Skip to main content

Impact of Ecobiol plus ® feed additive on growth performance, physiological response, oxidative status and immunological status of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) fingerlings challenged with Aeromonas hydrophila

Abstract

This research investigates the effects of dietary supplementation with Ecobiol plus® (Bacillus amyloliquefaciens CECT5940) on the growth performance, physiological responses, oxidative stress, and immune status of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) fingerlings revealed to Aeromonas hydrophila. A total of 525 Nile tilapia fingerlings, averaging 30.00 ± 5.00 g in initial weight, were randomly divided into four groups (control and three experimental groups), each with three replicates of 25 fish. Ecobiol plus® was integrated in the diet at concentrations of 0.0 (control), 0.1, 0.2, and 0.4 g/kg feed. Fish were fed at 3% of their biomass daily, with biweekly adjustments based on growth. The feeding trial lasted 8 weeks, followed by a 15-day challenge with Aeromonas hydrophila to evaluate immune responses and survival outcomes. The group receiving 0.4 g/kg of Ecobiol plus® exhibited the most significant improvements in growth performance, including higher weight gain, specific growth rate, and feed conversion efficiency (p < 0.05). Blood and biochemical assessments indicated increased hemoglobin, total protein, and globulin levels, reflecting improved physiological and immunological conditions. Additionally, lysozyme activity and phagocytic response were markedly enhanced, demonstrating the probiotic’s immune-boosting potential. Histopathological evaluations revealed reduced gut, gills, and hepatopancreas lesions, especially in groups with higher supplementation levels. Fish in Group T4, fed with 0.4 g/kg Ecobiol plus®, achieved the best growth performance, with a final weight of 77.96 ± 5.53 g, a weight gain of 42.46 ± 3.18 g, and a specific growth rate (SGR) of 1.51%/day, compared to the control group (T1) with a final weight of 75.26 ± 3.87 g, weight gain of 35.76 ± 2.08 g, and SGR of 1.24%/day. Survival rates considerably increased in the treated groups, with T4 exhibiting the highest rate of 96.00%, followed by T2 (94.68%), T3 (92.00%), and T1 (81.32%). Additionally, the LD50 of A. hydrophila was determined to be 3 × 10⁷ CFU/mL, underscoring the protective effect of Ecobiol plus® in enhancing fish immunity and resilience against bacterial challenges. These results suggest that Ecobiol plus® can be a natural, antibiotic-free additive to strengthen growth and disease resistance in Nile tilapia. The optimal inclusion level of Ecobiol plus® is 0.4 g/kg for maximum benefit.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Aquaculture is vital in ensuring global food security, providing a substantial proportion of animal protein for human consumption. Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) is essential worldwide due to its quick growth, adaptation to different environments, and cost-effectiveness for production. However, intensified aquaculture practices have increased disease outbreaks, primarily bacterial infections, compromising production and sustainability [1, 2]. Aquaculture is expanding rapidly to supply humans with a substantial quantity of animal proteins [3]. Aquaculture constitutes Egypt’s predominant source of fish production [4, 5]. Consequently, aquaculture practices have been intensified to maintain high production levels, increasing stress on aquatic animals and the environment [6]. Excessive antibiotic usage to control these infections has raised serious issues about antimicrobial resistance and environmental effects, necessitating the development of natural and sustainable alternatives [7].

Nevertheless, the applications of these substances led to many complications, and their perils might indirectly impact human well-being. Therefore, creating growth stimulants and natural substitutes has become urgently necessary for aquatic animal health [8,9,10]. The marine animals’ health is significantly influenced by the host terrestrial microorganisms, which perform vital functions such as stimulating the immune system, helping digest nutrients, and enhancing resistance to sophisticated diseases [11]. The functional integrity of intestinal microbiota, which has the potential to influence biological processes for the betterment of the host, is significantly reliant on the microbes’ capacity to interface with the digestive tract [8, 12].

Aquaculture operations rely heavily on fish feed as an expensive input due to the critical nature of fish nutrition in regulating the health of farmed shellfish and finfish [13]. A food item or condiment can be “fortified” by adding micronutrients (such as vitamins and minerals) to increase nutritional value and decrease health hazards. In addition to containing micronutrients lost during processing, micronutrients can improve the nutritional value of staple foods [14,15,16].

The need for more ecologically responsible aquaculture has increased research into probiotics as a possible therapy for aquatic creatures. Probiotics are dietary supplements containing live microorganisms that enhance the health of terrestrial livestock and humans [17,18,19]. Incorporating probiotics in aquatic organisms’ nutrition can benefit their physiological conditions, growth performance, and feed utilization [1, 20]. Nutritional probiotics can be assimilated optimally to bolster the immune system, particularly during stress. There are specific circumstances in which additional probiotics are required to stimulate immune cells further [21, 22].

Probiotics have gained attention as a promising solution to these challenges, offering enhanced growth, improved immune responses, and better gut health [23, 24]. Aly et al. [25] recorded that O. niloticus grew more when Bacillus pumilus was added as a feed additive for two months. Furthermore, tilapia immunity, health, and growth were all enhanced by adding B. coagulans B16 to water [26].

Among these, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens has shown significant potential as a probiotic in aquaculture, yet there is a dearth of studies on its specific effects on Nile tilapia under pathogenic challenges. Feeding B. amyloliquefaciens enhanced disease resistance, increased immunological activity in channel catfish, catla, and eel, and superior development and a better (FCR) in Nile tilapia [27]. Even so, no extensive research has ever been done on how B. amyloliquefaciens supplementation affects O. niloticus growth, intestinal morphometry, immunity, and overall health. Ecobiol Plus ® is a probiotic composed of B. amyloliquefaciens CECT5940 spores, which contributes to maintaining a healthy gut microflora (1 × 10 6 CFU).

This study aims to address the existing research gaps, including the lack of detailed knowledge about the impact of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens on physiological, immunological, and oxidative responses in Nile tilapia and the optimal dosage of Ecobiol plus® for achieving maximum health benefits. This study hypothesizes that including Ecobiol plus® in the diet of Nile tilapia promotes improved growth performance, boosts immune functionality, and increases disease resistance, especially during exposure to A. hydrophila. The primary objectives are to examine its effects on growth parameters, blood-related and metabolic indicators, survival rates, and tissue responses while determining the most effective dosage for practical aquaculture applications.

Materials and methods

Ethical approval

The ethics criteria set out by the Kafrelsheikh University Ethics Committee in Egypt (KFS-IACUC/138/2023) for the use and care of animals were meticulously followed throughout all processes involving fish alteration.

