Skip to main content

Nanoremediation of tilapia fish culture using iron oxide nanoparticles biosynthesized by Bacillus subtilis and immobilized in a free-floating macroporous cryogel

Abstract

Background and aim

Contamination from increased anthropogenic activities poses a threat to human health as well as the ecosystem. To develop a nanotechnological approach to improve aqua fisheries, we synthesized magnetic hematite nanoparticle-based gel and evaluated its efficacy in a cadmium-polluted closed system to decontaminate water and improve tilapia fish health.

Methods

Green iron oxide nanoparticles were biosynthesized by the metabolite of bacillus subtilis and incorporated into polyvinyl alcohol to construct a hydrogel by cryogelation.

Key findings

The cryogel had interconnected macropores with diameters widely ranging between 20 and 200 μm and could be free-floating in water. When applied in cadmium-polluted tilapia culture, this nanogel reduced turbidity and ammonia in the aquarium, adsorbed cadmium from the water with a larger quantity on the gel’s outer surface than in its center., and reduced cadmium concentration in tilapia’s liver, gills, and muscles. Application of this nano-based cryogel reduced the toxic effects of cadmium on tilapia fish. It maintained hepatic and renal cell nuclear integrity as determined by comet assay. This nano-treatment also reversed the cadmium-induced elevations of plasma lipids, glucose, stress marker cortisol, the hepatic enzymes AST and ALT, and the kidney function marker urea, and improved the lymphocytopenia and other hematological functions in tilapia fish intoxicated by cadmium.

Significance

The nano product of this work has many advantages. It is cheap, green, safe, can be easily manufactured, replaced, or removed from the aquaria, and proven efficient to clean aqua fisheries’ water. The concentration of NPs can be adjusted in the hydrogel, and the utilization of magnetic α-Fe2O3 NPs allows for the removal of the released particles by application of a magnetic field.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Human industrial and urban activities and poor environmental monitoring lead to contamination of waterbodies with non-degradable heavy metals. Unprecedented concentrations of these heavy metals have been recorded in aquatic ecosystems [1], increasing their adsorption into sediments or their bioaccumulation in aquatic species. The resulted toxicity has an important consequence of changing the biodiversity and the entire aquatic ecosystem [2]. Nevertheless, consumption of heavy metal-contaminated fish threatens human health, including causing carcinogenicity and deterioration of many tissues and systems [3]. As an example of those heavy metals, cadmium is one of the most known environmental pollutants and biotoxicants that may harm human health. The concentration of cadmium in freshwater was reported to range from 10 to 4000 ng/L, while it reaches as high as 100 µg/L in polluted areas and even 1 mg/L in artificial wetlands [4]. Other anthropogenic sources of Cd include fertilizer use containing Cd, mining, and combustion emissions that are dumped into the atmosphere [5]. Cadmium contamination was reported to cause several deleterious effects including, among others, liver failure, kidney dysfunction, cardiovascular problems, metabolic disorders, neurotoxic and carcinogenic effects, and reproductive and respiratory system defects [6] in several organisms. To avoid all of this, chemical discharge into receiving waterbodies should be prevented and sustainable water treatment technologies are urgently needed [7].

To remove toxic heavy metals from culture and waste waters, many technologies ranging from simple to complex have been developed. Variable physicochemical methods including precipitation, filtration, ion exchange, reverse osmosis, and adsorption, are commonly applied [8, 9]. However, physicochemical techniques are expensive and work only in the presence of high concentrations of heavy metals in the treated water [10]. In fact, most of these techniques were developed in the early 20th century and are not sufficient to face the challenges of the present pollution problems [11]. Bioremediation techniques, including phytoremediation, bio-sorption (treatment with dead biomass), bio-reduction, and intracellular bioaccumulation (by specific organism) have been applied, and are reasonable and ecofriendly [12] and phytoremediation was proven to be effective in removing contaminants from tilapia fish culture [7]. However, special extra care should be given to the added organisms as, for example, added plants, bacteria, fungi, and algae require separate areas to grow, extra handworks, extra times, and can cause changes in the ecosystem, if heavily applied. In addition, the biosorption action is not as powerful, when compared to that of other means such as adsorption by nanoparticles [13].

Nanotechnology is an interesting emerging innovative alternative for aquaculture and wastewater treatment. Nanoparticles are reported to have a great reactivity and adsorption properties for heavy metals due to, among many reasons, their nano size, huge surface area, and increased tensile strength. Meanwhile, they are light, cheap, easy to prepare, effective, energy independent, and ecofriendly systems [14, 15]. However, most research are interested in the adsorptive efficiency of nanoparticles and their ability to clean water [13, 16], but not the biological effects on aquatic organisms, although nanoparticles themselves have proven their own toxicity even to fetuses after passing through placenta [17]. The recovery of NPs from water is problematic, and the loss of nanoparticles in waterbodies may result in other environmental complications [11]. In this context, accumulated higher concentrations of silver nanoparticles than 30 µg/L were suggested to have potential toxic effects on tilapia [18]. It is therefore essential to immobilize NPs in a structure that allows for heavy metal adsorption but prevents the direct toxicity of NPs. In this context, three-dimensional polymer networks known as hydrogels can be synthesized using either physical or chemical cross-linking techniques. Because they are highly biocompatible with biological tissues, hydrogels are useful in biomedicine, tissue engineering, and the treatment of wastewater [19, 20]. As a biocompatible, non-toxic, and safe for human use, polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) could be treated readily using physiochemical methods to produce hydrogels [21].

In the present work, we applied a green nano system consisting of a free-floating macroporous cryogel immobilizing biosynthesized nanoparticles to adsorb the contaminating cadmium in tilapia fish (Oreochromis niloticus) culture. The aim of the gel was to prevent the direct contact between the fish and nanoparticles, and the consequent possible nanoparticle-induced fish toxicity. Tilapia was recruited because it is one of the most internationally consumed aquatic organisms due to their elevated proteins, lipids, minerals and other essential nutrients [22, 23]. As well, tilapia was reported as a bioindicator of water pollution, to monitor the water quality and to study the biological influence of heavy metals and the mechanisms of biological adaptations [24]. This applied nano system in the present study is introducing an efficient, costly effective, ecofriendly, and novel approach for a successful remediation of heavy metals in fish culture water.

Materials and methods

Preparation of microbial cell-free metabolites

Five tested microbial strains including the bacteria (Bacillus subtilis ATCC 6633, Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, Raoultella ornithinolytica ATCC 31898, and Leclercia adecarboxylata ATCC 23375) and the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae ATCC 9763 were sub-cultured on nutrient agar (Oxoid, UK) and yeast extract peptone agar (YEPA, Oxoid, UK) plates. A standard 0.5 MacFarland (1–2 × 108 CFU/ml) from each strain was prepared, inoculated into fresh sterile broth medium and incubated at 37 °C in a shaking incubator at 37 °C/120 rpm (LSI-3016R, Daihan Lab Tech, South Korea) for 48 h. After the incubation period, the microbial culture suspensions were centrifuged for 20 min at 8000 rpm and then filtered using a 0.2-µm surfactant-free cellulose acetate Nalgene syringe filter (Thermo Scientific Inc., USA) to separate the microbial biomass from the supernatant.

