Open Access

Serological report of influenza a (H7N9) infections among pigs in Southern China

  • Pei Zhou1,
  • Malin Hong1,
  • Mary M Merrill2,
  • Huamei He1,
  • Lingshuang Sun1 and
  • Guihong Zhang1Email author
BMC Veterinary Research201410:203

DOI: 10.1186/s12917-014-0203-x

Received: 24 May 2014

Accepted: 20 August 2014

Published: 2 September 2014

Abstract

Background

In 2013, a novel H7N9 avian influenza virus (AIV) was isolated from ill humans in Shanghai and Anhui Province, China. Since then, the virus has spread quickly throughout China. Previous isolation of H7N2 virus from swine suggests that additional H7 subtype AIVs may be transmitted through pigs. However, prior to the recent zoonosis of H7N9, there were very few studies on the seroprevalence of the H7 subtypes in this species. Thus, there is a need to perform serological surveys for novel H7N9 as well as other H7 subtype AIVs in swine. This surveillance may help us understand risk factors for outbreaks of influenza A (H7N9) virus.

Results

Only 2.0% (26/1310) of the pig sera had antibodies with an HI titer ≥1:20, and none had an MN titer ≥1:80, against the H7 antigen. Thus, no samples were found to be positive against H7N9. However, 13.6% (178/1310) of the pig sera had antibodies with HI titer ≥1:20 and 8.5% (112/1310) by MN titer ≥1:80 against H9 antigen. Thirty-seven percent (484/1310) of the pig sera had antibodies with HI titer ≥1:20 and 18.2% (238/1310) had MN titer ≥1:80 against pandemic 2009.

Conclusions

Pigs in southern China have been shown to be infected with multiple avian influenza viruses. As the prevalence of novel influenza A viruses (e.g., H7N9 avian influenza virus) may be increasing among poultry in China, similar seroepidemiological studies of pigs should be conducted in the future.

Keywords

H7N9 AIV Pig

Background

Among the 17 hemagglutinin (HA) subtype viruses detected among domestic birds, wild birds and bats, H7 subtypes have occasionally infected humans and generated significant public health concerns. In 2013, a novel H7N9 avian influenza virus (AIV) was isolated from ill humans in Shanghai and Anhui Province, China [1].Since then, the virus has spread quickly throughout the country. As of August 11, 2013, a total of 134 human H7N9 infections (45 deaths) in China had been reported to the World Health Organization (WHO) [2]. Recent research has shown that the novel H7N9 AIV may be transmissible between mammals (ferrets) [3],[4]. The H7N9 AIV has also been isolated from one retail pork worker in Shanghai. H7N9 zoonosis was not preceded by overt epizootics in domestic poultry or other avian species in the wild, and the source of human infection remains to be definitively established [5]. In response to the reported human infections with H7N9 virus, the Ministry of Agriculture of the People’s Republic of China expanded and enhanced surveillance in live bird markets and poultry farms, as well as in swine farms and slaughterhouses, across the whole country, particularly in the affected region and surrounding provinces of southern China. Within six weeks of the initial case report, testing of tens of thousands of samples from poultry and their environment resulted in the identification of 51 H7N9 virus isolates from the provinces of Anhui, Guangdong, Zhejiang, Fujian, and Jiangsu, as well as the Shanghai municipality, mostly from live poultry markets [6]. For multiple reasons, it seems biologically plausible that pigs could be involved in the ecology of this emergent H7N9 virus in southern China. Some large-scale swine farms are adjacent to lakes that are home to multiple species of wild birds. In southern China, many farms raise pigs and poultry in close proximity. Recently, avian-origin H7N2 influenza viruses have been isolated from pigs in South Korea [7]. The isolation of swine H7N2 virus suggests zoonotic significance, highlighting the probable transmission of H7 subtype AIVs through pigs and prompting us to perform surveillance in this species. Prior to the recent zoonosis of H7N9, there were very few studies on the seroprevalence of the H7 subtypes in pigs. Serologic surveys are urgently needed to help us understand outbreaks of influenza A (H7N9) virus. Thus, we conducted surveillance from January 2011 to November 2012 in the Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Guangdong and Fujian Provinces in eastern China to evaluate whether pigs were infected with the novel H7N9 virus.

