T |
29 | Saintpaul | 1 | T, N | - |
30 | Tarshyne | 1 | - | C |
31 | Typhimurium Pt 74 | 1 | - | - |
32 | Typhimurium Pt 74 | 1 | CF, S, T | - |
33 | Typhimurium At | 1 | - | - |
34 | Typhimurium At | 1 | - | DO,T |
35 | Virchow | 2 | T | - |
36 | Virchow | 1 | - | - |
37 | Virchow | 1 | CF | - |