Evaluation of ethanol vortex ELISA for detection of bovine tuberculosis in cattle and deer
© Wadhwa et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 22 November 2013
Accepted: 20 June 2014
Published: 4 July 2014
The use of serological assays for diagnosis of bovine tuberculosis (TB) has been intensively studied and use of specific antigens have aided in improving the diagnostic accuracy of the assays. In the present study, we report an in-house enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), developed by using ethanol extract of Mycobacterium bovis (M. bovis). The assay, named (ethanol vortex ELISA [EVELISA]), was evaluated for detection of anti- M. bovis antibodies in the sera of cattle and white-tailed deer.
By using the EVELISA, we tested sera obtained from two species of animals; cattle (n = 62 [uninfected, n = 40; naturally infected, n = 22]) and white-tailed deer (n = 41 [uninfected, n = 25; naturally infected, n = 7; experimentally infected, n = 9]). To detect species specific molecules, components in the ethanol extract were analyzed by thin layer chromatography and western blotting.
Among the tested animals, 77.2% of infected cattle and 87.5% of infected deer tested positive for anti- M. bovis antibody. There were only minor false positive reactions (7.5% in cattle and 0% in deer) in uninfected animals. M. bovis -specific lipids and protein (MPB83) in the ethanol extract were detected by thin layer chromatography and western blotting, respectively.
The results warrant further evaluation and validation of EVELISA for bovine TB diagnosis of traditional and alternative livestock as well as for free-ranging animal species.
KeywordsBovine tuberculosis Cattle White-tailed deer ELISA Mycobacterium bovis EVELISA
Mycobacterium bovis (M. bovis), a member of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex, causes bovine tuberculosis (TB) [1, 2], a zoonotic disease of animals including livestock, alternative livestock (e.g., captive cervids), zoo and wildlife. The major wildlife reservoirs of M. bovis include Eurasian badger (Meles meles), brushtail possums (Trichosurus vulpecula), Eurasian wild boar (Sus sucrofa) and white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus). For many developed nations, difficulties in eradicating bovine TB often arise due to the presence of infection in wildlife reservoirs with spillover to domestic species and movement of infected animals to bovine TB free regions. Within the US, eradication of bovine TB is hampered by importation of TB cattle from Mexico, the presence of a wildlife reservoir (i.e., white-tailed deer in Michigan), and continued detection of small nests of infection within the domestic herd. Particularly problematic for antemortem testing strategies is the detection of bovine TB in a very small number of animals in large dairy herds.
Bovine TB control relies primarily on detection of TB-affected herds by slaughter surveillance and antemortem testing. While current testing strategies are generally reliable at the herd level, the development of new diagnostic strategies for effective control of bovine TB is urgently needed, particularly for movement or border tests to identify individual infected animals . In a recent report from the United States Animal Health Association, a key recommendation to USDA, APHIS, Veterinary Services was to assist biologics companies in the development and evaluation of improved bovine TB diagnostic tests, emphasizing both stakeholder and federal government support for the development of improved bovine TB testing strategies .
The diagnostic assays currently available for detection of bovine TB in cattle and wildlife species could be divided mainly into 2 categories; direct assays (i.e. bacterial culture, microscopic demonstration of acid-fast bacilli and polymerase chain reaction [PCR]) and indirect assays (i.e. detection of cellular or humoral immune response) [5, 6]. Among the direct assays, bacterial culture and PCR are primarily used as postmortem tests as these tests lack the necessary sensitivity for antemortem detection of TB-infected animals and generally rely on detection of the organism within samples collected at necropsy. Cell mediated immune-based assays primarily include the tuberculin skin test (TST)  and interferon gamma (IFN-γ) release assays [8, 9], although other strategies are under development . In spite of advantages like simplicity of the procedure and comparatively inexpensive reagents, the TST is very labor intensive; requires two visits to the farm (i.e., injection of tuberculin and evaluation of the response 72 hours later) and practically difficult for wildlife species. IFN-γ release assays are comparatively expensive; require overnight delivery of viable blood samples and a trained technical staff . Antibody-based assays for detection of bovine TB have shown promising results due to their short turnaround time, cost effectiveness and flexibility of use. Previous studies used cross-reactive antigens and suffered from lower diagnostic specificity. The emergence of sensitive antibody-based diagnostic tests for detection of bovine TB supports the concept of development of a reliable and easy to use serologic test [12–16].
