Skip to main content

Table 3 Flash visual evoked potential (F-VEP) peak latencies

From: Comparison of the effect of sedation and general anesthesia on pattern and flash visual evoked potentials in normal dogs

Ā 

Sedation

General Anesthesia

O1

Oz

O2

O1

Oz

O2

N1

ā€ƒLatency (ms)

59.95* (49.90ā€“78.48)

60.84** (50.27ā€“74.35)

61.59*** (49.37ā€“72.16)

66.81 (47.28ā€“79.94)

66.80 (46.60ā€“80.01)

66.96 (46.45ā€“78.50)

ā€ƒn (%)

13 (100%)

13 (100%)

13 (100%)

13 (100%)

13 (100%)

13 (100%)

P1

ā€ƒLatency (ms)

90.81 (79.71ā€“102.43)

89.60 (78.88ā€“104.24)

90.05 (79.64ā€“105.00)

111.87 (75.18ā€“136.47)

110.25 (76.39ā€“133.45)

111.12 (77.29ā€“133.76)

ā€ƒn (%)

13 (100%)

13 (100%)

13 (100%)

10 (76.9%)

9 (69.2%)

9 (69.2%)

N2

ā€ƒLatency (ms)

115.57 (84.39ā€“131.11)

115.64 (85.15ā€“134.82)

112.24 (84.24ā€“133.08)

129.98 (91.79ā€“156.10)

139.95 (91.49ā€“151.27)

139.19 (92.39ā€“155.38)

ā€ƒn (%)

13 (100%)

13 (100%)

13 (100%)

9 (69.2%)

9 (69.2%)

9 (69.2%)

P2

ā€ƒLatency (ms)

151.35 (127.75ā€“171.20)

153.01 (128.73ā€“174.59)

154.51 (128.25ā€“173.39)

165.16 (140.5ā€“186.90)

165.31 (142.39ā€“187.05)

166.67 (142.69ā€“187.95)

ā€ƒn (%)

13 (100%)

13 (100%)

13 (100%)

7 (53.8%)

6 (46.2%)

7 (53.8%)

N3

ā€ƒLatency (ms)

182.67 (158.25ā€“203.35)

185.99 (158.47ā€“174.59)

185.92 (158.24ā€“205.32)

185.69 (175.27ā€“218.00)

188.89 (170.29ā€“222.83)

186.31 (175.72ā€“216.79)

ā€ƒn (%)

13 (100%)

13 (100%)

13 (100%)

7 (53.8%)

6 (46.2%)

6 (46.2%)

  1. Latency is presented as median (range)
  2. n (%) ā€“ number of dogs (percent of total) exhibiting that peak
  3. *Significantly different (Pā€‰=ā€‰0.045) latency compared to under general anesthesia
  4. **Significantly different (Pā€‰=ā€‰0.03) latency compared to under general anesthesia
  5. ***Significantly different (Pā€‰=ā€‰0.044) latency compared to under general anesthesia