Skip to main content

Table 2 Histochemical study parameters results for PRGF group, Saline solution group and Control group (normal skeletal muscle) at 1 (T1), 2 (T2) and 4 (T4) weeks after treatment

From: Histological and biochemical evaluation of plasma rich in growth factors treatment for grade II muscle injuries in sheep

Variable

Group

Group

Value (mean ± SD)

Inflammatory cells density

(cells/mm2)

T1

PRGF

47 ± 13(+,*)

Saline solution

87 ± 18(+,*)

Control

0 ± 0

T2

PRGF

52 ± 16(+,*)

Saline solution

101 ± 40(+,*)

Control

0 ± 0

T4

PRGF

59 ± 16(+,*)

Saline solution

107 ± 24(+,*)

Control

0 ± 0

Vascular area

(µm2)

T1

PRGF

303 ± 77(+,*)

Saline solution

497 ± 127(+,*)

Control

40 ± 1

T2

PRGF

173 ± 25(+,*)

Saline solution

373 ± 105(+,*)

Control

40 ± 2

T4

PRGF

160 ± 70(+)

Saline solution

224 ± 96(+)

Control

39 ± 2

Vascular density

(blood vessels/mm2)

T1

PRGF

21 ± 6(+)

Saline solution

26 ± 6(+)

Control

12 ± 2

T2

PRGF

16 ± 4(+)

Saline solution

20 ± 4(+)

Control

10 ± 3

T4

PRGF

14 ± 3(+,*)

Saline solution

20 ± 3(+,*)

Control

10 ± 2

Centrally nucleated fibers

(%)

T1

PRGF

27 ± 5(+,*)

Saline solution

16 ± 5(+,*)

Control

0 ± 0

T2

PRGF

36 ± 11(+,*)

Saline solution

25 ± 5(+,*)

Control

0 ± 0

T4

PRGF

50 ± 10(+,*)

Saline solution

34 ± 6(+,*)

Control

0 ± 0

Fibrotic areas

(%)

T1

PRGF

24 ± 3(+,*)

Saline solution

32 ± 5(+,*)

Control

0 ± 0

T2

PRGF

31 ± 5(+,*)

Saline solution

42 ± 4(+,*)

Control

0 ± 0

T4

PRGF

22 ± 3(+,*)

Saline solution

34 ± 5(+,*)

Control

0 ± 0

  1. (+)Statistically significant difference with respect to Control group (p < 0.05)
  2. (*)Statistically significant difference between PRGF and Saline solution groups (p < 0.05)