Green synthesis of iron oxide nanoparticles by bacterial metabolite

Fe2O3 NPs were synthesized according to the method described by Sundaram et al. [25]. In 500 ml Erlenmeyer flasks, cell-free supernatant of each microbial strain was resuspended in 100 ml of 5 mM FeCl3.6H2O (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) aqueous solution at ratio of 1:1 (v/v%) and stirred at 200 rpm at room temperature (25 °C) in the presence of sunlight. The reaction was conducted until the color changed from pure golden yellow to turbid brown as an indication for the biosynthesis of Fe2O3 NPs. Ultraviolet-Visible Spectroscopy (UV-Vis) in the range 200–600 nm was done using UV-Vis spectrophotometer V-760 (JASCO, UK) for the preliminary determination of Fe2O3 NPs [25]. The highest concentration Fe2O3 NPs-producing strain was selected for the biosynthesis of Fe2O3 NPs.

Characterization of nanoparticles

UV-Vis spectrum of Fe2O3 NPs was studied using UV/VIS/NIR Spectrophotometer V-630, Japan (Central Lab, Faculty of science, Damietta University, Egypt). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images were investigated using JEOL JEM-2100, Japan and zeta potential by using the Zeta sizer instrument (Malvern Instruments Ltd; zs90, Worcestershire, UK) at TEM Unit, Mansoura University, Egypt. X-ray diffraction (XRD) results were taken using the model LabX XRD-6000, Shimadzu, Japan (Nanotechnology Center, Kafrelsheikh University, Egypt). Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectra were obtained by using the SpectrumTwo IR Perkin Elmer instrument. FTIR spectrum of Fe2O3 NPs was recorded by FT/IR-4100typeA (Central Lab, Faculty of science, Damietta University, Egypt).

Preparation of PVA/Fe2O3 NPs hydrogels

Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA)-aldehyde macroporous hydrogel was prepared with the method previously described [19, 26], with modifications necessary to combine the gel with the nanoparticles. Briefly, PVA solutions were synthesized by combining 20 g of PVA with 200 ml Millipore water and stirred magnetically at 90 °C. After complete dissolution, different concentrations of sonicated Fe2O3 NPs (0.1–0.5 mg/ml) were mixed with the PVA solutions and stirred for 10 min. After cooling to 55 °C, aliquots 0.3 ml of glutaraldehyde solution (50%) was gradually added to the previous mixture and immediately poured into glass dishes (200 mm) with thickness of 5 mm and frozen at -18 °C for 20 h. Cryogelation of PVA/Fe2O3 NPs hydrogels was done using three successive frost (20 h at -18 °C) and defrost (20 h at room temperature) cycles. After cryogelation, hydrogels were dialyzed for two weeks against 5 l of deionized water to remove any unreacted glutaraldehyde.

Antibacterial activity of PVA/Fe2O3 NPs hydrogels

The antibacterial action of PVA/Fe2O3 NPs hydrogels was tested against Gram-positive bacteria (B. subtilis and Staphylococcus aureus) and Gram-negative bacteria (E. coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa) using agar well diffusion method [27]. 5 mm discs from different PVA/Fe2O3 NPs hydrogels were prepared and tested using Mueller Hinton Agar (MHA) plates inoculated by 0.5 McFarland of the tested bacteria. After incubation at 37 °C for 48 h, inhibition zones were measured and recorded in mm.

Fish and treatment grouping

Animal experiments comply with the ARRIVE guidelines and were carried out in accordance with the U.K. Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act, 1986 and associated guidelines, and EU Directive 2010/63/EU for animal experiments. The institutional ethical committee for animal research authorized and approved all the procedures and animal handling (Approval number and date: DuREC No 13 on Feb 27, 2023). Juveniles of tilapia fish (Oreochromis niloticus) with a mean weight 18.64 ± 0.54 g and mean length 10.34 ± 0.21 cm were purchased from local fish farms and left for two weeks for acclimatization to laboratory conditions prior to experimentation as described elsewhere [28]. The fish were fed twice daily (9:00 AM − 4:00 PM) at 3% of their body weight with commercial feed containing 25% crude protein. Glass aquaria with dimensions of 70 × 30 × 20 cm and a capacity of 42 l of dechlorinated tap water were used in this study. They were divided into 3 groups; 2 of them contained 2 mg/l [29] of cadmium chloride (CdCl2), while the 3rd was assigned to the control group without cadmium. After acclimatization, 15 tilapia fishes were transferred to each tank. One of the 2 cadmium groups was provided with the hydrogel immobilized with 0.1 mg/ml Fe2O3 NPs. Oreochromis niloticus in all aquaria were exposed to their specific treatments for 14 days. The water was changed twice a week to maintain the rearing conditions and CdCl2 concentrations. Water temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen, Ammonia and turbidity were measured twice weekly. Water temperature and pH were measured by (AD11-PH Meter), Dissolved oxygen was measured by (AD610- DO Meter), Ammonia was measured by (HI715 - handheld colorimeter Ammonia MR) and turbidity was measured by (Turbidity meter TU-2016 Lutron, Taiwan).

Estimation of cadmium concentration in fish tissue and nanogel

Following the experiment, three fish from each aquarium were euthanized with an overdose of buffered MS-222 (tricaine methanesulfonate, 200 mg/L) in a separate aquarium. These fish had their liver, muscles, and gills removed to estimate the amount of cadmium. Three nanogels were separated into sections for the same reason. Gel samples were taken from the gel’s core, periphery, and sub-periphery. Following a 48-hour oven drying process at 80 °C, all samples were digested using concentrated nitric acid (69%) and perchloric acid (70%) in a 2:1 ratio. The digestion was kept until the solution turned transparent. An atomic absorption spectrometer (PinAAcle 500, Perkin Elmer) was used to measure the amount of cadmium present in the filtered solution. Atomic absorption spectrophotometry was performed at the Water Research Microanalysis Laboratory, Damietta University. Cadmium was measured at 228.8 nm with a hollow cathode lamp. A standard curve was done using standard solutions of 0.005, 0.01, 0.05, 0.25, 2.5, and 10 ppm. Cadmium concentration was expressed as µg/g dry weight.

Fish body composition

For body chemical composition analysis, a tilapia fish sample was obtained from each treatment. Moisture, crude proteins and lipids of the entire tilapia body were estimated on a dry matter basis. By weighing a sample that had been previously weighed and dried at 105oC for at least 12 h, until total dryness. The sample’s water content was determined by the difference between the beginning and final weights. Crude protein was calculated by multiplying total nitrogen content estimated by the semi-automatic Kjeldahl method by 6.25, and crude lipids was estimated by extraction in a Soxhlet device using petroleum ether as an extraction solvent [30]. Body composition analysis was performed in the Water Research Microanalysis Laboratory at the Faculty of Science, Damietta University, Egypt.

