Management of a congenital tracheoesophageal fistula in a young Spanish water dog
© Kaminen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 28 April 2013
Accepted: 6 January 2014
Published: 14 January 2014
Tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF) in dogs is a rare disease with only few reports in the literature. This report aims to contribute to the current literature on suitable diagnostic methods for TEF and to provide follow-up information after successful surgical treatment.
A seven-month-old intact female Spanish Water Dog was presented for further investigation of recurrent respiratory symptom. Bronchoscopy revealed a small hole-like defect in the tracheal wall at the bifurcation. The finding of the contrast material swallow study under fluoroscopy was indicative of a TEF. To further evaluate the connection between the trachea and esophagus, a computed tomography scan was performed. The TEF was surgically approached by thoracotomy through the right lateral sixth intercostal space. The fistula was identified, double ligated and divided. Histopathology confirmed the process to originate from the esophagus and to be patent. The dog was re-examined two weeks and ten months after surgery, with no evidence of recurring clinical signs.
Contrast material swallow study using fluoroscopy was the most reliable diagnostic method. Bronchoscopy may allow the fistula to be visualized, but due to a small fistular opening it can lead to a false negative result. Surgical correction by ligation and dividing of the fistula suggests a good prognosis for early diagnosed and operated TEF.
KeywordsCongenital tracheoesophageal fistula Dog Bronchoscopy Fluoroscopy Computed tomography Histopathology
An esophageal fistula is an abnormal communication between the esophagus and trachea, bronchus, lung parenchyma or, rarely, the skin . Congenital and acquired tracheoesophageal or bronchoesophageal fistulas in dogs are rarely identified as predisposing factors for recurrent pneumonia [2–6]. To our knowledge, there have been only two previous reports describing tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF) in dogs, one congenital  and the other acquired due to an esophageal foreign body . Due to the rarity of the entity, there is very little experience concerning diagnostic methods and surgical correction techniques for TEF in dogs. Therefore, this report aims to contribute to the current literature on suitable diagnostic methods for TEF and to provide follow-up information after successful surgical treatment.
A seven-month-old, 13.2 kg intact female Spanish Water Dog was presented for further investigation of recurrent respiratory symptoms. Three weeks before referral, the dog had developed an acute onset of lethargy and coughing. Pneumonia was suspected, since chest radiographs showed consolidation of the lungs. Treatment with amoxicillin-clavulanic acida for ten days resulted in transient improvement in the clinical signs.
On presentation, lethargy, spontaneous cough, tachypnea (respiratory rate 60/min), and moderate crackles on lung auscultation were noted. Coughing was provoked especially after drinking and tracheal palpation. The partial oxygen pressure in the arterial blood (PaO2) was 80.5 mmHg. The C-reactive protein (CRP) level was markedly elevated (138 mg/l). Thoracic radiographs revealed alveolar consolidations in the left cranial and left caudal lung lobe, consistent with bronchopneumonia. In abdominal radiographs, the small intestine was gas filled. Supportive treatment and intravenous amoxicillin-clavulanic acidb administration were initiated.
The dog was re-examined two weeks and ten months after surgery, with no evidence of recurring clinical signs. At the first control visit, the blood leucocyte count, arterial PaO2, and CRP were within normal limits, and thoracic radiographs revealed signs of resolving bronchopneumonia. At the second visit, the blood leucocyte count, arterial PaO2, CRP, and thoracic radiographs showed no features suggesting a disease process. In addition, a CS study using fluoroscopy was performed. This did not detect any evidence of leakage of contrast medium from the esophagus. Both the structure and function of the esophagus appeared unaltered.
A congenital TEF is likely to arise as a result of interruption of the events responsible for elongation and separation of the esophageal and tracheal tubes during the fourth fetal week . In the present report, a congenital malformation is considered most likely due to the dog’s young age and the absence of an esophageal foreign body in its history. Histopathology confirms the process to originate from the esophagus and to be patent. The absence of Lamina muscularis mucosae in the fistula confirms its origin from the anterior part of the esophagus, since the former is present distally . Furthermore, the lack of any pathological changes in the excised tissue, i.e. absence of a significant inflammatory process and/or abnormal structures, provides strong evidence for its congenital nature [8, 9].
