Open Access

DGAT1 and ABCG2 polymorphism in Indian cattle (Bos indicus) and buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) breeds

  • Madhu S Tantia1Email author,
  • Ramesh K Vijh1,
  • Bishnu P Mishra1,
  • Bina Mishra1,
  • ST Bharani Kumar1 and
  • Monika Sodhi1
BMC Veterinary Research20062:32

DOI: 10.1186/1746-6148-2-32

Received: 25 August 2006

Accepted: 07 November 2006

Published: 07 November 2006

Abstract

Background

Indian cattle (Bos indicus) and riverine buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) give a poor yield of milk but it has a high fat and protein percentage compared to taurine cattle. The identification of QTLs (Quantitative Trait Loci) on BTA14 and BTA6 and its subsequent fine mapping has led to identification of two non conservative mutations affecting milk production and composition. Our objective was to estimate the frequency of K232A (DGAT1 – diacylglycerol – acyltransferase 1) and Y581S (ABCG2 – ATP binding cassette sub family G member 2) polymorphisms in diverse cattle and buffalo breeds of India having large variation in terms of milk production.

Results

We screened the reported missense mutations in six cattle and five buffalo breeds. The DGAT1K and ABCG2Y alleles were found to be fixed in Indian cattle and buffalo breeds studied.

Conclusion

This study provides an indirect evidence that all the Indian cattle and buffalo breeds have fixed alleles with respect to DGAT1 and ABCG2 genes reported to be responsible for higher milk fat yield, higher fat and protein percent.

Background

Significant development and refinement of analytical tools has resulted in identification of causal genes underlying QTLs (Quantitative Trait Loci) for various economic traits. is The detection of sequence variations of causal genes affecting the traits of interest are now possible in humans, animals and plants [1].

Several studies in cattle [24] identified a QTL for milk production traits especially the milk fat percentage on chromosome 14 (BTA 14) near the centromeric region. A comparative positional candidate gene approach led to identification of the candidate gene coding acylcoA: diacylglycerol – acyltransferase 1 (DGAT1). DGAT1 is considered to be the key enzyme in controlling the synthesis rate of triglycerides in adipocytes. Smith et al. [5] demonstrated absence of lactation in knockout mice lacking both copies of DGAT1. Grisart et al. [6, 7], Winter et al. [8] and Weller et al. [9] identified a polymorphism in exon 8 of the DGAT1 gene in Bos taurus, AA → GC exchange resulting in a non conservative substitution of amino acid 232 Lysine (K) → Alanine (A). This polymorphism has been associated with increased fat yield, fat and protein percent as well as decrease in milk and protein.

Another segregating QTL for milk production trait on BTA 6 was found by many workers in various populations of Bos taurus [1014]. The QTL centered around microsatellite BM143. Olsen et al. [15] used physical mapping and combined linkage and linkage disequilibrium mapping to fine map QTL region between ABCG2 and LAP3. Several genes like PKD2 [15], SPP1 (Osteopontin) gene [16, 17] and ABCG2 (ATP binding cassette sub family G member 2)[18] have been proposed as candidate genes in the QTL region. Cohen-Zinder et al. [18] analysed the sequence variation of these genes and demonstrated that ABCG2 (Y581S) allele (SNP A → C in exon 14) to be the only polymorphism which corresponded to the segregation status of the heterozygous and homozygous sires for the QTL based on the allele substitution effect.

These two QTNs (Quantitative Trait Nucleotide) DGAT1K and ABCG2Y are proposed non conservative mutations in Bos taurus associated with increased fat yield, fat and protein percent as well as decrease in milk yield. A study was carried out to adjudge the status of these mutations in Bos indicus and Bubalus bubalis.

Results and discussion

The sequence obtained for segment of DGAT1 in cattle (DQ228762) and buffalo (DQ228763); have been submitted to NCBI database. The sequence analysis of DGAT1 region in six breeds of cattle (Bos indicus) and 5 breeds of buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) revealed fixed DGAT1K allele (Fig. 1). The sequence of desired region of control individuals revealed heterozygous condition for reported mutation in 3 animals. No variation was observed in all the 11 breeds of cattle and buffalo undertaken in this study. Kaupe et al, [19] had reported fixed DGAT1K allele in Nellore cattle. Lacorta et al [20] also reported absence of A allele in Nellore and Guzerat cattle and very low frequency (<5%) in Gyr and Redsindhi cattle of Brazil. High frequency of DGAT1A has recently been reported in Uruguayan Creole cattle [21] and Holstein and its crosses [20]. This polymorphism has been associated with increased fat yield, fat and protein percent as well as decrease in milk and protein production.
Figure 1

Chromatograph of DGAT1 gene indicating AA → GC (K232A) mutation in Exon8.

