Table 3 Comparison of antimicrobial use and resistant E. coli frequencies in poultry, pigs, and beef cattle
Farmers antimicrobial use | Resistant E. coli isolates | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Poultry (n = 6) | Pig (n = 11) | Beef cattle (n = 16) | P | ESBL E. coli poultry (n = 10) | n-ESBL E. coli poultry (n = 13) | P | ESBL E. coli pigs (n = 11) | n-ESBL E. coli pigs (n = 146) | P | ESBL E. coli beef cattle (n = 11) | n-ESBL E. coli beef cattle (n = 74) | P | ||
n, (%) | n, (%) | |||||||||||||
TET | 2 (33.3) | 6 (54.5) | 12 (100.0) | 0.003 | TET | 5 (50.0) | 8 (61.5) | NS | 6 (54.5) | 86 (58.9) | NS | 9 (81.8) | 6 (8.1) | < 0.001 |
β-lacta | 0 (0.0) | 6 (54.5) | 2 (16.7) | 0.035 | AMP | 10 (100.0) | 8 (61.5) | NS | 11 (100.0) | 21 (14.4) | < 0.001 | 11 (100.0) | 9 (12.2) | < 0.001 |
SM | 0 (0.0) | 5 (45.5) | 2 (16.7) | NS | SM | 4 (40.0) | 6 (46.2) | NS | 6 (54.5) | 68 (46.6) | NS | 8 (72.7) | 22 (29.7) | 0.025 |
SXT | 5 (83.3) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | < 0.001 | SXT | 3 (30.0) | 5 (38.5) | NS | 8 (72.7) | 20 (13.7) | < 0.001 | 7 (63.6) | 4 (5.4) | < 0.001 |
QN | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | NS | NAL | 1 (10.0) | 2 (15.4) | NS | 0 (0.0) | 3 (2.1) | NS | 1 (9.1) | 1 (1.4) | NS |
C3G | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | NS | COX | 10 (100.0) | 0 (0.0) | < 0.001 | 11 (100.0) | 0 (0.0) | < 0.001 | 11 (100.0) | 0 (0.0) | < 0.001 |