Table 3 Leishmania DNA detection in lizards from different geographical districts
From: Pathogenic Leishmania spp. detected in lizards from Northwest China using molecular methods
Districts | Number of lizards | Number of positive lizards | Prevalence | 95% CI | Number of positive lizards (Infected by) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LS | LD | LT | LS + LD | LS + LT | LT + LD | LT + LS + LD | LTR + LS + LD | |||||
Jinghe County (S1) | 26 | 23 | 88.46% | 76.18–100.74% | 23 | 9 | 1 | 9 | 1 | – | – | 1 |
Xinyuan County (S2) | 8 | 4 | 50% | 15.35–84.65% | 3 | 1 | 0 | – | – | – | – | – |
Gongliu County (S3) | 30 | 14 | 46.67% | 28.82–64.52% | 6 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 1 | – | – | – |
Nilke County (S4) | 12 | 8 | 66.67% | 40.00–93.34% | 4 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | – | – | – |
Tekes County (S5) | 5 | 1 | 20% | −15.06–55.06% | 0 | 0 | 1 | – | – | – | – | – |
Zhaosu County (S6) | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | – | – | – |
Huocheng County (S7) | 36 | 17 | 47.22% | 30.91–63.53% | 5 | 17 | 0 | 5 | – | – | – | – |
Fukang County (S8) | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | – | – | – |
Qitai County (S9) | 14 | 1 | 7.14% | −6.35–20.63% | 0 | 1 | 0 | – | – | – | – | – |
Mori County(S10) | 48 | 16 | 33.33% | 19.99–46.67% | 4 | 16 | 0 | 4 | – | – | – | – |
Barkol County (S11) | 30 | 18 | 60% | 42.47–77.53% | 1 | 18 | 1 | 1 | – | 1 | – | – |
Yiwu County (S12) | 59 | 45 | 76.27% | 65.41–87.13% | 27 | 36 | 11 | 19 | 9 | 5 | 4 | – |
Hami City (S13) | 16 | 16 | 100% | 100–100% | 9 | 16 | 0 | 9 | – | – | – | – |
Dabancheng district (S14) | 19 | 15 | 78.95% | 60.62–97.28% | 7 | 12 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 1 | – |
Akesai County (S15) | 8 | 5 | 62.5% | 28.95–96.05% | 3 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | – |
Total | 316 | 183 | 57.91% | 52.47–63.35% | 92 | 145 | 22 | 57 | 15 | 11 | 7 | 1 |