Open Access

Molecular cloning and expression analysis of peptidase genes in the fish-pathogenic scuticociliate Miamiensis avidus

  • Jung Soo Seo1,
  • Eun Ji Jeon1,
  • Sung Hee Jung1,
  • Myoung Ae Park1,
  • Jin Woo Kim2,
  • Ki Hong Kim3,
  • Sung Ho Woo4 and
  • Eun Hye Lee1Email author
BMC Veterinary Research20139:10

DOI: 10.1186/1746-6148-9-10

Received: 4 May 2012

Accepted: 19 December 2012

Published: 11 January 2013

Abstract

Background

Parasite peptidases have been actively studied as vaccine candidates or drug targets for prevention or treatment of parasitic diseases because of their important roles for survival and/or invasion in the host. Like other parasites, the facultative histophagous ciliate Miamiensis avidus would possess peptidases that are closely associated with the invasion into the host tissue and survival in the host.

Results

The 17 genes encoding peptidases, including seven cathepsin-like cysteine peptidases, four serine carboxypeptidases, a eukaryotic aspartyl protease family protein, an ATP-dependent metalloprotease FtsH family protein, three leishmanolysin family proteins and a peptidase family M49 protein were identified from a Miamiensis avidus cDNA library by BLAST X search. Expression of genes encoding two cysteine peptidases, three leishmanolysin-like peptidases and a peptidase family M49 protein was up-regulated in the cell-fed ciliates compared to the starved ciliates. Especially, one cysteine peptidase (MaPro 4) and one leishmanolysin-like peptidase (MaPro 14) were transcribed more than 100-folds in the cell-fed ciliates.

Conclusions

The genetic information and transcriptional characteristics of the peptidases in the present results would be helpful to elucidate the role of peptidases in the invasion of scuticociliates into their hosts.

Keywords

Scuticociliates Miamiensis avidus Peptidases RT-PCR

Background

Parasite peptidases have been widely studied as potential vaccine candidates or promising targets of anti-parasitic agents for prevention or treatment of parasitic diseases, because of their crucial roles in completing the life cycles or diseases they produce. In many protozoan parasites that cause malaria, trypanosomiasis, leishmaniasis, amebiasis, toxoplasmosis, giardiasis, cryptosporidiosis, and trichomoniasis, the major roles of parasite peptidases include invasion by degradation of host cells and tissues, degradation of mediators of the immune responses, and the catabolism of host proteins for parasite growth and survival [15].

In the facultative histophagous Miamiensis avidus (= synonym of Philasterides dicentrarchi), which causes high mortality in cultured olive flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus) in Korea [6, 7], peptidases might play important roles in the process of transforming of the ciliates from the free-living form into the invasive, infectious form, which might make the peptidases as candidates for vaccine antigen or treatment drug target. It has been reported that peptidases secreted by Philasterides dicentrarchi can degrade type-I collagen, modulate host cellular immune responses, and induce apoptosis of leucocytes [811]. Moreover, P. dicentrarchi peptidases could affect host humoral immune responses by degrading the host immunoglobulins and reducing host complement activity in fish serum and ascitic fluid [12].

Although there are several reports about the important roles of peptidases in scuticociliate M. avidus, no studies combined with genetic identification of peptidase genes and gene expression related to the function on the invasion have been performed. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to identify peptidase genes that are expected to have features related to infection of M. avidus by comparison of expression level between the cell-fed and the starved ciliates.

Methods

Ciliates

Ciliates were isolated from ascitic fluid of an infected olive flounder Paralichthys olivaceus collected from a local fish farm in Korea, and were identified as Miamiensis avidus using species-specific oligonucleotide primers [6]. Chinook salmon embryo (CHSE)-214 cells, incubated at 20°C in Eagle’s minimum essential medium (MEM, Sigma, St. Louis, Mo, USA) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS), were used as grazing material to grow the ciliates under axenic culture conditions.

To obtain cell-free cultured ciliates, ciliates harvested from routine CHSE cell-feeding cultures were transferred to filtered sea water without any nutrient components and starved at 20°C for at least 1 month. To obtain cell-fed ciliates, ciliates were inoculated in sufficiently grown CHSE-214 cells in routine MEM supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS or in sufficiently grown CHSE-214 cells in filtered seawater supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS or were intraperitoneally injected into olive flounder. The ciliates from different culture conditions were harvested using a method described previously [13]. Briefly, the ciliates were harvested by centrifugation at 200 × g for 5 min, and washed more than 3 times by centrifugation at 150 × g for 5 min in Hanks’ balanced salt solution (Sigma) or filtered seawater. The experiments using fish and treatment of dead fish were performed in accordance with the guideline approved by Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries.

RNA preparation, cDNA library construction and expressed sequence tag (EST) analysis

Total RNA from CHSE-cultured M. avidus was prepared using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Poly A+ RNA from the total RNA prepared from CHSE-cultured M. avidus was isolated using the Stratagene Absolutely mRNA Purification Kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA, USA). A cDNA library was constructed using the ZAP Express cDNA Synthesis Kit and Gigapack III Gold packing extract (Stratagene) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The titer of constructed cDNA library was 5.6 × 105 plaque-forming units (pfu)/ml.