Experimental diet

Minerals, vitamins, fish oil, wheat bran, soybean meal, yellow maize, fish meal, and other isonitrogenous and isocaloric components comprise the base (control) diet. Digestible energy content was 12.6 MJ/kg, and crude protein content was 30%. These were sourced from the ALEKHWA® feed factory in Kafr El-Sheikh, Egypt (Table 1). A feed processor crushes the dry ingredients into tiny pieces. In the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th diets, As a filler, rice bran was utilized, and the probiotics (Ecobiol plus®; Evonic spana y Portugal S.A.) were incorporated at different concentrations: 0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4 gm/kg ration to the baseline diet). Ecobiol plus® is a commercially available probiotic product containing Bacillus amyloliquefaciens CECT5940 spores at 1 × 10⁶ CFU/g, along with inert carriers such as calcium carbonate. This product enhances gut microbial balance and immune response in aquaculture species. Diets were designed to be isonitrogenous and isocaloric so that nutritional profiles would be constant throughout treatments. After thoroughly combining them, the components included (water, oil, vitamins, mineral mixture, and dicalcium phosphate). A combination blender weighed and combined the contents for 20 min. As suggested by Shimeino et al. [28], each 100 gm/diet was added to the blend progressively following homogeneous blending. Pelletizing the dough was done using a 2–3 mm die. We air-dried the pellets and then kept them in a four-degree fridge. The feed additive, Ecobiol plus® (Bacillus amyloliquefaciens CECT5940, 1 × 10⁶ CFU/g), represents the spore concentration in the product, not in the gut. Produced by Evonic Spana y Portugal S.A., its nutritional profile was verified using standardized methods [29]. The filler in this recipe was rice bran to maintain the isonitrogenous and isocaloric nature of the diet. Including Ecobiol plus® at different concentrations (0.1, 0.2, and 0.4 g/kg) required slight reductions in rice bran content to accommodate the additive while ensuring the overall nutrient profile of the diet remained balanced. The reduction of rice bran did not equate to the supplementation amount of Ecobiol plus® due to the concentrated nature of the probiotic.

Table 1 Composition and chemical analysis of experimental diets (on dry matter basis)

Experimental plan

Ecobiol plus® (Bacillus amyloliquefaciens CECT5940, 1 × 10⁶ exceed CFU/g) was used as the feed additive in this study, with the spore concentration referring to the product rather than the gut microbiota. Manufactured by Evonic Spana y Portugal S.A., the nutritional content of the test diets was confirmed through standardized analysis.

After the initial acclimation period, the fish fingerlings were divided into four equal groups, each receiving three copies and each replica containing twenty-five fingerlings. Aeration was efficient, and 25 fish per aquarium were housed in 60 × 35 × 40 cm glass tanks. The fingerlings weighed 30.00 ± 5.00 g. Seventy liters of water were also present in the aquariums, resulting in a stocking density of 1.07 kg per 70 L. Water quality was maintained through continuous aeration and 50% daily water exchanges, ensuring optimal dissolved oxygen levels, pH, and nitrogenous wastes. The fish displayed normal behavior throughout the experiment, with no signs of stress or aggression, indicating the suitability of the setup for the study’s objectives. Meals supplemented with 0.1, 0.2, and 0.4 gm/kg ration of Ecobiol plus® were provided to Groups 2–4, whereas Group 1 (control group, T1) received commercial basal diets. T2, T3, and T4, in that order. Fish were fed the recommended diet for eight weeks, which amounted to 3% of the total biomass in the tank. At the beginning of the research phase, we weighed the fish every two weeks; we adjusted the meal amounts based on the fluctuations in their live body weight. Each tank’s water level was roughly doubled daily by adding dechlorinated fresh water, and fish and feeding waste were removed via siphoning.

The American Public Health Association reports that water analysis instruments (Lamotte device, USA) were used to examine water parameters twice weekly [30]. Throughout the trial, the environmental parameters were maintained as follows: temperature ranged from 24 to 27 °C, dissolved oxygen was 6.5 ± 0.5 mg/L, pH was 7.1 ± 0.8, electrical conductivity (EC) was 219 ± 2 µmho/cm, total ammonia was kept below 0.1 mg/L, and a 12:12-hour light-dark photoperiod was implemented (Table 2).

Table 2 Water Quality parameters measured in the current study

Growth parameters

At the eight-week mark, each mimic had 25 fish weighed using an electronic balance. The criteria were the (FCR), weight increase, and final biomass [31]. The growth performance parameters were assessed using standard formulas: Weight Gain (WG) was calculated as WG (%) = [(Final Weight (g) - Initial Weight (g)) / Initial Weight (g)] × 100; Specific Growth Rate (SGR) as SGR (%/day) = [(ln(Final Weight) - ln(Initial Weight)) / Experimental Duration (days)] × 100; and Feed Conversion Ratio (FCR) as FCR = Feed Intake (g) / Weight Gain (g). Individual weight gain was determined by subtracting each fish’s initial weight from its final weight. Total weight gain (TWG) was defined as the cumulative weight increase for the entire group, normalized to the total number of fish per group. These parameters assessed the overall growth response to the dietary treatments. The Survival Rate (SR) was computed as SR (%) = (Final Number of Fish / Initial Number of Fish) × 100. The final biomass for each group was calculated by multiplying the average weight of the surviving fish (in grams) by the total number of survivors at the end of the trial. The average final weight was derived by dividing the total group weight by the number of fish in that group. This method effectively captured the combined influence of growth and survival on the performance outcomes of each treatment group.

[32].

Blood parameters

After twenty-four hours of starvation, the treated fish were ready for the last sampling. To lower stress levels during sampling, the fish were sedated by immersion in water containing 40 mg/L of tricaine methanesulfonate (MS-222, SyncaineR, Syndel, Canada). For tissue collection, the experimental fish were euthanized by immersion in 250 mg/L of MS-222 for 10 min [33]. Three fish per replication allowed a random selection of nine fish from each group for weighing. Blood was collected from the caudal vein and divided into two portions. One portion was promptly used for hematological assessments and differential leukocyte counts, with the samples stored in EDTA-heparinized tubes. The process adhered to the protocol described by Urbinate and Carneiro [34]. Fish were randomly sampled from the same replicate groups for specific analyses to ensure representative results while minimizing sampling-related stress. For each replicate tank, 3–4 fish were randomly selected for hematological and biochemical analysis, while a separate set of fish was used for histopathological and immune parameter assessments. This approach ensured that no fish was subjected to multiple sampling procedures, which could influence the validity of subsequent measurements. All fish in a replicate group were exposed to identical conditions, and the data from these representative subsets were treated as reflective of the respective treatment groups. Statistical analyses accounted for replication to ensure robust and reliable comparisons. Hematological parameters were assessed using various methods: a hemocytometer for counting erythrocytes (RBCs) and leucocytes (WBCs), hemoglobin concentration (Hb g/dL) determination following established protocols, the micro-hematocrit method for estimating (PCV%), (MCHC), and (MCV) carried out by Beckman Coulter of Fullerton, California, using an automated hematology analyzer model LH 750 [35]. Differential leucocytic counts were conducted using the techniques outlined by [4]. Albumins, globulin, total proteins (ALT), and (AST) were performed as prescribed by [35].

