Skip to main content

Table 2 Antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of 243 Salmonella isolates from 2009 to 2012

From: Prevalence of Salmonella in broiler chickens in Kagoshima, Japan in 2009 to 2012 and the relationship between serovars changing and antimicrobial resistance

Antimicro-bial agent

No. of isolates at the MIC (μg/mL)

MIC break-point (μg/ml)

Resistance no. (%)

0.25

0.5

1

2

4

8

16

32

64

128

256

512

SM

0

0

0

0

3

9

7

124

100

0

0

0

≥16

231 (95.1)

OTC

0

2

12

7

0

0

0

0

2

114

106

0

≥16

222 (91.4)

SUL

0

0

2

1

3

9

6

1

0

0

0

221

≥512

221 (91.0)

AMP

0

33

70

6

1

0

0

0

5

8

1

120

≥32

134 (55.1)

CTX

112

0

1

2

9

13

87

17

1

1

0

0

≥4

128 (52.7)

CTF

2

50

62

1

3

11

25

8

64

10

7

0

≥8

125 (51.4)

KM

15

0

17

144

53

0

0

0

0

0

0

16

≥64

16 (6.6)

CFX

0

2

45

114

60

2

5

10

5

0

0

0

≥32

15 (6.2)

OFLX

228

2

7

4

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

≥2

4 (1.6)

CP

0

32

95

110

4

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

≥32

0 (0.0)

  1. AMP ampicillin, CTX cefotaxime, CFX cefoxitin, CP chloramphenicol, SM,streptomycin, SUL sulfamethoxazole, OTC oxytetracycline, KM kanamycin, OFLX,ofloxacin, CTF ceftiofur