The expressed sequence tags (ESTs) were analyzed by DNA sequencing of kanamycin resistant Escherichia coli clones containing cDNA fraction-harbored phagemid (pBK-CMV) after mass excision of the lambda phage library. DNA sequencing was conducted with T3/T7 phagemid sequencing primers using an ABI3730 automatic sequencer (96-capillary, Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) and Applied Biosystems BigDye® Terminator Cycle Sequencing Kits v3.1, in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations. A total of 1,265 EST sequences, obtained cDNA library of M. avidus RNA, were analyzed by sequence comparison with previously reported sequences in the EMBL/GenBank databases using the BLAST X search program of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). The domain search of deduced amino acid sequences was analyzed using the SMART web and the NCBI protein blast program.

Real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) of peptidase genes in Miamiensis avidus

RT-PCR was performed to further verify the expression patterns of the isolated peptidase genes. Total RNA was isolated from cell-free cultured ciliates and cell-fed ciliates using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). Total RNA was isolated several times, and the pooled total RNA was used for cDNA synthesis. cDNA was synthesized from 1 μg of total RNA using Superscript II Reverse Transcriptase and Oligo (dT) 20 primer (Invitrogen). RT-PCR was performed using Fast Start SYBR Green Master Mix (Roche, Indianapolis, IN-, USA) and 100 ng of synthesized cDNA in a 20 μl reaction volume. Quantitative PCR was conducted using an iQ5 Multicolor Real-Time PCR instrument (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA), and the β-tubulin (BTU) gene was used as the internal control for normalization. Thermal cycling conditions were one cycle of 3 min at 95°C (initial denaturation) followed by 40 cycles of 10 s at 95°C, 10 s at 55°C, 20 s at 72°C. The specific PCR primers for amplification of M. avidus peptidase genes were designed from the unique sequences obtained by analysis of ESTs using the OLIGO 5.0 software (National Bioscience) (Table 1) and the expected sizes of PCR products are listed in Table 2. The results of RT-PCR from triplicate experiments were expressed as mean Ct (Cycle threshold) values and standard deviation. The fold change in relative gene expression under the different culture conditions was determined by the 2−ΔΔCt method [14, 15]. ΔΔCt (delta delta Ct) values were calculated using an equation, where ΔΔCt = (CtMaPro - CtBTU)cell-fed - (CtMaPro - CtBTU)cell-free. Significant differences of Ct values were determined by Paired t-test after normalization using those of β-tubulin gene.
Table 1

Characterization of the peptidases in Miamiensis avidus

Name of clone

Number of clone

Protein length (amino acids)

Matched proteins (Species, Accession number)

Homology (E-value)

Putative domains contained

MaPro 1

3

355

Cathepsin L-like cysteine protease (Uronema marinum, AAX51228)

31% (1x10-57)

signal sequence, I29, peptidase C1

MaPro 2

2

346

Cathepsin L-like cysteine protease (Uronema marinum, AAX51228)

36% (3x10-68)

signal sequence, I29, peptidase C1

MaPro 3

2

355

Cathepsin L-like cysteine protease (Uronema marinum, AAX51228)

36% (2x10-54)

I29, peptidase C1

MaPro 4

1

342

Cathepsin L-like cysteine protease (Uronema marinum, AAX51228)

37% (1x10-57)

signal sequence, I29, peptidase C1

MaPro 5

1

342

Papain family cysteine protease containing protein (Tetrahymena thermophila SB210, EAR82238)

49% (2x10-59)

signal sequence, I29, peptidase C1

MaPro 6

2

337

Cathepsin B (Uronema marinum, AAR19103)

59% (9x10-146)

signal sequence, propeptide, peptidase C1

MaPro 7

1

362 (partial)

Cathepsin C (Danio rerio, AAH64286)

37% (1x10-57)

peptidase C1

MaPro 8

2

479

Serine carboxypeptidase (Oxytricha trifallax, AMCR01008778)

30% (1x10-57)

signal peptide, peptidase S10

MaPro 9

1

518

Serine carboxypeptidase family protein (Tetrahymena thermophile, XP_001031619)

36% (3x10-73)

signal peptide, peptidase S10

MaPro 10

5

473

Serine carboxypeptidase S28 family protein (Tetrahymena thermophile, XP_001013945)

53% (1x10-155)

signal peptide, peptidase S28

MaPro 11

1

477

Serine carboxypeptidase 24-like isoform 1 (Glycine max, XP_003519151)

32% (9x10-62)

signal peptide, peptidase S10

MaPro 12

1

381

Eukaryotic aspartyl protease family protein (Tetrahymena thermophile XP_001016313)

48% (2x10-107)

Asp domain

MaPro 13

1

283 (partial)

ATP-dependent metalloprotease FtsH family protein (Tetrahymena thermophila SB210, EAR83289)

79% (8x10-159)

AAA domain, Peptidase M41

MaPro 14

4

731

Leishmanolysin family protein, putative (Ichthyophthirius multifiliis, EGR31368)

34% (1x10-82)

Signal peptide, Peptidase M8, EGF-like domain, Furine-like repeat

MaPro 15

5

1102

Leishmanolysin family protein, putative (Ichthyophthirius multifiliis, EGR31368)

33% (1x10-73)