This case presented with the classical symptoms encountered in human and canine patients with esophageal fistulas: a chronic cough occurring after drinking due to aspiration of water through the fistula [3, 4, 10, 11], recurrent, chronic lower respiratory tract infections due to continuous aspiration via the fistula [10–13] and gas accumulation in the gastrointestinal tract due to the passage of air from the trachea into the gastrointestinal tract [2, 10, 11].
The tracheo- and bronchoesophageal fistulas in dogs previously reported were diagnosed with plain thoracic radiographs after barium CS study [2–4, 14], indicating that the defect had probably been relatively large in diameter, since a visible quantity of contrast material flowing through it. In the present case, the thoracic radiograph obtained after CS study with diluted contrast medium, demonstrated only a small amount of contrast medium in the lower part of the trachea and in the main bronchus. The presence of contrast material in the airways without visualization of the fistula itself may also be indicative of aspiration and cannot be considered specific for TEF.
In human medicine, numerous diagnostic techniques for TEF have been described, but given the relatively low incidence of TEF; there have been no randomized and controlled trials to support the better use of one method over another. None of the reported diagnostic methods are universally reliable, and the lack of sensitivity makes the diagnosis challenging in mildly affected patients [13, 15–19]. The initial radiological investigation consists of plain thoracic and abdominal radiographs, which may raise suspicion of TEF by showing evidence of aspiration and gastric dilatation [2, 12, 13]. The most frequently described radiological diagnostic techniques to confirm the presence of TEF are CS study and the tube esophagogram [13, 15, 19], where the contrast medium is injected into the esophagus under pressure and observed via plain radiographs and fluoroscopy.
Inconstant patency of TEF is associated in a dog with a slit-like opening of the esophageal fistula orifice . In humans, an esophageal mucosa fold occluding the esophageal side of the fistula, or an oblique course of the fistula to the esophagus has been described, which might cause the esophageal mucosa adjacent to the orifice to function as a valve during swallowing, compressing the anterior esophageal wall against the fistula and occluding its lumen [13, 20]. Additionally, a small diameter of the orifice, as in our case, can complicate the diagnosis of TEF. Diluted contrast medium may pass more easily through fistulas with a narrow lumen [12, 14], thereby rendering a diagnosis possible in suspected cases where CS study with undiluted contrast material is negative. It should be noted that, as in our case, diluted contrast medium may be more readily observed via fluoroscopy than plain thoracic radiographs.
The use of CT has been increasing in recent years. According to previous studies [12, 16, 18, 21], contrary opinions on the use of CT in humans exist. A recent study by Mahalik et al.  stated that a CT scan could provide good anatomic delineation, but might not help in surgical decision making. To the authors’ knowledge, the present case is the first reported study in which CT is used in a dog in an attempt to identify TEF. Non-contrast CT is not helpful in the diagnosis, since it does not enable the visualization of the distal esophageal part of the TEF. However, the air-filled pouch between the main bronchi would raise a suspicion of abnormal anatomy, even if the bronchoscopy does not reveal the orifice of the TEF. In neonate children, the concurrent use of air during CT has been a valuable aid in the diagnosis of TEF, serving as a negative contrast medium [21, 22].
Endoscopic techniques, such as bronchoscopy and esophagoscopy, are complimentary techniques for diagnosing TEF. They may allow the fistula to be directly visualized and its origin to be exactly localized [10, 13]. Nevertheless, endoscopic techniques can lead to a false negative result, and repeated examinations may be necessary, as the fistula can be difficult to identify in a single attempt . In our case, the tracheal wall defect was diagnosed during bronchoscopy. The defect was clearly visible only in the early stage of bronchoscopy, and when later reassessed appeared closed, and as such could easily had been left unrecognized. A reason for poor identification of the fistula could be the small size of the orifice, which might easily collapse due to pressure changes during ventilation. This indicates that a negative diagnosis in endoscopy is not exclusive and other diagnostic methods are needed when TEF is suspected.
In dogs, congenital or acquired bronchoesophageal fistulas are mainly seen in association with an esophageal diverticulum and foreign body . In humans, esophageal atresia is associated with congenital TEF in the vast majority of patients (85–88%) [23, 24]. In our case, the anatomic structure and function of the esophagus were unaltered both prior to and after surgery. This rules out any relevant concomitant anomalies and is considered a good prognostic indicator for surgical correction.