Methods

Swine farms in southern China vary in size from large-scale farms (>3000 pigs raised per year) to backyard farms (<100 pigs raised per year). Farms often raise pigs indoors, have little biosafety and seldom use swine influenza vaccines. Many pigs on swine farms have contact with wild birds or domestic poultry. We worked with local veterinary department leaders who regularly inspect swine farms in Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Guangdong and Fujian Provinces of southern China, where novel H7N9 AIV are currently circulating or were frequently detected in 2013. For inclusion in the study, we selected swine farms by location (to generate a geographically balanced sample of farms), and we studied only pigs on large-scale farms that denied having a swine influenza vaccine program. Pigs were selected using a stratified random sampling method. Three groups of pigs were selected from each farm: weaning pigs, finishing pigs, and sows. No anesthesia was used during phlebotomy. All the owners of the swine farms gave permission for their animals to be sampled in this study. Pigs were restrained by rope or wire loop while a health professional performed the 4.0-5.0 mL serum draw. Our sampling processes were assisted by local authorities and licensed veterinarians. The animal research in this study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Guangdong Center for Disease Control and Prevention.

As reported in previous studies [8], we employed a hemagglutination inhibition (HI) assay according to the WHO’s protocol. An H7 antigen (A/Guangdong/GH074/2013 (H7N9)) derived from the emergent H7N9 AIV was obtained from the College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University. Negative control serum (pig serum) and positive control (mice serum) were also prepared by the College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University. All serum samples were treated with a receptor-destroying enzyme [RDE, prepared by China National Influenza Center (CNIC)] and absorbed with erythrocytes to remove nonspecific inhibitors before use in the assays. Briefly, two-fold serial dilutions of serum samples were added to V-shaped micro titer plates, and 4 HA units of virus were added to each well. The mixture was incubated at room temperature for 35 minutes. Then, 1% (v/v) horse erythrocytes were added in each well. The plates were left at room temperature for 40 minutes. The HI titers were expressed as the highest dilution of serum producing complete inhibition of agglutination. All positive control serum specimens had HI titers of 1:20 or more. We isolated the other AIV antigens used in this study: low pathogenic avian influenza viruses (LPAIV) A/chicken/Guangdong/V/2008 (H9N2), at the College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University. The LPAIV A/chicken/Guangdong/V/2008 (H9N2), Beijing/1/94-like, was selected for a control as it is the most prevalent subtype of influenza virus in poultry in China [9]. The antigens A/California/7/2009pandemic (H1N1) 2009 virus, recently circulating among pigs in China, was also used for HI testing. Negative control serum and positive control serum specimens from different species were included in each plate to provide a full range of controls. Sera from pigs that were HI titer ≥ 20 by horse-RBC HI assay were confirmed with a microneutralization assay (MN) procedure recommended by the WHO [10]. Both the HI titer ≥ 1:20 and MN titer ≥ 1:80 were considered as positive evidence of previous H7N9 infection.

Results

During the period between January 2011 and November 2012, we drew blood from a total of 1310 pigs from 120 farms in Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Guangdong and Fujian Provinces of southern China. These 4 provinces have had numerous recent detections of H7N9. A total of 172 of the 1310 pigs had clinical signs of influenza-like infection (cough, sneezing or heavy nasal mucus). The results from the 1310 pig blood samples were obtained by HI assay and MN assay. HI titers of ≥1:20 were detected in 178 of the 1310 serum samples using the H9N2 AIV antigens. Only 26 of the 1310 samples had HI titers of ≥1:20 (2/26 with HI titer = 1:40) using the H7N9 AIV antigens. Although 112 of the 178 H9N2 AIV HI-positive samples were also positive by the MN assay (MN titer ≥1:80), none of the 26 H7N9 AIV HI-positive samples were positive by the MN assay (MN titer ≥1:80), revealing that no samples were positive for H7N9. As a control, 37.0% (484/1310) of sera were found positive by HI assay (HI titer ≥1:20) for H1N1 pdm09, and 18.2%(238/484)of these HI-positive samples were also positive by the MN assay (MN titer ≥1:80) (Table 1).
Table 1

Characteristics an influenza serological assay results of pigs sampled with serum specimen collections, January 2011 to November 2012