Signal peptide, Peptidase M8, EGF-like domain, Furine-like repeat

MaPro 16

1

693

Leishmanolysin family protein, putative (Ichthyophthirius multifiliis, EGR33997)

29% (1x10-64)

Signal peptide, Peptidase M8, EGF-like domain, Furine-like repeat

MaPro 17

1

708

Peptidase family M49 (Tetrahymena thermophila SB210, EAR87978)

61% (0)

Peptidase M49

Table 2

List of primers used in quantitative reverse-transcription PCR (RT-PCR)

Target clone/gene

Primers

Sequences (5- 3)

Product size (bp)

MaPro 1

Forward

TGCTTCCACTTCAGTTTTATCAGTCG

266

 

Reverse

GGTTAAGTTCAACTGTGGGGATTTCTAA

 

MaPro 2

Forward

TCTTGAGAGCTTCTGCTGCCAC

271

 

Reverse

TCTTGGATGTTTAATTCGGTGCTGT

 

MaPro 3

Forward

AATCCAACGAAGACATCAGAATCTTCT

246

 

Reverse

CAGGGACTTATCTGGAAGGTCTGGA

 

MaPro 4

Forward

TAGCTTCAATTGCTTCTGGTAGTCTTG

277

 

Reverse

ATCCATGTTTATTCCACATAGTCCATTAC

 

MaPro 5

Forward

ATTTCAAGCGATTGGAAGCTAAGAATC

308

 

Reverse

AATAATCCCAAATAGAATATTACCCATCTTC

 

MaPro 6

Forward

ACTTGGACTGCTGGATACAACAAAC

310

 

Reverse

CGGTGGAGATTCTGGTTTGAAC

 

MaPro 7

Forward

CGGTGGAGATTCTGGTTTGAAC

212

 

Reverse

TTCGGCATCAACAGAATGGTAGATAC

 

MaPro 8

Forward

ACGTTTTATTAGAAAGCCAAGGTAACC

260

 

Reverse

GGTATTTTCGTCGGTGTATTTGTAGCT

 

MaPro 9

Forward

GGGAAAAGGAAACTCTGCATTCG

348

 

Reverse

CATCCATTTTCAGCAGTGTACAGTTCTAT

 

MaPro 10

Forward

CAGATAATGGCTCTACTAATATTGCACTC

243

 

Reverse

AGGGATCTTCACTTCCATTTGTGAATAC

 

MaPro 11

Forward

ATTTGGCTCAATGGAGGACCTG

217

 

Reverse

CAGCGGTATTATCATCAGTGTAAGAGT

 

MaPro 12

Forward

CCACCTACAAACCCCAAGGAGAC

268

 

Reverse

GCGAAAGAGTTGTCTTCCCAGACT

 

MaPro 13

Forward

CAGCTCTTTTAACAGAAGGAGCTACAC

352

 

Reverse

TTTCTGAACTTCGGTATCCACCATA

 

MaPro 14

Forward

AGGGTATCTTCGAACAGCTCTTCG

319

 

Reverse

CATTGGGACAAGAGACTGAACAGTC

 

MaPro 15

Forward

AGCCTTGGAATGGAAATACTTTCGCTG

319

 

Reverse

CCAACACAGTATCCGTTAGAGCTACAG

 

MaPro 16

Forward

ACTCACGGATAGAACAATGCTCTTGC

314

 

Reverse

TTAAAGTGCTTGCGAGCCACTTCC

 

MaPro 17

Forward

TTGCAAGTTTCCTCTGGATTTGAATC

327

 

Reverse

TCCGTATATAAGTTCAATTGTGGCATC

 

β-tubulin

Forward

GTATGATCATTGATAACGAAGCCCTCTACG

323

 

Reverse

TCTGGGATCGGCGGCGCACATCATG

 

Results

Isolation and sequence analysis of peptidase genes from the Miamiensis aviduscDNA library

We isolated 32 clones harboring peptidase gene sequences from 1,265 EST clones of the M. avidus cDNA library and obtained 17 different peptidase gene sequences including 15 full open reading frames and two partial sequences after DNA sequencing with the T3 and T7 primers and gene specific primers. These 17 genes encoded peptidase proteins including seven cysteine peptidases, four serine carboxypeptidases, a eukaryotic aspartyl protease family protein, an ATP-dependent metalloprotease FtsH family protein, three leishmanolysin family proteins and a peptidase family M49 protein, respectively. The characteristics of the peptidase proteins, including frequency, protein length, homology to previously deposited proteins and conserved domains are shown in Table 1. The conserved domains were analyzed using the SMART web program, Genbank BLAST program, and other literature [1622].