We have previously reported an enzyme linked immunosorbant assay (ELISA) using ethanol extract of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis (MAP) to detect anti-MAP antibodies at early stage of Johne’s disease and named the assay ethanol vortex ELISA (EVELISA) [17–21]. We also reported an EVELISA based assay for detection of specific antibodies in the sera of farmed red deer . The objective of the present study was to determine the potential for application of the EVELISA test to detect anti- M. bovis antibodies in the sera of infected cattle and free-ranging white-tailed deer.
A total of 62 sera samples from cattle were obtained from the TB serum bank at US Department of Agriculture – Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service. The samples were obtained from farms in three states in the U.S.: Georgia (n = 40; dairy), Michigan (n = 21; beef) and California (n = 1; dairy). All the samples from Georgia were from a bovine TB-free herd whereas the California and Michigan samples were from M. bovis–infected cattle, as determined by mycobacterial culture, histology and IS6110 PCR techniques (performed at the National Veterinary Services Laboratories, Ames, IA). The 22 samples from Michigan and California received M. bovis PPD for Caudal Fold Test (CFT). All the 62 samples in this group were also tested for quantification of cellular immune response using IFN-γ assay and comparative cervical tuberculin (CCT) test. The CCT test involves injection of both M. bovis and M. avium PPD at 2 different sites on the neck. Serum samples were obtained before or at the time of injection of PPDs for skin testing. Of the total animals tested, 2 and 1 animals were categorized as suspected with CFT and CCT, respectively.
A total of 41 serum samples from white-tailed deer were obtained from the USDA/APHIS. Twenty five samples were from uninfected animals, 7 samples were from naturally infected animals from Michigan and 9 samples were from animals which were experimentally infected with M. bovis as previously described in Waters et al., 2004 .
Preparation of ethanol extract
A virulent strain of M. bovis (HC2005T), which was originally isolated from an M. bovis infected dairy cow, was cultured in Middlebrook’s 7H9 medium (Becton Dickinson, Cockeysville, MD) with addition of 0.05% Tween 80 (Fisher Scientific, Fair Lawn, NJ), 10% oleic acid-albumin-dextrose-NaCl (Becton Dickinson, Microbiology Systems, Franklin Lakes, NJ) at 37°C. For antigen preparation, M. bovis bacilli was harvested from stationary phase cultures, suspended in 80% ethanol at 80 mg wet weight of bacterial/ml and agitated by vortex at room temperature for 2 min, and centrifuged at 10,621 × g for 10 minutes to dislodge surface antigens. Extracted M. bovis antigen was diluted (1:80) in the ethanol solution and 50 μL of the solution was immobilized on wells of a 96-well microtiter plate (Costar™, Corning, MA) by evaporation.
The antigen-coated plate was incubated with 150 μL of buffer B (10 mM phosphate buffered saline, pH 7.0 [PBS], containing 0.05 v/v% Tween 20 [Fisher Scientific, Fair Lawn, NJ] and 10 v/v% SuperBlock [Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford, IL]) at room temperature for 30 min. The plate was then washed 4 times with 200 μL of PBST (10 mM PBS [pH 7.0] containing 0.05% Tween 20). Fifty μL of serum sample (preabsorption of cross-reactive antibodies with heat-killed Mycobacterium phlei [0.5 mg/mL] for 30 minutes) was then inoculated and incubated at room temperature for one hour. After washing the wells four times with 200 μL of PBST, 100 μL of horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated goat anti-bovine IgG heavy and light chains (for cattle samples) or 50 μL of horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated rabbit anti-deer IgG heavy and light chains (for deer samples) (1:1000 dilution; Kirkegaard & Perry Laboratories, Inc. Gaithersburg, MD; diluted in buffer B) was added to each well and incubated at room temperature for one hour. After washing the wells four times with 200 μL of PBST, 100 μL of tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) solution (as suggested by the manufacturer; Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL) was used to develop color reaction (10 min) according to manufacturer’s instruction and optical density (OD) of the solution was determined by a microplate reader (Model 680, BioRad, Hercules, CA) at 450 nm after terminating the reaction by adding 100 μL of 2 M sulfuric acid.