Hematological and biochemical analyses

Blood samples were collected from the caudal vein of euthanized fish according to Feldman et al. [31]. A complete blood count, hemoglobin content, and hematocrit value were measured directly. Plasma samples were gained by blood centrifugation (4000 g for 10 min at 4 °C). plasma glucose (mg/l), total protein (g/dl), total lipid (g/l), urea (mg/dl), the activity levels of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and cortisol were determined with commercial kits from Reactivos GPL (CHEMELEX, Barcelona, Spain).

Comet assay

In tilapia livers and kidneys of various groups, single cell gel electrophoresis (Alkaline Comet test) (Olive and Banáth, 2006) [32] was used to examine and measure cellular DNA damage in response to cadmium toxicity and the nano-treatment. After experimental tilapia cultures, small fragments of both tissues were carefully ground and10 µl of the suspension and 70 µl of 0.5% low-melting agarose were combined. A slide covered with 1% normal melting agarose was used to immobilize the combination. Dried slides were first incubated in cold lysis buffer at 4 °C for 24 h in the dark prior to being incubated in new alkaline electrophoresis buffer and neutralized with Tris buffer. Prepared slides were electrophoresed for 20 min at 25 V and 300 mA. Finally, slides were air-dried, fixed in 100% cold ethanol, stained with propidium iodide (PI, Merck), examined using a Zeiss Axioplan epifluorescence microscope, and comet score was recorded in fifty comet nuclei per slide.

Statistical analysis

Results are expressed as mean ± standard error of means (SEM). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by t-test as a post-hoc was used to estimate the statistical difference between the 3 groups. Statistical analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel. A P value < 0.05 was considered to be significant.

Results

Characterization of iron oxide NPs

A color change from pure golden yellow of FeCl3.6H2O solution to turbid brown occurred within 15–20 min as a first sign for the successful formation of Fe2O3 NPs. The biosynthesis process of NPs was confirmed by UV-Vis Spectroscopy, FTIR and XRD spectra. An absorbance peak at 390 nm was observed in the UV-Vis spectrum of Fe2O3 NPs which indicated to an excitation wavelength of α-Fe2O3 NPs band as described by Shikha et al. [33]. Figure 1A shows that all tested microbial strains had the ability to biosynthesized Fe2O3 NPs in the presence of sunlight. Fe2O3 NPs revealed a broad peak at 391 nm, which agree with previous findings [34, 35]. Among all microbes, the B. subtilis strain was selected for the extracellular biosynthesis of Fe2O3 NPs in a high concentration and within 15 min. The formation of Fe2O3 NPs was confirmed using UV–vis spectroscopy analysis (1B), as compared with the spectra of ferric chloride.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The green-synthesized iron oxide nanoparticles: (A) UV-Visible spectroscopy of Fe2O3 nanoparticles biosynthesis using different microbial metabolites. (B) Difference of absorbance in spectroscopy between iron oxide nanoparticles and ferrous chloride. (C) Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectra analysis of iron oxide nanoparticles. (D) X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis of iron oxide nanoparticles. (E) Zeta potential analysis of iron oxide nanoparticles, showing a sharp peak at -21.1 mV. (F) Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis of the green iron oxide nanoparticles

In the FTIR results, Fe2O3 NPs (Fig. 1C) showed peaks at 3617 cm− 1 resembling to polyphenols (O–H), 2494 and 2327 cm− 1 assigned to C–H bond of alkenes, 1430 cm− 1 corresponding to nitro group (N–O), 1058 cm− 1 resembling to C–C, 878 cm− 1 assigned to C–O bond. Stretching vibrations of metal-oxygen bonds appeared at the FTIR spectrum of Fe2O3 NPs between 400 and 700 cm− 1 (at 458 cm− 1), confirming the presence of Fe-O bond and Fe-O-Fe stretching vibration [36, 37].

The XRD spectrum of Fe2O3 NPs (Fig. 1D) shows intense diffraction peaks at 33.6°, 36.1°, 41.4°, 49.9°, 54.3°, 62.8° and 64.6° resemble to (104), (110), (113), (024), (116), (214) and (300) crystallographic planes of inverse spinel magnetite phase. Crystallographic lattice planes of (104), (113) conforming the presence of traces α-Fe2O3 NPs hematite phase at diffraction angles at 33.6° and 41.4°, which match with Joint Committee on Powder Diffraction Standards (JCPDS) card number 33–0664 (ICDD file number: 13–534) [38, 39]. Using the Scherrer equation d = kλ/βcosθ [40], where k is the Scherrer constant (0.54), λ is the x-ray wavelength (1.54 A°), β is the half width of the peak, and θ is the Bragg’s angle, it was determined that the average crystalline size was 38 nm.

The Zeta potential of Fe2O3 NPs was − 21.1 mV (Fig. 1D), indicating moderately stable NPs.

The morphology and size of the Fe2O3 NPs were examined by TEM. TEM images showed polygonal and quasi-spherical-shaped Fe2O3 NPs with an average size of 20–40 nm (Fig. 1E).

Taken together, these results confirm the biosynthesis of α-Fe2O3 NPs using the metabolite of B. subtilis at room temperature. The characterization data agree with some previously reported results [41].

Application of the nano-based gel in tilapia culture

The polyvinyl alcohol – glutaraldehyde cryogel presented in this study looked like sponge (Fig. 2A) with interconnected macropores that resulted from the freezing of the reactants. It was not the aim of the present study to physiochemically characterize the prepared PVA-GA cryogel or to analyze its pore structure and size or the adsorption kinetics and capacity, since these analyses were conducted several times in previous works [42,43,44,45,46]. However, it was clear, as shown in Fig. 2B, that the gel was thin-walled and extremely porous with clear observable microchannels. The pores/channels were heterogenous in their structure with diameters widely ranged between 20 and 200 μm or even greater.

Fig. 2
figure 2

The polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) hydrogel: The PVA-aldehyde hydrogel without immobilized NPs (A) is prepared by cryogelation.as described in the material and methods section. B) Scanning electron microscopy of the prepared macroporous gel (scale bar 100 μm). C) The biosynthesized iron oxide–containing hydrogel is free-floating in the tilapia aquarium. A video is available in the supplementary data. D) Structure of the gel at the end of culture period (scale bar 100 μm). Compare with subfigure B. E) A magnification of D showing the gel surface covered with a layer of amorphous material (scale bar 1 μm)

Figure 2C, and the video in the supplementary files, show the thin free-floating Fe2O3 NPs-immobilized cryogel. The gel was light red, which is the dominant color of the Fe2O3 NPs. After a period of floating, the applied gel became heavier due to water absorption and accumulation of biomaterial. At the end of the culture period, the scanning electron microscopic analysis (Fig. 2D) showed that the porosity and microstructure of the hydrogels was not preserved. Pores became narrower or even closed. Walls became opaque, thick and rough, as compared with the structure of the newly prepared gel (Fig. 2B). Figure 2E shows that amorphous material covers the walls of the gel, changing its shape and concealing its pores.

