Skip to main content

Table 1 Linear regression statistics of CT threshold values used to estimate DXA body composition in dogs and corresponding validation of the values predicted by CT abdominal using Lin’s concordance (rc2), Bland-Altman percentage bias and limits of agreement

From: Abdominal volume computed tomography assessment of body composition in dogs

Hounsfield Threshold Values To Estimate Body Composition (HU)

Regression Equation

r2

Gradient [95% CI]

y-intercept [95% CI]

rc [95% CI]

Percentage Difference in Mass [Limits of Agreement] (%)

Total DXA Mass

 −250/1500

y = 3.41x + 0.09

0.985

3.21 to 3.61

−1.39 to 1.58

0.992 [0.982 to 0.997]

−1.25 [− 14.73 to 12.24]

 −250/2000

y = 3.46x + 0.02

0.985

3.26 to 3.65

−1.44 to 1.49

0.993 [0.982 to 0.997]

−1.10 [− 14.17 to 11.98]

 − 190/2000

y = 3.49x + 0.01

0.985

3.29 to 3.68

−1.46 to 1.47

0.993 [0.983 to 0.997]

−1.05 [− 14.02 to 11.93]

 −190/1000

Excludeda

 

 − 250/3000

Excludedb

 

Total DXA Fat Mass

 −250/−5

y = 1.58x + 1.29

0.985

1.49 to 1.67

0.95 to 1.61

0.992 [0.982 to 0.997]

−1.53 [−22.41 to 19.35]

 −250/− 25

y = 1.70x + 1.35

0.981

1.59 to 1.81

0.99 to 1.72

0.991 [0.978 to 0.996]

−1.90 [−25.63 to 21.82]

 −190/− 30

y = 1.76x + 1.39

0.981

1.65 to 1.87

1.02 to 1.77

0.990 [0.977 to 0.996]

−1.88 [−26.09 to 22.33]

 − 135/− 105

y = 5.31x + 1.46

0.948

4.73 to 5.89

0.86 to 2.07

0.974 [0.938 to 0.989]

− 1.35 [−40.28 to 37.58]

Total DXA Lean Mass

 0/100

y = 6.30x - 3.81

0.956

5.67 to 6.93

−5.98 to −1.64

0.977 [0.947 to 0.990]

6.06 [−39.28 to 51.41]

 −5/150

y = 5.75x - 3.01

0.958

5.19 to 6.31

−5.06 to −0.97

0.978 [0.949 to 0.991]

3.82 [−29.86 to 37.49]

 −25/150

y = 5.22x - 2.80

0.972

4.81 to 5.64

−4.44 to −1.16

0.986 [0.966 to 0.994]

3.47 [−26.25 to 33.19]

 −29/150

y = 5.14x - 3.04

0.977

4.76 to 5.51

−4.55 to −1.52

0.988 [0.972 to 0.995]

4.87 [−30.43 to 40.17]

 −105/150

Excludedc

 

Total DXA Bone Mineral Content

 152/1000

Excludeda

 

 150/1500

y = 2.58x + 0.08

0.905

2.19 to 2.97

−0.04 to 0.21

0.950 [0.886 to 0.979]

−0.91 [−26.82 to 25.00]

 150/2000

y = 2.64x + 0.08

0.900

2.23 to 3.05

−0.05 to 0.21

0.947 [0.879 to 0.977]

−0.87 [−26.86 to 25.12]

 150/3000

Excludedd

  
  1. y is the total body tissue mass in kg estimated by the abdominal CT volume
  2. x is the volume in litres calculated by the abdominal CT using the supplied attenuation threshold values
  3. a Further analyses excluded as manual inspection revealed that cortical bone was excluded from the threshold range
  4. b Further analyses excluded as values did not differ to − 250/2000HU threshold
  5. c Further analyses excluded as manual inspection revealed a large volume of fat was included within the threshold range
  6. d Further analyses excluded as the volumes calculated were exactly the same as the 150/2000HU threshold range