Skip to main content

Table 2 Diagnostic work-up and antibiotic prescription in aURTDa cases presented to university hospitals or private practices

From: Antimicrobial use for selected diseases in cats in Switzerland

Parameter

 

University hospitals

Private practices

p-value

Total number of cases

 

n = 43

n = 184

 

Diagnostic work-up with PCRb

Yesc

25 (58%)

2 (1%)

<0.001

At least one of the symptoms listed in the guidelinesd

Yesc

29 (68%)

37 (21%)

<0.001

Unknown

1 (3%)

42 (23%)

 

Hospitalization

Yesc

31 (72%)

5 (3%)

<0.001

Pre-treated with antibiotics

Yesc

13 (30%)

8 (4%)

<0.001

 

Unknown

2 (5%)

4 (2%)

 

Antibiotic therapy

Yesc

31 (72%)

144 (78%)

n.s.e

  Antibiotic classes

Potentiated aminopenicillins

28 (90%)

42 (29%)

<0.001

 

Third generation cephalosporins

2 (6%)

47 (33%)

0.002

 

Aminopenicillins

1 (3%)

40 (28%)

0.002

 

Tetracyclines

2 (6%)

26 (18%)

n.s.e

 

Fluoroquinolones

1 (3%)

6 (4%)

n.s.e

 

Amphenicols

0 (0%)

3 (2%)

n.s.e

 

Macrolides

0 (0%)

3 (2%)

n.s.e

 

First generation cephalosporins

0 (0%)

1 (1%)

n.s.e

 

Penicillins

0 (0%)

1 (1%)

n.s.e

  Combination or serial therapyf

Yesc

4 (13%)

21 (15%)

n.s.e

  Critically important antibioticf

Yesc

3 (10%)

55 (38%)

0.001

  Duration of therapy (days)

Median (range)

12 (4–27)

10 (4–37)

n.s.e

Justification scoref

1

12 (28%)

37 (20%)

n.s.e

 

2

1 (2%)

3 (2%)

n.s.e

 

3

26 (61%)

22 (12%)

<0.001

 

4

3 (7%)

80 (43%)

<0.001

 

Judgement not possible

1 (2%)

42 (23%)

0.001

  1. aaURTD, acute upper respiratory tract disease; bPCR, polymerase chain reaction; cValues for the category “no” (reference group) are not shown; dPoor general condition, fever, lethargy and/ or anorexia; en.s., not significant; fAs defined in methods