Skip to main content

Table 4 Estimated parameters on the log.odds and odds scale for all 22 arcs based on the exact search

From: Additive Bayesian networks for antimicrobial resistance and potential risk factors in non-typhoidal Salmonella isolates from layer hens in Uganda

child

parent

Effect size

Standard Error

Effect size

  

Log.odds

Log.odds

odds

Farmsize M

Pets

−12.6

> > u

3.37E-06

Farmsize M

Management I

−9.6

> > u

6.77E-05

Farmsize M

Disposal 1

34.5

> > u

9.62E+ 14

Farmsize M

Disposal 2

77.1

> > u

3.05E+ 33

Farmsize M

Disposal 3

−23.3

> > u

7.60E-11

Farmsize M

Disposal 4

−65.9

> > u

2.40E-29

Farmsize M

Disposal 5

0.001

1.41

1.00E+ 00

Farmsize M

Pets

−66.9

0.01

8.82E-30

Farmsize L

Management I

−0.4

0.91

6.70E-01

Farmsize L

Disposal 1

−23.6

0.15

5.63E-11

Farmsize L

Disposal 2

−21.9

> > u

3.08E-10

Farmsize L

Disposal 3

− 99.6

1.01E-07

5.55E-44

Farmsize L

Disposal 4

−76

NaN

9.85E-34

Farmsize L

Disposal 5

− 109.1

5.54E-08

4.15E-48

Management I

Gender

−1.9

0.59

1.50E-01

Management I

Eggtrays

2.0

0.58

7.39E+ 00

Vaccinator S

Gender

3.9

1.07

4.94E+ 01

Vaccinator S

Pets

−19.3

> > u

4.15E-09

Vaccinator S

Farmsize S

0.9

0.90

2.46E+ 00

Vaccinator S

Farmsize M

−20.3

> > u

1.53E-09

Vaccinator S

Farmsize L

−2.9

1.08

5.50E-02

Vaccinator S

Eggtrays

−8.7

> > u

1.67E-04

Vaccinator E

Gender

−2.7

1.40

6.72E-02

Vaccinator E

Pets

−17.6

1.42E-07

2.27E-08

Vaccinator E

Farmsize S

−7.4

1.97

6.11E-04

Vaccinator E

Farmsize M

36.8

> > u

9.59E+ 15

Vaccinator E

Farmsize L

3.6

1.29

3.66E+ 01

Vaccinator E

Eggtrays

−26.9

> > u

2.08E-12

Disposal 2

Pets

−0.4

0.80

6.70E-01

Disposal 2

Eggtrays

−2.9

0.74

5.50E-02

Disposal 3

Pets

13.2

> > u

5.40E+ 05

Disposal 3

Eggtrays

−0.2

1.30

8.19E-01

Disposal 4

Pets

1.4

0.74

4.06E+ 00

Disposal 4

Eggtrays

2.5

0.83

1.22E+ 01

Disposal 5

Pets

11.6

> > u

1.09E+ 05

Disposal 5

Eggtrays

−157.8

NaN

2.94E-69

SULFA

CIPR

2.5

0.79

1.22E+ 01

SULFA

TRIM

4.2

1.32

6.67E+ 01

CIPR

TET

−0.4 (−0.4*)

NA

6.70E-01

CIPR

TRIM

−0.3 (− 0.3*)

NA

7.41E-01

CIPR

SXT

−0.3

0.86

7.41E-01

TRIM

SXT

8.9

3.99

7.33E+ 03

SXT

CHL

−3.6 (−0.5*)

NA

2.73E-02

SXT

AMP

−3.6

6.61

2.73E-02

CHL

AMP

8.9

4.83

7.33E+ 03

AMP

Vaccinator S

8.6

1.21

5.43E+ 03

AMP

Vaccinator E

8.7

1.29

6.00E+ 03

AMP

Disposal 2

1.6

1.36

4.95E+ 00

AMP

Disposal 3

0.6

1.23

1.82E+ 00

AMP

Disposal 4

−7.5

2.89

5.53E-04

AMP

Disposal 5

−6.5

3.20

1.50E-03

  1. > > u indicates that standard errors were so large (i.e. > xE+ 01) that they are not useful. * When the estimation of the standard errors was unstable, presumably due to sparse data, the effect sizes were also estimated with the bayesglm() function for the binomial variable. Table 4 presents the estimated parameters (effect sizes and standard errors) on the log.odds and on the odds scale for all 22 arcs based on the exact search and the function multinom() in [24].
Back to article page

BMC Veterinary Research

ISSN: 1746-6148

Contact us