Thin layer chromatography
The ethanol extract was dried by spinning in a speed vacuum concentrator (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA) and washed with a mixture of 1 mL of chloroform/methanol (2:1) and 200 μL of water. The organic layer was transferred to a new tube and dried. The extract was then re-suspended in a chloroform/methanol (2:1) solution at the concentration of 5 mg/mL and separated by thin layer chromatography on an aluminum-backed Silica gel plate (TLC Silica gel 60, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) with a development solution (chloroform/methanol/water [90:10:1]). The Silica gel plates were then stained using a polymolybdate solution.
To determine if M. bovis specific immunodominant antigen, MPB83, was present in M. bovis ethanol extracts, a Western blot using monoclonal antibody against MPB83 (1 F11, kind gift from Dr. Jim McNair, Agri-Food Biosciences Institute, Northern Ireland) was conducted. The extract (~10 μg) and recombinant protein (7 μg) were mixed 1:1 with 2× SDS-PAGE loading dye and loaded onto a 12% (w/v) SDS-PAGE gel for electrophoretic separation. Electro-transfer of proteins onto pure nitrocellulose was accomplished with the Bio-Rad Trans Blot Cell (Bio-Rad Laboratories) with sodium phosphate buffer (25 mM, pH 7.8) at 0.8 A for 90 min. After transfer, nitrocellulose was blocked with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM NaPO4, pH 7.4) plus 2% bovine serum albumin (BSA) and 0.1% Tween-20 (block buffer). Monoclonal antibody was diluted 1:500 in block buffer and incubated on the blot at room temperature for 2 h. After three washes in PBS plus 0.1% Tween-20, blots were incubated for 1.5 h in anti-mouse-peroxidase (Thermo Scientific) diluted 1:20,000 in block buffer. The blots were again washed three times as described above and developed using SuperSignal West Pico chemiluminescent substrate (Thermo Scientific).
All experiments were conducted in duplicate or triplicate, and repeated at least twice. The test sensitivity was determined by dividing the number of M. bovis culture- test positive animals by the total number of M. bovis culture positive animals, with the result expressed as a percentage. The test specificity was determined by dividing the number of bTB free, test-negative animals by the total number of bTB free animals, with the result expressed as a percentage. The cut-off value was determined based on the two-graph receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis .
All animal care and use procedures were reviewed and approved by the NADC Animal Care and Use Committee.
Results and discussion
Recent advances with use of M. bovis specific proteins such as MPB83, MPB70, ESAT-6, and CFP-10 have improved the specificity of serologic-based assays; however, with only minimal improvement of sensitivity . Several studies have used these antigens and evaluated diagnostic sensitivity and specificity. For example, De Anda et al., 1996 reported a sensitivity of 73% using MPB70 in an ELISA format to test 120 M. bovis infected and 223 cattle from bovine TB free herd . Waters et al., 2011 tested MPB83 and MPB70 using sera from infected cattle and reported apparent sensitivity and specificity of 63% and 98%, respectively . ESAT-6 and CFP-10 were used in an ELISA format by Whelan et al., 2008 using a total of 1489 bovine TB negative and 522 bovine TB positive cattle sera and stated sensitivity of 40.6% - 86.6% and specificity of 82.6% - 69.7%, based upon use of two different test interpretation criteria . In the present study, we detected anti- M. bovis antibodies in 77.2% and 87.5% infected cattle and deer, respectively. However, the number of samples in this study is not enough to compare diagnostic accuracy and there is a need to test more samples to further validate the EVELISA for use in the diagnosis of bovine TB.
Control activities for bovine TB are being regularly discussed by the regulatory agencies since the organism has been recognized as a threat to the One Health triad (human-livestock-wildlife). Serological assays with their logistics and financial advantages have proved to fit very well in the strategy for controlling bovine TB. Our data indicated that EVELISA test may have a diagnostic sensitivity comparative with ELISA tests reported previously and warrant further studies using a larger number of samples to validate the accuracy of the test. We recently showed that serodiagnosis of Johne’s disease with ethanol extract of MAP can be done in two minutes by a capacitance biosensor which may be a potential format for development of an on-site test for bovine TB using the M. bovis extract [27, 28].
