Table 2 Classification of the studies based on their purposes of the use of each modality
From: Appendicular skeletal muscle mass assessment in dogs: a scoping literature review
Purpose of use of modality | LC | US | CT | MRI | DEXA | Number | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Reliability study | Baker et al. 2010 [44] | ✓a | 5 | ||||
McCarthy et al. 2019 [50] | ✓a | ||||||
Bascuñán et al. 2016 [51] | ✓a | ||||||
Smith et al. 2013 [52] | ✓a | ||||||
Clarke et al. 2020 [57] | ✓ | ||||||
Validation study | Sakaeda et al. 2016 [64] | ✓b, a | ✓ | 3 | |||
Frank et al. 2019 [9] | ✓b | ✓b, a | ✓ | ||||
Bullen et al. 2017 [65] | ✓b | ✓ | |||||
Clinical application (one modality) [4,5,6,7,8, 10,11,12, 18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37, 39,40,41,42,43, 45,46,47,48,49, 53,54,55,56, 58,59,60,61,62,63, 66,67,68,69,70] | 48 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 54 | |
Clinical application (> two modalities) | White et al. 2020 [38] | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
Number of studies | 55 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 62 | |