Skip to main content

Table 2 Assessment of reporting quality of included studies

From: Quality of interventional animal experiments in Chinese journals: compliance with ARRIVE guidelines

Content and Subject

Item

Description

Total

pre-ARRIVE

post-ARRIVE

χ2 value

P value

items assessed as “yes”

items assessed as “yes”

items assessed as “yes”

N

%

N

%

N

%

TITLE

 

1

Provide as accurate and concise a description of the content of the article as possible.

4241

97.7

2196

97.1

2045

98.3

6.25

0.012

ABSTRACT

 

2

Provide an accurate summary of the background, research objectives (including details of the species or strain of animal used), key methods, principal findings, and conclusions of the study

4117

94.8

2084

92.2

2033

97.7

67.25

< 0.001

INTRODUCTION

 Background

3a

Include sufficient scientific background (including relevant references to previous work) to understand the motivation and context for the study, and explain the experimental approach and rationale.

4071

93.8

2057

91.0

2014

96.8

62.36

< 0.001

3b

Explain how and why the animal species and model being used can address the scientific objectives and, where appropriate, the study’s relevance to human biology.

1609

37.1

737

32.6

872

41.9

40.24

< 0.001

 Objectives

4

Clearly describe the primary and any secondary objectives of the study, or specific hypotheses being tested.

4248

97.8

2198

97.2

2050

98.5

8.60

0.003

METHODS

 Ethical statement

5

Indicate the nature of the ethical review permissions, relevant licenses (e.g. Animal [Scientific Procedures] Act 1986), and national or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals, that cover the research.

286

6.59

125

5.53

161

7.74

8.59

0.003

 Study design

6a

For each experiment, give brief details of the study design, including: the number of experimental and control groups.

3741

86.2

1893

83.7

1848

88.8

23.44

< 0.001

6b

For each experiment, give brief details of the study design, including: any steps taken to minimise the effects of subjective bias when allocating animals to treatment (e.g., randomisation procedure) and when assessing results (e.g., if done, describe who was blinded and when).

3961

91.2

2034

90.0

1927

92.6

9.43

0.002

6c

For each experiment, give brief details of the study design, including: the experimental unit (e.g. a single animal, group, or cage of animals).

4312

99.3

2245

99.3

2067

99.3

0.02

0.890

6d

For each experiment, give brief details of the study design, including: A time-line diagram or flow chart can be useful to illustrate how complex study designs were carried out.

63

1.45

15

0.66

48

2.31

20.46

< 0.001

 Experimental procedures

7a

For each experiment and each experimental group, including controls, provide precise details of all procedures carried out. For example: How (e.g., drug formulation and dose, site and route of administration, anaesthesia and analgesia used [including monitoring], surgical procedure, method of euthanasia). Provide details of any specialist equipment used, including supplier(s).

4172

96.1

2165

95.8

2007

96.4

1.37

0.242

7b

For each experiment and each experimental group, including controls, provide precise details of all procedures carried out. For example: When (e.g., time of day).

269

6.20

214

9.46

55

2.64

86.78

< 0.001

7c

For each experiment and each experimental group, including controls, provide precise details of all procedures carried out. For example: Where (e.g., home cage, laboratory, water maze).

513

11.8

309

13.7

204

9.80

15.53

< 0.001

7d

For each experiment and each experimental group, including controls, provide precise details of all procedures carried out. For example: Why (e.g., rationale for choice of specific anaesthetic, route of administration, drug dose used).

1631

37.6

806

35.7

825

39.6

7.38

0.007

 Experimental animals

8a

Provide details of the animals used, including species, strain, sex, developmental stage (e.g., mean or median age plus age range), and weight (e.g., mean or median weight plus weight range).

4162

95.9

2160

95.5

2002

96.2

1.23

0.268

8b

Provide further relevant information such as the source of animals, international strain nomenclature, genetic modification status (e.g. knock-out or transgenic), genotype, health/immune status, drug- or testnaive, previous procedures, etc.

3785

87.2

1909

84.4

1876

90.2

31.68

< 0.001

 Housing and husbandry

9a

Housing (e.g., type of facility, specific pathogen free (SPF); type of cage or housing; bedding material; number of cage companions; tank shape and material etc. for fish).

