Skip to main content

Table 2 Geographical distribution of positive serovars

From: Leptospira seroprevalence and associated risk factors in healthy Swedish dogs

County

 

SAX

BRA

CAN

COPa

ICTa

Stockholm (n = 15)

% (n)

40 (6)

13.3 (2)

6.7 (1)

26.7 (4)

13.3 (2)

CI

2.0–6.5

3.7–37.9

1.2–29.8

10.9–52.0

3.7–37.9

Västra

Götaland (n = 3)

% (n)

100 (3)

-

-

-

-

CI

43.9–100

    

Skåne (n = 10)

% (n)

90 (9)

10 (1)

-

-

-

CI

59.6–98.2

1.8–40.4

   

All counties (n = 28b)

n (%)

64.3 (18)

10.7 (3)

3.6 (1)

14.3 (4)

7.1 (2)

CI

45.8–79.3

3.7–27.2

0.6–17.7

5.7–31.5

2.0–22.7

  1. Number of individuals (n), relative prevalence (%), and 95% confidence interval (CI). Serovars: Saxkoebing (SAX), Bratislava (BRA), Canicola (CAN), Copenhagi (COP), and Icterohaemorhagiae (ICT)
  2. aCOP and ICT belong to the same serogroup: Icterohaemorhagiae
  3. bOne dog was positive for two serovars