Skip to main content

Table 2 Sample sizes and outcomes for 20 OTP-controlled RCTs

From: Veterinary homeopathy: Systematic review of medical conditions studied by randomised trials controlled by other than placebo

i: Individualised/Treatment

Ref.

First author

Year

N start (hom.)

N start (cont.)

N start (tot.)

N end (hom.)

N end (cont.)

N end (tot.)

% Attrition

Designated 'main outcome'

Type of data

Direction of change favouring homeopathy

Problem with designated 'main outcome measure'

End-point

Notes

A12

Schütte

1988

33

31

64

33

31

64

0.0

Piglet mortality

Dichot.

Lower

Yes: Gives percentage of dead piglets (events) but not number of piglets born (total)

28 d

N = No. of sows treated

ii: Non-individualised/Treatment

Ref.

First author

Year

N start (hom.)

N start (cont.)

N start (tot.)

N end (hom.)

N end (cont.)

N end (tot.)

% Attrition

Designated 'main outcome'

Type of data

Direction of change favouring homeopathy

Problem with designated 'main outcome measure'

End-point

Notes

A42

Lohr

2013

53

56

109

46

54

100

8.3

Cure rate (Sum-score (physical condition))

Dichot.

Higher

Only 46 (Hom) and 54 (Cont) animals regularly completed the study, and are therefore the data for our calculations. The authors themselves calculated cure rate based on 50 and 56 animals respectively.

Up to 4 d

 

A14

Coelho

2009

35

11

46

35

9

44

4.3

Proportion of animals without diarrhoea at the end of treatment

Dichot.

Higher

No

12 d

 

A41

Catto

2013

72

36

108

72

36

108

0.0

Faecal egg count

Contin.

Lower

Yes: Unclear sample sizes – see Notes

Second year

The numbers of animals in each group based on the assumption that each group comprised 3 paddocks (12 animals in each). No information on dropouts.

A19

Silva

2008

9

9

18

?9

?9

?18

Unclear

Mean number of engorged ticks per annum

Contin.

Lower

Yes: SD not stated; N at endpoint not stated

1 yr

 

A40

Lotfollahzadeh

2012

52

23

75

50

15

65

13.3

Rectal temperature

Contin.

Lower

 

14 d

 

A21

Zacharias

2008

7

7

14

?7

?7

?14

Unclear

Faecal egg count

Contin.

Lower

No. Numbers for analysis interpolated from Figure 1A. N not stated for endpoint, but assumed to be N = 7.

68 d

Disparity between data (mean eggs per gram) for conv med group given in text (1,483) and by inspection of Fig 1 (1,300 approx.)

A15

Faulstich

2006

24

22

46

22

19

41

10.9

Treatment success (overall effectiveness)

Dichot.

Higher

No : Numbers for analysis from percentage data in Table 9

21 d

Control really active?

A16

Klocke

2010

32

36

68

32

36

68

0.0

Absence of clinical mastitis infection

Dichot.

Higher

No: Data derived from text of Results [line 6])

First 100 days post-calving

 

A20

Varshney

2005

67

96

163

67

96

163

0.0

Quarter cure-rate (non-fibrosed)

Dichot.

Higher

No : Numbers for analysis from percentage data in Table 2

Up to 28 d

N = quarters, not animals

A39

Braun

2011

30

34

64

28

32

60

6.3

Cure rate (MMA-sum score)

Dichot.

Higher

 

Up to 4 d (H) or 3 d (C)

 

A13

Beceriklisoy

2008

30

8

38

30

8

38

0.0

Treatment 'success' (recovery rate)

Dichot.

Higher

No

Up to 20 d

 

A18

Sandoval

1998

200

200

400

200

200

400

0.0

Cumulative total mortality (1st quality broilers)

Contin.

Lower

Yes: Data are presented as accumulated mortality – not amenable to meta-analysis

49 d

N = 1st quality broilers

A17

Rocha

2006

10

10

20

10

10

20

0.0

Proportion of animals not requiring anti-helminthic treatment

Dichot.

Higher

No: Data derived from text of Results (second paragraph)

4 mo (first phase)

 

iii: Non-individualised/Prophylaxis

Ref.

First author

Year

N start (hom.)

N start (cont.)

N start (tot.)

N end (hom.)

N end (cont.)

N end (tot.)

% Attrition

Designated 'main outcome'

Type of data

Direction of change favouring homeopathy

Problem with designated 'main outcome measure'

End-point

Notes

A34

Signoretti

2008

8

8

16

?8

?8

?16

Unclear

Faecal egg count per gram

Contin.

Lower

No. But assumes zero attrition rate. Data from Table 3.

30 d

 

A36

Soto

2008

24

24

48

24

24

48

0.0

Number of animal-days with diarrhoea

Dichot.

Lower

No. But relate 7-day cumulated data to total possible number of animal-days per group

7d period

Hom plus sucrose saline vs. sucrose saline only

A31

Reis

2006

30

30

60

30

30

60

0.0

Serum cortisol

Contin.

Lower

No. Assumes zero attrition rate based on legend for Figure 1.

60 d

Hom plus mineral salt vs. mineral salt only

A32

Reis

2008

15

15

30

15

?15

?30

Unclear

Rabies-neutralizing antibody titer

Contin.

Higher

No. But assumes zero attrition rate.

60 d after vaccination

Compares Group FEV2 (Hom + salt) with Group V2 (salt only)

A35

Sommer

1972

40

18

58

40

18

58

0.0

Number with infertility disorders

Dichot.

Lower

No. Data from table 2

Not stated

 

A38

Williamson

1991

101

32

133

?100

?32

?132

Unclear

Number with peripartum disorders

Dichot.

Lower

Yes: Unclear tabulations

None

 
  1. hom. = homeopathy. cont. = control. tot = total. dichot. = dichotomous. contin. = continuous