1022

23.5

409

1819

613

29.5

77.81

< 0.001

9b

Husbandry conditions (e.g., breeding programme, light/dark cycle, temperature, quality of water etc. for fish, type of food, access to food and water, environmental enrichment).

928

21.4

338

15.0

590

28.4

115.83

< 0.001

9c

Welfare-related assessments and interventions that were carried out before, during, or after the experiment.

147

3.39

77

3.41

70

3.36

0.01

0.939

 Sample size

10a

Specify the total number of animals used in each experiment and the number of animals in each experimental group.

3440

79.2

1728

76.4

1712

82.3

22.47

< 0.001

10b

Explain how the number of animals was decided. Provide details of any sample size calculation used.

1

0.02

0

0.00

1

0.05

1.09

0.297

10c

Indicate the number of independent replications of each experiment, if relevant.

6

0.14

4

0.18

2

0.10

0.51

0.474

 Allocating animals to experimental groups

11a

Give full details of how animals were allocated to experimental groups, including randomization or matching if done.

522

12.0

208

9.20

314

15. 1

35.54

< 0.001

11b

Describe the order in which the animals in the different experimental groups were treated and assessed.

4070

93.7

2100

92.9

1970

94.7

5.89

0.015

 Experimental outcomes

12

Clearly define the primary and secondary experimental outcomes assessed (e.g., cell death, molecular markers, behavioral changes).

4071

93.8

2098

92.8

1973

94.8

7.55

0.006

 Statistical methods

13a

Provide details of the statistical methods used for each analysis.

3585

82.6

1677

74.2

1908

91.7

230.97

< 0.001

13b

Specify the unit of analysis for each dataset (e.g. single animal, group of animals, single neuron).

2840

65.4

1287

56.9

1553

74.6

150.14

< 0.001

13c

Describe any methods used to assess whether the data met the assumptions of the statistical approach.

662

15.3

284

12.6

378

18.2

26.33

< 0.001

RESULTS

 Baseline data

14

For each experimental group, report relevant characteristics and health status of animals (e.g., weight, microbiological status, and drug- or test-naı¨ve) before treatment or testing (this information can often be tabulated).

223

5.14

87

3.85

136

6.54

16.06

< 0.001

 Numbers analysed

15a

Report the number of animals in each group included in each analysis. Report absolute numbers (e.g.10/20, not 50%)

3023

69.6

1546

68.4

1477

71.0

3.46

0.063

15b

If any animals or data were not included in the analysis, explain why.

3213

74.0

1661

73.5

1552

74.6

0.70

0.402

 Outcomes and estimation

16

Report the results for each analysis carried out, with a measure of precision (e.g, standard error or confidence interval).

3811

87.8

1918

84.8

1893

91.0

38.01

< 0.001

 Adverse events

17a

Give details of all important adverse events in each experimental group.

64

1.47

21

0.93

43

2.07

9.66

0.002

17b

Describe any modifications to the experimental protocols made to reduce adverse events.

1

0.02

1

0.04

0

0.00

0.92

0.337

DISCUSSION

 Interpretation/scientific implications

18a

Interpret the results, taking into account the study objectives and hypotheses, current theory, and other relevant studies in the literature.

4157

95.7

2143

94.8

2014

96.8

10.62

0.001

18b

Comment on the study limitations including any potential sources of bias, any limitations of the animal model, and the imprecision associated with the results.

228

5.25

103

4.56

125

6.01

4.59

0.032

18c

Describe any implications of your experimental methods or findings for the replacement, refinement, or reduction (the 3Rs) of the use of animals in research.

15

0.35

4

0.18

11

0.53

3.89

0.048

 Generalisability/translation

19

Comment on whether, and how, the findings of this study are likely to translate to other species or systems, including any relevance to human biology.

281

6.47

134

5.93

147

7.06

2.32

0.128

 Funding

20

List all funding sources (including grant number) and the role of the funder(s) in the study.

47

1.08

15

0.66

32

1.54

7.74

0.005