EHV-1 cLAMP# | EHV-1 rtLAMP | |||
Positive | Negative | Total | ||
Positive | 2 | 1 | 3 | |
Negative | 0 | 29 | 29 | |
Total | 2 | 30 | 32 | |
Kappa (0.95 CI; p(Kappa)) | 0.784 (0.377–1.191; 0.00) | |||
McNemar’s Chi square (p(Chi sq)) | 0.00 (1.00) | |||
Overall agreement b | 96.88% (80.00% PA; 98.31% NA) | |||
EHV-1 sgLAMP | EHV-1 rtLAMP | |||
Positive | Negative | Total | ||
Positive | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
Negative | 0 | 30 | 30 | |
Total | 2 | 32 | 34 | |
Kappa (0.95 CI; p(Kappa)) | 0.638 (0.185–1.09; 0.000) | |||
McNemar’s Chi square (p(Chi sq)) | 0.500 (0.479) | |||
Overall agreement b | 94.12% (66.67% PA; 96.77% NA) | |||
EHV-1 sgLAMP | EHV-1 cLAMP# | |||
Positive | Negative | Total | ||
Positive | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
Negative | 1 | 27 | 28 | |
Total | 3 | 29 | 32 | |
Kappa (0.95 CI; p(Kappa)) | 0.520 (0.047–0.993; 0.0014) | |||
McNemar’s Chi square (p(Chi sq)) | 0.00 (1.00) | |||
Overall agreement b | 90.62% (57.14% PA; 94.74% NA) |