Skip to main content

Table 1 Descriptive and single-factorial analyses of risk factors for health and performance problems in dairy farms in Northern Germany (qualitative variables); a varying number of farms is due to missing values

From: Case-control study on factors associated with a decreased milk yield and a depressed health status of dairy herds in northern Germany

Risk factors

Category

Cases

Controls

Single factorial analyses

N

%

N

%

OR

LCL

UCL

P

Health Management

Infectious diseases

Positive for liver flukes

No1

31

68.9

38

80.9

1

   

Yes

14

31.1

9

19.2

1.91

0.73

4.99

0.1887

Positive for lungworms

No1

28

62.2

37

78.7

1

   

Yes

17

37.8

10

21.3

2.25

0.89

5.65

0.0855

Positive for intestinal parasites

No1

21

46.7

32

68.1

1

   

Yes

24

53.3

15

31.9

2.44

1.04

5.69

0.0394

Positive for MAP

No1

40

88.9

45

95.7

1

   

Yes

4

8.9

1

2.1

4.49

0.48

41.79

0.1873

Claw Health

Claw with high-grade dermatitis digitalis

No1

22

48.9

26

55.3

1

   

Yes

23

51.1

21

44.7

1.29

0.57

2.94

0.5374

Number out of ten examined cows with poor claw condition

No cow1

27

60.0

29

61.7

1

  

0.14262

One cow

7

15.6

13

27.7

0.58

0.20

1.67

0.3104

> one cow

11

24.4

5

10.6

2.36

0.73

7.69

0.1533

Frequency of herd claw trimming

monthly or quarterly1

3

6.7

5

10.6

1

  

0.78002

Half-yearly

23

51.1

22

46.8

1.74

0.37

8.18

0.4815

> half-yearly/ irregularly

19

42.2

20

42.6

1.58

0.33

7.56

0.5645

Housing

Stocking density

Average ratio of cows per watering place

≤ 1 1

15

33.3

9

19.2

1

  

0.10332

1.01–1.5

16

35.6

27

57.5

0.36

0.13

1.00

0.0498

>  1.5

14

31.1

11

23.4

0.77

0.24

2.40

0.6438

Average ratio of cows per feeding place

≤ 1 1

14

31.1

10

21.3

1

  

0.35512

1.01–1.5

25

55.6

26

55.3

0.69

0.26

1.83

0.4523

>  1.5

6

13.3

11

23.4

0.39

0.11

1.41

0.1501

Average ratio of cows per cubicle

≤ 1 1

21

46.7

21

44.7

1

   

>  1

24

53.3

26

55.3

0.92

0.41

2.10

0.8484

Comfort of cubicles

% of pens with raised cubicles

No pen1

9

20.0

15

31.9

1

  

0.04652

1–99% of pens

12

26.7

19

40.4

1.06

0.35

3.16

0.9270

All pens

24

53.3

13

27.7

3.08

1.06

8.94

0.0390

Number of pens with no bedding material in cubicles

No pen1

29

64.4

32

68.1

1

   

≥ 1 pen

16

35.6

15

31.9

1.18

0.50

2.80

0.7120

Number of pens with no bedding material nor rubber mats in cubicles

No pen1

40

88.9

38

80.9

1

   

≥ 1 pen

5

11.1

9

19.2

0.53

0.16

1.72

0.2885

Dimensions of cubicles

Average height of neck rail of cubicles > 115 cm

Yes1

26

57.8

26

55.3

1

   

No

19

42.2

21

44.7

0.91

0.40

2.07

0.8121

Average width of cubicles > 120 cm

Yes1

0

0.0

0

0.0

no logistic regression possible

No

47

100.0

47

100.0

Average distance from neck rail to curb > 195 cm

Yes1

33

73.3

36

76.6

1

   

No

12

26.7

11

23.4

1.19

0.46

3.06

0.7181

Floors

% of pens with slippery floors

None1

21

46.7

20

42.6

1

  

0.42592

1–49% of pens

5

11.1

10

21.3

0.48

0.14

1.64

0.2394

≥ 50% of pens

19

42.2

17

36.2

1.06

0.43

2.61

0.8914

Number of pens with damaged floors

No pen1

36

80.0

42

89.4

1

   

≥ 1 pen

9

20.0

5

10.6

2.10

0.65

6.84

0.2180

Hygiene

% of pens with dirty or very dirty floors

0–49% of pens1

5

11.1

14

29.8

1

  

0.04812

50–99% of pens

15

33.3

17

36.2

2.47

0.72

8.49

0.1511

All pens

24

53.3

16

34.0

4.38

1.32

14.50

0.0158

% of pens with dirty or very dirty lying areas

None1

12

26.7

25

53.2

1

  

0.00702

1–49%

8

17.8

11

23.4

1.52

0.48

4.75

0.4756

≥ 50%

24

53.3

11

23.4

4.73

1.76

12.72

0.0020

Nutrition

Feeding management

Frequency of daily feed delivery felc3

≥ twice a day1

17

37.8

20

42.6

1

   

< twice a day

28

62.2

27

57.5

1.22

0.53

2.81

0.6407

Frequency of pushing the feed back to the fence felc3

≥ 5 times a day1

3

6.7

8

17.0

1

  

0.13182

4 times a day

12

26.7

15

31.9

2.40

0.53

10.88

0.2562

3 times a day

14

31.1

15

31.9

2.80

0.63

12.50

0.1773

<  3 times a day

16

35.6

8

17.0

6.00

1.26

28.50

0.0242

Silage quality

High-grade mildewed silage or a silage with decomposition or loss of structure

No1

14

31.1

23

49.0

1

   

Yes

31

68.9

24

51.1

2.12

0.91

4.97

0.0834

Silage with abnormal dry matter content

No1

30

66.7

33

70.1

1

   

Yes

15

33.3

14

29.8

1.18

0.49

2.84

0.7145

Grass silage with crude ash content (> 8%)

No1

3

6.4

1

2.1

1

   

Yes

44

93.5

46

97.9

1.47

0.23

9.21

0.6834

Grass silage with pH-value > 4.7 or corn silage with pH-value > 4.2

No1

43

95.6

45

95.7

1

   

Yes

2

4.4

2

4.3

1.05

0.14

7.76

0.9645

Silage with microbiological deviations

No1

9

20.2

12

25.5

1

   

Yes

36

80.0

34

72.3

1.37

0.51

3.66

0.5282

Crude fiber

% of the herd with milk fat < 3% in the last DHI data

<  3%

30

66.7

28

59.6

1

  

0.60342

3–5%

9

20.0

9

19.2

0.93

0.32

2.69

0.8983

>  5%

6

13.3

10

21.3

0.56

0.18

1.74

0.3170

Crude fiber per kg DM in the diets < 18% (PMR) or < 16% (TMR)

No1

18

40.0

16

34.0

1

   

Yes

27

60.0

31

66.0

0.77

0.33

1.81

0.5547

Confounders

Season of the farm visit

Nov-Apr1

15

33.3

26

55.3

1

   

May-Oct

30

66.7

21

44.7

2.48

1.06

5.77

0.0356

Access to pasture

No1

9

20.0

16

34.0

1

   

Yes

36

80.0

31

66.0

2.06

0.80

5.32

0.1337