AW was a graduate student (when the study was conducted) and SE an Associate Professor in the Center for Wildlife Health, Department of Forestry, Wildlife and Fisheries, University of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture, Knoxville, Tennessee. REJ is a Veterinary Student at the College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tennessee, Knoxville. KE is a Research Coordinator in the Center for Wildlife Health, Department of Forestry, Wildlife and Fisheries, University of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture, Knoxville, Tennessee. WRW and MVP are Veterinary Medical Officers and JPB is a Research Microbiologist at USDA, Ames, IA.
- M. bovis :
Mycobacterium avium ssp. paratuberculosis
Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay
Ethanol vortex enzyme linked immunosorbent assay
Tuberculin skin test
- CCT test:
Comparative cervical tuberculin test
Purified protein derivatives
Polymerase chain reaction
The work was supported by the following grants to SE: University of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture (UTIA) AgResearch Innovation Grant UTIA Center for Wildlife Health seed grant and M-CERV grant, UTRF Technology Maturation Funding and graduate research assistantship to AW by the Department of Forestry, Wildlife and Fisheries, UTIA, Knoxville. We acknowledge the help and guidance from Dr. Jeffery Nelson and his staff at the Tuberculosis Serum Bank, National Veterinary Service Laboratory, Ames, Iowa.
- Michel AL, Muller B, van Helden PD: Mycobacterium bovis at the animal-human interface: a problem, or not?. Vet Microbiol. 2010, 140 (3–4): 371-381.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Smith NH, Gordon SV, de la Rua-Domenech R, Clifton-Hadley RS, Hewinson RG: Bottlenecks and broomsticks: the molecular evolution of Mycobacterium bovis. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2006, 4 (9): 670-681.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Waters WR, Palmer MV, Thacker TC, Davis WC, Sreevatsan S, Coussens P, Meade KG, Hope JC, Estes DM: Tuberculosis immunity: opportunities from studies with cattle. Clin Dev Immunol. 2011, 2011: 768542.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- United States Animal Health Association: The Future of the National Tuberculosis Program Report. Denver, Colorado: Unites States Animal Health Association; 2009.Google Scholar
- Wadhwa A, Hickling GJ, Eda S: Opportunities for improved serodiagnosis of human tuberculosis, bovine tuberculosis, and paratuberculosis. Vet Med Int. 2012, 2012: 674238.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Maas M, Michel AL, Rutten VP: Facts and dilemmas in diagnosis of tuberculosis in wildlife. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2013, 36 (3): 269-285.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mackintosh CG, Littlejohn RP, Thompson BR: Improving The Tuberculin Test In Red Deer (Cervus Elaphus). Deer Branch N Z Vet Assoc: 2007. 2007, 83-86.Google Scholar
- Anon: Bovine tuberculosis. Diagnostic techniques. OIE Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals. 2008, Chapter 2.4.7: 686-689.Google Scholar
- Wood PR, Jones SL: BOVIGAM: an in vitro cellular diagnostic test for bovine tuberculosis. Tuberculosis. 2001, 81 (1–2): 147-155.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Waters WR, Thacker TC, Nonnecke BJ, Palmer MV, Schiller I, Oesch B, Vordermeier HM, Silva E, Estes DM: Evaluation of gamma interferon (IFN-gamma)-induced protein 10 responses for detection of cattle infected with Mycobacterium bovis: comparisons to IFN-gamma responses. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2012, 19 (3): 346-351.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schiller I, Waters WR, Vordermeier HM, Nonnecke B, Welsh M, Keck N, Whelan A, Sigafoose T, Stamm C, Palmer M, Thacker T, Hardegger R, Marg-Haufe B, Raeber A, Oesch B: Optimization of a whole-blood gamma interferon assay for detection of Mycobacterium bovis-infected cattle. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2009, 16 (8): 1196-1202.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Green LR, Jones CC, Sherwood AL, Garkavi IV, Cangelosi GA, Thacker TC, Palmer MV, Waters WR, Rathe CV: Single-antigen serological testing for bovine tuberculosis. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2009, 16 (9): 1309-1313.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lyashchenko K, Whelan AO, Greenwald R, Pollock JM, Andersen P, Hewinson RG, Vordermeier HM: Association of tuberculin-boosted antibody responses with pathology and cell-mediated immunity in cattle vaccinated with Mycobacterium bovis BCG and infected with M. bovis. Infect Immun. 2004, 72 (5): 2462-2467.