Determination of immune parameters

Phagocytic activity (PA) was revealed using the method following Kawahara et al. [36]., calculated as PA (%) = (Macrophages containing yeast / Total number of macrophages) × 100. The Phagocytic Index (PI) was measured as PI = (Number of cells phagocytized / Number of phagocytic cells), following the protocols of [37, 38]. Serum lysozyme (LYZ) activity was evaluated using a turbidimetric assay with lyophilized Micrococcus lysodeikticus cells (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MN, USA), as described by Ellis [39].

A. hydrophila challenge

The experimental infection procedure was performed following the method of Li et al. [40],, involving an intraperitoneal injection of 0.2 ml of Aeromonas hydrophila culture at a concentration of 3 × 10⁷ CFU/ml. The bacterial concentration was determined using the drop plate method, as described by [41]. The A. hydrophila strain was cultured on Tryptic Soy Agar (TSA) plates at 28 °C for 24 h, then suspended in sterile saline and serially diluted from 10² to 10⁷ CFU/ml. The final suspension was prepared for injections, with each fish receiving 0.5 ml of the bacterial dilution intraperitoneally. Fish were observed for two weeks post-injection, and mortalities were recorded twice daily as per Ibrahim et al. [42], Dead fish were collected for post-mortem examination. The lethal dose causing 50% mortality (LD50) was calculated according to Reed and Muench [43]; the LD50, denoting the lethal dose that causes the death of 50% of the treated fish, was calculated.

Gene expression

RNA was extracted according to the instructions using the TRIzol reagent from Life Technologies in Gaithersburg, MD, USA. Here at Applied Biosystems in Foster City, CA, USA, we use the MultiScribe RT enzyme kit to synthesize cDNA. Real-time PCR was conducted in triplicate using the Power SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, CA, USA) on a 7500 Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The thermocycling conditions included initial denaturation at 95 °C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 15 s, and annealing/extension at 60 °C for 1 min. The relative expression of target genes was compared to the control group, using β-actin as the normalization reference. The 2^−∆∆Ct method [44] was applied to calculate relative gene expression levels, and primer sequences are listed in Table 3.

Table 3 Primers sequences of genes analyzed in real-time PCR

Histopathological analysis

For histopathological analysis, samples from the intestine, hepatopancreas, kidney, and spleen were collected after anesthetizing fish with 40% ethyl alcohol. Five fish were randomly selected per treatment group (0.1, 0.2, and 0.4 g/kg of Ecobiol plus®) before and after the A. hydrophila challenge. Tissues were preserved in 10% formaldehyde for 24 h, dehydrated using a graded ethanol series (70% to absolute), cleared with xylene, and embedded in paraffin. Sections measuring 4–5 μm were stained with hematoxylin and eosin [4]. Dimensions of intestinal villi (length, width, crypt depth, and surface area) were quantified using ImageJ software (v. 1.53k) (Bethesda, MD, USA). Data from 10 randomly selected villi and crypts in 5 cross-sections were analyzed with one-way ANOVA in SPSS v.22, with significance set at p < 0.05. Results are expressed as means ± standard error.

Statistical analysis

The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to assess data normality, while Levene’s test was employed to verify homogeneity of variance. Statistical comparisons among experimental groups were conducted using one-way ANOVA (SPSS version 22, SPSS Inc., IL, USA). Duncan’s post-hoc test was applied for further analysis when significant differences were identified. A p-value of less than 0.05 was deemed statistically significant. Results are presented as means ± standard error.

Results

Growth and blood parameters

The impacts of Ecobiol plus® on the growth performance of O. niloticus were evaluated. All treated groups showed significant improvements in final weight, weight gain, and total weight gain compared to the control group (T1), with the T4 group exhibiting the highest values (p < 0.05; Table 4). Additionally, the feed conversion ratio (FCR) significantly improved across all treated groups, with T4 showing the most favorable FCR (p < 0.05; Table 5). However, feed intake remained consistent across all groups, with no significant differences observed (p > 0.05; Table 5). No substantial differences were detected between the treated and control groups in RBCs, PCV, and blood indices. However, (Hb) levels were substantially elevated in the T4 group compared to the other groups (p < 0.05; Table 6). For differential leukocyte counts, WBCs, lymphocytes, and monocytes were substantially elevated (p < 0.05) in all treated groups, with the highest values observed in the T3 and T4 groups. In contrast, basophil, eosinophil, and heterophil counts did not differ substantially among the groups (p > 0.05; Table 7). Biochemical analysis showed significantly higher globulin and total protein levels in all treated groups than the control, with the T4 group exhibiting the highest values (p < 0.05; Table 8). In contrast, albumin, ALT, and AST levels remained consistent across all groups, with no significant differences observed (p > 0.05; Table 8).

Table 4 The effect of Ecobiol plus® on growth performance of Oreochromis niloticus
Table 5 Effect of Ecobiol plus® on haematological parameters of Oreochromis Niloticu
Table 6 Effect of Ecobiol plus® on the differential leukocytic count of Oreochromis niloticus
Table 7 Effect of Ecobiol plus® on biochemical analysis of Oreochromis niloticus
Table 8 Effect of Ecobiol plus® on immunity of Oreochromis niloticus

Immunological parameters

Lysozyme activity and phagocytic index (PI) were substantially superior in all treated groups associated to the control (p < 0.05). (PA) was increased dramatically in the T3 and T4 treated one associated to T2 and T1 (p < 0.05; Table 9). The LD50 of Aeromonas hydrophila was determined to be 3 × 10⁷ CFU/mL. This value represents the bacterial concentration that resulted in 50% mortality in the untreated control group. The determination of LD50 acts as a scale for assessing the protective effects of Ecobiol plus® against A. hydrophila infection. Fish groups supplemented with Ecobiol plus® exhibited significantly improved survival rates, even at the LD50 challenge dose. Specifically, the 0.4 g/kg group achieved a survival rate of 96%, highlighting the efficacy of the probiotic in mitigating the pathogenic effects of A. hydrophila (Suppl Table 1).

