Skip to main content

Table 3 Growth performance at week 6 of treatments supplemented with different postbiotics and differen levels of inulin

From: Effects of dietary postbiotic and inulin on growth performance, IGF1 and GHR mRNA expression, faecal microbiota and volatile fatty acids in broilers

Parameter

Dietary treatmentse

SEM

Negative control

Positive control

T1

T2

T3

T4

T5

T6

FI (g)

4245.17

4153.71

4289.19

4298.08

4199.29

4279.61

4187.49

4267.91

25.03

BW (g)

2239.59b

2248.93b

2267.28b

2266.69b

2334.90a

2330.79a

2264.72b

2345.48a

6.51

WG (g)

2189.10b

2198.34b

2217.79b

2217.52b

2284.31a

2279.52a

2215.59b

2295.24a

6.50

FCR

1.94a

1.89abc

1.93ab

1.93ab

1.84c

1.88abc

1.89abc

1.86bc

0.01

  1. abcmeans within a row for each parameter with different superscripts are significantly different (p < 0.05)
  2. enegative control: basal diet, positive control: basal diet + neomycin and oxytetracycline, T1: (0.3 % RI11), T2: (0.3 % RG14), T3: (0.3 % RI11 + 0.8 % inulin), T4: (0.3 % RI11 + 1.0 % inulin), T5: (0.3 % RG14 + 0.8%inulin), T6: (0.3 % RG14 + 1.0%inulin)