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schiller I, Oesch B, Vordermeier HM, Palmer MV, Harris BN, Orloski KA, Buddle BM, Thacker TC, Lyashchenko KP, Waters WR: Bovine tuberculosis: a review of current and emerging diagnostic techniques in view of their relevance for disease control and eradication. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2010, 57 (4): 205-220.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Waters WR, Whelan AO, Lyashchenko KP, Greenwald R, Palmer MV, Harris BN, Hewinson RG, Vordermeier HM: Immune responses in cattle inoculated with Mycobacterium bovis, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, or Mycobacterium kansasii. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2010, 17 (2): 247-252.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Waters WR, Buddle BM, Vordermeier HM, Gormley E, Palmer MV, Thacker TC, Bannantine JP, Stabel JR, Linscott R, Martel E, Milian F, Foshaug W, Lawrence JC: Development and evaluation of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for use in the detection of bovine tuberculosis in cattle. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2011, 18 (11): 1882-1888.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Eda S, Elliott B, Scott MC, Waters WR, Bannantine JP, Whitlock RH, Speer CA: New method of serological testing for Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis (Johne's disease) by flow cytometry. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2005, 2 (3): 250-262.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Speer CA, Scott MC, Bannantine JP, Waters WR, Mori Y, Whitlock RH, Eda S: A novel enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for diagnosis of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis infections (Johne’s Disease) in cattle. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2006, 13 (5): 535-540.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Eda S, Bannantine JP, Waters WR, Mori Y, Whitlock RH, Scott MC, Speer CA: A highly sensitive and subspecies-specific surface antigen enzyme- linked immunosorbent assay for diagnosis of Johne’s disease. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2006, 13 (8): 837-844.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Scott MC, Bannantine JP, Kaneko Y, Branscum AJ, Whitlock RH, Mori Y, Speer CA, Eda S: Absorbed EVELISA: a diagnostic test with improved specificity for Johne’s disease in cattle. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2010, 7 (11): 1291-1296.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wadhwa A, Bannantine JP, Byrem TM, Stein TL, Saxton AM, Speer CA, Eda S: Optimization of serum EVELISA for milk testing of Johne’s disease. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2012, 9 (8): 749-754.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wadhwa A, Johnson RE, Mackintosh CG, Griffin JF, Waters WR, Bannantine JP, Eda S: Use of ethanol extract of Mycobacterium bovis for detection of specific antibodies in sera of farmed red deer (Cervus elaphus) with bovine tuberculosis. BMC Vet Res. 2013, 9 (1): 256.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Waters WR, Palmer MV, Bannantine JP, Whipple DL, Greenwald R, Esfandiari J, Andersen P, McNair J, Pollock JM, Lyashchenko KP: Antigen recognition by serum antibodies in white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) experimentally infected with Mycobacterium bovis. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2004, 11 (5): 849-855.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Greiner M, Sohr D, Gobel P: A modified ROC analysis for the selection of cut-off values and the definition of intermediate results of serodiagnostic tests. J Immunol Methods. 1995, 185 (1): 123-132.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- DeAnda JH, Monaghan M, Collins JD, Brennan PJ, Salman MD: Evaluation of MPB70, bovine PPD and lipoarabinomannan as antigens in ELISA for the serodiagnosis of bovine tuberculosis. Prev Vet Med. 1996, 27 (3–4): 211-215.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Whelan C, Shuralev E, O’Keeffe G, Hyland P, Kwok HF, Snoddy P, O’Brien A, Connolly M, Quinn P, Groll M, Watterson T, Call S, Kenny K, Duignan A, Hamilton MJ, Buddle BM, Johnston JA, Davis WC, Olwill SA, Clarke J: Multiplex immunoassay for serological diagnosis of Mycobacterium bovis infection in cattle. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2008, 15 (12): 1834-1838.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Li S, Cui H, Yuan Q, Wu J, Wadhwa A, Eda S, Jiang H: AC electrokinetics-enhanced capacitive immunosensor for point-of-care serodiagnosis of infectious diseases. Biosens Bioelectron. 2014, 51: 437-443.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cui H, Li S, Yuan Q, Wadhwa A, Eda S, Chambers M, Ashford R, Jiang H, Wu J: An AC electrokinetic impedance immunosensor for rapid detection of tuberculosis. Analyst. 2013, 138 (23): 7188-7196.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.