Skip to main content

Table 2 Risk factors in farm level, standardized methods, and relative importance of each factor

From: A spatial assessment of Nipah virus transmission in Thailand pig farms using multi-criteria decision analysis

Factors

Very low (1)

Low (2)

Medium (3)

High (4)

Very high (5)

Weight

Certified standard farm

Yes

 

Submitted but not certified

 

Not certified

0.05652

Type of pig house

Close (evaporation)

Close (wind tunnel)

Open (net)

 

Open (no net)

0.22995

Flying fox bat (s) found in farm area

Never

 

A bat flying through

A bat eating in farm

A bat roosting in farm

0.13653

Frequency of flying fox bat (s) found in farm area

Never

Seldom (<12 times per year)

Occasionally (at least a time per month)

Often (> 2 times per week)

Always (almost every day)

0.13653

Presence of fruit trees in farm

No

 

< 20 trees

 

>20 trees

0.06654

Number of fruit trees less than 15 m. away from the pig house

No

  

<5 trees

>5 trees

0.10251

Presence of high trees in farm

No

<20 trees

 

>20 trees

 

0.03272

Number of high trees being less than 15 m. away from pig house

No

 

<5 trees

>5 trees

 

0.06367

Type of other animals in farm

No

Others

Cow/horse/goat

Dog/cat

Rodent

0.02538

Presence of fence surrounding farm

Yes

  

No

 

0.02643

Quarantine of at least 14 days before introduction of new pig

Yes

  

No

 

0.02643

Spatial suitability of NiV transmission where this pig farm is located

Very low

Low

Medium

High

Very high

0.09678