Table 8 Factors associated with the income from livestock sales on cattle, small ruminant and village chicken farms in the CDZ of Myanmar *This cut-off represent the median income from the sale of animals of this livestock species
Variables | Categories | N | % of households in income category | Odds ratio | p-value | Wald test | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Low | Medium | High | ||||||
Outcome variable: Income generated from selling cattle | ||||||||
No income (US$ 0) – 128 (36.9%) | ||||||||
Low (< US$ 450) – 127 (32.2%)* | ||||||||
High (> US$ 450) – 127 (30.9%) | ||||||||
Type of animal reared | Cattle only | 382 | 56.0 | 19.5 | 22.6 | 1 | 0.0003 | |
Cattle + Small ruminant | 13.2 | 9.7 | 22.5 | 4.1 (1.4–12.0) | 0.013 | |||
Cattle + Village chicken | 20.6 | 40.8 | 25.9 | 3.1 (1.7–5.9) | 0.001 | |||
Cattle + Small ruminant + Village chicken | 10.2 | 30.0 | 29.1 | 5.1 (2.5–10.3) | < 0.0001 | |||
Reproductive disorders | No | 382 | 99.3 | 96.3 | 93.9 | 1 | – | |
Yes | 0.7 | 3.7 | 6.1 | 4.5 (2.2–9.3) | < 0.0001 | |||
Outcome variable: Income generated from selling small ruminant | ||||||||
No income (US$ 0) – 55 (18.9%) | ||||||||
Low (< US$ 533) – 131 (39.9%)* | ||||||||
High (> US$ 533) – 117 (41.1%) | ||||||||
Digestive disorders | No | 303 | 63.4 | 49.7 | 37.8 | 1 | – | |
Yes | 36.6 | 50.3 | 62.2 | 0.6 (0.1–1.0) | 0.023 | |||
Reproductive disorders | No | 303 | 75.9 | 63.8 | 45.0 | 1 | – | |
Yes | 24.1 | 36.2 | 55.0 | 0.8 (0.3–1.3) | 0.001 | |||
Outcome variable: Income generated from selling village chicken | ||||||||
No income (US$ 0) – 72 (23.2%) | ||||||||
Low (< US$ 373) – 129 (39.7%)* | ||||||||
High (> US$ 373) – 126 (37.1%) | ||||||||
Types of animal reared | Village chicken only | 327 | 32.4 | 34.5 | 0 | 1 | < 0.0001 | |
Cattle + Village chicken | 37.8 | 27.6 | 35.9 | 3.2 (1.8–5.5) | < 0.0001 | |||
Small ruminant + Village chicken | 11.1 | 14.5 | 31.2 | 7.5 (3.6–15.3) | < 0.0001 | |||
All 3 spp. | 18.7 | 23.4 | 32.8 | 4.8 (2.3–10.3) | < 0.0001 | |||