Skip to main content

Table 1 Categorical variables included in the bivariate analysis (chi-squared test with p < 0.2). Controls: 93 farms that remained brucellosis-free for at least three years. Cases: 98 herds previously free of brucellosis that became infected

From: Risk factors for new bovine brucellosis infections in Colombian herds

Variables

Control

Case

OR

95% CI

Lower

Upper

p-value

Livestock type

 Dairya

68 (73.12%)

60 (61.22%)

1

   

 Beef

8 (8.60%)

22 (22.45%)

3.12

1.29

7.52

0.009

 Dual purpose (beef and milk)

17 (18.28%)

16 (16.33%)

1.07

0.5

2.29

0.869

Equipment shared with other farms

 Noa

81 (87.10%)

77 (78.57%)

1

   

 Yes

12 (12.90%)

21 (21.43%)

1.84

0.85

4

0.12

Cleaning and disinfection of clinical equipment and clothing

 Yesa

86 (92.47%)

85 (86.73%)

1

   

 No

7 (7.53%)

13 (13.27%)

1.88

0.72

4.94

0.197

Presence of facilities to shelter animals

 Noa

41 (44.09%)

31 (31.63%)

1

   

 Yes

52 (55.91%)

67 (68.37%)

1.7

0.94

3.08

0.077

Farm fencing

 Completelya

91 (97.85%)

91 (92.86%)

1

   

 Partially

2 (2.15%)

7 (7.14%)

3.5

0.71

17.3

0.105

Contact of the herd with other neighbouring farms

 Noa

78 (83.87%)

67 (68.37%)

1

   

 Yes

15 (16.13%)

31 (31.63%)

2.41

1.2

4.83

0.012

Infected animals in the neighbouring herd

 Noa

7 (7.53%)

2 (2.04%)

1

   

 Yes

86 (92.47%)

96 (97.96%)

3.91

0.79

19.32

0.074

Mixed farm (farms that have species other than buffaloes or cattle)

 Noa

80 (86.02%)

72 (73.47%)

1

   

 Yes

13 (13.98%)

26 (26.53%)

2.22

1.06

4.648

0.032

Water access points shared with other farms b

 No farms or brucellosis-free farmsa

59 (63.44%)

48 (48.98%)

1

   

 Non-brucellosis-free farms

34 (36.56%)

50 (51.02%)

1.81

1.01

3.22

0.045

Presence of drainage from other farms

 Noa

58 (62.37%)

48 (48.98%)

1

   

 Yes

35 (37.63%)

50 (51.02%)

1.73

0.97

3.07

0.063

Animal movement: Brucella status b of other herds at the destination

 Brucellosis-free farms or no movementa

89 (95.70%)

87 (88.78%)

1

   

 Non-brucellosis-free farms

4 (4.30%)

11 (11.22%)

2.81

0.86

9.17

0.076

Status of the origin of replacement animalsb (internal or brucellosis-free farms vs calves from non-brucellosis-free farms)

 Brucellosis-free farms or internala

85 (91.40%)

67 (68.37%)

1

   

 Non-brucellosis-free farms

8 (8.60%)

31 (31.63%)

4.92

2.12

11.39

< 0.001

Internal replacement with calves from the same farm whose mothers were positive

 Noa

89 (95.70%)

78 (79.59%)

1

   

 Yes

4 (4.30%)

20 (20.41%)

5.71

1.87

17.41

0.001

Introduction of heifers < 24 months old into the farm

 No admittancea

79 (84.95%)

72 (73.47%)

1

   

 Admittance

14 (15.05%)

26 (26.53%)

2.04

0.99

4.2

0.052

Number of cattle introduced into the farm (per year)

 Nonea

66 (70.97%)

53 (54.08%)

1

   

 Ten or fewer

19 (20.43%)

23 (23.47%)

1.51

0.74

3.06

0.255

 Between eleven and thirty

6 (6.45%)

10 (10.20%)

2.08

0.71

6.08

0.178

 More than thirty

2 (2.15%)

12 (12.25%)

7.47

1.6

34.85

0.004

Infection status of the origin of the cattle b (of all ages)

 Tested negative for Brucella or brucellosis-free farma

71 (76.34%)

58 (59.18%)

1

   

 Not tested, unknown status of the farm, positive herds

22 (23.66%)

40 (40.82%)

2.23

1.19

4.16

0.012

Introduction of other domestic species into the farm

 Nonea

88 (94.63%)

85 (86.74%)

1

   

 More than twenty

0 (0.0%)

3 (3.06%)

7.25

0.37

142.37

0.13

 Less than or equal to twenty

5 (5.37%)

10 (10.20%)

2.07

0.68

6.31

0.194

Brucella status b of the origin of the bulls

 Artificial inseminationa

36 (38.71%)

34 (34.69%)

1

   

 Free herds

44 (47.31%)

16 (16.33%)

0.39

0.18

0.81

0.011

 Unknown/positive status

13 (13.98%)

48 (48.98%)

3.91

1.81

8.46

< 0.001

Access of dogs and cats to/contact with aborted foetuses and reproductive discharges

 No (or no dogs)a

66 (70.97%)

59 (60.20%)

1

   

 Yes

27 (29.03%)

39 (39.80%)

1.62

0.88

2.95

0.119

  1. aCategory considered as reference. Variables with more than two categories have been pairwise compared with this category
  2. bThe brucellosis status of other farms was obtained from the tests performed within the framework of the control programme