Antibacterial activity of PVA/Fe2O3 NPs hydrogels

The antibacterial activity of PVA/Fe2O3 NPs hydrogels against B. subtilis, S. aureus, E. coli and P. aeruginosa was studied using the agar well diffusion method as shown in Table 1. The 0.1 mg/ml PVA/Fe2O3 NPs hydrogel has the ability to inhibit all tested microbes with inhibition zones of 20 and 17 mm against G-ve E. coli and P. aeruginosa, respectively, as well as 18 and 16 mm against G + ve B. subtilis and S. aureus. High concentrations from Fe2O3 NPs did not produce notable increasing in the antibacterial activity, which may refer to the low releasability of NPs from the hydrogel (El-Zahed et al., 2021). Overall, it was noted that PVA/Fe2O3 NPs hydrogel was more effective against G-ve bacteria than G + ve bacteria. This action might be due to the G + ve bacterium’s strong cell wall, which is made up of thick layers of peptidoglycan and so prevents the entry of Fe2O3 NPs into the bacterial cell [47].

Table 1 Agar well diffusion method test of PVA/Fe2O3 NPs

The prepared hydrogel adsorbs cadmium

Cadmium concentration was estimated in the cryogel immobilizing Fe2O3 NPsafter 14 days in aquaria of tilapia fish culture. The results revealed a concentration gradient in the gel from the outer surface to the core (Fig. 3A). This adsorption led to decreasing cadmium concentration in the cultured fish tissues. This concentration was estimated in 3 tilapia organs: liver, muscle, and gills (Fig. 3B). Cadmium was significantly decreased in these tissues in the cadmium-nano-treated group as compared with the cadmium only treated group. In addition, characters of culture water were also improved by the nano-gel. Treatment with this nano-gel significantly decreased turbidity and ammonia content not only in comparison with the cadmium-treated culture, but also with the control culture [Fig. 3C].

Fig. 3
figure 3

Iron oxide nanoparticles immobilized in PVA hydrogel adsorb cadmium and clean water in tilapia fish culture. (A) Cadmium concentration (ug/ml) in the gel. The gel was divided vertically into 3 pieces from the outer surface to the core in the same area. Data are shown as mean ± SEM of N = 3. The “*” denotes that all values are significantly different from each other (t-test after ANOVA) and show a concentration gradient from the surface to the core. (B) The adsorption of the heavy metal by the nano treatment of Cd-polluted tilapia culture significantly reduces cadmium concentration (ug/g dry wt) in different fish tissues. N = 3. Statistical analyses: ANOVA < 0.05 for all organs. “a” denotes higher Cd concentration than the control value, and “b” denotes a significantly lower value than that of the Cd only – treated group (t-test as a post-hoc test). (C) Effect of iron oxide nanoparticles immobilized in PVA hydrogel on Cd-polluted tilapia fish culture water physicochemical characters. Data are mean ± SEM values of samples collected twice weekly. ANOVA value was mentioned if significant. Posthoc t-test: “a” and “b” denote lower value than those of control and Cd-treated groups, respectively

Nano treatment maintains the nuclear integrity of cadmium-intoxicated tilapia

Significant DNA damage was recorded in both livers and kidneys of tilapia fish exposed to cadmium toxicity for 14 days (Fig. 4). DNA integrity defects were proved by comet assay, which results in different parameters that can be quantified. Thus, the results revealed significant increases in both the comet tail length (fragmented DNA), tail DNA quantity, and tail moment (= tail length x % tail DNA) in both liver and kidney cells. The adsorptive iron oxide nano treatment completely maintained the nuclear integrity in kidney, since similar quantitative results were obtained to the control results. This maintenance was only partial in the hepatic cells.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Reduction of Cd-induced DNA damage in liver (left panel) and kidney (right panel) of tilapia fish by iron oxide nanoparticles immobilized in PVA hydrogel. Single cell DNA damage was visualized by comet assay. The upper images represent the comet results of the control, cadmium-treated, and Cd-nanocomposite-treated groups, respectively. Data of comet analysis are mean ± SEM values of samples collected at the end of the tilapia culture period. ANOVA value was significant (P < 0.05) for all tested parameters. Posthoc t-test: “a” denotes significantly higher value than the control value, and “b” denotes a significantly lower value than that of the Cd–treated group

Nano treatment reverses affected tilapia physiological aspects in cadmium-intoxicated culture

As shown in Fig. 5, the toxic effect of 14-day-cadmium treatment on blood parameters of tilapia fish was obvious. Treatment with cadmium increased significantly both total plasma lipids, glucose, cortisol, the hepatic enzymes AST and ALT, and the kidney function marker urea, whereas it decreased significantly both plasma proteins and the fish body weight. Adsorption of cadmium by the iron oxide-gel-nano treatment reversed these effects significantly, when compared with the cadmium-treated cultures. However, the results of all of these parameters reveal that this restoration was only partial, since all values were still significantly different from the control values (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Nutritional and functional aspects of tilapia fish exposed to cadmium in culture and treated with hydrogel immobilizing iron oxide nanoparticles to adsorb the heavy metal. Tilapia was cultured in these conditions for 2 weeks. Data are presented as mean ± SEM of N = 3. ANOVA was significant (P < 0.05) in all measurements. “a” and “b” denote a significantly different value from that of control and cadmium-treated groups, respectively (t-test, P < 0.05)

The body composition was not largely altered by different treatments, since no significant differences were observed between different groups. The most obvious result was the non-significant increase of crude lipid content in cadmium-treated group (6.88%), compared to that of the control group (5.58%), and the cadmium-nano-treated group (6.42%). The crude protein was non-significantly decreased from 21.03% in the control group to 20.31% in cadmium-treated group. The nano treatment did not alter this content (20.42%). Similar results were obtained for fish body moisture (69.43, 68.12, and 70% for control, Cd-, and Cd-nano-treated groups, respectively.) and body ash (3.52%, 3.13% and 3.49% for control, Cd-, and Cd-nano-treated groups, respectively).

Hematological analyses in the present work are summarized in Table 2. In most parameters, blood parameters were harmed by exposure to cadmium, an effect that was partially lessened by the nanocomposite treatment. White blood cell (WBC) count in cadmium group was found to be significantly less than the control. This decrease is mostly due to the significantly reduced lymphocyte count. Noticeably, monocytes and neutrophils were doubled in the nano-treated group, when compared even with the control group. Cadmium exposure significantly decreased the RBC count, hematocrit value and hemoglobin concentration in tilapia fish. This hematopoietic impairment triggered by cadmium toxicity could be corrected by the nano treatment.