The seven cysteine peptidases (MaPro 1 - MaPro 7) commonly contained the peptidase C1A domain in their mature protein sequences, which contained catalytic triad residues (C, H, and N) essential for peptidolytic activity, glutamine (Q) residue involved in the formation of the oxyanion hole, the structurally important GCNGG motif, six cysteine residues forming three disulfide bonds and S2 subsite determining enzyme substrate specificity (Figure 1). However, in MaPro 4, both the first amino acid residue of the catalytic triad and the fifth cysteine residues forming a disulfide bond were G, not C. The five cysteine peptidase proteins had signal peptide sequences, except for MaPro 3 and MaPro 7 which had no detectable signal peptide and obtained partial sequence containing only the peptidase C1A domain, respectively. The conserved signatures of cathepsin L family protein, ERFNIN and GNFD motifs with slight variation were presented in the type I29 inhibitor domain of MaPro 1 - MaPro 5 proteins presented in other cathepsin L proteins. ERFNIN motif seems to function as an autoinhibitory domain [23] and an important role of GNFD motif in processing and folding of C1A proteses have been shown using site-directed mutagenesis studies [24]. Sequence identities of MaPro 1 – MaPro 5 with the cathepsin L protein of Uronema marinum (UmCatL, AAX51228), which is one of the most related scuticociliate species, were 30.7%, 35.9%, 35.6%, 37% and 22.4%, respectively. The MaPro 6 protein sequence contained a signal peptide, a propeptide C1 domain, and a peptidase C1A domain containing twelve conserved cysteine residues forming disulfide bonds and the “occluding loop” which is a specific feature of cathepsin B-like peptidases distinct from other C1 superfamily peptidases and had a 58.9% identity to the cathepsin B-like peptidase protein of U. marinum (Figure 1). We identified four different serine carboxypeptidase proteins and three different leishmanolysin family proteins in M. avidus. All four serine carboxypeptidase proteins contained a signal peptide, and three had a peptidase S10 domain, and one had a peptidase S28 domain that commonly exist in serine carboxypeptidase proteins. The leishmanolysin family proteins had a signal peptide, a peptidase M8 domain, and a different number of epidermal growth factor (EGF)-like domains and furine-like repeats. As the individual lengths of the proteins were varied (Table 1), common peptidase M8 domains were aligned for comparative purposes with other reported leishmanolysin family protein sequences of similar protozoa (Figure 2). As shown in Figure 2, the HEXXH motif and cysteine residues conserved in other metallopeptidase proteins were present [22].
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1746-6148-9-10/MediaObjects/12917_2012_Article_596_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Multiple alignment of the deduced amino acid sequences of Miamiensis avidus cysteine peptidases. The deduced amino acid sequences of Miamiensis avidus cysteine peptidases MaPro 1 to - MaPro 7 were aligned with Papain (the type peptidase of C1A superfamily, GenBank: AAB02650), Uronema marinum cathepsin L-like protein (UmCatL, GenBank: AAX51228), Homo sapiens cathepsin B protein (HsCatB, GenBank: AAH10240) and Uronema marinum cathepsin B protein (UmCatB, GenBank: AAR19103). The signal peptide, I29 (Inhibitor 29)/ Propeptide, Peptidase C1A domains are boxed. Conserved signatures of cathepsin L family proteins (ERFNIN and GNFD) with slight modifications in I-29 peptide of the cathepsin L-like proteins (MaPro 1- MaPro 5) are highlighted in bold, italic, grey shaded and indicated by ERFNIN and GNFD above the alignment. The catalytic triad residues (C, H and N) are marked in bold, grey shaded and indicated by sharp (#). Conserved proline residues at position 2 of the mature proteins are indicated by asterisk (*) and cysteine residues forming disulphide bonds are in bold, grey shaded and indicated by C above the alignment. S2 subsite determining enzyme substrate specificity is indicated by a black vertical arrow above the alignment. The predicted ‘occluding loop’, which is the specific feature of cathepsin B-like peptidases, is presented in only MaPro 6 and is indicated with a black thick underline.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1746-6148-9-10/MediaObjects/12917_2012_Article_596_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

Multiple sequence alignment of peptidase M8 domains of the Miamiensis avidus leishmanolysin family proteins. The peptidase M8 domains of M. avidus leishmanolysin family proteins MaPro 14 – MaPro 16 were aligned with the previously deposited protozoan sequences in protein databases. The zinc-binding signature, HEXXH motif conserved in many kinds of metallopeptidases is shown in bold and in square box, and cysteine residues are presented in bold. The GenBank accession numbers of aligned leishmanolysin family proteins of Ichthyophtirius multifiliis, Leishmania donovani and Tetrahymena thermophila are EGR30431, XP_001024633 and AAA29244, respectively.

Real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) of peptidase genes

The relative level of peptidase genes expression was analyzed by quantitative RT-PCR using cDNA prepared from M. avidus RNA grown under the different culture conditions. As shown in Table 3, the MaPro 4, MaPro 7, MaPro 14, and MaPro 17 genes, which corresponded with a cathepsin L-like cysteine peptidase, a cathepsin C-like cysteine peptidase, a leishmanolysin-like peptidase and a peptidase family M49 protein gene, showed more than 2-fold increased expression in the cell-fed ciliates compared with that in the starved ciliates. Two leishmanolysin-like peptidases, MaPro 15 and MaPro 16, showed detectable Ct values only in the cell-fed ciliates during our RT-PCR process (Table 3).
Table 3

Real time RT-PCR analysis of peptidase genes in Miamiensis avidus under the different culture conditions

Name of clone

Mean Ctavalue (SDb)

Fold increase in expression (2−ΔΔCt(SD))

 

Cell-free culture

Cell-feeding culture

Cell-free culture

Cell-feeding culture

MaPro 1

28.48(0.51)

22.67(0.32)

1.05(0.40)

1.01(0.22)

MaPro 2**

25.38(0.24)