Location

Pigs studied

Number sampled

Number (%) with ILI

Number (%) with serological evidence of avian H9N2 infection

Number (%) with serological evidence of avian H7N9 infection

Number (%) with serological evidence of H1N1 pdm09 infection

    

HI assay ≥1:20

MN assay ≥1:80

HI assay ≥1:20

MN assay ≥1:80

HI assay ≥1:20

MN assay ≥1:80

Jiangsu

Weaning pigs

84

18(21.4)

8(9.5)

4(4.8)

0(0)

0(0)

22(26.2)

14(16.7)

 

Finishing pigs

120

12(10)

14(11.7)

8(6.7)

2(1.7)

0(0)

48(40.0)

22(18.3)

 

Sows

92

12(13.0)

18(19.5)

12(13.0)

4(4.3)

0(0)

28(30.4)

18(19.6)

Zhejiang

Weaning pigs

92

10(10.9)

6(6.5)

2(2.2)

0(0)

0(0)

34(37.0)

10(10.9)

 

Finishing pigs

124

20(16.1)

14(11.3)

8(6.5)

0(0)

0(0)

40(32.3)

26(21.0)

 

Sows

108

18(16.7)

24(22.2)

16(14.8)

4(3.7)

0(0)

40(37.0)

20(18.5)

Guangdong

Weaning pigs

152

22(14.5)

10(6.6)

4(2.6)

0(0)

0(0)

50(32.9)

16(10.5)

 

Finishing pigs

124

8(6.5)

16(12.9)

12(9.7)

2(1.6)

0(0)

36(45.2)

28(22.6)

 

Sows

152

24(15.8)

32(21.1)

26(17.1)

8(5.3)

0(0)

66(43.4)

36(23.7)

Fujian

Weaning pigs

78

14(17.8)

6(7.7)

4(5.1)

0(0)

0(0)

26(33.3)

10(12.8)

 

Finishing pigs

94

6(6.4)

12(12.8)

6(6.4)

4(4.3)

0(0)

36(38.3)

18(19.1)

 

Sows

90

8(8.9)

18(20.0)

10(11.1)

2(2.2)

0(0)

38(42.2)

20(22.2)

Total

 

1310

172(13.3)

178(13.6)

112 (8.5)

26(2.0)

0(0)

464(35.4)

238(18.2)

ILI = influenza-like-illness; HI = horse RBC hemagglutination inhibition assay; MN = microneutralization assay; H9N2 = A/chicken/Guangdong/V/2008(H9N2); H1N1 = A/California/7/2009pandemic (H1N1) ; H7N9 = A/Guangdong/GH074/2013(H7N9).

None of the four provinces studied had statistically significant different rates of swine infection with avian influenza virus. However, by HI assay, samples from 2012 showed an increased risk of elevated antibodies against avian influenza virus H7N9 as compared to samples from 2011. Sows had a significant increased risk of elevated antibodies against avian influenza virus H7N9, and finishing pigs had increased risk (though not significant), compared to weaning pigs. Also, pigs without signs of influenza-like-illness had a significant increased risk of elevated antibodies to avian H9N2 and pdm09 H1N1 as compared to pigs with signs of influenza-like-illness. Influenza-like-illness had no significant effect on antibodies against H7N9 virus (Table 2). HI geometric mean antibody titers (GMT) of AIV H9N2 and H1N1 pdm09 were 33.44 and 40.98 respectively (Figure 1). The GMT of H7N9 was 22.25, indicating again that all serum samples were negative.
Table 2

Risk factors for elevated antibody against influenza A viruses by horse RBC hemagglutination inhibition assay (titer ≥1:20) among pigs sampled in Jiangsu , Zhejiang , Guangdong and Fujian Provinces China

 

A/chicken/Guangdong/V/2008(H9N2)

A/Guangdong/GH074/2013(H7N9)

A/California/7/2009pandemic (H1N1)

Risk factor

Number (%)

OR (95% CI)

Number (%)

OR (95% CI)

Number (%)

OR (95% CI)

Location

      

Jiangsu

40(13.5)

1.0[0.63-1.58]

6(2.0)

1.7[0.46-5.93]