Table 9 Effect of Ecobiol plus® on immunity of Oreochromis niloticus challenged with A. Hydrophila

Post-challenge with A. hydrophila, lysozyme activity was markedly improved (p < 0.05) in all groups treated with Ecobiol plus® associated with the control. However, no significant phagocytic index or activity differences were observed across the groups (p > 0.05; Table 10).

Table 10 Morphometric analysis of the intestine of O. Niloticus treated fed on diets containing different concentrations of Ecobiol plus®

Gene expression

The mRNA expression levels of IGF-1, GSH-Px, and GHR were significantly elevated in the liver of fish from the T2 and T4 groups, supplemented with 0.1 and 0.4 g/kg of Ecobiol plus®, respectively (p < 0.05; Figs. 1 and 2). Additionally, all Ecobiol plus®-treated groups displayed markedly higher TNF-α mRNA expression (p < 0.05), with no significant differences before the A. hydrophila challenge. Following the challenge, IL-1β expression was significantly upregulated in the T2 and T4 groups, with the T4 group showing the highest levels (p < 0.05; Fig. 3). The upregulation of genes (IGF-1, GSH-Px, GHR, SOD, TNF-α, and IL-1β) in the T2 and T4 groups followed a consistent pattern, though expression magnitudes varied. Notably, IGF-1 and GHR exhibited more substantial increases compared to SOD and GSH-Px, reflecting the interplay between growth, antioxidant, and immune pathways activated by probiotic supplementation.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Gene expression of the liver (IGF-1) and (GHR) of Nile tilapia in different groups supplemented with different doses of Ecobiol plus® for 8 weeks. * denote notable variation between groups (P < 0.05), ns = denote no notable variation between groups

Fig. 2
figure 2

Gene expression of liver (SOD) and (GSH-PX) of Nile tilapia in different groups supplemented with different doses of Ecobiol plus ® for 8 weeks. * denote notable variations between groups (P < 0.05), ns = denote no notable variations between groups

Fig. 3
figure 3

Gene expression of liver (TNF-α) and (IL-1β) of Nile tilapia pre and post challenge with A. hydrophila in different groups supplemented with different Ecobiol plus ® for 8 weeks. * denote notable variations between groups (P < 0.05), ns = denote no notable variations between groups

Histopathological result

Histopathological analysis revealed intact gills (Fig. 4) and spleen (Fig. 5) in both control and Ecobiol plus®-treated groups. The hepatopancreas showed normal structure in control and low-dose groups. At the same time, medium and high doses caused mild to moderate vacuolation and vascular congestion in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 6). Intestinal examination showed improved villi structure and morphometric parameters, particularly at higher Ecobiol plus® concentrations (Fig. 7; Table 10). In challenged, untreated controls, gills exhibited severe damage, which was progressively alleviated with Ecobiol plus®, appearing intact at high doses (Fig. 8). The gills, spleen, hepatopancreas, and anterior intestine showed notable differences between the control and treated groups. Gills: The gills of the control non-treated group showed severe hyperplasia, fusion of secondary lamellae, and congestion. In a dose-dependent way, these pathogenic results were diminished., with the gills of the T4 group appearing intact (Fig. 8). Spleen The control and low-concentration groups exhibited severe congestion, hemolysis, and necrosis, while the medium and high-concentration groups showed reduced pathological changes. The T4 group showed normal splenic structure (Fig. 9). Hepatopancreas: The control group exhibited necrosis, mononuclear cell infiltration, and vacuolar degeneration of hepatic and pancreatic tissue. These lesions were reduced in the T3 and T4 groups, which showed only mild vacuolar degeneration (Fig. 10). Intestine: The control and low-concentration groups displayed degenerative alterations in the intestinal epithelium and sloughing of villi. In contrast, the medium and high-concentration groups (T3 and T4) showed marked improvement, with elongated and branched villi (Fig. 11). According to the results shown in Table 10, the villi’s breadth, length, crypt depth, a ratio of villi length to crypt depth, and surface area all improved substantially as the dosage increased.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Photomicrograph of H&E-stained panel of gills of control (A) and Ecobiol plus® (B) treated groups showing intact primary gill lamellae (P), secondary lamellae (arrow heads), average size and intact branchial blood vessels

Fig. 5
figure 5

Photomicrograph of H&E stained panel of spleen of control (A) and Ecobiol plus® (B) treated groups showing normal splenic architecture with interconnected red (R) and white (W) pulp in addition to ellipsoid (E) and melanomacrophage (M)

Fig. 6
figure 6

Photomicrograph of H&E stained panel of hepatopancreas of control (A), Low (B), medium (C) and high (D) Ecobiol plus® treated groups showing normal hepatic architecture in which hepatocytes (H) with centrally located nuclei are arranged in cord-like pattern and separated by blood sinusoids (S) radiating from central vein (CV) in addition to presence of pancreatic acini (P). Micro and microsteatosis of hepatocytes (arrows) and congestion of blood vessels (arrowheads) were evident, especially in Ecobiol plus® treated groups

Fig. 7
figure 7

Photomicrograph of H&E stained panel of the anterior part of the intestine of control (A), Low (B), medium (C), and high (D) Ecobiol plus® treated groups showing intact intestinal villi (V), which were elongated and show some branching, especially with a high concentration of Ecobiol plus®. The villi were lined by simple columnar epithelium with goblet cells (E) tested on lamina propria of loose C.T (P) and lamina muscularis (M), which were covered externally by tunica serosa

Fig. 8
figure 8

Photomicrograph of H&E stained panel of gills of post-challenged control (A), low (B), medium (C), and High (D) Ecobiol plus® treated groups showing hyperplasia and fusion of secondary lamellae (thick arrows), congestion of branchial blood vessels (thin arrows), edema in primary and secondary lamellae (arrowheads)

Fig. 9
figure 9

Photomicrograph of H&E stained panel of spleen of post-challenged control (A), low (B), medium (C), and High (D) Ecobiol plus® treated groups showing increase in melanomacrophage centers in control, medium Ecobiol plus® groups (thick arrows), congestion and hemolysis of splenic blood vessels (thin arrows) in addition to edema, depletion of white pulp and necrosis of splenic parenchyma in control and low Ecobiol plus® groups (arrowheads) while the medium and high groups appeared intact with mixed red (R) and white (W) pulp