Table 2 Biochemical and hematological parameters of tilapia fish cultured in cadmium-polluted aquaria and treated with a hydrogel immobilizing green iron oxide nanoparticles

Discussion

The efficacy of fish culture water purification methods is of great direct concern since pollution is increasing as a result of growing anthropogenic activities. Of special interest, heavy metals are not biodegradable and accumulate in different organisms, with the consequence of being toxic and even carcinogenetic to human [48, 49]. Numerous articles demonstrated the high adsorptive capacity of nanoparticles for heavy metal contamination from aquatic solutions [13, 50,51,52]. However, fish long directly exposed to higher levels of nanoparticles exhibited variable intoxication responses, including inflammation, immune suppression, metabolic stress, biochemical disturbance, and growth retardation. These toxic effects depend on the exposure duration to NPs, and NP concentrations and size [53,54,55]. Similarly, non-magnetic nanoparticles have restricted applicability to purify water, since they are difficult to be separated from water [51]. This separation is crucial, since accumulation of NPs may be toxic per se. To isolate nanoparticles from the direct contact with the fish, preventing their toxicity, we thought to immobilize these NPs in a polymer structure (the hydrogel) that is free-floating like a jelly fish and can be easily removed or replaced. To reduce costs, cheap material such as ferrous sulphate and PVA have been used in synthesizing the nanoproduct. Nanoparticles were synthesized by a natural metabolite of Bacillus subtilis, implying the cost-effectiveness and usefulness of natural products [56].

The study focused primarily on water treatment using immobilized Fe2O3 NPs and studying the effect on tilapia fish health. Fe2O3 NPs have been chosen because they have many advantages, including the easy and cheap preparation applied method shown in the present study, reported adsorption efficiency for different heavy metals, and the ease of removal from water. The applied gel can be easily withdrawn from water. In addition, if there were magnetic α-Fe2O3 NP, the mean constituent in the gel, released in the culture water, they could be easily removed by application of a magnet or any magnetic field. The green preparation of NPs is also advantageous. It is easy, cheap, safe, and does not require any specific factories [14, 15, 17].

Application of the PVA cryogel incorporated with Fe2O3 NPs in in this study was shown to improve culture water characters. Water of this nano hydrogel was “very clean”. This treatment significantly reduced turbidity and ammonia content of water not only in comparison with the cadmium-treated culture, but also with the control culture. The reduction of ammonia in culture water suggests that the nano-gel also attracted nitrogenous remains. Together with the deposited material shown in the SEM image of the gel at the end of the culture, the results revealed an action of “sweeping and removing dirt” by the applied hydrogel from water in the fish farm.

The present study revealed obvious effects of cadmium on both nuclear and physiological levels of the tilapia O. niloticus. The results of the comet assay show that cadmium in culture water was able to cause significant increase of both tail length, tail DNA, and tail moment, indicating induction of primary DNA damage by cadmium presented as single-stranded breaks in the studied tilapia cells. These data agree with many previous reports in different tissues variable fish species [57,58,59,60]. Adsorption of cadmium by the applied nanogel prevented – to a great extent – this toxic effect and maintained the nuclear integrity.

In the present study, a significant decrease was observed in the total plasma protein content of O. niloticus upon exposure to cadmium. As well, total body protein was non-significantly decreased. This decrease may be a secondary action of the kidney damage caused by cadmium toxicity, which can cause protein loss and a consequent hypoproteinemia, or also secondary to the disturbance in protein synthesis on the cellular level or inhibition of blood protein synthesis in the liver [61, 62]. The decrease of plasma proteins has been reported to affect the transport and removal of toxic substances, including cadmium binding [63, 64].

Different environmental stressors increase carbohydrate metabolism with the consequent elevation of blood glucose levels [65, 66]. This elevation due to environmental stress conditions is commonly used as a key indicator for assessing fish health and stress status [67]. In the present study, cadmium exposure significantly caused hyperglycemia in Oreochromis niloticus. Many reasons were reported that cadmium exposure may increase blood glucose including interfering with glucose homeostasis, metalloenzymes, and lipid peroxidation, inhibition of insulin release and insulin receptor levels, activation of gluconeogenesis enzymes, excessive oxidative injuries, and alterations in DNA and membrane structures and functions [68, 69]. In agreement with the present results, many studies reported a significant increase in glucose level in different fish species after cadmium exposure, which is mediated by stress responses including the different reasons mentioned above [70,71,72].

In the same context, the results showed a significant increase of cortisol level. A concomitant elevation of both cortisol and glucose in response to cadmium intoxication was early reported in Oreochromis mossambicus [70] and other fish species [73]. Together with metallothionein, cortisol was considered the most sensitive index to stress. The significant lowering of both glucose and cortisol in the present result indicate that tilapia is exposed to less stress after treatment with the iron oxide nano gel.

Absorbed cadmium accumulates in different organs, including the kidney, liver, and gills, and the liver is always the first target for cadmium accumulation at high concentrations [74]. The hepatic transaminases ALT and AST are the most important liver function markers that secreted into the plasma upon tissue damage and dysfunction induced by toxicant exposure. In the present study, the plasma ALT and AST levels in O. niloticus were significantly increased upon exposure to cadmium. Their elevation indicates that cadmium exposure induces liver damage in tilapia, resulting in the leakage of ALT and AST into the bloodstream. These results agree with that of previous reports in different fish species, including tilapia [7, 75]. The kidney also is the second target of cadmium toxicity. The present study showed an increase of urea level, as a kidney function marker, upon cadmium exposure, compared to the control group. This urea increase in cadmium exposed fish may be attributed to the glomerular inefficiency and kidney dysfunction [75].

Hematological indices are indicators of health status in different fish types, since they reflect the physiological alterations after exposure to different stressors as pollutants, including heavy metals, and less oxygen supply. These parameters have different sensitivity to various environmental factors and chemicals, and the change of water quality. Hematological analyses in the present work were harmed by cadmium toxicity, an effect that was partially lessened by the nano gel treatment. White blood cell (WBC) count in cadmium group was found to be significantly less than the control, reflecting cadmium’s deleterious effect on the fish immunity. This decrease is mostly due to the great noticed lymphocytopenia. Fish immunosuppression and reduced disease resistance by cadmium toxicity was previously reported [76]. Regarding RBCs and hemoglobin, cadmium is also known to cause anemia through hemolysis, less cellular iron uptake, a decrease in cell viability, a decrease in red blood cell synthesis, and deficient erythropoietin production in different fish species [77], including tilapia [61]. In the present work, cadmium exposure significantly decreased the RBC count, hematocrit value and hemoglobin concentration in tilapia fish, suggesting that cadmium exposure can cause toxicity by targeting the hematological properties of tilapia. This hematopoietic impairment triggered by cadmium toxicity could be corrected by the nano treatment.