98(33.1)

0.92[0.65-1.27]

Fujian

36(13.7)

1.0[0.63-1.63]

6(2.3)

1.9[0.52-6.72]

100(38.2)

1.1[0.81-1.59]

Guangdong

58(13.6)

1.0[0.65-1.52]

10(2.3)

1.9[0.59-6.16]

152 (29.2)

1.0[0.75-1.37]

Zhejiang

44(13.6)

reference

4(1.2)

reference

114(35.2)

reference

Pigs studied

      

Sows

92(20.8)

3.3[2.13-5.10]

18(4.1)

35.4[2.13-590.30]

172(38.9)

1.3[0.10-1.75]

Finishing pigs

56(12.1)

1.7[1.09-2.75]

8(1.7)

15.2[0.84-264.4]

160(34.6)

1.0[0.83-1.46]

Weaning pigs

30(7.4)

reference

0(0.0)

reference

132(32.5)

reference

Time

      

2012

103(17.7)

1.4[0.98-1.87]

20(3.4)

3.2[1.28-8.07]

252(43.3)

1.2[0.95-1.54]

2011

75(13.7)

reference

6(1.1)

reference

212(38.7)

reference

ILI

      

No

170(14.9)

3.6[1.74-7.46]

24(2.1)

1.8[0.43-7.82]

390(34.3)

3.9[2.49-6.08]

Yes

8(4.6)

reference

2(1.2)

reference

24(14.0)

reference

Pigs were studied during the period January 2011 to November 2012.

Figure 1

The geometric mean antibody titers of H9N2 AIV, H7N9 AIV and H1N1 pdm09 infections from January 2011 to November 2012 using a hemagglutination inhibition (HI) assay. Geometric mean titers and 95% CIs of antibody titers against subtype H9N2, H7N9 and H1N1 are indicated by long and black short horizontal lines. Samples titers indicated by borrow symbols.

Discussion

China has been identified as a hot spot for the generation of novel influenza viruses. In this report, we identified large farms that seemed to have a high probability of exposure to the novel H7N9 virus and found no evidence of infection in pigs. The surveillance of pigs has focused on the subtype of H1, H3, H5 and H9 [11]-[13], while prior to the recent zoonosis of H7N9 [1],[3]-[5],[14],[15], there were very few studies on the seroprevalence of the H7 subtype. Our results matched the results reported previously, with an 8.5% prevalence of H9 infection. Although we found no definitive serological evidence of avian H7 influenza virus in swine in southern China, 2.0% of the specimens had an HI titer ≥1:20. This suggests that pig herds of southern China may have some potential risks of subtype H7 infection. While we agree that pigs have potential to serve as mixing vessels for the novel influenza virus generation [16],[17], this study found no evidence that pigs were involved in the ecology of the H7N9 virus.

Our study had a number of limitations. First, it is possible that results may have been confounded due to serologic cross-reactivity between different viral subtypes. In our study, the possibility of cross-reaction between subtypes was not evaluated. However, there were no positive serum against H7N9 via two serological methods (HI and MN), which indicates that no cross-reaction occurred between H7N9 and other avian viruses of this study. Second, we did not study pigs from small farms or slaughterhouses, and thus our study population may not be representative of all pigs in these provinces.

Conclusions

The unique environment on swine farms and live animal markets (LAMs) in southern China provides many opportunities for wild aquatic birds, domestic poultry, and pigs to come in close contact with one another, thereby increasing the likelihood of interspecies transmission and generation of novel influenza viruses through reassortment [11],[18]. As novel viruses may change rapidly, it seems prudent to continue surveillance for the H7N9 virus among non-poultry domestic animal species such as pigs and dogs [19],[20]. Zhu et al. reported that pigs were infected productively by human-isolated H7N9 influenza virus and shed virus for 6 days [15]. Xu and colleagues reported rapid adaptation of avian H7N9 virus in pigs; the avian H7N9 virus replicated to a high titer after only one passage [14]. P. Horby suggests that a hidden epidemic of H7N9 in other animals may be well under way and that it will provide opportunities for further adaptation of H7N9 to mammals and for re-assortment with human- or pig-adapted viruses if H7N9 is circulating in the large populations of pigs [21]. Therefore, such studies are crucial in understanding and reducing risk factors for human H7N9 infection in China.

