From: Effects of various mastitis treatments on the reproductive performance of cows
Group | n | AI | n | DO | n | S/C | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Control | 60 | 78.5c | ± | 20.9m,z,c | 60 | 88.8 | ± | 27.4n, z, c | 60 | 1.4 | ± | 0.6m, z, c |
Antibiotics | 157 | 92.4 | ± | 27.1y | 157 | 119.8 | ± | 43.7y | 157 | 1.9 | ± | 1.0 y |
First treatment | 92 | 90.2 | ± | 25.8k | 102 | 112.8 | ± | 38.2m | 102 | 1.7 | ± | 0.9 m |
Prolonged treatment | 65 | 95.6 | ± | 28.8k | 54 | 132.9 | ± | 50.3k | 54 | 2.3 | ± | 1.1k |
First treatment | ||||||||||||
 Antibiotic | 20 | 102.6 | ± | 28.9 ab | 25 | 130.1 | ± | 37.5ab | 25 | 1.8 | ± | 0.8abc |
 Antibiotic + antioxidants | 25 | 78.6 | ± | 21.9 c | 25 | 99.16 | ± | 34.6bc | 25 | 1.8 | ± | 0.9abc |
 Antibiotic + lysozyme dimer | 23 | 82.0 | ± | 24.6 bc | 24 | 101.8 | ± | 27.5bc | 24 | 1.7 | ± | 0.8bc |
 Antibiotic +NSAIDs | 25 | 99.5 | ± | 20.3 abc | 28 | 118.9 | ± | 43.5abc | 28 | 1.6 | ± | 1.1bc |
Prolonged treatment | ||||||||||||
 Antibiotic | 21 | 108.9 | ± | 31.4 a | 16 | 155.7 | ± | 64.8a | 16 | 2.4 | ± | 1.3ab |
 Antibiotic + antioxidants | 14 | 80.6 | ± | 23.5 bc | 14 | 109.3 | ± | 46.7bc | 14 | 1.9 | ± | 0.9abc |
 Antibiotic + lysozyme dimer | 14 | 89.3 | ± | 29.5 abc | 13 | 130.5 | ± | 43.0ab | 13 | 2.7 | ± | 1.3a |
 Antibiotic +NSAIDs | 15 | 97.1 | ± | 23.1 abc | 12 | 132.3 | ± | 26.0ab | 12 | 2 | ± | 0.6abc |
SEM | Â | 1.78 | Â | 2.86 | Â | 0.06 | ||||||
P value | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Control vs. first and prolonged treatments(k,m,n) | 0.001 |  | <  0.001 |  | <  0.001 | |||||||
 Control vs. antibiotics (y,z) |  | < 0.001 |  | < 0.001 |  | < 0.001 | ||||||
 Control vs. treatments(a,b,c) |  | <  0.001 |  | <  0.001 |  | <  0.001 |