Surgery consists of ligation and division of the fistula and, if needed, repair of the tracheal and esophageal walls [10, 25]. In the present case, the connection between the trachea and esophagus was identified with a catheter, as previously described [10, 24]. Thoracotomy was performed in the sixth intercostal space according to guide wire location in thorax radiographs. The proximal end of the fistula was not further searched for due to the moderate length of the fistula, challenging location between important structures, thick connective tissue, and adhesions surrounding the fistula. In humans, surgical repair of the proximally located fistula is approached through the cervical route along the anterior border of the sternocleidomastoid muscle. An approach via thoracotomy is taken when the fistula is located more distally, at the level of the carina, or when partial pulmonary resection is required at the same time [10, 20]. TEFs of newborns have also been successfully repaired thoracoscopically .
Due to the low incidence of reported TEFs in dogs and the lack of long-term follow-up data, no information on complications or the recurrence rate is available. In our case report, the dog’s postoperative course was uneventful, with no signs of recurrence within the ten-month follow-up period. Recurrent TEF is one complication of surgical therapy among children with congenital esophageal atresia and TEF . TEF recurs in less than 5% to 8% of cases, most often 2 to 18 months after initial repair [24, 25]. Ligation of the fistula rather than complete division increases the incidence of recurrent TEF .
Recurrent respiratory infections in young dogs require a thorough examination to identify possible predisposing pathological conditions. TEF needs to be considered as a possible cause for repeated respiratory tract infections. CS study using fluoroscopy was the most reliable diagnostic method in our case. Diluted contrast material is advisable to use in suspected cases where CS study with undiluted contrast material is negative. Bronchoscopy may allow the fistula to be visualized, but due to a small fistular opening it can lead to a false negative result. When non-contrast CT is not helpful in the TEF diagnosis, air in the esophagus as a negative contrast medium could be more informative. In the case described, surgical correction by ligation and dividing of the fistula remained successful after ten months, and suggests a good prognosis for early diagnosed and operated TEF.
aSynulox, Pfizer Oy Animal Health, Helsinki, Finland.
bAmoxClav, Hexal AG, Holzkirchen, Germany.
cOlympus GIF N180, Olympus Medical Systems Europa GMBH, Hamburg, Germany.
dSodium Chloride 0.9% Injections USP, B. Braun Medical Oy, Helsinki, Finland.
eMixobar colon, 1.0 mg/ml, E-Z-EM, Anjou, Canada.
fBuster Sterile Dog Catheter 1.3 × 500 mm, 4 FG, Kruuse, Langeskov, Denmark.
g0.025′ guidewire VisiGlide, 2700 mm, Olympus, Hamburg, Germany.
hPentax EG2940K, Pentax GMB, Hamburg, Germany.
iDurogesic, Janssen-Cilag Oy, Espoo, Finland.
jRimadyl, Pfizer Oy Animal Health, Helsinki, Finland.
Partial oxygen pressure in the arterial blood
Contrast material swallow
- Fingeroth JM: Surgical techniques for esophageal surgery. Textbook of Small Animal Surgery. 2nd edition. Edited by: Slatter. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2003:530.Google Scholar
- Stogdale L, Steyn DG, Thompson BC: A congenital oesophagotracheal fistula in a two-year-old dog. J S Afr Vet Assoc. 1977, 48: 212-214.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Basher AWP, Hogan PM, Hanna PE, Runyon CL, Shaw DH: Surgical treatment of a congenital bronchoesophageal fistula in a dog. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1991, 199: 479-482.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Caywood DD, Feeney DA: Acquired esophagobronchial fistula in a dog. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 1982, 18: 590-594.Google Scholar
- Schebitz H: X-ray appearance of an esophagotracheal fistula due to foreign body perforation in a dog. Tierarztl Umsch. 1960, 15: 87.Google Scholar
- Della Ripa MA, Gaschein F, Gaschein L, Cho DY: Canine bronchoesophageal fistulas: case report and literature review. Compendium. 2010, 32: 1-10.Google Scholar
- Ross AJ: Organogenesis of the Gastrointestinal Tract. Fetal and Neonatal Physiology. 4th edition. Edited by: Polin RA, Fox WW, Abman SH. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2011:1188.Google Scholar