Fig. 10
figure 10

Photomicrograph of H&E stained panel of the hepatopancreas of post-challenged control (A), low (B), medium (C), and High (D) Ecobiol plus® treated groups showing hepatocellular necrosis (arrowheads), congestion of hepatic and pancreatic blood vessels (thick arrows) in addition to vacuolar degeneration of hepatic and pancreatic cells (thin arrows)

Fig. 11
figure 11

Photomicrograph of H&E stained panel of the anterior part of the intestine of post-challenged control (A), low (B), medium (C), and High (D) Ecobiol plus® treated groups showing sloughing of the apical part of intestinal villi (thin arrows), degeneration of lamina epithelial (thick arrows) and edema in the lamina propria (arrowheads)

Discussion

Probiotics and prebiotics in feed can boost aquaculture output, reduce mortality, and mitigate biotic and abiotic stressors [45]. In this study, the dietary supplementation of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens (Ecobiol plus®) substantially enhanced growth performance, immune responses, gene expression, and intestinal morphology in Nile tilapia. These findings underline the potential of functional feed additives as sustainable alternatives to antibiotics in aquaculture, addressing both productivity and environmental concerns [46]. The study revealed that all growth parameters were significantly enhanced in Ecobiol plus®-treated groups, with the highest increases noticed in the T4 group (0.4 g/kg Ecobiol plus®). These enhancements are attributed to better feed utilization, reduced feed conversion rates, and improved digestibility of diet components, leading to reduced production costs [47, 48]. The ability of probiotics to modulate gut microbiota diversity enhances nutrient absorption and growth performance, consistent with previous findings [23, 49]. Specific probiotic strains, including B. amyloliquefaciens, may act as supplementary nutritional sources, synthesizing essential nutrients and stimulating appetite through feed purification and vitamin synthesis [49]. Similar trends have been reported in Nile tilapia and Litopenaeus vannamei post-larvae, where enhanced intestinal microbiota improved nutrient metabolism and immunity [50]. These findings reinforce the role of gut microbiota in mediating nutrient assimilation and systemic immune responses [51]. Hematological analysis indicated no significant variation in RBC counts among the treated and control groups, consistent with ElSabagh et al. [47]. However, the T4 group exhibited a substantial increase in hemoglobin (Hb) levels, likely reflecting higher oxygen transport to meet the energy demands of improved growth [52]. Enhanced WBC and lymphocyte counts were observed in all Ecobiol plus®-treated groups, indicative of an elevated immune response triggered by the probiotic supplementation [53]. The observed erythrogram improvements may be linked to probiotics’ hepatoprotective and hepatostimulatory properties [54], as well as enhanced iron absorption facilitated by organic acid secretion in the gastrointestinal tract [55]. The biochemical parameters demonstrated hyperproteinemia and hyperglobulinemia in T4-treated fish, suggesting an enhanced innate immune response [56]. Globulin, a precursor of antibodies, is a biomarker for improved immunity, corroborating prior findings in the Nile tilapia-fed probiotic diets [57, 58]. Variations in ALT and AST levels were minimal, indicating the hepatoprotective effects of Ecobiol plus®, as lower enzyme leakage points to intact liver cell membranes [59].

Ecobiol plus® significantly amplified immunological responses, with the highest lysozyme activity and phagocytic indices detected in the T4 group. Lysozyme, a critical component of innate immunity, protects fish against infections through its bactericidal action [4, 60]. Probiotic administration likely stimulated lysozyme-secreting cells, enhancing non-specific immunity [61]. These findings are consistent with prior studies in Nile tilapia, rainbow trout, and L. vannamei, demonstrating the broad-spectrum efficacy of Bacillus probiotics in aquaculture [62].The enhanced immune responses observed in Ecobiol plus®-treated groups were maintained after the (A) hydrophila challenge. Lysozyme and phagocytic activity were significantly increased, consistent with prior research linking (B) amyloliquefaciens supplementation to improved bactericidal and lysozyme activity [63]. These effects likely contributed to reduced mortality and enhanced disease resistance in treated fish, emphasizing the role of feed additives in improving resilience under pathogenic stress. The LD50 of Aeromonas hydrophila was determined to be three × 10⁷ CFU/mL, consistent with reported virulence levels in aquaculture species [40]. Fish supplemented with Ecobiol plus® showed significantly higher survival rates at the LD50 dose, with the 0.4 g/kg group achieving 96% survival contrasted to 81.32% in the control. This highlights the potential of Ecobiol plus® as a prophylactic additive to increase immune response and disease resistance in aquaculture systems.

Probiotic supplementation induced significantly enhanced expression of immune- and stress-related genes, for instance, TNF-α, IL-1β, SOD, and GSH-Px in T2 and T4 groups. TNF-α enhances immune regulation by promoting lymphocyte migration to infection sites [19]. Similarly, elevated SOD and GSH-Px expression underscores the antioxidant capacity of B. amyloliquefaciens, mitigating oxidative injury induced by (ROS) [64]. These findings validate the dual role of Ecobiol plus® in enhancing immunity and oxidative stress defenses in Nile tilapia. The histopathological analysis highlighted significant improvements in gut morphology, including increased villi length, width, and crypt depth in Ecobiol plus®-treated groups. These changes reflect enhanced nutrient absorption and gut health, consistent with prior studies in Nile tilapia [65]. Increased goblet cell activity contributed to pathogen exclusion and epithelial integrity, reducing the impact of A. hydrophila-induced damage [66].

Improvements were also observed in the gills, hepatopancreas, and spleen, with treated groups exhibiting reduced lesions and inflammation compared to controls. In the current study, the spleens of fish in the control group showed severe pathological alterations, including congestion of blood vessels, necrotic areas, depletion of white pulp, and increased melanomacrophage centers. These findings indicate significant immune suppression and tissue damage caused by the A. hydrophila challenge, consistent with previous studies highlighting similar stress responses in fish spleens under pathogenic attack [67].

In contrast, fish supplemented with medium and high Ecobiol plus® showed substantial amelioration of splenic damage. The spleens in these groups exhibited minimal congestion, well-preserved white and red pulp, and reduced necrosis, indicating a protective effect of the dietary intervention. These improvements suggest that the probiotic treatment modulates immune responses and enhances the fish’s ability to counteract infection, which aligns with prior research demonstrating the immunomodulatory potential of Bacillus-based probiotics [67]. The observed reduction in pathological lesions supports the role of probiotics in promoting immune homeostasis by stimulating lymphocyte proliferation, reducing inflammation, and maintaining splenic architecture [68]. These findings highlight the spleen’s critical role in systemic immune function and provide robust evidence for the immunoprotective effects of Ecobiol plus® in mitigating the impacts of bacterial challenges. These results reinforce the protective effects of Ecobiol plus® against pathogenic and oxidative stressors.