Conclusion

We have developed a free-floating jellyfish-like nano-based structure composed of a PVA cryogel incorporated with green Fe2O3 NPs, biosynthesized by the metabolite of B. subtilis bacteria at room temperature and in the presence of sunlight. This nano-based gel was proven to have antibacterial effect. Cadmium accumulation in the Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus, one of the most consumed fish in the world, showed a disruptive effect on the physiological processes and health of the fish, which threatens millions of tilapia-consuming humans. The prepared nano-based magnetic iron oxide gel could adsorb cadmium in tilapia aquaculture, improving the fish physiology and health. This was represented as maintaining the hepatic and renal cellular and nuclear integrity and functions, the main body and plasma composition, and improving the hematological and immunological parameters. The nano-based hydrogel has many advantages and presents an advanced technique in remediation of toxic heavy metals.

Data availability

All data and material are included in the manuscript.

References

  1. Abotalib AZ, Abdelhady AA, Heggy E, Salem SG, Ismail E, Ali A, Khalil MM. Irreversible and large-scale Heavy Metal Pollution arising from increased damming and water reuse in the Nile Delta. Earths Future. 2023;11(3). https://doi.org/10.1029/2022EF002987. e2022EF002987.

  2. Singh V, Singh N, Rai SN, Kumar A, Singh AK, Singh MP, Sahoo A, Shekhar S, Vamanu E, Mishra V. Heavy Metal Contamination in the aquatic ecosystem: toxicity and its remediation using eco-friendly approaches. Toxics. 2023;11(2):147. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics11020147.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Balali-Mood M, Naseri K, Tahergorabi Z, Khazdair MR, Sadeghi M. Toxic mechanisms of five heavy metals: Mercury, lead, Chromium, Cadmium, and Arsenic. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12:643972. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.643972.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Liu P, Rudick M, Anderson RG. Multiple functions of caveolin-1. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(44):41295–8. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.R200020200.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kubier A, Wilkin RT, Pichler T. Cadmium in soils and groundwater: a review. Appl Geochem. 2019;108:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2019.104388.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Genchi G, Sinicropi MS, Lauria G, Carocci A, Catalano A. The effects of Cadmium Toxicity. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;26(11):3782. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17113782.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Beheary M, Sheta B, Hussein M, Nawareg M, El-MataryF, Hyder A. Environmental Remediation of Tilapia Aquaculture Wastewater using Ceratophyllum demersum and Lemna minor. Egypt J Aquat Biology Fisheries. 2019;23(2):379–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kumar M, Seth A, Singh A, Rajput M, Sikandar M. Remediation strategies for heavy metals contaminated ecosystem: a review. Environ Sustain Indic. 2021;12:100155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2021.100155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Qasem NAA, Mohammed RH, Lawal DU. Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewater: a comprehensive and critical review. NPJ Clean Water. 2021;4:36. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41545-021-00127-0.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Anirudhan TS, Sreekumari SS. Adsorptive removal of heavy metal ions from industrial effluents using activated carbon derived from waste coconut buttons. J Environ Sci. 2011;23:1989–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1001-0742(10)60515-3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Savina IN, Otero-Gonzalez L, Berillo D. Macroporous Cryogel-Based systems for Water Treatment Applications and Safety: nanocomposite-based cryogels and Bacteria-based bioreactors. In: Mohanan PV, Kappalli S, editors. Biomedical Applications and Toxicity of nanomaterials. Singapore: Springer; 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7834-0_1.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Singh V, Singh J, Singh N, Rai SN, Verma MK, Verma M, Singh V, Chivate MS, Bilal M, Mishra V. Simultaneous removal of ternary heavy metal ions by a newly isolated Microbacterium paraoxydans strain VSVM IIT(BHU) from coal washery effluent. BioMetals 2022, 2022, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10534-022-00476-4

  13. Yang J, Hou B, Wang J, Tian B, Bi J, Wang N, Li X, Huang X. Nanomaterials for the removal of Heavy metals. Nanomaterials. 2019;9:424. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9030424.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. El-Zahed MM, Baka ZA, Abou-Dobara MI, Elsayed AK, Aboser M, Hyder A. In vivo toxicity and antitumor activity of newly green synthesized reduced graphene oxide/silver nanocomposites. Bioresour Bioprocess. 2021;8:44. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40643-021-00400-7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Elzoheiry A, Ayad E, Omar N, Elbakry K, Hyder A. Anti-liver fibrosis activity of curcumin/chitosan-coated green silver nanoparticles. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):18403. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-23276-9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Li Z, Gong Y, Zhao D, Dang Z, Lin Z. Enhanced removal of zinc and cadmium from water using carboxymethyl cellulose-bridged chlorapatite nanoparticles. Chemosphere. 2021;263:128038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128038.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Elsharawy K, Abou-Dobara M, Elgammal H, Hyder A. Chitosan coating does not prevent the effect of the transfer of green silver nanoparticles biosynthesized by Streptomyces malachitus into fetuses via the placenta. Reprod Biol. 2020;20(1):97–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.repbio.2020.01.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mabrouk M, Mansour A, Abdelhamid A, Abualnaja A, Mamoon A, Gado W, Matter A, Ayoub H. Impact of aqueous exposure to silver nanoparticles on growth performance, redox status, non-specific immunity, and histopathological changes of Nile Tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus, challenged with Aeromonas hydrophila. Aquacult Rep. 2021;21:100816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aqrep.2021.100816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Savina IN, Ingavle GC, Cundy AB, Mikhalovsky SV. A simple method for the production of large volume 3D macroporous hydrogels for advanced biotechnological, medical and environmental applications. Sci Rep. 2016;6:21154. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep21154.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Gan D, Xing W, Jiang L, Fang J, Zhao C, Ren F, Fang L, Wang K, Lu X. Plant-inspired adhesive and tough hydrogel based on Ag-Lignin nanoparticles-triggered dynamic redox catechol chemistry. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):1487. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09351-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Berillo DA, Caplin JL, Cundy AB, Savina IN. A cryogel-based bioreactor for water treatment applications. Water Res. 2019;153:324–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2019.01.028.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hernández-Sánchez F, Aguilera-Morales M. Nutritional richness and importance of the consumption of Tilapia in the Papaloapan Region. Revista Electrónica De Vet. 2012;13(6):1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Fanuel J, Penina G, Colin M. 2017. Comparative Analysis of Nutritional Value of Oreochromis niloticus (Linnaeus), Nile Tilapia, Meat from Three Different Ecosystems. Journal of Food Quality, 2017, Article ID 6714347, 8 pages, https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6714347

  24. Zahran E, Abdelhamid F, Aboelfadl E, El-Matbouli M. Biomarker responses of Nile tilapia towards wastewater effluents exposure. Aquac Res. 2021;52(4):1382–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/are.14992.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Sundaram PA, Augustine R, Kannan M. Extracellular biosynthesis of iron oxide nanoparticles by Bacillus subtilis strains isolated from rhizosphere soil. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng. 2012;17:835–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12257-011-0582-9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Al-Jwaid AK, Berillo D, Savina IN, Cundy AB, Caplin JL. One-step formation of three-dimensional macroporous bacterial sponges as a novel approach for the preparation of bioreactors for bioremediation and green treatment of water. RSC Adv. 2018;8(54):30813–24. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8ra04219e.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). (2017) Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. In Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing: Approved standard- twenty-seven Edition, Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Wayne, PA.