Ethical approval

This study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of South China Agricultural University.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank Professor Gregory C. Gray of Duke Medicine and Duke-NUS for his helpful critical review of this manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Key Basic Research Program (Project 973) of China (grant no. 2011CB504700-G), the Science and Technology Projects of Guangdong province (2012B020306005), the International Sci & Tech Cooperation Program (2010DFB33920) and the Modern Agricultural Industry Technology System (CARS-36). The funding organizations had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, ownership of the materials, or preparation of the manuscript.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Key Laboratory of Animal Disease Control and Prevention of the Ministry of Agriculture, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University
(2)
Department of Environmental & Global Health, College of Public Health & Health Professions, University of Florida

References

  1. Gao R, Cao B, Hu Y, Feng Z, Wang D, Hu W, Chen J, Jie Z, Qiu H, Xu K, Xu X, Lu H, Zhu W, Gao Z, Xiang N, Shen Y, He Z, Gu Y, Zhang Z, Yang Y, Zhao X, Zhou L, Li X, Zou S, Zhang Y, Li X, Yang L, Guo J, Dong J, Li Q, et al: Human infection with a novel avian-origin influenza A (H7N9) virus. N Engl J Med. 2013, 368 (20): 1888-1897. 10.1056/NEJMoa1304459.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. WHO: Avian influenza A(H7N9) virus. 2013. , [http://www.who.int/influenza/human_animal_interface/influenza_h7n9/en/index.html?treeid=BEAC9C103DF952C104&nowtreeid=109A124F107E106CF505AA103]
  3. Zhang Q, Shi J, Deng G, Guo J, Zeng X, He X, Kong H, Gu C, Li X, Liu J, Wang G, Chen Y, Liu L, Liang L, Li Y, Fan J, Wang J, Li W, Guan L, Li Q, Yang H, Chen P, Jiang L, Guan Y, Xin X, Jiang Y, Tian G, Wang X, Qiao C, Li C, et al: H7N9 influenza viruses are transmissible in ferrets by respiratory droplet. Science. 2013, 341 (6144): 410-414. 10.1126/science.1240532.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Gabbard JD, Dlugolenski D, Van Riel D, Marshall N, Galloway SE, Howerth EW, Campbell PJ, Jones C, Johnson S, Byrd-Leotis L, Steinhauer DA, Kuiken T, Tompkins S, Tompkins SM, Tripp R, Lowen AC, Steel J: Novel H7N9 Influenza Virus Shows Low Infectious Dose, High Growth Rate, and Efficient Contact Transmission in the Guinea Pig Model. J Virol. 2014, 88 (3): 1502-1512. 10.1128/JVI.02959-13.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Watanabe T, Kiso M, Fukuyama S, Nakajima N, Imai M, Yamada S, Murakami S, Yamayoshi S, Iwatsuki-Horimoto K, Sakoda Y, Takashita E, McBride R, Noda T, Hatta M, Imai H, Zhao D, Kishida N, Shirakura M, de Vries RP, Shichinohe S, Okamatsu M, Tamura T, Tomita Y, Fujimoto N, Goto K, Katsura H, Kawakami E, Ishikawa I, Watanabe S, Ito M, et al: Characterization of H7N9 influenza A viruses isolated from humans. Nature. 2013, 501 (7468): 551-555. 10.1038/nature12392.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. OIE: Low pathogenic avian influenza (poultry), China (People’s Rep. of). 2013. Available at: ., [http://www.oie.int/wahis_2/public/wahid.php/Reviewreport/Review?reportid=13314]
  7. Kwon TY, Lee SS, Kim CY, Shin JY, Sunwoo SY, Lyoo YS: Genetic characterization of H7N2 influenza virus isolated from pigs. Vet Microbiol. 2011, 153 (3-4): 393-397. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.06.011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Green A: The epidemiologic approach to studies of association between HLA and disease: II. Estimation of absolute risks, etiologic and preventive fraction. Tissue Antigens. 1982, 19: 259-268. 10.1111/j.1399-0039.1982.tb01450.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Tian J, Qi W, Li X, He J, Jiao P, Zhang C, Liu GQ, Liao M: A single E627K mutation in the PB2 protein of H9N2 avian influenza virus increases virulence by inducing higher glucocorticoids (GCs) level. PLoS One. 2012, 7 (6): e38233-10.1371/journal.pone.0038233.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. WHO: Manual for the laboratory diagnosis and virological surveillance of influenza. 2011. Available at: ., [http://www.aitoolkit.org/site/DefaultSite/filesystem/documents/WHO%20lab%20manual.pdf]
  11. Ninomiya A, Takada A, Okazaki K, Shortridge KF, Kida H: Seroepidemiological evidence of avian H4, H5, and H9 influenza A virus transmission to pigs in southeastern China. Vet Microbiol. 2002, 88 (2): 107-114. 10.1016/S0378-1135(02)00105-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Li HY, Yu KZ, Xin XG, Yang HL, Li YB, Qin YN, Bi YZ, Tong GZ, Chen HL: Serological and virologic surveillance of swine influenza in China from 2000 to 2003. Int Congr Ser. 2004, 1263: 754-757. 10.1016/j.ics.2004.04.002.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Song XH, Xiao H, Huang Y, Fu G, Jiang B, Kitamura Y, Liu W, Liu D, Gao GF: Serological Surveillance of Influenza A Virus Infection in Swine Populations in Fujian Province, China: No Evidence of Naturally Occurring H5N1 Infection in Pigs. Zoonoses Public Health. 2010, 57 (4): 291-298. 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2009.01270.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Xu L, Bao L, Deng W, Zhu H, Li F, Chen T, Lv Q, Yuan J, Xu Y, Li Y, Yao Y, Gu S, Yu P, Chen H, Qin C: Rapid adaptation of avian H7N9 virus in pigs. Virology. 2014, 452-453: 231-236. 10.1016/j.virol.2014.01.016.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Zhu H, Wang D, Kelvin DJ, Li L, Zheng Z, Yoon SW, Wong SS, Farooqui A, Wang J, Banner D, Chen R, Zheng R, Zhou J, Zhang Y, Hong W, Dong W, Cai Q, Roehrl MH, Huang SS, Kelvin AA, Yao T, Zhou B, Chen X, Leung GM, Poon LL, Webster RG, Webby RJ, Peiris JS, Guan Y, Shu Y, et al: Infectivity, transmission, and pathology of human-isolated H7N9 influenza virus in ferrets and pigs. Science. 2013, 341 (6142): 183-186. 10.1126/science.1239844.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Brown IH: The epidemiology and evolution of influenza viruses in pigs. Vet Microbiol. 2000, 74 (1-2): 29-46. 10.1016/S0378-1135(00)00164-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Su S, Qi WB, Chen JD, Zhu WJ, Huang Z, Xie JX, Zhang GH: Seroepidemiological Evidence of Avian Influenza A Virus Transmission to Pigs in Southern China. J Clin Microbiol. 2013, 51 (2): 601-602. 10.1128/JCM.02625-12.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Zhang G, Kong W, Qi W, Long LP, Cao Z, Huang L, Qi H, Cao N, Wang W, Zhao F, Ning Z, Liao M, Wan XF: Identification of an H6N6 swine influenza virus in southern China. Infect Genet Evol. 2011, 11 (5): 1174-1177. 10.1016/j.meegid.2011.02.023.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Su S, Zhou P, Fu X, Wang L, Hong M, Lu G, Sun L, Qi W, Ning Z, Jia K, Yuan Z, Wang H, Ke C, Wu J, Zhang G, Gray GC, Li S: Virological and epidemiological evidence of avian influenza virus infections among feral dogs in live poultry markets, china: a threat to human health?. Clin Infect Dis. 2014, 58 (11): 1644-1646. 10.1093/cid/ciu154.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Su S, Gray GC, Lu J, Liao M, Zhang G, Li S: New “One Health” Strategies Needed for Emerging Pathogens Detection and Control at Cantonese Live Animal Markets, China.Clin Infect Dis 2014, [Epub ahead of print].,Google Scholar
  21. Horby P: H7N9 is a virus worth worrying about. Nature. 2013, 496 (7446): 399-399. 10.1038/496399a.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Zhou et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.