Conclusion

This study highlights the value of Ecobiol plus® as a probiotic in the diets of freshwater fish, specifically Oreochromis niloticus fingerlings, by demonstrating its ability to enhance growth performance, physiological responses, and disease resistance. These findings are particularly relevant to modern intensive aquaculture practices, where stress from A. hydrophila is a common challenge. Ecobiol plus® offers a promising alternative to antibiotics, effectively boosting the immune system of fish exposed to pathogens. Based on the significant improvements observed in growth rate and immune parameters, it is recommended to include 0.4 g/kg of Ecobiol plus® in the diets of Nile tilapia fingerlings for optimal performance and health.

The limitation of the study

The study provides valuable insights into the effects of Ecobiol plus® on the growth performance, physiological response, oxidative stress, and immune response in Nile tilapia; however, it has certain limitations. The research was conducted in a controlled environment with a limited sample size, which may not fully capture variations observed in large-scale aquaculture or diverse geographical settings. The study duration was also relatively short, limiting the understanding of long-term effects. The investigation focused solely on Aeromonas hydrophila, leaving the efficacy of Ecobiol plus® against other pathogens unexplored. Furthermore, the controlled conditions may not reflect real-world aquaculture systems, where environmental stressors like fluctuating water quality and temperature variations could influence outcomes. These factors highlight the need for further research to validate and extend the findings under varied and practical aquaculture conditions.

Data availability

The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this work are available within the article. Raw data that supports the findings are available upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Zidan EM, Goma AA, Tohamy HG, Shukry M, Naiel MA. Impact of feeding Artemia franciscana enriched with various oil resources on growth, blood biochemical and behavioral indices, and survival of Oreochromis niloticus. Annals Anim Sci. 2024;24(4):1251–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sherif AH, Farag EA, Mahmoud AE. Temperature fluctuation alters immuno-antioxidant response and enhances the susceptibility of Oreochromis niloticus to Aeromonas hydrophila challenge. Aquacult Int. 2024;32(2):2171–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Arechavala-Lopez P, Cabrera‐Álvarez MJ, Maia CM, Saraiva JL. Environmental enrichment in fish aquaculture: a review of fundamental and practical aspects. Reviews Aquaculture. 2022;14(2):704–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Moustafa EM, Shukry M, Zayed MM, Farrag FA, Abd El-Aziz WE, Omar AA. Impact of Sel-Plex® dietary supplementation on growth performance, physiological response, oxidative status, and immunity-linked gene expression in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) fingerlings challenged with Aeromonas hydrophila. Open Veterinary J. 2024;14(1):70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sherif A, Abdellatif J, Elsiefy M, Gouda M, Mahmoud A. Occurrence of infectious Streptococcus agalactiae in the farmed Nile tilapia. Egypt J Aquat Biol Fish. 2022;26(3):403–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Omar AA, Gado MS, Kandel HE, Farrag FA, Shukry M. Probiotic Efficacy in Aquaculture: The Role of Technospore®(Bacillus coagulans) in Improving Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) Performance and Disease Resistance: a Study on Gut Health, Immunological Response, and Gene Expression. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins 2024:1–18.

  7. Aliko V, Qirjo M, Sula E, Morina V, Faggio C. Antioxidant defense system, immune response and erythron profile modulation in gold fish, Carassius auratus, after acute manganese treatment. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2018;76:101–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Abo-Raya MH, Shi Y, Wang Y, Sayed SM, Shukry M. Enhancing immune and antioxidant responses in Nile tilapia through dietary supplementation with Ulva fasciata extract: a study on gene expression and resistance to Aeromonas hydrophila. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr 2024.

  9. Eldessouki EA, et al. Using nutraceutical to alleviate transportation stress in the Nile tilapia. Egypt J Aquat Biology Fisheries. 2023;27(1):413–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Okasha LA, Abdellatif JI, Abd-Elmegeed OH, Sherif AH. Overview on the role of dietary Spirulina platensis on immune responses against Edwardsiellosis among Oreochromis Niloticu s fish farms. BMC Vet Res. 2024;20(1):290.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Yan J, Li Y, Liang X, Zhang Y, Dawood MA, Matuli’c D, Gao J. Effects of dietary protein and lipid levels on growth performance, fatty acid composition and antioxidant-related gene expressions in juvenile loach Misgurnus anguillicaudatus. Aquac Res. 2017;48(10):5385–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ramírez C, Romero J. The microbiome of Seriola lalandi of wild and aquaculture origin reveals differences in composition and potential function. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:1844.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Sumandeep Kaur SK, Dhanwinder Singh DS, Kuldip Singh KS. Effect of selenium application on arsenic uptake in rice (Oryza sativa L.). 2017.

  14. Sîrbu E, Dima MF, Tenciu M, Cretu M, Coadă MT, Țoțoiu A, Cristea V, Patriche N. Effects of dietary supplementation with probiotics and prebiotics on growth, physiological condition, and resistance to pathogens challenge in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Fishes. 2022;7(5):273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Elnagar MA, Khalil RH, Talaat TS, Sherif AH. A blend of chitosan-vitamin C and vitamin E nanoparticles robust the immunosuppressed-status in Nile tilapia treated with salt. BMC Vet Res. 2024;20(1):331.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Sherif AH, Khalil RH, Talaat TS, Baromh MZ, Elnagar MA. Dietary nanocomposite of vitamin C and vitamin E enhanced the performance of Nile tilapia. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):15648.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Shehata AI, Soliman AA, Ahmed HA, Gewaily MS, Amer AA, Shukry M, Abdel-Latif HM. Evaluation of different probiotics on growth, body composition, antioxidant capacity, and histoarchitecture of Mugil Capito. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):7379.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Sherif H. Inhibitory effect of nano selenium on the recurrence of Aeromonas hydrophila bacteria in Cyprinus carpio. Egypt J Aquat Biology Fisheries. 2021;25(3):713–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chaklader MR, Ahmed HA, Khafaga AF, Shukry M, Selema TAA, Abdel-Latif HM. Silybum marianum promotes growth, hepatic antioxidative activity, and splenic immunity but does not influence the intestinal barrier function of Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus. Aquaculture. 2024;583:740554.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Asaduzzaman M, Iehata S, Akter S, Kader MA, Ghosh SK, Khan MNA, Abol-Munafi AB. Effects of host gut-derived probiotic bacteria on gut morphology, microbiota composition and volatile short chain fatty acids production of Malaysian Mahseer Tor tambroides. Aquaculture Rep. 2018;9:53–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ranjha MMAN, Shafique B, Batool M, Kowalczewski PŁ, Shehzad Q, Usman M, Manzoor MF, Zahra SM, Yaqub S, Aadil RM. Nutritional and health potential of probiotics: a review. Appl Sci. 2021;11(23):11204.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Tawfeek WS, Kassab AS, Al-Sokary ET, Abass ME, Sherif AH. Chlorella vulgaris algae ameliorates chlorpyrifos toxicity in Nile tilapia with special reference to antioxidant enzymes and Streptococcus agalactiae infection. Mol Biol Rep. 2024;51(1):1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Negm AE, Abo-Raya MH, Gabr AM, Baloza SH, El‐Nokrashy A, Prince A, Arana D, Wang Y, Abdelazeem S, Albadrani GM. Effects of phytase enzyme supplementation on growth performance, intestinal morphology and metabolism in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr 2024.108(4)