  28. Sherif AH, Farag EA, Mahmoud AE. Temperature fluctuation alters immuno-antioxidant response and enhances the susceptibility of Oreochromis niloticus to Aeromonas hydrophila challenge. Aquacult Int. 2023;1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-023-01263-9.

  29. Wang ZJ, Liu XH, Jin L, Pu DY, Huang J, Zhang YG. Transcriptome profiling analysis of rare minnow (Gobiocypris rarus) gills after waterborne cadmium exposure comp. Biochem Physiol D Genomic Proteomic. 2016;19:120–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbd.2016.05.003.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Horwitz WAOAC, International. Official Methods of Analysis of Aoac International. 17. Ed. Current through revision ed. Gaithersburg Md: AOAC International; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Feldman BF, Zink JG, Jain NC, Schalm OW. 2000. Schalm’s veterinary hematology. 5th edition, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, New York, 1344 pp.

  32. Olive P, Banáth J. The comet assay: a method to measure DNA damage in individual cells. Nat Protoc. 2006;1:23–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2006.5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Shikha P, Randhawa BS, Kang TS. Greener synthetic route for superparamagnetic and luminescent α-Fe2O3 nanoparticles in binary mixtures of ionic liquid and ethylene glycol. RSC Adv. 2015;5:51158–68. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA07218B.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Devi HS, Boda MA, Shah MA, Parveen S, Wani AH. Green synthesis of iron oxide nanoparticles using Platanus orientalis leaf extract for antifungal activity. Green Process Synthesis. 2019;8(1):38–45. https://doi.org/10.1515/gps-2017-0145.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Sandhya J, Kalaiselvam S. Biogenic synthesis of magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles using inedible borassus flabellifer seed coat: characterization, antimicrobial, antioxidant activity and in vitro cytotoxicity analysis. Mater Res Express. 2020;7(1):015045. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ab6642.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Akhtar K, Khan SA, Khan SB, Asiri AM. Scanning Electron Microscopy: Principle and Applications in nanomaterials characterization. In: Sharma S, editor. Handbook of materials characterization. Cham: Springer; 2018. pp. 113–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92955-2_4.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  37. Li CF, Xie LJ, Zhao JW, Gu LF, Tang HB, Zheng L, Li GR. Interfacial Fe-O-Ni-O-Fe Bonding regulates the active Ni sites of Ni-MOFs via Iron Doping and decorating with FeOOH for Super-efficient Oxygen Evolution. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2022;61(17):e202116934. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202116934.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Khalil AT, Ovais M, Ullah I, Ali M, Shinwari ZK, Maaza M. Biosynthesis of iron oxide (Fe2O3) nanoparticles via aqueous extracts of Sageretia thea (Osbeck.) And their pharmacognostic properties. Green Chem Lett Rev. 2017;10(4):186–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/17518253.2017.1339831.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Reveendran R, Khadar MA. Structural, optical and electrical properties of Cu doped α-Fe2O3 nanoparticles. Mater Chem Phys. 2018;219:142–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2018.08.016.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Muniz FTL, Miranda MR, Morilla dos Santos C, Sasaki JM. The Scherrer equation and the dynamical theory of X-ray diffraction. Acta Crystallogr Found Adv. 2016;72:385–90. https://doi.org/10.1107/S205327331600365X.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Yadwade R, Kirtiwar S, Ankamwar B. A review on green synthesis and applications of iron oxide nanoparticles. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2021;21(12):5812–34. https://doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2021.19285.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Pan Y, Liu Z, Wang W, Peng C, Shi K, Ji X. Highly efficient macroporous adsorbents for toxic metal ions in water systems based on polyvinyl alcohol–formaldehyde sponges. J Mater Chem A. 2016;42537–49. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5TA09295G.

  43. Dolgormaa A, Lv CJ, Li Y, Yang J, Yang JX, Chen P, Wang HP, Huang J. Adsorption of Cu(II) and zn(II) ions from Aqueous Solution by Gel/PVA-Modified Super-paramagnetic Iron Oxide nanoparticles. Molecules. 2018;23(11):2982. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23112982.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Corona-Escalera AF, Tinajero-Díaz E, García-Reyes RA, Luna-Bárcenas G, Seyfoddin A, Padilla-de la Rosa JD, González-Ávila M, García-Carvajal ZY. Enzymatic crosslinked hydrogels of gelatin and poly (vinyl alcohol) loaded with probiotic Bacteria as oral delivery system. Pharmaceutics. 2022;14(12):2759. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14122759.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Darban Z, Shahabuddin S, Gaur R, Ahmad I, Sridewi N. Hydrogel-based Adsorbent Material for the effective removal of Heavy metals from Wastewater: a Comprehensive Review. Gels. 2022;8(5):263. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels8050263.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Dong L, Shan C, Liu Y, Sun H, Yao B, Gong G, Jin X, Wang S. Characterization and mechanistic study of Heavy Metal Adsorption by Facile synthesized magnetic xanthate-modified Chitosan/Polyacrylic Acid Hydrogels. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(17):11123. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191711123.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Veerapandian M, Yun K. Functionalization of biomolecules on nanoparticles: specialized for antibacterial applications. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011;90(5):1655–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-011-3291-6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Vardhan KH, Kumar PS, Panda RC. A review on Heavy Metal Pollution, Toxicity and Remedial measures: current trends and Future perspectives. J Mol Liq. 2019;290:111197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2019.111197.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Liosis C, Papadopoulou A, Karvelas E, Karakasidis TE, Sarris IE. Heavy Metal Adsorption Using Magnetic Nanoparticles for Water Purification: a critical review. Mater (Basel). 2021;14(24):7500. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14247500.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Qu X, Alvarez PJJ, Li Q. Applications of Nanotechnology in Water and Wastewater Treatment. Water Res. 2013;47:3931–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2012.09.058.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Wadhawan S, Jain A, Nayyar J, Mehta SK. Role of nanomaterials as adsorbents in Heavy Metal Ion Removal from Waste Water: a review. J Water Process Eng. 2020;33:101038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2019.101038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Khoso WA, Haleem N, Baig MA, Jamal Y. Synthesis, characterization and heavy metal removal efficiency of nickel ferrite nanoparticles (NFN’s). Sci Rep. 2021;11:3790. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-83363-1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Marin S, Vlasceanu GM, Tiplea RE, Bucur IR, Lemnaru M, Marin MM, Grumezescu AM. Applications and toxicity of silver nanoparticles: a recent review. Curr Top Med Chem. 2015;15(16):1596–604. https://doi.org/10.2174/1568026615666150414142209.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Hedayati SA, Farsani HG, Naserabad SS, Hoseinifar SH, Van Doan H. Protective effect of dietary vitamin E on immunological and biochemical induction through silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) inclusion in diet and silver salt (AgNO3) exposure on zebrafish (Danio rerio). Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol. 2019;222:100–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpc.2019.04.004.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Khan MZH, Hossain MMM, Khan M, Ali MS, Aktar S, Moniruzzaman M, Khan M. Influence of nanoparticle-based nano-nutrients on the growth performance and physiological parameters in tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). RSC Adv. 2020;10(50):29918–22. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ra06026g.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Hyder A. Naturally-occurring carboxylic acids from traditional antidiabetic plants as potential pancreatic islet FABP3 inhibitors. A molecular docking-aided study. Chem Biol Interact. 2023;372:110368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbi.2023.110368.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Ahmed MK, Parvin E, Arif M, Akter MS, Khan MS, Islam MM. Measurements of genotoxic potential of cadmium in different tissues of fresh water climbing perch Anabas testudineus (Bloch), using the comet assay. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2010;30(1):80–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.etap.2010.04.003.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Jindal R, Verma S. In vivo genotoxicity and cytotoxicity assessment of cadmium chloride in peripheral erythrocytes of Labeo rohita (Hamilton). Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2015;118:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2015.04.005.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Naik A, Shyama S, D’Costa A. Evaluation of genotoxicity, enzymatic alterations and cadmium accumulation in Mozambique tilapia Oreochromis mossambicus exposed to sub lethal concentrations of cadmium chloride. Environ Chem Ecotoxicol. 2020;2:126–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enceco.2020.07.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Drąg-Kozak E, Kuchta-Gładysz M, Grzesiakowska A, Łuszczek-Trojnar E, Socha M. Genotoxic Effect of Cadmium and Zinc in the Peripheral erythrocytes of prussian carp (Carassius Gibelio B). J Vet Res. 2022;66(4):619–28. https://doi.org/10.2478/jvetres-2022-0057.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Mekkawy IA, Mahmoud UM, Wassif ET, Naguib M. Effects of cadmium on some haematological and biochemical characteristics of Oreochromis niloticus (Linnaeus, 1758) dietary supplemented with tomato paste and vitamin E. Fish Physiol Biochem. 2011;37(1):71–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10695-010-9418-3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Eissa M, Earabany N, Hyder A. In vitro efficacy of liver microenvironment in bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell differentiation. Vitro Cell Dev Biology – Anim. 2020;56(4):341–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11626-020-00436-7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. De Smet H, Blust R, Moens L. Cadmium-binding to transferrin in the plasma of the common carp Cyprinus carpio. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol. 2001;128(1):45–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1532-0456(00)00171-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Li Y, Huang YS, He B, Liu R, Qu G, Yin Y, Shi J, Hu L, Jiang G. Cadmium-binding proteins in human blood plasma. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 2020 30; 188:109896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.109896