The sequence obtained for ABCG2 (DQ205445 for cattle and DQ205444 for buffalo) have been submitted to NCBI database. The analysis of sequence of ABCG2 region in Indian breeds of cattle (Bos indicus) and buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) revealed fixed ABCG2Y allele (Fig. 2). Only one animal of control group was heterozygous for ABCG2 allele. Cohen-Zinder et al, [18] reported increase in frequency of ABCG2Y allele with selction for higher milk fat and protein percentage in the Israeli Holstein population.
Figure 2

Chromatograph of ABCG2 gene indicating A → C (Y581S) mutation in Exon14.

Conclusion

This study provides an indirect evidence that all the Indian cattle and buffalo breeds have fixed alleles with respect to DGAT1 and ABCG2 genes reported to be responsible for higher milk fat yield, higher fat and protein percent. There is considerable genetic variation in milk production in India which can be exploited to increase the milk yield without having an adverse effect on fat and protein percent.

Methods

The DNA samples of 20 unrelated animals from Sahiwal, Rathi, Deoni, Tharparkar, Red Kandhari and Punganur breeds of cattle; and Murrah, Jaffarabadi, Surti, Mehsana and Bhadawari breeds of buffalo were isolated. The blood samples were collected over a large area in the native tract of breeds where AI services were not in operation to avoid any relationship among the sampled individuals to the extent possible. Five samples of B. taurus × B. indicus crosses were taken as control. We sequenced the DGAT1 and ABCG2 regions for known mutations by designing primers. The primer sequence for DGAT1 were: forward 5'-GCACCATCCTCTTCCTCAAG-3' and reverse 5'-GGAAGCGCTTTCGGATG-3'[19] and for ABCG2 were: forward 5'-CAGGGCTGTTGGTAAATCTCA-3' (nt 62491–511) and reverse 5'-GCACGGTGACAGATAAGGAGA-3' (nt 62580–600) from NCBI database sequence AJ871176

These PCR conditions were standardized using gradient PCR (iCycler, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). For DGAT1 PCR conditions were 5 min at 95°C; 35 cycles 45 s at 95°C, 45 s at 57°C, 45 s at 72°C; and a final 10 min extension at 72°C. For ABCG2 touch down PCR profile included 5 min at 95°C; 5 cycles 45 s at 95°C, 45 s at 57°C, 45 s at 72°C; 15 cycles 45 s at 95°C, 45 s at 56°C, 45 s at 72°C; 15 cycles 45 s at 95°C, 45 s at 55°C, 45 s at 72°C; and a final 10 min extension at 72°C. The PCR products were purified with Exo-AP (New England Biolabs, Beverely, MA, USA) digestion and sequenced with Big Dye terminator chemistry (Applied Biosystems, California, CA, USA) on ABI 3100 Avant sequencer. The sequence analysis was performed using SeqScape software ver. 2.0 (Applied Biosystems, California, CA, USA).

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
National Bureau of Animal Genetic Resources

