Skip to main content

Table 1 Summary of surveys giving mean mark proportion per working zone, mean number of dogs sighted per working zone and total across areas, Chapman and distance sampling method estimates with 95% confidence intervals. In bold: Means of repeated surveys, abundance estimates calculated with data from both surveys

From: A comparison of population estimation techniques for individually unidentifiable free-roaming dogs

 

Mark proportion

Number of dogs sighted

Chapman abundance

Distance-method abundance

Per working zone

Total area

Per working zone

Total study area

Total study area

Mean

(SD)

Mean

(SD)

Estimate

(95% CI)

Estimate

(95% CI)

All roads

 Both surveys

0.45

(0.22)

 

22.63

(9.70)

5202.36

(4733.75–5670.97)

5067.06

(4454.27–5764.17)

  Survey 1

0.41

(0.25)

559

21.42

(9.27)

6438.73

(6044.40–6833.07)

5681.90

(4945.60–6527.81)

  Survey 2

0.48

(0.18)

622

23.84

(10.15)

3965.99

(3683.61–4248.36)

4948.98

(4296.05–5701.14)

Subset roads

 Both surveys

0.41

(0.23)

 

13.65

(5.83)

5190.76

(4491.27–5890.26)

5810.61

(5141.12–6567.28)

  Survey 1

0.40

(0.24)

359

13.77

(5.02)

5743.77

(5239.96–6247.59)

7019.16

(5529.45–8910.22)

  Survey 2

0.42

(0.22)

358

13.53

(6.64)

4637.75

(4157.64–5117.87)

5295.03

(4385.32–6393.45)