- Bacha JW, Bacha LM: Color Atlas of Veterinary Histology.2nd edition. Baltimore Maryland, Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2000:119-132.Google Scholar
- Brown CC, Baker DC, Barker IK: Alimentary system. Jubb, Kennedy & Palmer’s Pathology of Domestic Animals. 5th edition. Edited by: Maxie MG.Edinburg: Elsevier Saunders; 2007:35-36.Google Scholar
- Genty E, Attal P, Nicollas R, Roger G, Triglia J-M, Garabedian E-N, Bobin S: Congenital tracheoesophageal fistula without esophageal atresia. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 1999, 48: 231-238. 10.1016/S0165-5876(99)00039-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Beasley SW, Myers NA: The diagnosis of congenital tracheoesophageal fistula. J Pediatr Surg. 1988, 23: 415-417. 10.1016/S0022-3468(88)80437-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hajjar WM, Iftikhar A, Al Nassar SA, Rahal SM: Congenital tracheoesophageal fistula: a rare and late presentation in adult patient. Ann Thorac Med. 2012, 7: 48-50. 10.4103/1817-1737.91553.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ng J, Antao B, Bartram J, Raghavan A, Shawis R: Diagnostic difficulties in the management of H-type tracheoesophageal fistula. Acta Radiol. 2006, 47: 801-805. 10.1080/02841850600854902.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Park RD: Bronchoesophageal fistula in the dog: literature survey, case presentations, and radiographic manifestations. Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet. 1984, 6: 669-676.Google Scholar
- Laffan EE, Daneman A, Ein SH, Kerrigan D, Manson DE: Tracheoesophageal fistula without esophageal atresia: are pull-back tube esophagograms needed for diagnosis?. Pediatr Radiol. 2006, 36: 1141-1147. 10.1007/s00247-006-0269-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fitoz S, Atasoy Ç, Yagmurlu A, Akyar S, Erden A, Dindar H: Three-dimensional CT of congenital esophageal and distal tracheoesophageal fistula in neonates: preliminary results. AJR. 2000, 175: 1403-1407. 10.2214/ajr.175.5.1751403.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gassner I, Geley TE: Sonographic evaluation of oesophageal atresia and trachea-oesophageal fistula. Pediatr Radiol. 2005, 35: 159-164. 10.1007/s00247-004-1329-y.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mahalik SK, Sodhi KS, Narasinhan KL, Rao KLN: Role of preoperative 3D CT reconstruction for evaluation of patients with esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula. Pediatr Surg Int. 2012, 28: 961-966. 10.1007/s00383-012-3111-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kirk JME, Dicks-Mireaux C: Difficulties in diagnosis of congenital H-type trachea-oesophageal fistulae. ClinRadiol. 1989, 40: 150-153.Google Scholar
- Acosta JL, Battersby JS: Congenital tracheoesophageal fistula in the adult. Am Thorac Surg. 1974, 17: 51-57. 10.1016/S0003-4975(10)65058-8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wen Y, Peng Y, Zhai RY, Li YZ: Application of MPVR and TL-VR with 64-row MDCT in neonates with congenital EA and distal TEF. World J Gastroenterol. 2011, 17: 1649-1654. 10.3748/wjg.v17.i12.1649.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Soye JA, Yarr J, Dick AC, Paterson A: Multidetector-row computed tomography three-dimensional volume reformatted ‘transparency’ images to define an upper pouch fistula in oesophageal atresia. Pediatr Radiol. 2005, 35: 624-626. 10.1007/s00247-005-1405-y.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Myers NA, Beasley SW, Auldist AW: Secondary esophageal surgery following repair of esophageal atresia with distal tracheoesophageal fistula. J Pediatr Surg. 1990, 25: 773-777. 10.1016/S0022-3468(05)80017-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Benjamin B: Endoscopy in esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1981, 90: 376-382.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Touloukian RJ: Long-term results following repair of esophageal atresia by end-to-side anastomosis and ligation of the tracheoesophageal fistula. J Pediatr Surg. 1981, 16: 983-988. 10.1016/S0022-3468(81)80860-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tokhais TA, Zamakhshary M, Aldekhayel S, Mandora H, Sayed S, AlHarbi K, Alqahtani AR: Thoracoscopic repair of tracheoesophageal fistulas: a case control matched study. J Pediatr Surg. 2008, 43: 805-809. 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.12.015.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.