References

  1. Glazier AM, Nadeau JH, Aitman TJ: Finding genes that underlie complex traits. Science. 2002, 298: 2345-2349. 10.1126/science.1076641.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Riquet J, Coppieters W, Cambisano N, Arranz JJ, Berzi P, Davis SK, Grisart B, Farnir F, Karim L, Mni M, Simon P, Taylor JF, Vanmanshoven P, Wagenaar D, Womack JE, Georges M: Fine-mapping of quantitative trait loci by identity by descent in outbred populations: application to milk production in dairy cattle. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1999, 96: 9252-9257. 10.1073/pnas.96.16.9252.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Looft C, Reinsch N, Karall-Albrecht C, Paul S, Brink M, Thomsen H, Brockmann G, Kuhn C, Schwerin M, Kalm E: A mammary gland EST showing linkage disequilibrium to a milk production QTL on bovine Chromosome 14. Mamm Genome. 2001, 12: 646-650. 10.1007/s003350020003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Farnir F, Grisart B, Coppieters W, Riquet J, Berzi P, Cambisano N, Karim L, Mni M, Simon P, Wagenaar D: Simultaneous mining of linkage and LD to fine map QTL in outbred half-sib pedigrees: Revisiting the location of a QTL with major effect on milk production on bovine chromosome 14. Genetics. 2002, 161: 275-287.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Smith SJ, Cases S, Jensen DR, Chen SC, Sande E, Tow B, Sanan DA, Raber J, Eckel RH, Farese RV: Obesity resistance and multiple mechanism of triglyceride synthesis in mice lacking DGAT1. Nat Genet. 2000, 25: 87-90. 10.1038/75651.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Grisart B, Coppieters W, Farnir F, Karim L, Ford C, Berzi P, Cambisano N, Mni M, Reid S, Simon P, Spelman R, Georges M, Snell R: Positional candidate cloning of a QTL in dairy cattle: Identification of a missense mutation in the bovine DGAT1 gene with major effect on milk yield and composition. Genome Res. 2002, 12: 222-231. 10.1101/gr.224202.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Grisart B, Farnir F, Karim L, Cambisano N, Kim JJ, Kvasz A, Mni M, Simon P, Frere JM, Coppieters W: Genetic and functional confirmation of the causality of the DGAT1 K232A quantitative trait nucleotide in affecting milk yield and composition. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2004, 101: 2398-2403. 10.1073/pnas.0308518100.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Winter A, Kramer W, Werner FAO, Kollers S, Kata S, Durstewitz G, Buitkamp J, Womack JE, Thaller G, Fries R: Association of a lysine-232/alanine polymorphism in a bovine gene encoding acyl-CoA: diacylglycerol acyltransferase (DGAT1) with variation at a quantitative trait locus for milk fat content. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2002, 99: 9300-9305. 10.1073/pnas.142293799.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Weller JI, Golik M, Seroussi E, Ezra E, Ron M: Population-wide analysis of a QTL affecting milk-fat production in the Israeli Holstein population. J Dairy Sci. 2003, 86: 2219-2227.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Georges M, Nielsen D, Mackinnon M, Mishra A, Okimoto R, Pasquino AT, Sargeant LS, Sorensen A, Steele MR, Zhao X: Mapping quantitative trait loci controlling milk production in dairy cattle by exploiting progeny testing. Genetics. 1995, 139: 907-920.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Kuhn C, Freyer G, Weikard R, Goldammer T, Schwerin M: Detection of QTL for milk production traits in cattle by application of a specifically developed marker map of BTA6. Anim Genet. 1999, 30: 333-340. 10.1046/j.1365-2052.1999.00487.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Nadesalingam J, Plante Y, Gibson JP: Detection of QTL for milk production on Chromosomes 1 and 6 of Holstein cattle. Mamm Genome. 2001, 12: 27-31. 10.1007/s003350010232.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Olsen HG, Gomez-Raya L, Vage DI, Olsaker I, Klungland H, Svendsen M, Adnoy T, Sabry A, Klemetsdal G, Schulman N: A genome scan for quantitative trait loci affecting milk production in Norwegian dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci. 2002, 85: 3124-3130.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Khatkar MS, Thompson PC, Tammen I, Raadsma HW: Quantitative trait loci mapping in dairy cattle: review and meta-analysis. Genet Sel Evol. 2004, 36: 163-190. 10.1051/gse:2003057.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Olsen HG, Lien S, Gautier M, Nilsen H, Roseth A, Berg PR, Sundsaasen M, Svendsen KK, Meuwissen TH: Mapping of a milk production QTL to a 420 kb region on bovine chromosome 6. Genetics. 2005, 169: 275-283. 10.1534/genetics.104.031559.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Cohen M, Seroussi E, Band MR, Lewin HA, Drackley JK, Larkin DM, Everts-van der Wind A, Heon-Lee J, Loor JJ, Shani M: SPP1 is a candidate gene for the QTL affecting milk protein concentration on BTA6 in Israeli Holstein. 29th Int Conf Ani Gen, ISAG, F015, Tokyo, Japan. 2004Google Scholar
  17. Schnabel RD, Kim JJ, Ashwell MS, Sonstegard TS, Van Tassel CP, Connor EE, Taylor JF: Fine-mapping milk production quantitative trait loci on BTA6: Analysis of the bovine osteopontin gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2005, 102: 6896-6901. 10.1073/pnas.0502398102.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Cohen M, Seroussi E, Larkin DM, Loor JJ, Everts-van der Wind A, Heon-Lee J, Drackley JK, Band MR, Hernandez AG, Shani M, Lewin HA, Weller JI, Ron M: Identification of a missense mutation in the bovine ABCG2 gene with a major effect on the QTL on chromosome 6 affecting milk yield and composition in Holstein cattle. Genome Res. 2005, 15: 936-944. 10.1101/gr.3806705.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Kaupe B, Winter A, Fries R, Erhardt G: DGAT1 polymorphism in Bos indicus and Bos Taurus cattle breeds. Anim Genet. 2004, 71: 182-187.Google Scholar
  20. Lacorte GA, Machado MA, Martinez ML, Campos AL, Maciel RP, Verneque RS, Teodoro RL, Peixoto MGCD, Carvalho MRS, Fonseca CG: DGAT1 K232A polymorphism in Brazilian cattle breeds. Genet Mol Res. 2006, 5: 475-482.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Rincón G, Armstrong E, Postiglioni A: Analysis of the population structure of Uruguayan Creole cattle as inferred from milk major gene polymorphisms. Genet Mol Biol. 2006, 29: 491-495.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Tantia et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.