21.25(0.12)

1.01(0.16)

0.31(0.03)

MaPro 3

27.43(0.34)

22.11(0.10)

1.02(0.23)

0.71(0.05)

MaPro 4**

34.96(0.28)

21.95(0.24)

1.02(0.20)

147.58(24.89)

MaPro 5

33.19(0.44)

29.71(0.63)

1.03(0.30)

0.21(0.08)

MaPro 6**

23.93(0.36)

20.01(0.19)

1.02(0.27)

0.27(0.04)

MaPro 7*

33.61(0.31)

25.72(0.11)

1.01(0.22)

4.19(0.33)

MaPro 8**

26.94(0.21)

24.11(0.31)

1.01(0.14)

0.13(0.03)

MaPro 9*

29.33(0.58)

26.79(0.58)

1.05(0.42)

0.11(0.04)

MaPro 10

32.67(1.44)

26.44(0.29)

1.29(0.86)

1.34(0.27)

MaPro 11

30.26(1.30)

25.09(0.25)

1.24(0.79)

0.64(0.11)

MaPro 12**

25.57(0.08)

22.90(0.29)

1.00(0.06)

0.11(0.02)

MaPro 13*

34.37(0.34)

31.15(1.30)

1.02(0.22)

0.21(0.16)

MaPro 14**

32.51(0.41)

19.37(0.01)

1.03(0.27)

159.78(1.40)

MaPro 15

N/Ac

31.12(0.76)

  

MaPro 16

N/A

31.52(0.57)

  

MaPro 17*

34.68(0.77)

26.87(0.32)

1.10(0.54)

4.04(0.84)

β-tubulin

23.37(0.45)

17.55(0.22)

  

aCt: Cycle threshold, bSD: standard deviation, cN/A: No detectable Ct value was obtained within 40 cycles, * : Significant differences P<0.05, ** : Significant differences P<0.005.

Discussion

Scuticociliatosis, causing severe mortality in South Korea, has been considered one of the most serious fish diseases than any other countries [6, 7]. Although several reports have revealed that some chemotherapeutics showed effective scuticocidal activities in vitro [2527], finding effective chemotherapeutics is still remained to be difficult in vivo. Therefore, efficient vaccine development is urgently to prevent diseases. Several studied have attempted to develop vaccines using whole cells and have shown some positive results by obtaining good protection against scuticociliate infection following vaccination [2830]. However, as there are some limitations for in vitro mass and economic culture of scuticociliates for commercial use, subunit vaccines should be developed with development of cost-effective methods of antigens. Selecting suitable target antigens that can induce effective protective responses may be the most important factor to develop effective subunit vaccines. Among scuticociliate antigens, the crucial roles of peptidases in infection of host fish have been already reported by previous studies [812, 31].

In the present study, M. avidus were starved for at least 1 month by inoculation in the filtered seawater without any additional nutrients and cells. Similar to what occurs during the free-living stage, these starved ciliates may lose their ability to destroy fish tissue due to a reduction in protease activities they need. Quantitative RT-PCR was performed to investigate mRNA expression of the identified peptidase genes in relation with the cell-feeding parasitic stage of M. avidus. The results showed that two cysteine peptidases, a leishmanolysin-like peptidase and a peptidase family M49 protein genes were up-regulated more than 2-fold in the cell-fed ciliates than in the starved ciliates. Among them, one cysteine peptidase gene (MaPro 4) and one leishmanolysin-like peptidase gene (MaPro 14) showed 100-fold higher expression in the cell-fed ciliates. Expression of two other leishmanolysin-like peptidase genes (MaPro 15 and MaPro 16) was detected only in the cell-fed ciliates.

The differential expression of the cysteine peptidases in the cell-fed ciliates might be an important part of M. avidus pathogenesis as shown in previous studies [812]. Many parasite cysteine peptidases and their important roles in pathogenesis have been well documented in a variety of parasites and inhibitors of cysteine peptidases have been developed for anti-parasitic chemotherapy, as cysteine peptidase inhibitors can selectively inhibit parasite peptidases without untoward toxicity to the host [3236]. In this study, we cloned seven different cysteine peptidases genes and two of them (MaPro 4 and MaPro 7) were differentially up-regulated in the cell-fed ciliates. We obtained the mRNA sequences of three leishmanolysin-like family proteins containing the metalloprotease M8 domain and found differential mRNA expression in the cell-fed ciliates. Leishmanolysin, which is also known as the gp63 protein, is a metalloprotease found in protozoan parasites including Leishmania and Trypanosoma. This protein is the most abundant cell surface protein during the promastigote stage of the parasite and is attached to the membrane by a glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchor [3740]. The protective effects of gp63 immunization have been recently demonstrated using various vaccine formulations by many researchers [41, 42]. In fish pathogenic haemoflagellates Cryptobia spp., metallopeptidase activity was only found in the pathogenic strain of C. salmositica, its activity decreased significantly with long-term in vitro culture, and the purified metallopeptidases could lyse fish red blood cells [4345]. Moreover, metallopeptidase activities could be neutralized by either a monoclonal antibody or a natural anti-peptidase or the antibody against the DNA vaccines [4648].