  24. Diab AM, El-Rahman FA, Khalfallah MM, Salah AS, Farrag F, Darwish SI, Shukry M. Evaluating the impact of Dietary and Water-based probiotics on Tilapia Health and Resistance to Aeromonas hydrophila. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins 2024:1–17.

  25. Aly SM, Ahmed YA-G, Ghareeb AA-A, Mohamed MF. Studies on Bacillus subtilis and Lactobacillus acidophilus, as potential probiotics, on the immune response and resistance of Tilapia nilotica (Oreochromis niloticus) to challenge infections. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2008;25(1–2):128–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhou X, Tian Z, Wang Y, Li W. Effect of treatment with probiotics as water additives on tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) growth performance and immune response. Fish Physiol Biochem. 2010;36:501–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Reda RM, Selim KM. Evaluation of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens on the growth performance, intestinal morphology, hematology and body composition of Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus. Aquacult Int. 2015;23:203–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Shimeno S, Masumoto T, Hujita T, Mima T, Ueno S. -i: Alternative protein sources for fish meal in diets of young yellowtail. 1993.

  29. Thiex N, Novotny L, Crawford A. Determination of ash in animal feed: AOAC official method 942.05 revisited. J AOAC Int. 2012;95(5):1392–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. APHA-AWWA-WPCF. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. APHA American Public Health Association; 1981.

  31. Magouz FI, Salem MF, Moustafa EM, Elkhamy SA. Impact of biomos and agrimos dietary supplementation on growth performance, feed utilization and immunological parameters of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) fingerlings. Slovenian Veterinary Research/Slovenski Veterinarski Zbornik 2019, 56.(Suppl 22):87–98

  32. Mekouar MA. 15. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Yearbook Int Environ Law. 2020;31(1):326–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Dawood MA, AbdEl-Kader MF, Moustafa EM, Gewaily MS, Abdo SE. Growth performance and hemato-immunological responses of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) exposed to deltamethrin and fed immunobiotics. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2020;27:11608–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Urbinati EC, Carneiro PCF. Sodium chloride added to transport water and physiological responses of matrinxã Brycon amazonicus (Teleost: Characidae). Acta Amazonica. 2006;36:569–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Moustafa EM, Khalil RH, Saad TT, Amer MT, Shukry M, Farrag F, Elsawy AA, Lolo EE, Sakran MI, Hamouda AH. Silver nanoparticles as an antibacterial agent in Oreochromis niloticus and Sparus auratus fish. Aquac Res. 2021;52(12):6218–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Kawahara E, Ueda T, NOMURA S: INVITRO PHAGOCYTIC-ACTIVITY OF WHITE-SPOTTED CHAR BLOOD-CELLS AFTER INJECTION WITH AEROMONAS-SALMONICIDA EXTRACELLULAR PRODUCTS. In., vol. 26: JAPAN SOC FISH PATHOL DEPT FISHERIES-FAC AGR ACADEMY CENTER 358-5, YAMABUKI… 3–214.

  37. Abd El-Kader MF, Shukry M, Dawood MA, Hassan MM, Farrag F, Omar A, El‐Sawy HB, Abd Alaziz MA, Hamouda HS, Abd‐Elghany MF. Ameliorative effect of dietary lipopolysaccharides on Oreochromis niloticus juveniles submitted to aflatoxin B1‐induced oxidative stress and bacterial challenge. Aquac Res. 2021;52(8):3660–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Shukry M, Abd El-Kader MF, Hendam BM, Dawood MA, Farrag FA, Aboelenin SM, Soliman MM, Abdel-Latif HM. Dietary aspergillus oryzae modulates serum biochemical indices, immune responses, oxidative stress, and transcription of HSP70 and cytokine genes in Nile tilapia exposed to salinity stress. Animals. 2021;11(6):1621.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Ellis A. Lysozyme assays. Techniques in fish immunology/SOS Pub 1990.

  40. Li J, Ni X, Liu Y, Lu C. Detection of three virulence genes alt, ahp and aerA in Aeromonas hydrophila and their relationship with actual virulence to zebrafish. J Appl Microbiol. 2011;110(3):823–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Kamali H, Mohammed MF. Antibacterial activity of Hibiscus sabdariffa, Acacia seyal var. Seyal and Sphaeranthus suaveolens var. Suaveolens against upper respiratory tract pathogens. Sudan J Med Sci. 2006;1(2):121–6.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Ibrahem M, Shaheed I, Yazeed H, Korani H. Assessment of the susceptibility of polyculture reared African catfish and Nile tilapia to Edwardsiella tarda. J Am Sci. 2011;7(3):779–86.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Reed LJ, Muench H. A simple method of estimating fifty per cent endpoints. 1938.

  44. Livak KJ. TD Schmittgen 2001 Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2 – ∆∆CT method. Methods 25 4 402–8.

  45. Yousuf S, Tyagi A, Singh R. Probiotic supplementation as an emerging alternative to chemical therapeutics in finfish aquaculture: a review. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. 2023;15(5):1151–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Ghiasi M, Nasrollahzadeh Saravi H, Fazli H, Safari R, Farabi SMV, Binaii M, Yaghobzadeh Z, Zare E, Behrozui S, Habibi F. Evaluation of some risk factors on the rainbow trout production with emphasis on water microbial indices and heavy metals of farms along the Haraz River. ISFJ 2021, 30(6):25–42.

