Skip to main content

Table 1 Sensitivity comparison of NanoPCR and conventional PCR assays for the detection of FCV in fecal samples and nasal swab samples

From: Development of a triple NanoPCR method for feline calicivirus, feline panleukopenia syndrome virus, and feline herpesvirus type I virus

NanoPCR

Conventional PCR

 

Positive

Negative

Total

Positive

15

9

24

Negative

0

14

14

Total

15

23

38

  1. The conventional PCR positive rate of FCV: 15/38 = 39.47%; The Nano PCR positive rate of FCV: 24/38 = 63.16%
Back to article page

BMC Veterinary Research

ISSN: 1746-6148

Contact us