Skip to main content

Table 10 The number and percentage of working farm dogs with reported musculoskeletal abnormalities in the hind quarters (including tail), and the number and percentage of dogs with a musculoskeletal abnormality that were also lame in the hind quarters. Data were collected from 641 working farm dogs that were enrolled in TeamMate. Types of clinical abnormalities that were recorded in fewer than 10 dogs are combined and listed as ‘Other’

From: TeamMate: a longitudinal study of New Zealand working farm dogs. I. Methods, population characteristics and health on enrolment

Anatomical location and type of abnormalities

Number of dogs

Lame hind leg(s)

n

% (95% CI)

n

% (95% CI)

Hip

 Reduced range of motion

59

9 (7–11)

12

20 (10–31)

 Painful

43

7 (5–9)

15

35 (21–49)

 Other

8

1 (0–2)

4

50 (15–85)

 All dogs with hip abnormalities

88

14 (11–16)

21

24 (15–33)

Stifle

 Crepitus

19

3 (2–4)

5

26 (7–46)

 Reduced range of motion

18

3 (2–4)

5

28 (7–48)

 Hard swelling

32

5 (3–7)

6

19 (5–32)

 Other

13

2 (1–3)

4

31 (6–56)

 All dogs with stifle abnormalities

62

10 (7–12)

16

26 (15–37)

Tarsals

 Reduced range of motion

27

4 (3–6)

8

30 (12–47)

 Hard swelling

12

2 (1–3)

4

33 (7–60)

 Other

10

2 (1–3)

1

10 (0–29)

 All dogs with tarsal abnormalities

43

7 (5–9)

9

21 (9–33)

Tail

 Reduced range of motion

12

2 (1–3)

1

8 (0–24)

 Other

12

2 (1–3)

2

17 (0–38)

 All dogs with tail abnormalities

22

3 (2–5)

3

14 (0–28)

Hind digits

 Other

19

3 (2–4)

4

21 (3–39)

 All dogs with hind digit abnormalities

19

3 (2–4)

4

21 (3–39)

Metatarsals

 Other

6

1 (0–2)

1

17 (0–46)

 All dogs with metatarsal abnormalities

6

1 (0–2)

1

17 (0–46)