  65. Hyder A, Laue C, Schrezenmeir J. Variable responses of islet cells of different ages and species to hypoxia. Transpl Proc. 1998;30:578–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Hyder A, Laue C, Schrezenmeir J. Effect of extracellular pH on insulin secretion and glucose metabolism in neonatal and adult rat pancreatic islets. Acta Diabetol. 2001;38(4):171–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s592-001-8075-9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Kim J, Kim S, Kim J. Bio-floc technology application in flatfish Paralichthys olivaceus culture: effects on water quality, growth, hematological parameters, and immune responses. Aquaculture. 2018;495:703–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2018.06.034.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Han JC, Park SY, Hah BG, Choi GH, Kim YK, Kwon TH, Kim EK, Lachaal M, Jung CY, Lee W. Cadmium induces impaired glucose tolerance in rat by down-regulating GLUT4 expression in adipocytes. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2003;413(2):213–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-9861(03)00120-6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Buha A, Đukić-Ćosić D, Ćurčić M, Bulat Z, Antonijević B, Moulis JM, Goumenou M, Wallace D. Emerging links between Cadmium exposure and insulin resistance: Human, Animal, and cell Study Data. Toxics. 2020;8(3):63. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics8030063.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Pratap H, Wendelaar Bonga S. Effects of water-borne cadmium on plasma cortisol and glucose in the cichlid fish Oreochromis mossambicus. Comp Biochem Physiol C: Comp Pharmacol. 1990;95(2):313–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0742-8413(90)90124-R.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Banaee M, Soltanian S, Sureda A, Gholamhosseini A, Haghi BN, Akhlaghi M, Derikvandy A. Evaluation of single and combined effects of cadmium and micro-plastic particles on biochemical and immunological parameters of common carp (Cyprinus carpio). Chemosphere. 2019;236:124335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.07.066.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Paul JS, Small BC. Chronic exposure to environmental cadmium affects growth and survival, cellular stress, and glucose metabolism in juvenile channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus). Aquat Toxicol. 2021;230:105705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2020.105705.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Tort L, Kargacin B, Torres P, Giralt M, Hidalgo J. The effect of cadmium exposure and stress on plasma cortisol, metallothionein levels and oxidative status in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) liver. Comparative biochemistry and physiology C: Pharmacology. Toxicol Endocrinol. 1996;114(1):29–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/0742-8413(95)02107-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Liu XH, Pang X, Jin L, Pu DY, Wang ZJ, Zhang YG. Exposure to acute waterborne cadmium caused severe damage on lipid metabolism of freshwater fish, revealed by nuclear lipid droplet deposition in hepatocytes of rare minnow. Aquat Toxicol. 2023;257:106433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2023.106433.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Javed M, Ahmad MI, Usmani N, Ahmad M. Multiple biomarker responses (serum biochemistry, oxidative stress, genotoxicity and histopathology) in Channa punctatus exposed to heavy metal loaded waste water. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):1675. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01749-6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Lee JW, Jo AH, Lee DC, Choi CY, Kang JC, Kim JH. Review of cadmium toxicity effects on fish: oxidative stress and immune responses. Environ Res. 2023;236(Pt 2):116600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2023.116600.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Wang N, Gao C, Zhang P, Guan L, Wang Y, Qin Y, Li Y. Effect of Bacillus cereus against cadmium induced hematological disturbances and immunosuppression in Carassius auratus Gibelio. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2019;89:141–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2019.03.047.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by the graduation projects program of the Academy of Scientific Research & Technology (ASRT), Egypt.

Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

BM: conceptualisation, supervision, draft revising; ME: synthesized and characterised the nanostructure; MN: data curing, revised first draftZE: data curingSS: data curingAH: conceptualisation, wrote first draft.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ayman Hyder.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval

This study is approved by Damietta University Research Ethics Committee (DuREC No 13 on Feb 27, 2023).

Competing interests

Authors declare no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not Applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sheta, B., El-Zahed, M., Nawareg, M. et al. Nanoremediation of tilapia fish culture using iron oxide nanoparticles biosynthesized by Bacillus subtilis and immobilized in a free-floating macroporous cryogel. BMC Vet Res 20, 455 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-024-04292-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-024-04292-5

Keywords