Recent technological advances in whole genome sequence analyses and comparative genomic analyses have revealed that there are more than 90 peptidase homologs in a single organism such as Plasmodium falciparum, Tetrahymena thermophila and Ichthyophthirius multifiliis [4951]. In protozoa, 254, 578, 480 and 95 peptidase genes have been identified in Ichthyophthrius multifiliis, Paramecium tetraurelia, Tetrahymena thermophile, and Plasmodium falciparum, respectively [51]. Like other parasites, M. avidus may express many peptidase proteins to undergo various biological processes including parasite survival and pathogenesis. In this study, we obtained 17 different peptidase genes from a M. avidus cDNA library by ESTs sequence screening, and the results of differential mRNA expression related to pathogenesis were also obtained. Based on the analysis of structurally conserved regions and motifs presented in the deduced amino acid sequences of each peptidase proteins, five cathepsin L-like cysteine peptidases, one cathepsin B-like cysteine peptidase, one cathepsin C-like cysteine peptidase, four serine carboxypeptidase, a eukaryotic aspartyl protease family protein, an ATP-dependent metalloprotease FtsH family protein, three leishmanolysin family proteins, and a peptidase family M49 protein were identified although there were some structurally differences with previously reported similar proteins. Although the number of identified peptidase genes obtained from this study was relatively lower than expected, this is the first report of cloning and mRNA expression of peptidase gene homologs as important virulence factors in M. avidus. Moreover, the information of exact protein sequence obtained from this study could help to perform futher studies to develop specific inhibitors.

We are currently performing studies on the actual activities using recombinant proteins of cloned peptidase genes to understand whether these proteins are biologically active at the protein level. We will further analyze of M. avidus genome using large scale-genome analysis techniques to identify more peptidase sequences, and will perform combined research of transcriptional analysis and enzymatic activities of each peptidase proteins.

Conclusions

In conclusion, the genetic information obtained from this study could help to design specific vaccine formulations and inhibitors of peptidases to prevent and control of fish scuticociliatosis caused by M. avidus, although further studies to elucidate the exact roles of these peptidases should be conducted.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by a research fund of the National Fisheries Research and Development Institute (NFRDI, RP-2012-AQ-062), Republic of Korea.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Pathology Division, National Fisheries Research & Development Institute (NFRDI)
(2)
Aquatic Life Disease Control Division, NFRDI
(3)
Department of Aquatic Life Medicine, Pukyong National University
(4)
Institute of Fisheries Sciences, Pukyong National University

