From: Appendicular skeletal muscle mass assessment in dogs: a scoping literature review
Correlations | Locations | Values | Statistical analysis | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bullen et al. [65] | US (MT) vs. CT (MT) | Supraspinatus (n = 24) | 0.99319 | Cronbach’s ɑ ɑ≧0.9: Excellent 0.9 > ɑ≧0.8: Good 0.8 > ɑ≧0.7: Acceptable 0.7 > ɑ≧0.6: Questionable 0.6 > ɑ≧0.5: Poor 0.5 > ɑ: Unacceptable | |||
Infraspinatus (n = 24) | 0.98447 | ||||||
Cubital extensors (n = 15) | 0.98901 | ||||||
Cubital flexors (n = 9) | 0.99275 | ||||||
Coxofemoral extensors (n = 12) | 0.73232 | ||||||
Frank et al. [9] | LC vs. CT (Thigh CSA) | Proximal location | 0.77* | Matrix of pseudo R2 (* indicates p≦0.05) | |||
Distal location | 0.76* | ||||||
LC vs. US (Thigh MT) | Proximal location (lateral side) | 0.09* | |||||
Distal location (lateral side) | 0.05 | ||||||
Proximal location (medial side) | 0.04 | ||||||
Distal location (medial side) | 0.10* | ||||||
LC vs. US (Rectus femoris CSA) | Proximal location (lateral side) | 0.17* | |||||
Distal location (lateral side) | 0.19* | ||||||
Proximal location (medial side) | 0.43* | ||||||
Distal location (medial side) | 0.27* | ||||||
LC vs. US (Rectus femoris MT) | Proximal location (lateral side) | 0.00 | |||||
Distal location (lateral side) | 0.00 | ||||||
Proximal location (medial side) | 0.00 | ||||||
Distal location (medial side) | 0.00 | ||||||
US (Rectus femoris CSA) vs. CT (Thigh CSA) | Proximal location (lateral side) | 0.87* | |||||
Distal location (lateral side) | 0.70* | ||||||
Proximal location (medial side) | 0.51* | ||||||
Distal location (medial side) | 0.80* | ||||||
US (Rectus femoris MT) vs. CT (Thigh CSA) | Proximal location (lateral side) | 0.01 | |||||
Distal location (lateral side) | 0.19* | ||||||
Proximal location (medial side) | 0.04 | ||||||
Distal location (medial side) | 0.00 | ||||||
US (Thigh MT) vs. CT (Thigh CSA) | Proximal location (lateral side) | 0.38* | |||||
Distal location (lateral side) | 0.63* | ||||||
Proximal location (medial side) | 0.37* | ||||||
Distal location (medial side) | 0.03 | ||||||
Sakaeda et al. [64] | US (MT) vs. MRI (MT) Quadriceps | Proximal 1/6 | 0.701* | US (MT) vs. MRI (CSA) Quadriceps | Proximal 1/6 | 0.691* | Intraclass correlation coefficient (* indicates p≦0.05, ** indicates p≦0.01, *** indicates p≦0.001) |
Proximal 1/3 | 0.857** | Proximal 1/3 | 0.878*** | ||||
Mid-point | 0.751* | Mid-point | 0.737* | ||||
Distal 1/3 | 0.486 | Distal 1/3 | – | ||||
Distal 1/6 | – | Distal 1/6 | – | ||||
US (MT) vs. MRI (MT) Biceps femoris | Proximal 1/6 | 0.385 | US (MT) vs. MRI (CSA) Biceps femoris | Proximal 1/6 | – | ||
Proximal 1/3 | 0.934*** | Proximal 1/3 | 0.651* | ||||
Mid-point | 0.970*** | Mid-point | 0.774** | ||||
Distal 1/3 | 0.638* | Distal 1/3 | 0.671* | ||||
Distal 1/6 | – | Distal 1/6 | – | ||||
US (MT) vs. MRI (MT) Semitendinosus | Proximal 1/6 | −0.140 | US (MT) vs. MRI (CSA) Semitendinosus | Proximal 1/6 | – | ||
Proximal 1/3 | 0.790** | Proximal 1/3 | 0.635* | ||||
Mid-point | 0.653* | Mid-point | 0.359 | ||||
Distal 1/3 | 0.277 | Distal 1/3 | – | ||||
Distal 1/6 | 0.229 | Distal 1/6 | – | ||||
US (MT) vs. MRI (MT) Semimembranosus | Proximal 1/6 | 0.008 | US (MT) vs. MRI (CSA) Semimembranosus | Proximal 1/6 | – | ||
Proximal 1/3 | – | Proximal 1/3 | – | ||||
Mid-point | 0.543 | Mid-point | – | ||||
Distal 1/3 | – | Distal 1/3 | – | ||||
Distal 1/6 | 0.126 | Distal 1/6 | – |