  47. Elsabagh M, Mohamed R, Moustafa EM, Hamza A, Farrag F, Decamp O, Dawood MA, Eltholth M. Assessing the impact of Bacillus strains mixture probiotic on water quality, growth performance, blood profile and intestinal morphology of Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus. Aquacult Nutr. 2018;24(6):1613–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Hendam BM, Baromh MZ, Khafaga AF, Shukry M, El-Son MA, Abdel-Latif HM. Effects of dietary baobab, Adansonia digitata on growth, haemato-immunological status, antioxidant biomarkers, intestinal histomorphometry, gene expression responses, and disease resistance in Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus. Aquaculture. 2024;581:740473.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Soltan M, Fouad I, Elfeky A. Growth and feed utilization of Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus fed diets containing probiotic. Global Vet. 2016;17(5):442–50.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Sadat Hoseini Madani N, Adorian TJ, Ghafari Farsani H, Hoseinifar SH. The effects of dietary probiotic Bacilli (Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus licheniformis) on growth performance, feed efficiency, body composition and immune parameters of whiteleg shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) postlarvae. Aquac Res. 2018;49(5):1926–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Trichet VV. Nutrition and immunity: an update. Aquac Res. 2010;41(3):356–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Nikinmaa M, Soivio A, Nakari T, Lindgren S. Hauling stress in brown trout (Salmo trutta): physiological responses to transport in fresh water or salt water, and recovery in natural brackish water. Aquaculture. 1983;34(1–2):93–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Tachibana L, Telli GS, Dias DC, Goncalves GS, Guimaraes MC, Ishikawa CM, Cavalcante RB, Natori MM, Fernandez Alarcon MF, Tapia-Paniagua S. Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus licheniformis in diets for Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus): effects on growth performance, gut microbiota modulation and innate immunology. Aquac Res. 2021;52(4):1630–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Sarma M, Sapcota D, Sarma S, Gohain A. Herbal growth promoters on haemato-biochemical constituents in broilers. Indian Veterinary J. 2003;80(9):946–8.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Hariom Yadav HY, Shalini Jain SJ, Sinha P. Antidiabetic effect of probiotic dahi containing Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacillus casei in high fructose fed rats. 2007. 23:62-68

  56. Andrews SR, Sahu NP, Pal AK, Kumar S. Haematological modulation and growth of Labeo rohita fingerlings: effect of dietary mannan oligosaccharide, yeast extract, protein hydrolysate and chlorella. Aquac Res. 2009;41(1):61–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Nayak S, Swain P, Mukherjee S. Effect of dietary supplementation of probiotic and vitamin C on the immune response of Indian major carp, Labeo rohita (Ham). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2007;23(4):892–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Moustafa EM, Farrag FA, Shukry M, El-Din HMS, Omar AA. Ameliorative effect of BIO-MOS® as a dietary supplementation on growth performance, physiological response, oxidative status, and immunity-linked gene expression in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) fingerlings challenged with Aeromonas hydrophila. Open Veterinary J. 2024;14(1):116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Farrag F, Khalil F, Refaey M, El-Shebly A, Zenhom O, Behery A, IMPACT OF DIETARY PROTEIN AND AQUA-MAX PLUS® ON GROWTH, FEED EFFICIENCY, AND PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSES OF MONO-SEX NILE TILAPIA. (Oreochromis niloticus, L. 1758). Egypt J Nutr Feeds. 2020;23(1):171–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Saurabh S, Sahoo P. Lysozyme: an important defence molecule of fish innate immune system. Aquac Res. 2008;39(3):223–39.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Butt RL, Volkoff H. Gut microbiota and energy homeostasis in fish. Front Endocrinol. 2019;10:9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Newaj-Fyzul A, Adesiyun AA, Mutani A, Ramsubhag A, Brunt J, Austin B. Bacillus subtilis AB1 controls Aeromonas infection in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss, Walbaum). J Appl Microbiol. 2007;103(5):1699–706.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Yaqub A, Awan MN, Kamran M, Majeed I. Evaluation of potential applications of dietary probiotic (Bacillus licheniformis SB3086): Effect on growth, digestive enzyme activity, hematological, biochemical, and immune response of Tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus). Turkish J Fisheries Aquat Sci 2021, 22(5).

  64. Cao Y, Liu H, Qin N, Ren X, Zhu B, Xia X. Impact of food additives on the composition and function of gut microbiota: a review. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2020;99:295–310.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Moustafa EM, Farrag FA, Dawood MA, Shahin K, Hamza A, Decamp O, Mohamed R, Elsabagh M, Eltholth M, Omar AA. Efficacy of Bacillus probiotic mixture on the immunological responses and histopathological changes of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus, L) challenged with Streptococcus iniae. Aquac Res. 2021;52(5):2205–19.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Ringø E, Olsen RE, Mayhew TM, Myklebust R. Electron microscopy of the intestinal microflora of fish. Aquaculture. 2003;227(1–4):395–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Saputra F, Shiu Y-L, Chen Y-C, Puspitasari AW, Danata RH, Liu C-H, Hu S-Y. Dietary supplementation with xylanase-expressing B. amyloliquefaciens R8 improves growth performance and enhances immunity against Aeromonas hydrophila in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2016;58:397–405.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Raheem A, Liang L, Zhang G, Cui S. Modulatory effects of probiotics during pathogenic infections with emphasis on immune regulation. Front Immunol. 2021;12:616713.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AAO., DHA., MS., conceptualization, methodology, investigation, and data curation. AAE., FAF., and WEA. drafted the manuscript and performed the statistical analysis being supervised by EMM., Writing, review, and editing of the manuscript, supervision, formal analysis, and visualization was performed by AAO., MS., EMM. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Mustafa Shukry or Eman M. Moustafa.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

The ethics criteria set out by the Kafrelsheikh University Ethics Committee in Egypt (KFS-IACUC/138/2023) for the use and care of animals were meticulously followed throughout all processes involving fish alteration. The Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) used in this study were obtained from a private fish farm in Tolompat 7, Kafrelsheikh Governorate, with full permission from the owner for their use in the experiment. All procedures involving the fish complied with ethical standards and were approved by the relevant institutional animal care and use committee.

Consent for publication

The authors obtained permission from all participants before submitting their data to a journal. Permission was obtained from the owner of the fish farm for the use of the Nile tilapia in this experiment.

Consent to participate

All authors have affirmed their participation in this study and consented to publishing their information in this scholarly article. Informed consent was obtained from all owners before they participated in the study, ensuring compliance with ethical research standards.

Declaration of Generative AI in Scientific Writing

The authors confirm that no artificial intelligence tools were used to analyze or derive insights from the data during the research phase.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Omar, A.A., Assar, D.H., Shukry, M. et al. Impact of Ecobiol plus ® feed additive on growth performance, physiological response, oxidative status and immunological status of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) fingerlings challenged with Aeromonas hydrophila. BMC Vet Res 21, 46 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-025-04480-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-025-04480-x

Keywords