Skip to main content

Table 2 Sensitivity comparison of NanoPCR and conventional PCR assays for the detection of FPV in fecal samples and nasal swab samples

From: Development of a triple NanoPCR method for feline calicivirus, feline panleukopenia syndrome virus, and feline herpesvirus type I virus

NanoPCR

Conventional PCR

 

Positive

Negative

Total

Positive

7

5

12

Negative

0

26

26

Total

7

31

38

  1. The conventional PCR positive rate of FPV: 7/38 = 18.42%; The Nano PCR positive rate of FPV: 12/38 = 31.58%