References

  1. McKerrow JH, Sun E, Rosenthal PJ, Bouvier J: The proteases and pathogenicity of parasitic protozoa. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1993, 47: 821-853. 10.1146/annurev.mi.47.100193.004133.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Que X, Reed SL: The role of extracellular cysteine proteinases in pathogenesis of Entamoeba histolytica invasion. Parasitol Today. 1997, 13: 190-194. 10.1016/S0169-4758(97)01043-0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Rosenthal PJ: Proteases of protozoan parasites. Adv Parasitol. 1999, 43: 105-159.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Jime’nez JC, Uzcanga G, Zambrano A, Di Prisco MC, Lynch NR: Identification and partial characterization of excretory/secretory products with proteolytic activity in Giardia intestinalis. J Parasitol. 2000, 86: 859-862.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Klenmba M, Goldberg DE: Biological roles of proteases in parasitic protozoa. Annu Rev Biochem. 2002, 71: 275-305. 10.1146/annurev.biochem.71.090501.145453.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Kim SM, Cho JB, Kim SK, Nam YK, Kim KH: Occurrence of scuticociliatosis in olive flounder Paralichthys olivaceus by Philasterides dicentrarchi (Ciliophora: Scuticociitida). Dis Aquat Organ. 2004, 62: 233-238.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Jung SJ, Kitamura S, Song JY, Oh MJ: Miamiensis avidus (Ciliophora: Scuticociliatida) causes systemic infection of olive flounder Paralichthys olivaceus and is a senior synonym of Philasterides dicentrarchi. Dis Aquat Organ. 2007, 73 (3): 227-234.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Paramá A, Iglesias R, Alvarez MF, Sanmartn ML, Leiro J: Chemotactic responses of the fish-parasitic scuticociliate Philasterides dicentrarchi to blood and blood components of the turbot Scophthalmus maximus, evaluated using a new microplate multiassay. J Microbiol Methods. 2004, 58: 361-366. 10.1016/j.mimet.2004.04.018.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Paramá A, Iglesias R, Alvarez MF, Leiro J, Ubeira FM, Sanmartín ML: Cysteine proteinase activities in the fish pathogen Philasterides dicentrarchi (Ciliophora: Scuticociliatida). Parasitology. 2004, 128: 541-548. 10.1017/S0031182004004883.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Paramá A, Castro R, Arranz JA, Sanmartín ML, Lamas J, Leiro J: Scuticociliate cysteine proteinases modulate turbot leucocyte functions. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2007, 23 (5): 945-956. 10.1016/j.fsi.2007.02.001.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Paramá A, Castro R, Lamas J, Sanmartín ML, Santamarina MT, Leiro J: Scuticociliate proteinases may modulate turbot immune response by inducing apoptosis in pronephric leucocytes. Int J Parasitol. 2007, 37: 87-95. 10.1016/j.ijpara.2006.08.013.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Piazzon C, Lamas J, Leiro M: Role of scuticociliate proteinases in infection success in turbot, Psetta maxima (L.). Parasite Immunol. 2011, 33: 535-544. 10.1111/j.1365-3024.2011.01310.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Lee EH, Kim KH: Identification of differentially expressed genes in parasitic phase Miamiensis avidus (Ciliophora: Scuticociliatia) using suppression subtractive hybridization. Dis Aquat Organ. 2011, 94: 135-142. 10.3354/dao02320.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Giulietti A, Oververgh L, Valckx D, Decallonne B, Bouillon R, Mathieu C: An overview of real-time quantitative PCR: applications to quantify cytokine gene expression. Methods. 2001, 25: 386-401. 10.1006/meth.2001.1261.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD: Analysis of Relative Gene Expression Data Using Real-Time Quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT Method. Methods. 2001, 25: 402-408. 10.1006/meth.2001.1262.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Jesudhasan PR, Tan CW, Hontzeas N, Woo PT: A cathepsin L-like cysteine proteinase gene from the protozoan parasite, Cryptobia salmositica. Parasitol Res. 2007, 100: 881-886. 10.1007/s00436-006-0344-3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Herrmann L, Erkelenz M, Aldag I, Tiedtke A, Hartmann MW: Biochemical and molecular characterisation of Tetrahymena thermophila extracellular cysteine proteases. BMC Microbiol. 2006, 6: 19-10.1186/1471-2180-6-19.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Jousson O, Di Bello D, Donadio E, Felicioli A, Pretti C: Differential expression of cysteine proteases in developmental stages of the parasitic ciliate Ichthyophthirius multifiliis. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2007, 269: 77-84. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2006.00611.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Ahn SJ, Seo JS, Kim MS, Jeon SJ, Kim NY, Jang JH, Kim KH, Hong YK, Chung JK, Lee HH: Cloning, site-directed mutagenesis and expression of cathepsin L-like cysteine protease from Uronema marinum (Ciliophora: Scuticociliatida). Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2007, 156: 191-198. 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2007.07.021.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Lim SU, Seo JS, Kim MS, Ahn SJ, Jeong HD, Kim KH, Park NG, Kim JK, Chung JK, Lee HH: Molecular cloning and characterization of Cathepsin B from a scuticociliate, Uronema marinum. Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol. 2005, 142: 283-292. 10.1016/j.cbpb.2005.07.016.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Sajid M, McKerrow JH: Cysteine proteases of parasitic organisms. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2002, 120: 1-21. 10.1016/S0166-6851(01)00438-8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Jiang W, Bond JS: Families of metalloendopeptidases and their relationships. FEBS Lett. 1992, 312: 110-114. 10.1016/0014-5793(92)80916-5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Karrer KM, Peiffer SL, DiTomas ME: Two distinct gene subfamilies within the family of cysteine protease genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1993, 90: 3063-3067. 10.1073/pnas.90.7.3063.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Vernet T, Berti PJ, DeMontigny C, Musil R, Tessier DC, Menard R, Magny MC, Storer AC, Thomas DY: Processing of the papain precursor. The ionization state of a conserved amino acid motif within the Pro region participates in the regulation of intra-molecular processing. J Biol Chem. 1995, 270: 18038-10846.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Iglesias R, Paramá A, Álvarez MF, Leiro J, Sanmartín ML: Antiprotozoals effective in vitro against the scuticociliate fish pathogen Philasterides dicentrarchi. Dis Aquat Organ. 2002, 49: 191-197.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Quintela JM, Peinador C, González L, Iglesias R, Paramá A, Álvarez F, Sanmartín ML, Riguera R: Piperazine N-substituted naphthyridines, pyridothienopyrimidines and pyridothienotriazines: new antiprotozoals active against Philasterides dicentrarchi. Eur J Med Chem. 2003, 38: 265-275. 10.1016/S0223-5234(03)00032-1.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Paramá A, Piazzon MC, Lamas J, Sanmartín ML, Leiro J: In vitro activity of the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug indomethacin on a scuticociliate parasite of farmed turbot. Vet Parasitol. 2007, 48: 318-324.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Sitjà-Bobadilla A, Palenzuela O, Alvarez-Pellitero P: Immune response of turbot, Psetta maxima (L.) (Pisces: Teleostei), to formalin-killed scuticociliates (Ciliophora) and adjuvanted formulations. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2007, 24: 1-10.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Sanmartín ML, Paramá A, Castro R, Cabaleiro S, Leiro J, Lamas J, Barja JL: Vaccination of turbot, Psetta maxima (L.), against the protozoan parasite Philasterides dicentrarchi: effects on antibody production and protection. J Fish Dis. 2008, 31: 135-140. 10.1111/j.1365-2761.2007.00876.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Lee EH, Kim KH: Immobilization antigen-independent protection of olive flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus) against Philasterides dicentrarchi (Ciliophora: Scuticociliatia) infection. Aquaculture. 2008, 279: 211-213. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2008.03.045.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Lee EH, Kim CS, Cho JB, Ahn KJ, Kim KH: Measurement of protease activity of live Uronema marinun (Ciliata: Scuticociliatida) by fluorescence polarization. Dis Aquat Organ. 2003, 54: 85-88.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Sajid M, MeKerrow JH: Cysteine proteases of parasitic organisms. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2002, 120: 1-21. 10.1016/S0166-6851(01)00438-8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Mckerrow JH, Engel JC, Caffrey CR: Cysteine protease inhibitors as chemotherapy for parasitic infections. Bioorg Med Chem. 1999, 7: 639-644. 10.1016/S0968-0896(99)00008-5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Engel JC, Doyle PS, Hsieh I, McKerrow JH: Cysteine protease inhibitors cure an experimental Trypanosoma cruzi infection. J Exp Med. 1998, 188: 725-734. 10.1084/jem.188.4.725.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. McKerrow JH, Rosenthal PJ, Swenerton R, Doyle P: Development of protease inhibitors for protozoan infections. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2008, 21: 668-672. 10.1097/QCO.0b013e328315cca9.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Atkinson HJ, Babbitt PC, Sajid M: The global cysteine peptidase landscape in parasites. Trends Parasitol. 2009, 25: 573-581. 10.1016/j.pt.2009.09.006.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Bouvier J, Etges RJ, Bordier C: Identification and purification of membrane and soluble forms of the major surface protein of Leishmania promastigotes. J Biol Chem. 1985, 260: 15504-15509.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Bouvier J, Bordier C, Vogel H, Reichelt R, Etges R: Characterization of the promastigote surface protease of Leishmania as a membrane-bound zinc endopeptidase. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1989, 37: 235-245. 10.1016/0166-6851(89)90155-2.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Etges R, Bouvier J, Bordier C: The major surface protein of Leishmania promastigotes is a protease. J Biol Chem. 1986, 261: 9098-9101.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Etges R, Bouvier J, Bordier C: The major surface protein of Leishmania promastigotes is anchored in the membrane by a myristic acidlabeled phospholipid. EMBO J. 1986, 5: 597-601.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Mazumder S, Maji M, Das A, Ali N: Potency, efficacy and durability of DNA/DNA, DNA/protein and protein/protein based vaccination using gp63 against Leishmania donovani in BALB/c mice. PLoS One. 2011, 6: e14644-10.1371/journal.pone.0014644.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Bhowmick S, Ravindran R, Ali N: gp63 in stable cationic liposomes confers sustained vaccine immunity to susceptible BALB/c mice infected with Leishmania donovani. Infect Immun. 2008, 76: 1003-1015. 10.1128/IAI.00611-07.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Zuo X, Woo PTK: Proteases in pathogenic and nonpathogenic haemoflagellates, Cryptobia spp. (Sarcomastigophora: Kinetoplastida), of fishes. Dis Aquat Organ. 1997, 29: 57-65.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Uo X, Woo PTK: Purified metalloprotease from the pathogenic haemoflagellate, Cryptobia salmositica, and its in vitro proteolytic activities. Dis Aquat Organ. 1997, 30: 177-185.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Woo PT: Immunological and therapeutic strategies against salmonid cryptobiosis. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2010, Article ID 341783-Google Scholar
  46. Zuo X, Woo PTK: In vivo neutralization of Cryptobia salmositica metallo-protease by α2-macroglobulin in the blood of rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss and in brook charr Salvelinus fontinalis. Dis Aquat Organ. 1997, 29: 67-72.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Zuo X, Woo PTK: Natural anti-proteases in rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss and brook charr, Salvelinus fontinalis and the in vitro neutralization of fish α2-macroglobulin by the metalloprotease from the pathogenic haemoflagellate, Cryptobia salmositica. Parasitology. 1997, 114: 375-382. 10.1017/S0031182096008578.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Tan CW, Jesudhasan PRR, Woo PTK: Towards a metalloprotease-DNA vaccine against piscine cryptobiosis caused by Cryptobia salmositica. Parasitol Res. 2008, 102: 265-275.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Wu Y, Wang X, Liu X, Wang Y: Data-mining approaches reveal hidden families of proteases in the genome of malaria parasite. Genome Res. 2003, 13: 601-616. 10.1101/gr.913403.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Eisen JA, Coyne RS, Wu M, Wu D, Thiagarajan M, Wortman JR, Badger JH, Ren Q, Amedeo P, Jones KM, Tallon LJ, Delcher AL, Salzberg SL, Silva JC, Haas BJ, Majoros WH, Farzad M: Macronuclear genome sequence of the ciliate Tetrahymena thermophila, a model eukaryote. PLoS Biol. 2006, 4: e286-10.1371/journal.pbio.0040286.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Coyne RS, Hannick L, Shanmugam D, Hostetler JB, Brami D, Joardar VS, Johnson J, Radune D, Singh I, Badger JH, Kumar U, Saier M, Wang Y, Cai H, Gu J, Mather MW, Vaidya AB, Wilkes DE, Rajagopalan V, Asai DJ, Pearson CG, Findly RC, Dickerson HW, Wu M, Martens C, Van de Peer Y, Roos DS, Cassidy-Hanley DM, Clark TG: Comparative genomics of the pathogenic ciliate Ichthyophthirius multifiliis, its free-living relatives and a host species provide insights into adoption of a parasitic lifestyle and prospects for disease control. Genome Biol. 2011, 12: R100-10.1186/gb-2011-12-10-r100.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Seo et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement